Integrated data from intravital imaging and HPLC-MS/MS analysis reveal large interspecies differences in AFB1 metabolism in mice and rats.

Large interspecies differences between rats and mice concerning the hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) are known, with mice being more resistant. However, a comprehensive interspecies comparison including subcellular liver tissue compartments has not yet been performed. In this study, we performed spatio-temporal intravital analysis of AFB1 kinetics in the livers of anesthetized mice and rats. This was supported by time-dependent analysis of the parent compound as well as metabolites and adducts in blood, urine, and bile of both species by HPLC-MS/MS. The integrated data from intravital imaging and HPLC-MS/MS analysis revealed major interspecies differences between rats and mice: (1) AFB1-associated fluorescence persisted much longer in the nuclei of rat than mouse hepatocytes; (2) in the sinusoidal blood, AFB1-associated fluorescence was rapidly cleared in mice, while a time-dependent increase was observed in rats in the first three hours after injection followed by a plateau that lasted until the end of the observation period of six hours; (3) this coincided with a far stronger increase of AFB1-lysine adducts in the blood of rats compared to mice; (4) the AFB1-guanine adduct was detected at much higher concentrations in bile and urine of rats than mice. In both species, the AFB1-glutathione conjugate was efficiently excreted via bile, where it reached concentrations at least three orders of magnitude higher compared to blood. In conclusion, major differences between mice and rats were observed, concerning the nuclear persistence, formation of AFB1-lysine adducts, and the AFB1-guanine adducts.

Acetaminophen overdose causes a breach of the blood-bile barrier in mice but not in rats.

Acetaminophen (APAP) is known to cause a breach of the blood-bile barrier in mice that, via a mechanism called futile bile acid (BA) cycling, increases BA concentrations in hepatocytes above cytotoxic thresholds. Here, we compared this mechanism in mice and rats, because both species differ massively in their susceptibility to APAP and compared the results to available human data. Dose and time-dependent APAP experiments were performed in male C57BL6/N mice and Wistar rats. The time course of BA concentrations in liver tissue and in blood was analyzed by MALDI-MSI and LC-MS/MS. APAP and its derivatives were measured in the blood by LC-MS. APAP-induced liver damage was analyzed by histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and by clinical chemistry. In mice, a transient increase of BA in blood and in peri-central hepatocytes preceded hepatocyte death. The BA increase coincided with oxidative stress in liver tissue and a compromised morphology of bile canaliculi and immunohistochemically visualized tight junction proteins. Rats showed a reduced metabolic activation of APAP compared to mice. However, even at very high doses that caused cell death of hepatocytes, no increase of BA concentrations was observed neither in liver tissue nor in the blood. Correspondingly, no oxidative stress was detectable, and the morphology of bile canaliculi and tight junction proteins remained unaltered. In conclusion, different mechanisms cause cell death in rats and mice, whereby oxidative stress and a breach of the blood-bile barrier are seen only in mice. Since transient cholestasis also occurs in human patients with APAP overdose, mice are a clinically relevant species to study APAP hepatotoxicity but not rats.