Lupus activity and outcomes in lupus patients undergoing maintenance dialysis.

OBJECTIVES: Lupus activity has long been considered to decline after initiation of maintenance dialysis (MD). This assumption is based on limited historical data. We aimed to describe the natural history of lupus in patients undergoing MD. METHODS: We assembled a national retrospective cohort of lupus patients who started dialysis between 2008 and 2011, included in the REIN registry with a 5-year follow-up. We analysed healthcare consumption from the National Health Data System. We evaluated the proportion of patients 'off-treatment' (i.e. receiving 0-5 mg/d of corticosteroids, without any immunosuppressive therapy) after the start of MD. We describe the cumulative incidences of non-severe and severe lupus flares, cardiovascular events, severe infections, kidney transplantation and survival. RESULTS: We included 137 patients (121 females and 16 males), with a median age of 42 years. The proportion of patients 'off-treatment' at dialysis initiation was 67.7% (95% CI: 61.8, 73.8%), and increased to 76.0% (95% CI: 73.3, 78.8) at 1 year and 83.4% (95% CI: 81.0, 85.9%) at 3 years, with a lower proportion in younger patients. Lupus flares mainly occurred in the first year after MD initiation, and at 12 months 51.6% of patients had presented a non-severe lupus flare and 11.6% a severe lupus flare. In addition, 42.2% (95% CI: 32.9, 50.3%) and 23.7% (95% CI: 16.0, 30.7%) of patients at 12 months had been hospitalized for cardiovascular events or infections, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proportion of lupus patients off-treatment increases after MD initiation, but non-severe and severe lupus flares continue to occur, mainly during the first year. This calls for the continued follow-up of lupus patients by lupus specialists after dialysis initiation.

FIBER-ML, an Open-Source Supervised Machine Learning Tool for Quantification of Fibrosis in Tissue Sections.

Pathologic fibrosis is a major hallmark of tissue insult in many chronic diseases. Although the amount of fibrosis is recognized as a direct indicator of the extent of disease, there is no consentaneous method for its quantification in tissue sections. This study tested FIBER-ML, a semi-automated, open-source freeware that uses a machine-learning approach to quantify fibrosis automatically after a short user-controlled learning phase. Fibrosis was quantified in sirius red-stained tissue sections from two fibrogenic animal models: acute stress-induced cardiomyopathy in rats (Takotsubo syndrome-like) and HIV-induced nephropathy in mice (chronic kidney disease). The quantitative results of FIBER-ML software version 1.0 were compared with those of ImageJ in Takotsubo syndrome, and with those of inForm in chronic kidney disease. Intra- and inter-operator and inter-software correlation and agreement were assessed. All correlations were excellent (>0.95) in both data sets. The values of discriminatory power between the pathologic and healthy groups were <10-3 for data on Takotsubo syndrome and <10-4 for data on chronic kidney disease. Intra-operator agreement, assessed by intra-class coefficient correlation, was good (>0.8), while inter-operator and inter-software agreement ranged from moderate to good (>0.7). FIBER-ML performed in a fast and user-friendly manner, with reproducible and consistent quantification of fibrosis in tissue sections. It offers an open-source alternative to currently used software, including quality control and file management.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in White and Black populations in Europe, Brazil and Africa.

BACKGROUND: A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPIAS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts. METHODS: Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed. RESULTS: In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPIAS (bias of -0.6 and -3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males. CONCLUSION: In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPIAS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate with a methodology adapted to the context of drug dosage adjustment.

AIM: The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) creatinine-based equation is still used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for drug dosage adjustment. Incorrect eGFR may lead to hazardous over- or underdosing. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis, CG was validated against measured GFR (mGFR) in 14 804 participants and compared with the Modification-of-Diet-in-Renal-Diseases (MDRD), Chronic-Kidney-Disease-Epidemiology (CKD-EPI), Lund-Malmö-Revised (LMR) and European-Kidney-Function-Consortium (EKFC) equations. Validation focused on bias, imprecision and accuracy (percentage of estimates within ±30% of mGFR, P30), overall and stratified for mGFR, age and body mass index at mGFR <60 mL/min, as well as classification in mGFR stages. RESULTS: The CG equation performed worse than the other equations, overall and in mGFR, age and BMI subgroups in terms of bias (systematic overestimation), imprecision and accuracy except for patients ≥65 years where bias and P30 were similar to MDRD and CKD-EPI, but worse than LMR and EKFC. In subjects with mGFR <60 mL/min and at BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2 , all equations performed similarly, and for BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 CG and LMR had the best results though all equations had poor P30-accuracy. At BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 the bias of the CG increased with increasing BMI (+17.2 mL/min at BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 ). The four more recent equations also classified mGFR stages better than CG. CONCLUSIONS: The CG equation showed poor ability to estimate GFR overall and in analyses stratified for mGFR, age and BMI. CG was inferior to correctly classify the patients in the mGFR staging compared to more recent creatinine-based equations.

Age-adapted percentiles of measured glomerular filtration in healthy individuals: extrapolation to living kidney donors over 65 years.

OBJECTIVES: Most data on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) originate from subjects <65 years old, complicating decision-making in elderly living kidney donors. In this retrospective multi-center study, we calculated percentiles of measured GFR (mGFR) in donors <65 years old and extrapolated these to donors ≥65 years old. METHODS: mGFR percentiles were calculated from a development cohort of French/Belgian living kidney donors <65 years (n=1,983), using quantiles modeled as cubic splines (two linear parts joining at 40 years). Percentiles were extrapolated and validated in an internal cohort of donors ≥65 years (n=147, France) and external cohort of donors and healthy subjects ≥65 years (n=329, Germany, Sweden, Norway, France, The Netherlands) by calculating percentages within the extrapolated 5th-95th percentile (P5-P95). RESULTS: Individuals in the development cohort had a higher mGFR (99.9 ± 16.4 vs. 86.4 ± 14 and 82.7 ± 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) compared to the individuals in the validation cohorts. In the internal validation cohort, none (0%) had mGFR below the extrapolated P5, 12 (8.2%) above P95 and 135 (91.8%) between P5-P95. In the external validation cohort, five subjects had mGFR below the extrapolated P5 (1.5%), 25 above P95 (7.6%) and 299 (90.9%) between P5-P95. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that extrapolation of mGFR from younger donors is possible and might aid with decision-making in elderly donors.

Development and Validation of a Modified Full Age Spectrum Creatinine-Based Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate : A Cross-sectional Analysis of Pooled Data.

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Study (CKiD) equation for children and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for adults are recommended serum creatinine (SCr)-based calculations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, these equations, as well as their combination, have limitations, notably the problem of implausible changes in GFR during the transition from adolescence to adulthood and overestimation of GFR in young adults. The full age spectrum (FAS) equation addresses these issues but overestimates GFR when SCr levels are low. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a modified FAS SCr-based equation combining design features of the FAS and CKD-EPI equations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for development and validation. SETTING: Research and clinical studies (n = 13) with measured GFR available. PATIENTS: 11 251 participants in 7 studies (development and internal validation data sets) and 8378 participants in 6 studies (external validation data set). MEASUREMENTS: Clearance of an exogenous marker (reference method), SCr level, age, sex, and height were used to develop a new equation to estimate GFR. RESULTS: The new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation is a FAS equation with low bias (-1.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, -2.7 to 0.0 mL/min/1.73 m2] in children and -0.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 [CI, -1.2 to -0.5 mL/min/1.73 m2] in adults) across the FAS (2 to 90 years) and SCr range (40 to 490 µmol/L [0.45 to 5.54 mg/dL]) and with fewer estimation errors exceeding 30% (6.5% [CI, 3.8% to 9.1%] in children and 3.1% [CI, 2.5% to 3.6%] in adults) compared with the CKiD and CKD-EPI equations. LIMITATION: No Black patients were included. CONCLUSION: The new EKFC equation shows improved accuracy and precision compared with commonly used equations for estimating GFR from SCr levels. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet).

Temporal trends in living kidney donation in France between 2007 and 2017.

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies have demonstrated a slight increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) for living kidney donors (LKD). In France, living kidney donation doubled within the past 10 years. We investigated the change in characteristics of LKD between 2007 and 2017 and the adequacy of follow-up. METHODS: Data were obtained from the national registry for LKD. We compared characteristics of LKD between two study periods: 2007-11 and 2012-17, and stratified donors by age and relation to recipient. We aggregated four characteristics associated with higher ESRD risk [young age, first-degree relation to recipient, obesity, low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for age] in a single risk indicator ranging from 0 to 4. RESULTS: We included 3483 donors. The proportion of unrelated donors >56 years of age increased significantly. The proportion of related donors <56 years of age decreased significantly. The body mass index and proportion of obese donors did not change significantly. The proportion of donors with low estimated GFR for age decreased significantly from 5% to 2.2% (P < 0.001). The proportion of donors with adequate follow-up after donation increased from 19.6% to 42.5% (P < 0.001). No donor had a risk indicator equal to 4, and the proportion of donors with a risk indicator equal to 0 increased significantly from 19.2% to 24.9% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in living kidney donation in France does not seem to be associated with the selection of donors at higher risk of ESRD and the proportion of donors with adequate annual follow-up significantly increased.

The spectrum of kidney biopsies in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, acute kidney injury, and/or proteinuria.

We report a multicentric retrospective case series of patients with COVID-19 who developed acute kidney injury and/or proteinuria and underwent a kidney biopsy in the Paris and its metropolitan area. Forty-seven patients (80.9% men) with COVID-19 who underwent a kidney biopsy between March 08 and May 19, 2020 were included. Median age was 63 years IQR [52-69]. Comorbidities included hypertension (66.0%), diabetes mellitus (27.7%), obesity (27.7%), history of chronic kidney (25.5%), cardiac (38.6%) and respiratory (27.3%) diseases. Initial symptoms were fever (85.1%), cough (63.8%), shortness of breath (55.3%), and diarrhea (23.4%). Almost all patients developed acute kidney injury (97.9%) and 63.8% required renal replacement therapy. Kidney biopsy showed two main histopathological patterns, including acute tubular injury in 20 (42.6%) patients, and glomerular injury consisting of collapsing glomerulopathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 17 (36.2%) patients. Two (4.3%) patients had acute vascular nephropathy, while eight (17%) had alternative diagnosis most likely unrelated to COVID-19. Acute tubular injury occurred almost invariably in the setting of severe forms of COVID-19, whereas patients with glomerular injury had various profiles of COVID-19 severity and collapsing glomerulopathy was only observed in patients harboring a combination of APOL1 risk variants. At last follow-up, 16 of the 30 patients who initially required dialysis were still on dialysis, and 9 died. The present study describes the spectrum of kidney lesions in patients with COVID-19. While acute tubular injury is correlated with COVID-19 severity, the pattern of glomerular injury is intimately associated with the expression of APOL1 risk variants.

Living kidney donor evaluation for all candidates with normal estimated GFR for age.

Multiple days assessments are frequent for the evaluation of candidates to living kidney donation, combined with an early GFR estimation (eGFR). Living kidney donation is questionable when eGFR is <90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (KDIGO guidelines) or 80 ml/min/1.73 m2 (most US centres). However, age-related GFR decline results in a lower eGFR for older candidates. That may limit the number of older kidney donors. Yet, continuing the screening with a GFR measure increases the number of eligible donors. We hypothesized that in-depth screening should be proposed to all candidates with a normal eGFR for age. We compared the evolution of eGFR after donation between three groups of predonation eGFR: normal for age (Sage ) higher than 90 or 80 ml/min/1.73 m2 (S90 and S80, respectively); across three age groups (<45, 45-55, >55 years) in a population of 1825 French living kidney donors with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. In donors younger than 45, postdonation eGFR, absolute- and relative-eGFR variation were not different between the three groups. For older donors, postdonation eGFR was higher in S90 than in S80 or Sage but other comparators were identical. Postdonation eGFR slope was comparable between all groups. Our results are in favour of in-depth screening for all candidates to donation with a normal eGFR for age.

The spectrum of kidney function alterations in adolescents with a solitary functioning kidney.

BACKGROUND: A precise assessment of glomerular filtration rate is key to delineate the care of children with a solitary functioning kidney (SFK). Data regarding measured GFR (mGFR) in this population is restricted to a single study of 77 individuals, which suggested that a GFR estimation (eGFR) method based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR-CKiD2) performed better than Schwartz's equation (eGFR-Schwartz). METHODS: We measured GFR in 210 consecutive adolescents (7 to 22 years old) with an SFK referred to our institution between 2014 and 2019 and in 43 young candidates for kidney donation (18 to 25 years old). We compared the distribution of mGFR in both groups and determined the factors associated with reduced mGFR in adolescents with an SFK. We further compared different eGFR formulas with mGFR and assessed the association of mGFR and eGFRs with PTH and FGF23, two early indicators of GFR reduction. RESULTS: While adolescents with an SFK had a similar median mGFR to healthy controls (103 ± 24ml/min/1.73m2 vs. 107 ± 12 ml/min/1.73m2), the fraction of individuals with an mGFR below 90 ml/min/1.73m2 was higher in patients with SFK (23% vs. 5% in controls; P = 0.005). Multiple linear regression identified older age, ipsilateral abnormalities of the urinary tract, lack of compensatory hypertrophy, and treated hypertension as independent factors associated with reduced mGFR. A smaller bias using eGFR-Schwartz (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 3 to 7) was revealed when compared to other eGFR. Compared to eGFR-Schwartz, mGFR showed a stronger correlation with PTH (r = 0.04 vs. r = 0.1) and FGF23 (r = 0.03 vs. r = 0.05). CONCLUSION: SFK is not a benign condition, since 20% of the patients display altered kidney function. Our results raise caution regarding the use of the cystatin-based equation. mGFR shows a better ability than eGFR-Schwartz to differentiate patients showing early homeostatic adaptation to GFR reduction.

CKD: A Call for an Age-Adapted Definition.

Current criteria for the diagnosis of CKD in adults include persistent signs of kidney damage, such as increased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio or a GFR below the threshold of 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 This threshold has important caveats because it does not separate kidney disease from kidney aging, and therefore does not hold for all ages. In an extensive review of the literature, we found that GFR declines with healthy aging without any overt signs of compensation (such as elevated single-nephron GFR) or kidney damage. Older living kidney donors, who are carefully selected based on good health, have a lower predonation GFR compared with younger donors. Furthermore, the results from the large meta-analyses conducted by the CKD Prognosis Consortium and from numerous other studies indicate that the GFR threshold above which the risk of mortality is increased is not consistent across all ages. Among younger persons, mortality is increased at GFR <75 ml/min per 1.73 m2, whereas in elderly people it is increased at levels <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 Therefore, we suggest that amending the CKD definition to include age-specific thresholds for GFR. The implications of an updated definition are far reaching. Having fewer healthy elderly individuals diagnosed with CKD could help reduce inappropriate care and its associated adverse effects. Global prevalence estimates for CKD would be substantially reduced. Also, using an age-specific threshold for younger persons might lead to earlier identification of CKD onset for such individuals, at a point when progressive kidney damage may still be preventable.

Impact of estimation versus direct measurement of predonation glomerular filtration rate on the eligibility of potential living kidney donors.

While direct measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) provide the most accurate evaluation of pre-donation kidney function, guidelines do not systematically require the use of a reference method. We evaluated whether and to what extent relying upon creatinine-based estimating equations (eGFR) rather than direct measurement of GFR (mGFR) alters the selection of potential living donors. We compared the impact of 4 equations (the MDRD study equation, the CKD-EPI equation, the revised Lund-Malmö equation, and the full age spectrum [FAS] equation) on the evaluation of 2733 potential donors with GFR measured by reference methods. We also considered the impact of using either absolute or age-adapted GFR thresholds. The CKD-EPI and FAS equations had the best performances (P10 of 50.6% and 47.8%; P30 of 94.4% and 93.1%, respectively) and led to the lowest proportion of improperly evaluated candidates. Misclassification was more frequent when GFR adequacy was defined as an absolute threshold of 90 ml/min/1.73m2 as compared to an age-adapted definition (26% and 5%, respectively). Interpretation of eGFR according to an absolute threshold of 90 ml/min/1.73m2 identified 1804 candidates eligible to donate, compared to 2648 when mGFR was interpreted with age-adapted thresholds. We conclude that creatinine-based estimates cannot substitute for direct GFR measurement to evaluate candidates for kidney donation. When reference methods for direct GFR measurement are not available, our data suggest that a strategy based on age-adapted eGFR values estimated with either the CKD-EPI or FAS equation should be preferred.

[A sensorymotor precursor of the hyperactivity syndrom. Study of a sample of swiss French-speaking children]. / Un précurseur sensorimoteur du syndrome d'hyperactivité - Etude d'un groupe d'enfants de la population romande.

Psychological examination aims at objectifying the key symptoms of hyperactivity, namely the disorders of attention and of the exe-cutive functions (briefly, the activation-inhibition control). The -records of 237 patients, aged 5 to 17 and attending our day clinics between 2004 and 2016, are analyzed retrospectively. 40 cases present an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), combined presentation, after DSM-5 criteria. These children and adolescents show not only a typical impulsivity on the computerized test of -attention, but also some deficit in learning to write, a precocious manifestation of their neurodevelopmental disorders. This comorbidity correctly classifies 82.4 % of the hyperactivity and control cases, a quite strong effect in the context of the hard to reach -diagnosis of the ADHD syndrom.

L'examen psychologique vise à objectiver les symptômes clés de l'hyperactivité, à savoir les troubles de l'attention et des fonctions exécutives (en bref, le contrôle activation-inhibition). Les dossiers de 237 patients de nos consultations, âgés de 5 à 17 ans et examinés entre 2004 et 2016, sont analysés rétrospectivement. 40 cas présentent un trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyper­activité (TDAH), présentation mixte, selon les critères du DSM-5. Ces ­enfants et adolescents montrent non seulement une impulsivité ­caractéristique aux épreuves informatisées de l'attention, mais aussi un déficit dans l'acquisition de l'écriture, une manifestation précoce de leurs troubles neurodéveloppementaux. Cette association classe correctement 82,4 % des hyper­actifs et des contrôles, un effet fort, vu le diagnostic difficile du syndrome TDAH.

The age-calibrated measured glomerular filtration rate improves living kidney donation selection process.

Recommendations on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) threshold compatible with living kidney donation are not agreed upon. The recent KDIGO guidelines suggested a reset of the conventional cutoff value of 80 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. While GFR physiologically declines with age, it is unclear whether and how age should be taken into account for selecting acceptable pre-donation GFR. In this multicenter retrospective study encompassing 2007 kidney donors in France, we evaluated the impact of age using two threshold measured GFR (mGFR)s (80 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Three groups of donors were defined according to baseline mGFR: below 80, 80-89.9 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more. Thirty-two percent of donors were selected despite an mGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donors with the lowest mGFR were significantly older (60 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 11 years) and this applied to both male and female donors. The lifetime-standardized renal reserve, defined as the pre-donation mGFR value divided by the expected number of remaining years of life, was similar irrespective of baseline mGFR groups. Similar results were obtained when eGFR was used instead of mGFR. Finally, in a subgroup of 132 donors with repeated mGFR five years after donation, the magnitude of mGFR decrease was similar in all groups (-34.3%, -33.9%, and -34.9% respectively). Thus, the decision to accept individuals with mGFR lower than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 for kidney donation is highly dependent on the age of the candidate. Hence, threshold values lower than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 are reasonable for older donors. Age-calibrated mGFR may improve efficiency of the selection process.

From Isonatric to Isotonic Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Isonatric hemodialysis aims at maintaining stable cellular hydration through a close control of natremia, considered a surrogate of tonicity. However, 2 methods are available to perform isonatric hemodialysis: one based on natremia derived from plasma conductivity (NaCond) and the other based on natremia measured at laboratory (NaLab). We compared the control of tonicity obtained by isonatric hemodialysis based on NaLab or NaCond. METHODS: Changes in tonicity NaLab and NaCond were recorded during 55 hemodialysis sessions. Sessions were divided according to the variation of tonicity: hypotonic sessions (tonicity decrease ≥2 mOsm/kg); isotonic sessions (tonicity variation <2 mOsm/kg); hypertonic sessions (tonicity increase ≥2 mOsm/kg). RESULTS: During isotonic hemodialysis, NaCond decreases significantly by 1 mmol/L, whereas NaLab remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Isonatric hemodialysis based on NaLab and isonatric hemodialysis based on NaCond is to be distinguished. Isotonic hemodialysis could be performed by decreasing NaCond by 1 mmol/L or maintaining NaLab stability.

Use of computed tomography assessed kidney length to predict split renal GFR in living kidney donors.

OBJECTIVES: Screening of living kidney donors may require scintigraphy to split glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To determine the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) to split GFR, we compared scintigraphy-split GFR to CT-split GFR. We evaluated CT-split GFR as a screening test to detect scintigraphy-split GFR lower than 40 mL/min/1.73 m2/kidney. METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study on 346 potential living donors who had GFR measurement, renal scintigraphy, and CT. We predicted GFR for each kidney by splitting GFR using the following formula: Volume-split GFR for a given kidney = measured GFR*[volume of this kidney/(volume of this kidney + volume of the opposite kidney)]. The same formula was used for length-split GFR. We compared length- and volume-split GFR to scintigraphy-split GFR at donation and with a 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: A better correlation was observed between length-split GFR and scintigraphy-split GFR (r = 0.92) than between volume-split GFR and scintigraphy-split GFR (r = 0.89). A length-split GFR threshold of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2/kidney had a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 75 % to detect scintigraphy-split GFR less than 40 mL/min/1.73 m2/kidney. Both techniques with their respective thresholds detected living donors with similar eGFR evolution during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Length-split GFR can be used to detect patients requiring scintigraphy. KEY POINTS: • Excellent correlation between kidney length and scintigraphy predicted GFR • Kidney length screening detects all donors with GFR lower than 40 mL/min/1.73 m 2 • Kidney length screening can replace scintigraphy screening.

What is the significance of end-stage renal disease risk estimation in living kidney donors?

Two end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risk calculators were recently developed by Grams et al., and Ibrahim et al. to calculate ESRD risk before donation among living kidney donors. However, those calculators have never been studied among potential donors for whom donation was refused due to medical contraindications and compared to a group of donors. We compared 15-year and lifetime ESRD risk of donors and nondonors due to medical cause as estimated by those two calculators. Nondonors due to medical cause (n = 27) had a significantly higher 15-year ESRD risk compared to donors (n = 288) with both calculators (0.25 vs. 0.14, P < 0.001 for that developed by Grams et al. and 2.21 vs. 1.43, P = 0.002 for that developed by Ibrahim et al.). On the contrary, lifetime ESRD risk was not significantly different between the two groups. At both times (15 years and lifetime), we observed a significant overlap of ESRD risk between the two groups. ESRD risk calculators could be complementary to standard screening strategy but cannot be used alone to accept or decline donation.