Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nurs Crit Care ; 2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531666

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To create and test psychometrically a paediatric version of the Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire to assess paediatric critical care nurses' intention to use physical restraint. DESIGN: A psychometric study. SETTING: Five medical-surgical Paeditric Intensive care Units from five hospitals in Spain. METHODS: The study took place in three phases. In phase 1, the questionnaire was adapted. In phase 2, the content validity of each item was determined, and a pilot test was conducted. In phase 3, we administered the questionnaire and determined its psychometric properties. RESULTS: The assessment of the intention to use physical restraint was extended to all critical paediatric patients, two items were eliminated from the initial questionnaire, four new items were included, and the clinical scenarios of the intention subscale were expanded from three to six. Overall content validity index for the full instrument of 0.96 out of 1. The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire is made up of four subscales (attitude, subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioural control (PBC), and intention) subdivided into 7 factors and 51 items. The internal consistency for the attitude subscale obtained a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.80 to 0.73, for the SN it was 0.72 to 0.89, for the PBC it was from 0.80 to 0.73 and for the intention subscale it was 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire is an instrument composed of seven factors and 51 items that validly and reliably assesses the intention of paediatric nurses to apply PR in PICUs. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Having this instrument will help health centres move towards restraint-free care by allowing managers to assess professionals' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions around the use of PR in PICUs.

2.
Infection ; 51(5): 1319-1327, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694093

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of an optimal and reproducible cutoff value set according to a predefined lymphopenia scale as an early predictor of in-hospital mortality and other outcomes in patients hospitalized with pneumococcal pneumonia and positive urinary antigen at admission to the emergency department. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted based on analysis of a prospective registry of consecutive immunocompetent adults hospitalized for pneumococcal pneumonia in two tertiary hospitals. Generalized additive models were constructed to assess the smooth relationship between in-hospital mortality and lymphopenia. RESULTS: We included 1173 patients. Lymphopenia on admission was documented in 686 (58.4%). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding the presence of comorbidities. Overall, 299 (25.5%) patients were admitted to intensive care and 90 (7.6%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Fifty-nine (5%) patients died, among them 23 (38.9%) in the first 72 h after admission. A lymphocyte count < 500/µL, documented in 282 (24%) patients, was the predefined cutoff point that best predicted in-hospital mortality. After adjustment, these patients had higher rates of intensive care admission (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.9-4.3), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-3.9), septic shock (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-2.9), treatment failure (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.5), and in-hospital mortality (OR 2.2; 95% 1.1-4.9). Severe lymphopenia outperformed PSI score in predicting early and 30-day mortality in patients classified in the higher-risk classes. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte count < 500/µL could be used as a reproducible predictor of complicated clinical course in patients with an early diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Linfopenia , Neumonía Neumocócica , Adulto , Humanos , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Hospitalización , Cuidados Críticos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 73(6): 751-758, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28251276

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyze the quality of the information contained in the adverse drug reactions (ADR) reports and to describe the magnitude and characteristics of the lacking information. METHODS: All reports of serious ADR received by the Catalan Center of Pharmacovigilance in 2014 were analyzed using the VigiGrade and a more clinical and qualitative approach. RESULTS: Up to 824 reports describing serious ADR were included in the study; of them, 503 (61.0%) were sent by health care professionals (HPs) and the remaining 321 (39.0%) came from pharmaceutical companies (PhC). More than 80% of missing variables such as 'onset date' or 'time-to-onset' of the ADR were from PhCs reports. 'Onset of treatment date' was not filled in 28 (22.2%) of the reports including an 'additional monitoring' medicine, and 'end of treatment' date was not completed in 53 of those reports (42.1%). In summary, 39% of the reports involving a black triangle medicine sent by PhCs lacked some essential information such as the onset date of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of the reports coming from manufacturers did not include information that is considered a limiting factor to evaluate any causal relationship, and can be an issue for the detection of safety signals. To take advantage of this huge amount of potentially important information that is almost useless at present, data mining tools and new algorithms should be developed and tested with the aim of finding formulas to deal with a huge amount of low quality data without losing it, nor generating a number of false associations.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Farmacovigilancia , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/normas , Anciano , Minería de Datos , Industria Farmacéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 17(1): 130, 2017 06 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633626

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding fit and healthy patients with pneumonia at different ages. We evaluated the association of age with clinical presentation, serotype and outcomes among healthy and well-functioning patients hospitalized for bacteremic pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of consecutive healthy and well-functioning patients hospitalized for this type of pneumonia. Patients were stratified into younger (18 to 64 years) and older (≥65 years) groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 399 consecutive patients were hospitalized with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. We included 203 (50.8%) patients who were healthy and well-functioning patients, of whom 71 (35%) were classified as older. No differences were found in antibiotic treatment, treatment failure rate, antibiotic resistance, or serotype, except for serotype 7F that was less common in older patients. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, the older patients had higher 30-day mortality (OR 6.83; 95% CI 1.22-38.22; P = 0.028), but were less likely to be admitted to the ICU (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.05-0.39; P < 0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.94; P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy and well-functioning older patients have higher mortality than younger patients, but nevertheless, ICU admission was less likely and hospital stays were shorter. These results suggest that the aging process is a determinant of mortality, beyond the functional status of patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Bacteriemia/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Neumonía Neumocócica/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Respirology ; 19(6): 936-43, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24976113

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Urinary pneumococcal antigen detection provides good results in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia but has rarely been used in bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia and it is not known whether it is associated with outcome in this type of pneumonia. Our objectives were to assess the usefulness of an immunochromatographic technique for detecting the pneumococcal antigen in urine in a large prospective study of patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia and explore any potential association with outcomes. METHODS: This study, carried out over 8 years, included all adult immunocompetent patients admitted for bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia. An immunochromatographic test for the Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen in urine was performed in the first 24 h. The sensitivity of test was assessed and patients were divided into two groups according to test results to explore differences on admission and during the course of the illness using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 350 patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia included, 261 (74.6%) were positive for the antigen. Patient characteristics were very similar on admission and differences in severity (Pneumonia Severity Index) were not statistically significant. In the adjusted analysis, antigen-positive patients had a higher risk of intensive care unit admission, treatment failure and adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the immunochromatographic urinary antigen test was 74.6% and positive results were associated with poorer clinical outcome. We therefore recommend systematic use of this test when pneumonia is diagnosed in the emergency department.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Cromatografía de Afinidad/métodos , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/inmunología , Bacteriemia/orina , Biomarcadores/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Neumocócica/inmunología , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
6.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 128, 2014 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25096919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia by Streptococcus pneumoniae has been traditionally associated with poor outcomes in patients with pneumonia; however, data on its impact on outcomes are limited and are sometimes contradictory. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in two hospitals in northern Spain in which cases diagnosed with pneumococcal pneumonia were selected from a cohort of hospitalized patients with pneumonia between January 2001 and July 2009. We compared patients with pneumococcal bacteremic pneumonia with those with pneumococcal non-bacteremic pneumonia. RESULTS: We compared 492 patients with negative blood culture and 399 with positive culture results. Host related factors were very similar in both groups. Severity of illness on admission measured by CURB-65 score was similar in both groups. Adjusted analysis showed a greater likelihood of septic shock during in-hospital course among patients with pneumococcal bacteremia (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5; P=0.006). Likewise, patients with positive blood culture had greater in-hospital mortality (OR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1- -3.9; P=0.02), 15-day mortality (OR 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.4; P=0.0006), and 30-day mortality (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although host related factors and severity on admission were very similar in the two groups, bacteremic patients had worse in-hospital course and outcomes. Bacteraemia in pneumococcal pneumonia is of prognostic significance.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/microbiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
7.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 83: 103690, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598942

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the intention to use physical restraint (PR) and the relationship with sociodemographic and professional variables of the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) nurses. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicentre and correlational study was carried out from October 2021 to December 2023 in five paediatric intensive care units from five maternal and child hospitals in Spain. The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire was provided. Moreover, sociodemographic and employment variables were registered. RESULTS: A total of 230 paediatric nurses participated in the study. A total of 87.7 % were females with an average age of 35.5 ± 9.7 years and working experience of 10.5 ± 8.4 years. The mean scores obtained were 21.1 ± 3.8 for attitude, 13.1 ± 5.0 for subjective norms, 14.4 ± 4.3 for perceived behavioural control and 28.0 ± 6.0 for intention. The nurses apply more physical restraint to anxious patients, with scarce analgesics and sedation, those affected with pharmacological withdrawal symptoms and those with a high risk of accidental removal of vital support devices or fall from bed. The sex (p = 0.007) and type of employment contract (p = 0.01) are the variables that are significantly correlated with the intention to use of PR. CONCLUSION: The paediatric nurses analysed had a moderate attitude, social pressure and perceived behavioural control towards the use of PR. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: It is important to know the factors that influence the intention to use physical restraint in order to standardise safe practice for critically ill paediatric and to ensure that patients' rights are respected by obtaining informed consent and assessing the prescription, continuation and removal of physical restraint.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Intención , Restricción Física , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Restricción Física/estadística & datos numéricos , Restricción Física/métodos , Restricción Física/psicología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , España , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actitud del Personal de Salud
8.
Int J Infect Dis ; 134: 106-113, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the differences in short- and long-term prognosis and the predictors of survival between patients with community-acquired Legionella and Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia, diagnosed early by urinary antigen testing (UAT). METHODS: Prospective multicenter study conducted in immunocompetent patients hospitalized with community-acquired Legionella or pneumococcal pneumonia (L-CAP or P-CAP) between 2002-2020. All cases were diagnosed based on positive UAT. RESULTS: We included 1452 patients, 260 with community-acquired Legionella pneumonia (L-CAP) and 1192 with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia (P-CAP). The 30-day mortality was higher for L-CAP (6.2%) than for P-CAP (5%). After discharge and during the median follow-up durations of 11.4 and 8.43 years, 32.4% and 47.9% of patients with L-CAP and P-CAP died, and 82.3% and 97.4% died earlier than expected, respectively. The independent risk factors for shorter long-term survival were age >65 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac arrhythmia, and congestive heart failure in L-CAP and the same first three factors plus nursing home residence, cancer, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, altered mental status, blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dl, and congestive heart failure as a cardiac complication during hospitalization in P-CAP. CONCLUSION: In patients diagnosed early by UAT, the long-term survival after L-CAP or P-CAP was shorter (particularly after P-CAP) than expected, and this shorter survival was mainly associated with age and comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Legionella , Neumonía Neumocócica , Neumonía , Humanos , Anciano , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Pronóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico
9.
J Infect ; 85(6): 644-651, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154852

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To construct a prediction model for bacteraemia in patients with pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (P-CAP) based on variables easily obtained at hospital admission. METHODS: This prospective observational multicentre derivation-validation study was conducted in patients hospitalised with P-CAP between 2000 and 2020. All cases were diagnosed based on positive urinary antigen tests in the emergency department and had blood cultures taken on admission. A risk score to predict bacteraemia was developed. RESULTS: We included 1783 patients with P-CAP (1195 in the derivation and 588 in the validation cohort). A third (33.3%) of the patients had bacteraemia. In the multivariate analysis, the following were identified as independent factors associated with bacteraemia: no influenza vaccination the last year, no pneumococcal vaccination in the last 5 years, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) ≥30 mg/dL, sodium <130 mmol/L, lymphocyte count <800/µl, C-reactive protein ≥200 mg/L, respiratory failure, pleural effusion and no antibiotic treatment before admission. The score yielded good discrimination (AUC 0.732; 95% CI: 0.695-0.769) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value 0.801), with similar performance in the validation cohort (AUC 0.764; 95% CI:0.719-0.809). CONCLUSIONS: We found nine predictive factors easily obtained on hospital admission that could help achieve early identification of bacteraemia. The prediction model provides a useful tool to guide diagnostic decisions.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Neumonía Neumocócica , Humanos , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Cultivo de Sangre , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Hospitalización
10.
Polymers (Basel) ; 14(23)2022 Nov 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36501504

RESUMEN

The use of block copolymers as a sacrificial template has been demonstrated to be a powerful method for obtaining porous carbons as electrode materials in energy storage devices. In this work, a block copolymer of polystyrene and polyacrylonitrile (PS-b-PAN) has been used as a precursor to produce fibers by electrospinning and powdered carbons, showing high carbon yield (~50%) due to a low sacrificial block content (fPS ≈ 0.16). Both materials have been compared structurally (in addition to comparing their electrochemical behavior). The porous carbon fibers showed superior pore formation capability and exhibited a hierarchical porous structure, with small and large mesopores and a relatively high surface area (~492 m2/g) with a considerable quantity of O/N surface content, which translates into outstanding electrochemical performance with excellent cycle stability (close to 100% capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles) and high capacitance value (254 F/g measured at 1 A/g).

11.
J Infect ; 82(1): 67-75, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189773

RESUMEN

OBJETIVES: To assess the incidence, related factors, timing and duration of new- onset atrial fibrillation in a cohort of consecutive patients diagnosed with pneumococcal pneumonia. METHODS: Observational study including all immunocompetent adults hospitalized for pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients were classified by time (atrial fibrillation recognized on emergency room arrival or developed during hospitalization) and duration (paroxysmal or persistent). Patients were followed-up for 6 months after discharge. RESULTS: We included 1092 patients, of whom 109 (9.9%) had new-onset atrial fibrillation. An early event was documented in 87 (79.8%) cases. Arrhythmia was classified as paroxysmal in 78 patients. Older age, heavy drinking, respiratory rate ≥ 30/minute, leukopenia, severe inflammation and bacteremia were independent risk factors for developing new-onset atrial fibrillation on admission. Overall, 48 (4.4%) patients died during hospitalization, the rate being higher in those patients who developed new-onset arrhythmia (17.9% vs 2.9% p<0.001). Among patients with events recognized at admission, in-hospital mortality was higher in those with persistent arrhythmia (34.8% vs 6.3%, p = 0.002) and 6-month survival was better among those who developed paroxysmal event. CONCLUSIONS: The development of new-onset atrial fibrillation was associated with pneumonia severity, and higher in-hospital mortality. Bacteremia and severe systemic inflammation were factors associated with its development.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Neumonía Neumocócica , Adulto , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 52(9): 603-611, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552142

RESUMEN

Purpose: Nowadays, most cases of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (PCAP) are diagnosed by positive urinary antigen. Our aims were to analyse process of care in patients hospitalised with non-bacteremic PCAP (NB-PCAP) and identify factors associated with poor outcome (PO) in this population.Methods: We conducted a prospective study, including patients hospitalised for NB-PCAP (positive urinary antigen and negative blood culture) over a 15 year period. We performed multivariate analysis of predisposing factors for PO, defined as need for mechanical ventilation and/or shock and/or in-hospital death.Results: Of the 638 patients included, 4.1% died in hospital and 12.8% had PO. Host-related factors were similar in patients with and without PO, but patients with PO had higher illness severity on admission. Adjusted analysis revealed the following independent factors associated with PO: being a nursing home resident (OR: 6.156; 95% CI: 1.827-20.750; p = .003), respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min (OR: 3.030; 95% CI: 1.554-5.910; p = .001), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (OR: 4.789; 95% CI: 1.967-11.660; p = .001), diastolic blood pressure <60 mmHg (OR: 2.820; 95% CI: 1.329-5.986; p = .007), pulse rate ≥125 beats/min (OR: 3.476; 95% CI: 1.607-7.518; p = .002), pH <7.35 (OR: 9.323; 95% CI: 3.680-23.622; p < .001), leukocytes <4000/µL (OR: 10.007; 95% CI: 2.960-33.835; p < .001), and severe inflammation (OR: 2.364; 95% CI 1.234-4.526; p = .009). The area under the curve for predicting PO was 0.890 (95% CI: 0.851-0.929).Conclusions: Since patients with PO seem different and had worse in-hospital course, we identified eight independent risk factors for PO measurable on admission.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/sangre , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Neumocócica/sangre , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunocompetencia , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Infect ; 79(6): 542-549, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704242

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess survival and identify predictors of survival more than 30-days after discharge in a cohort of consecutive patients diagnosed with pneumococcal pneumonia. METHODS: Observational study including all consecutive immunocompetent adult patients surviving more than 30-days after hospitalization. The bacteriological diagnosis was based on the results of urinary antigen testing and/or blood culture. Life expectancy was calculated for each patient considering their sex, age and date of discharge. RESULTS: We included 1114 patients that survived more than 30- days after discharge. Of them, 431 (38.6%) died during follow-up (median follow-up of 6.7 years). Age, history of cancer, liver disease, chronic renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, atrial arrhythmia and coronary disease, red cell distribution width (RDW) > 15%, positive blood culture, hematocrit < 30% and living in a nursing home were independent risk factors for reduced long-term survival after hospital discharge. Cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 93.9%, 85.3% and 76%, respectively. Among non-survivors, 361 (83.8%) died earlier than expected given their life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after hospital discharge is mainly associated with age and comorbidities. The findings of bacteremia and elevated RDW on admission could help identify patients at high risk of long-term mortality.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Sobrevida , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
14.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 69(8): 1018-24, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24470128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations due to pneumonia increase steadily with age. The purpose of this study is to explore differences in host- and pathogen-related factors, process of care, and outcome as a function of age in elderly patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia and identify factors related to mortality. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of a cohort of elderly (65-79 years) and very elderly patients (≥ 80 years old) diagnosed with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. The serotypes of the strains isolated and their resistance were also analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 399 patients were identified, of whom 225 patients (140 elderly and 85 very elderly patients) were included. Despite the groups having similar characteristics on admission, very elderly patients had higher rates of both hospital (16.47% vs 7.14%, p = .028) and 30-day (20% vs 6.43%, p = .002) mortality. Factors found to be predictors of mortality were: altered mental status (odds ratio [OR]: 13.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.68-47.23), respiratory rate more than or equal to 30/min (OR: 5.82; 95% CI: 1.82-18.64), systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg (OR: 10.90; 95% CI: 1.45-81.93), blood urea nitrogen more than 30 mg/dL (OR: 5.41; 95% CI: 1.03-28.42), bilateral or multilobar lung involvement (OR: 5.24; 95% CI: 1.55-17.76), and age (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Very elderly patients have poorer outcomes with no significant differences in host- and pathogen-related factors or process of care. Mortality rates in these patients are associated with age and the severity of their clinical condition.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Análisis Multivariante , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Neumocócica/microbiología , Prognatismo , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 47 Suppl 6: 24-9, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21703476

RESUMEN

Aerosolized antimicrobial agents have been used in clinical practice since the 1950s. The main advantage and aim of using this route of administration is delivery of the drug to the site of infection in the lung. Achieving this aim may produce high concentrations in the site of infection or colonization and reduce systemic toxicity to a minimum. The most convincing data to support the use of aerosolized antimicrobials comes from their use as maintenance treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. In addition to this indication, the use of aerosolized antimicrobials has also been studied in the treatment or prevention of a series of other diseases, including noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, prophylaxis against fungal lung infections, mycobacterial lung infections and, more recently, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although the theoretical bases underlying aerosol antibiotic administration seem convincing, there is insufficient evidence to support its routine use. Due to the gaps in knowledge that persist in the routine use of aerosolized antibiotics, caution should be exercised in situations without clearly established indications for this modality, such as the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis or Pneumocystis pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico
17.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 40(5): 424-7, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18418804

RESUMEN

Our aim was to describe the incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Escherichia coli through the analysis of a cohort of patients with this condition. This study includes all the patients who were admitted to our hospitals because of CAP caused by E. coli, diagnosed with highly reliable microbiological techniques, such as blood culture, bronchoscopic protected specimen brush (PSB) or transthoracic needle aspiration (TNA). 29 patients were enrolled, representing 0.4% of CAP cases admitted. Main symptoms were fever and dyspnoea. 18 patients were classified into class IV and class V of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). Diagnosis was based on blood culture in 24 cases, PSB in 4 cases and by TNA in 1 case. Three of the patients died, the longer time evolution of the symptoms being the only factor related to higher mortality (p<0.05). Mean hospitalization time was 7.1+/-3.1 d, and correlated with severity at admission (r=0.43; p<0.003). This study demonstrates that CAP caused by E. coli is infrequent. It has an unspecific presentation and mortality rate is 10.3%, associated with longer time before admission to hospital.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja , Sangre/microbiología , Broncoscopía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/mortalidad , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Neumonía/mortalidad , Neumonía/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
18.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(supl.6): 24-29, jun. 2011.
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-94260

RESUMEN

La administración de los antimicrobianos en aerosol se viene utilizando en la práctica clínica desde la décadade los cincuenta del siglo pasado. La principal ventaja y el objetivo de esta vía de administración es el depósitodel fármaco en el sitio de la infección en el pulmón. La consecución de este objetivo puede producir altasconcentraciones en el lugar de la infección o colonización y reducir al mínimo la toxicidad sistémica. Los datosmás convincentes para apoyar el uso de antimicrobianos en aerosol provienen de su uso para el tratamientode mantenimiento en pacientes con fibrosis quística. Además de su utilización en la fibrosis quística,el uso de los antimicrobianos en aerosol también se ha estudiado para el tratamiento o prevención de unaserie de enfermedades adicionales, incluyendo las bronquiectasias no fibrosis quística, la neumonía asociadaa la ventilación mecánica, la profilaxis contra las infecciones pulmonares por hongos, la infección pulmonarpor micobacterias y, más recientemente, en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Aunque lasbases teóricas que hay detrás de la administración de antibióticos en aerosol parecen convincentes, los datosdisponibles son limitados para apoyar el uso rutinario de esta modalidad terapéutica. Debido a las lagunasque aún hay acerca del uso rutinario de antibióticos en aerosol, se debe tener precaución cuando se contemplela administración de antimicrobianos a través de esta vía en situaciones que no respondan con claridad alas indicaciones establecidas, como el tratamiento de pacientes con fibrosis quística, las bronquiectasias o laneumonía por Pneumocystis(AU)


Aerosolized antimicrobial agents have been used in clinical practice since the 1950s. The main advantage andaim of using this route of administration is delivery of the drug to the site of infection in the lung. Achievingthis aim may produce high concentrations in the site of infection or colonization and reduce systemic toxicityto a minimum. The most convincing data to support the use of aerosolized antimicrobials comes from theiruse as maintenance treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. In addition to this indication, the use ofaerosolized antimicrobials has also been studied in the treatment or prevention of a series of other diseases,including noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, prophylaxis against fungal lunginfections, mycobacterial lung infections and, more recently, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Although the theoretical bases underlying aerosol antibiotic administration seem convincing, there isinsufficient evidence to support its routine use. Due to the gaps in knowledge that persist in the routine useof aerosolized antibiotics, caution should be exercised in situations without clearly established indications forthis modality, such as the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis or Pneumocystispneumonia(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquitis Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Pentamidina/administración & dosificación , Pentamidina/uso terapéutico , Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Tobramicina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA