T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping and morphology of the median nerve before and after surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping has been applied to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for quantitative assessment of the median nerve. However, quantitative changes in the median nerve before and after surgery using T2 MRI mapping remain unclear. We aimed to investigate whether pathological changes could be identified by pre- and postoperative T2 MRI mapping of the median nerve in CTS patients after open carpal tunnel release. METHODS: This was a prospective study that measured median nerve T2 and cross-sectional area (CSA) values at the distal carpal tunnel, hamate bone, proximal carpal tunnel, and forearm levels pre- and postoperatively. Associations between T2, CSA, and nerve conduction latency were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with CTS (mean age, 64.5 ± 11.7 years) who underwent surgery were studied. The mean preoperative T2 values significantly decreased from 56.3 to 46.9 ms at the proximal carpal tunnel levels (p = .001), and from 52.4 to 48.7 ms at the hamate levels postoperatively (p = .04). Although there was a moderate association between preoperative T2 values at the distal carpal tunnel levels and distal motor latency values (r = -.46), other T2 values at all four carpal tunnel levels were not significantly associated with CSA or nerve conduction latency pre- or postoperatively. DISCUSSION: T2 MRI mapping of the carpal tunnel suggested a decrease in nerve edema after surgery. T2 MRI mapping provides quantitative information on the median nerve before and after surgery.

Visualization of the morphological changes in the median nerve after carpal tunnel release using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the pre- and postoperative morphology of the median nerve using three-dimensional (3-D) MRI in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: We assessed 31 patients with CTS who underwent open carpal tunnel release and T2*-weighted MRI of the wrist preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The median nerve morphology was evaluated on the basis of the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and cross-sectional volumes (CSVs). The association between these MRI findings and nerve conduction studies was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean preoperative CSA and CSV values at the proximal carpal tunnel level significantly decreased from 22.2 mm2 and 24.4 mm3 to 16.5 mm2 and 18.1 mm3, respectively, postoperatively. Median nerve swelling at the proximal carpal tunnel level was observed in 29 (94%) and 23 (74%) patients before and after surgery, respectively. The mean preoperative CSA and CSV values at the hamate level significantly increased from 9.9 to 12.3 mm2 and from 10.9 to 13.5 mm3 after surgery, respectively. Nerve narrowing at the hamate bone level was preoperatively observed in 28 (90%) patients and postoperatively in 21 (68%) patients. Preoperative CSA and CSV values at the proximal carpal tunnel were significantly associated with preoperative distal motor and sensory latency. CONCLUSIONS: Visual confirmation of the median nerve morphology using 3-D MRI is useful when considering postoperative recovery and explaining the nerve condition to the patients. KEY POINTS: • The 3-D morphology of the median nerve after carpal tunnel release can be delineated using 3-D MRI. • Preoperative swelling of the median nerve in the 2-D and 3-D planes reflects the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. • Visual confirmation of the median nerve morphology is useful when considering median nerve recovery after carpal tunnel release and for explaining the condition of the nerve to patients.

T2 mapping of the median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the changes in MRI T2 mapping values in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared to healthy controls. METHODS: We enrolled 71 patients with CTS and 26 healthy controls. Median nerve T2 values were measured at the distal carpal tunnel, hamate bone, proximal carpal tunnel, and forearm levels. These were compared between patients and controls and correlated with median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and nerve conduction measurements. RESULTS: The mean T2 values at the proximal carpal tunnel levels were higher in the CTS group (56.7 ms) than in the control group (51.2 ms, P = .02) and also were higher than at the distal carpal tunnel (51.0 ms, P < .001) and forearm levels (47.6 ms, P < .001). T2 values were not significantly associated with CSA or nerve conduction measurements. DISCUSSION: T2 mapping of the carpal tunnel provides qualitative information on median nerve pathology but does not reflect CTS severity.

Subcutaneous flexor tendon rupture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the clinical features and functional outcomes of surgically repaired subcutaneous flexor tendon ruptures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 fingers of 24 RA patients who underwent surgical treatment for flexor tendon ruptures. Evaluations performed at the time of presentation following rupture were C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-ESR, as well as Larsen grading for carpal bone destruction. The ruptured tendon and postoperative active range of motion (ROM) of digits were also examined. RESULTS: The mean CRP was 2.4 mg/dl, ESR was 52 mm/h, and the DAS28-ESR was 4.5. Carpal bone destruction according to Larsen grade IV-V was observed in 18/24 patients. Affected digits were most commonly the thumb (12) and the ring and little fingers (9 each). Tendon ruptures were most common in the carpal tunnel in zone IV. The mean postoperative finger ROM (flexion/extension) was 38°/2° for the interphalangeal (IP) joint of the thumb and 23°/-2° for the distal interphalangeal joint of the other four fingers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with flexor tendon ruptures present with high disease activity and advanced bone destruction. It is important to reduce the risk of progressive bone destruction and subsequent tendon rupture via tight control of disease activity.

Is local anesthesia or general anesthesia preferable for plate removal after clavicle fracture surgery under general anesthesia? A comparative study using a patient questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Because we have a limited number of surgeries performed under general anesthesia, implant removal after plate fixation for clavicular fracture is often performed under local anesthesia. However, it is unclear whether local anesthesia or general anesthesia is preferred. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patients who had undergone implant removal surgery under local or general anesthesia after clavicle fracture surgery to assess their impressions of each procedure and which anesthesia they would prefer if they were to undergo plate removal in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted on 239 patients. Fifty-six patients who had undergone plate fixation of a clavicle fracture in whom plate removal was conducted under local anesthesia in a university hospital, and one hundred and eighty-three patients in whom plate removal was conducted under general anesthesia in a general hospital. All participants had undergone plate fixation for clavicle fractures under general anesthesia. The participants were asked to complete a questionnaire including a question on which method of anesthesia they would prefer should they have to undergo similar surgery in the future. RESULTS: The patients of both groups responded that they would prefer the same method of anesthesia as before to be used (87.1 % of the patients who underwent plate removal under local anesthesia, 78.9 % of the patients underwent plate removal under general anesthesia), with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent surgery under local anesthesia preferred local anesthesia if they were to undergo it next, even though most of them felt some pain. Though surgeons tend to focus only on the patient's distress during surgery, they also find that patients are often dissatisfied during the perioperative period, including bed rest and urinary catheters. Although clavicle plate removal may be performed under general anesthesia in many cases, it may be worth considering plate removal under local anesthesia to use general anesthesia surgery effectively, which is limited due to financial problems and facilities. Plate removal under local anesthesia was just as acceptable as general anesthesia for the patients.