Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index.

This prospective study assessed whether respiratory variations in velocity time integral, peak blood flow velocity and non-invasive pleth variability index are useful measurements in infants undergoing congenital heart surgery and determined threshold values that may help guide fluid administration. In 27 infants receiving mechanical ventilation, of mean (SD) weight 10.4 (6.3) kg, 13 increased their stroke volume index ≥ 15% following a fluid challenge and 14 did not. The best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was for the echocardiographic-derived variables respiratory variation in blood peak flow velocity (area under the ROC curve = 0.92; p = 0.0002) and respiratory variation of the velocity time integral (area under the ROC curve = 0.84; p = 0.002). The pleth variability index also predicted fluid responsiveness (area under the ROC curve = 0.79; p = 0.01), in contrast to heart rate (area under the ROC curve = 0.53; p = 0.75) and central venous pressure (area under the ROC curve = 0.57; p = 0.52).

A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients.

SUMMARY: This study assessed two disposable devices; the newly developed supraglottic airway device i-gel and the LMA-Unique in routine clinical practice. Eighty patients (ASA 1-3) undergoing minor routine gynaecologic surgery were randomly allocated to have an i-gel (n = 40) or LMA-Unique (n = 40) inserted. Oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, tidal volume and peak airway pressure were recorded, as well as time of insertion, airway leak pressure, postoperative sore-throat, dysphonia and dysphagia for each device. Time of insertion was comparable with the i-gel and LMA-Unique. There was no failure in the i-gel group and one failure in the LMA-Unique group. Ventilation and oxygenation were similar between devices. Mean airway pressure was comparable with both devices, whereas airway leak pressure was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the i-gel group (mean 29 cmH(2)O, range 24-40) compared with the LMA-Unique group (mean 18 cmH(2)O, range 6-30). Fibreoptic score of the position of the devices was significantly better in the i-gel group. Post-operative sore-throat and dysphagia were comparable with both devices. Both devices appeared to be simple alternatives to secure the airway. Significantly higher airway leak pressure suggests that the i-gel may be advantageous in this respect.

The carcinoembryonic antigen and its prognostic impact on immunocytologically detected intraperitoneal colorectal cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been suggested to promote colon cancer progression. In this study we analyzed the prognostic impact of CEA expression on intraperitoneally detected single colon cancer cells. METHODS: Peritoneal lavage samples of 135 colorectal cancer patients were immunocytologically analyzed, including a staining of cellular CEA; serum CEA levels were measured; and 5-year survival rates were calculated according to immunocytological findings and CEA expression. RESULTS: The worst survival rate of 20% was found in patients suffering from CEA-expressing intraperitoneal tumor cells (P = 0.0006). The prognostic impact of an intraperitoneal tumor cell finding significantly increased when serum CEA levels were elevated: only 23% survived 5 years in contrast to a 85% 5-year survival rate of patients who neither had signs of dissemination nor showed elevated serum CEA values (P = 0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the determination of CEA expression improves the prognostic impact of an intraperitoneal tumor cell finding.

Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare three disposable airway devices, the LMA Unique (LMA-U), the Ambu laryngeal mask (Ambu LM) and the Soft Seal laryngeal mask (Soft Seal LM) for elective general anaesthesia during controlled ventilation in non-paralysed patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I-III patients scheduled for routine minor obstetric surgery were randomly allocated to the LMA-U (n = 40), Ambu LM (n = 40) or Soft Seal LM (n = 40) groups, respectively. Patients were comparable with respect to weight and airway characteristics. A size 4 LMA was used in all patients and inserted by a single experienced anaesthesiologist. Oxygenation, overall success rate, insertion time, cuff pressure and resulting airway leak pressure were determined as well as a subjective assessment of handling and the incidence of sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness. RESULTS: Time of insertion was shortest with the Ambu LM, while failure rates were comparable with the LMA-U, the Ambu LM and the Soft Seal LM (median 19 s; range 8-57 s; success rate 100% vs. 14; 8-35; 97% vs. 20; 12-46; 95%). Insertion was judged 'excellent' in 75% of patients in the LMA-U group, in 70% of patients in Ambu LM group and in 65% of patients in the Soft Seal LM group. There was no difference between devices with respect to postoperative airway morbidity at 6 h or 24 h following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: All three disposable devices were clinically suitable with respect to insertion times, success rates, oxygenation, airway and leak pressures, as well as to subjective handling and postoperative airway morbidity.