A pilot human evaluation of a formulation of irinotecan and hyaluronic acid in 5-fluorouracil-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data demonstrate that the polysaccharide hyaluronic acid (HA) acts as a macromolecular carrier for chemotherapeutic drugs. In these studies the formulation of HA and irinotecan reduced treatment-related toxicity and improved efficacy via the preferential delivery of irinotecan to the tumor and lymph nodes. This study was designed as a first-in-man investigation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan when administered within the HA-Irinotecan formulation. METHODS: 5-Fluorouracil refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients were intravenously treated with HA-Irinotecan (300 mg/m(2) irinotecan with 1,000 mg/m(2) HA) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. After safety was demonstrated, the irinotecan dose was increased to 350 mg/m(2) with maintenance of the HA at 1,000 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with HA-Irinotecan. Overall toxicity was low, with an 8 and 17% incidence of grade lll/lV diarrhea and neutropenia, respectively. No grade III/IV nausea or vomiting was observed. Seventeen percent of patients had a partial response and 50% experienced stable disease, indicating that the efficacy of the irinotecan was maintained. Median survival was 16.6 months, while median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. CONCLUSION: HA-Irinotecan containing standard doses of irinotecan can be safely administered to patients. Comparison to historical irinotecan data suggests HA-Irinotecan may have a greater margin of safety without compromising anticancer activity.

Diagnostic pathology of lymphoproliferative disorders.

The last 20 years have seen a dramatic change in the way we classify, and therefore diagnose, lymphoma. Two decades ago, the International Working Formulation enabled diagnosis and management on the basis of H&E sections alone, with no mandatory requirement for immunophenotyping, molecular studies or any other ancillary investigations. The concept of categorisation by 'clinicopathological entities' defined by clinical features, morphology, immunophenotype and more recently, genotype, began with the Kiel, and Lukes and Collins classifications in the late 1970s, becoming fully expressed in the REAL and subsequently WHO classifications. The current, multidisciplinary approach to categorisation adds significantly to the task facing the anatomical pathologist, since it requires distribution of biopsy material to all the appropriate specialised laboratories, the gathering of a range of cross-disciplinary information, the correlation of all diagnostic findings, deduction of a definitive diagnosis and, finally, integration of all the above into a single multiparameter report. In this review, we summarise the contemporary approach to the biopsy, diagnosis and reporting of lymphoproliferative disorders.

Hyaluronan-Irinotecan improves progression-free survival in 5-fluorouracil refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to conduct a randomised phase II study in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer with the purpose of confirming preliminary clinical data indicating that the formulation of irinotecan with the drug carrier, hyaluronan (HA) reduced toxicity of the drug. METHODS: Irinotecan-naïve patients were randomized to receive either irinotecan (350 mg/m(2)) or HA-Irinotecan (HA 1,000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at 350 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (41 HA-Irinotecan and 35 irinotecan-alone) were enrolled. There was no significant difference in any individual, or overall, grade 3 or 4 toxicity. There was a trend for increased diarrhea in the HA-Irinotecan-treated patients (20 versus 9%; P = 21), potentially explained by a disproportionate number of baseline toxicity-associated risk factors in this treatment group. The median number of cycles completed was six for HA-Irinotecan patients and two for irinotecan-alone patients (P = 0.005). When compared to the control arm, HA-Irinotecan patients had a significantly longer median progression-free survival of 5.2 versus 2.4 months (P = 0.017) and time to treatment failure (4 vs. 1.8 months; P = 0.007). Median overall survival was 10.1 months for HA-Irinotecan compared to 8.0 months for irinotecan patients (P = 0.196). CONCLUSION: Further studies are required to define the safety of the formulation of irinotecan with HA. While this study was not adequately powered to demonstrate survival differences, these phase II data indicated HA-Irinotecan to be a promising therapy demonstrating improved efficacy compared to irinotecan-alone.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of intravenous hyaluronic acid in combination with doxorubicin or 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: Pre-clinically, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to systemically target chemotherapeutic drugs to tumours while ameliorating treatment toxicities. This study is a preliminary clinical investigation to determine if HA could be safely used in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and doxorubicin (DOX). METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic cancer were intravenously administered 500 mg/m2 HA in combination with escalating doses of DOX (30-60 mg/m2) or 5-FU (cumulative dose of 1,350-2,250 mg/m2 per cycle). The effect of pre-administration of 20 mg/m2 of folinic acid on HA/5-FU chemotherapy was also investigated. Patients were randomized to receive either HA/chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in their first treatment cycle and vice versa for the second cycle. Patients received HA and chemotherapy in all subsequent cycles. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated, tumour responses were observed and the co-administration of HA did not alter the pharmacokinetics of clinically relevant doses of 5-FU or DOX. CONCLUSION: High doses of intravenous high-molecular-weight HA can be safely co-administered with clinical doses of chemotherapy without significantly altering the toxicity or pharmacokinetics of the drugs or HA.

Cisplatin, fludarabine, and cytarabine: a novel, pharmacologically designed salvage therapy for patients with refractory, histologically aggressive or mantle cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on in vitro synergism, the combination of cytarabine (ara-C) and cisplatin is the basis of many salvage regimens for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, patients with previously refractory disease are significantly less likely to respond, stimulating the search for novel salvage regimens. In vitro, fludarabine enhances the cytotoxicity of both ara-C and cisplatin, increasing ara-C incorporation into DNA and inhibiting repair of platinum/DNA adducts, suggesting that the combination of cisplatin, fludarabine, and ara-C (PFA) may have clinical utility. METHODS: A Phase-II study of a 96 hour continuous infusion of cisplatin with two timed-sequential couplets of fludarabine and ara-C together with granulocyte colony stimulating factor was performed in 45 patients with previously refractory, histologically aggressive or mantle cell NHL. RESULTS: Patients had predominantly diffuse large cell and/or immunoblastic NHL or its variants (80%), or they had mantle cell lymphoma (18%). Overall, 93% of patients had previously refractory disease, with a median International Prognostic Index score of 3. A median of 2 cycles per patient were delivered (range, 1-4 cycles) with significant myelosuppression; there were medians of 2 days of neutropenia < 0.5 x 10(9)/L (range, 0-12 days) and 3 days of thrombocytopenia < 20 x 10(9)/L (range, 0-24 days). This was more severe in older patients and was cumulative with successive cycles. Thirty-five percent of cycles were complicated by infections, nausea and emesis were prominent, but other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Peripheral blood progenitor cells were mobilized adequately after the first cycle, but collections were impaired after more prolonged therapy. The overall response rate was 48% (7% of patients had complete responses, and 41% of patients had partial responses), with one toxic death due to tumor-lysis syndrome. Patients with mantle cell lymphoma were more likely to respond than patients with other histologies (88% vs. 39%, respectively; P = 0.019), although three of eight patients had relapsed rather than refractory disease. The median remission duration was 4 months, with 28% of potentially eligible patients able to proceed to subsequent high dose therapy. The actuarial 2 year survival rates were 20% +/- 6% overall and 50 +/- 18% for patients with mantle cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Given the adverse outlook for these patients, the results are promising, particularly for patients with mantle cell lymphoma, and suggest that the addition of fludarabine as a potential biochemical modulator may enhance the activity of cisplatin and ara-C. This is associated with significant cumulative (but manageable) myelosuppression. This paradigm, in which a nucleoside analogue is used to inhibit the repair of platinum/DNA adducts, also may be applicable for the treatment of patients with other types of platinum-sensitive tumors.