Analysis of Specimen Mammography with Artificial Intelligence to Predict Margin Status.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative specimen mammography is a valuable tool in breast cancer surgery, providing immediate assessment of margins for a resected tumor. However, the accuracy of specimen mammography in detecting microscopic margin positivity is low. We sought to develop an artificial intelligence model to predict the pathologic margin status of resected breast tumors using specimen mammography. METHODS: A dataset of specimen mammography images matched with pathologic margin status was collected from our institution from 2017 to 2020. The dataset was randomly split into training, validation, and test sets. Specimen mammography models pretrained on radiologic images were developed and compared with models pretrained on nonmedical images. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: The dataset included 821 images, and 53% had positive margins. For three out of four model architectures tested, models pretrained on radiologic images outperformed nonmedical models. The highest performing model, InceptionV3, showed sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 42%, and AUROC of 0.71. Model performance was better among patients with invasive cancers, less dense breasts, and non-white race. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and internally validated artificial intelligence models that predict pathologic margins status for partial mastectomy from specimen mammograms. The models' accuracy compares favorably with published literature on surgeon and radiologist interpretation of specimen mammography. With further development, these models could more precisely guide the extent of resection, potentially improving cosmesis and reducing reoperations.

Omission of Axillary Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for ypN + positive patients as patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) were excluded from trials omitting ALND in pN + patients. We sought to characterize trends in omission of ALND in patients with ypN + disease. METHODS: Adult women with invasive breast carcinoma in the National Cancer Database between 2012 and 2019 who received NST (chemotherapy or endocrine) and had ypN + disease were included. Patients were excluded if they did not have definitive surgery within eight months of diagnosis. The primary study outcome was completion of ALND versus omission. Differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were identified using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total, 103,121 women were included. Most had cT1 (26%) or cT2 (45%) tumors, cN + disease (71%), and ductal histology (83%). 69% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 31% neoadjuvant endocrine without chemotherapy (30% both). ALND was performed in 77% of patients. Omission of ALND became more prevalent each year from 2012 (14%) to 2019 (34%). On multivariate modeling, year of diagnosis, black race, cN status, higher grade, estrogen receptor+/HER2-receptor subtype, and mastectomy were associated with increased prevalence of ALND. Age, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index score, endocrine versus chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiation were not associated with receipt of ALND. CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines recommending ALND, omission is common in patients with ypN + breast cancer after NST. Omission of ALND increased significantly over time and is associated with clinical and demographic factors. Future study is needed to determine the oncologic safety of this approach.

Racial-ethnic variations in phyllodes tumors among a multicenter United States cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have identified racial-ethnic differences in the diagnostic patterns and recurrence outcomes of women with phyllodes tumors (PT). However, these studies are generally limited in size and generalizability. We therefore sought to explore racial-ethnic differences in age, tumor size, subtype, and recurrence in a large US cohort of women with PT. METHODS: We performed an 11-institution retrospective review of women with PT from 2007 to 2017. Differences in age at diagnosis, tumor size and subtype, and recurrence-free survival according to race-ethnicity. RESULTS: Women of non-White race or Hispanic ethnicity were younger at the time of diagnosis with phyllodes tumor. Non-Hispanic Other women had a larger proportion of malignant PT. There were no differences in recurrence-free survival in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in age, tumor size, and subtype were small. Therefore, the workup of young women with breast masses and the treatment of women with PT should not differ according to race-ethnicity. These conclusions are supported by our finding that there were no differences in recurrence-free survival.

Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in cT1-T2/N0 HER2-Amplified Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for small node-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer remains controversial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may risk overtreatment, whereas surgery first fails to identify patients with residual disease in need of escalated adjuvant systemic therapy. We investigated patient characteristics associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Adult women with cT1-T2/N0, HER2+ breast cancer between 2013 and 2017 in the National Cancer Database who underwent surgery within 8 months of diagnosis were included. Patients were classified as receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus a surgery-first approach. We assessed the sociodemographic and clinical predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery first and associations between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer treatments using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: We identified 56,784 women, of whom 12,758 (22%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 29,139 (53%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 12,907 (24%) received no chemotherapy, and 1980 were missing chemotherapy information. After adjustment, cT2 stage was the strongest predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery first. Younger age and later diagnosis year were positively associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, hormone receptor positivity, Black race, rural county, and government-funded or no health insurance were inversely associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariable analyses, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to have a mastectomy (vs. lumpectomy) and sentinel lymph node biopsy or no nodal surgery (vs. axillary lymph node dissection). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive multi-agent (vs. single-agent) chemotherapy than those who received adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy exist in women with HER2+ breast cancer, which reflect both clinical parameters and disparities. Optimal treatment strategies should be implemented equitably across sociodemographic groups.

Omission of Radiation in Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer: Opportunity for De-escalation of Care.

INTRODUCTION: De-escalation of breast cancer treatment aims to reduce patient and financial toxicity without compromising outcomes. Level I evidence and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support omission of adjuvant radiation in patients aged >70 y with hormone-sensitive, pT1N0M0 invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. We evaluated radiation use in patients eligible for guideline concordant omission of radiation. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of patients eligible for radiation omission from two pooled randomized controlled trials, which included stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery, was performed to evaluate factors associated with radiation use. RESULTS: Of 631 patients, 47 (7.4%) met radiation omission criteria and were treated by 14 surgeons at eight institutions. The mean age was 75.3 (standard deviation + 4.4) y. Majority of patients identified as White (n = 46; 97.9%) and non-Hispanic (n = 44; 93.6%). The mean tumor size was 1.0 cm; 37 patients (88.1%) had ductal, 4 patients (9.5%) had lobular, and 17 patients (40.5%) had low-grade disease. Among patients eligible for radiation omission, 34 (72.3%) patients received adjuvant radiation. Those who received radiation were significantly younger than those who did not (74 y, interquartile range = 4 y, versus 78 y, interquartile range = 11 y, P = 0.03). There was no difference in radiation use based on size (P = 0.4), histology (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.7), race (P = 1), ethnicity (P = 0.6), institution (P = 0.1), gender of the surgeon (P = 0.7), or surgeon (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 10% of patients undergoing breast conservation met criteria for radiation omission. Nearly three-quarters received radiation therapy with younger age being a driver of radiation use, suggesting ample opportunity for de-escalation, particularly among younger eligible patients.

Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Single-center studies have demonstrated that resection of cavity shave margins (CSM) halves the rate of positive margins and re-excision in breast cancer patients undergoing partial mastectomy (PM). We sought to determine if these findings were externally generalizable across practice settings. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial occurring in 9 centers across the United States, stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing PM were randomly assigned to either have resection of CSM ("shave" group) or not ("no shave" group). Randomization occurred intraoperatively, after the surgeon had completed their standard PM. Primary outcome measures were positive margin and re-excision rates. RESULTS: Between July 28, 2016 and April 13, 2018, 400 patients were enrolled in this trial. Four patients (2 in each arm) did not meet inclusion criteria after randomization, leaving 396 patients for analysis: 196 in the "shave" group and 200 to the "no shave" group. Median patient age was 65 years (range; 29-94). Groups were well matched at baseline for demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Prior to randomization, positive margin rates were similar in the "shave" and "no shave" groups (76/196 (38.8%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), respectively, P = 0.604). After randomization, those in the "shave" group were significantly less likely than those in the "no shave" group to have positive margins (19/196 (9.7%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), P < 0.001), and to require re-excision or mastectomy for margin clearance (17/196 (8.7%) vs. 47/200 (23.5%), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Resection of CSM significantly reduces positive margin and re-excision rates in patients undergoing PM.

Suboptimal therapy following breast conserving surgery in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess potential disparities in guideline-concordant care delivery among women with early-stage triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. METHODS: Women ≥ 40 years old diagnosed with pT2N0M0 triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with primary surgery and axillary staging between 2012 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation concordant with current guidelines. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to assess the prevalence of optimal therapy use across patient and cancer characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess 5-year overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the impact of optimal therapy on 5-year mortality. RESULTS: 11,785 women were included with 7,843 receiving optimal therapy. Receipt of optimal therapy decreased with age even after adjusting for comorbidities and cancer characteristics; other sociodemographic factors were not associated with differences in receipt of optimal therapy. Among patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, most were not offered the treatment (49%) or refused (40%). Overall 5-year survival was higher among women who received optimal therapy (89% [95% CI 88.0-89.3] vs. 66% [95% CI 62.9-68.5]). Patients who received suboptimal therapy were over twice as likely to die within 5 years of their diagnosis (adjusted HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.12-2.82). CONCLUSION: Age is the primary determinant of the likelihood of a woman to receive optimal adjuvant therapies in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. Patients who did not receive optimal therapy had significantly diminished survival.

The Prognostic Value of Axillary Staging Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has historically been characterized by high rates of recurrence and poor survival; however, there have been significant improvements in systemic therapy. We sought to investigate modern treatment of IBC and define the yield and prognostic significance of axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Women with clinical stage T4d, N0-N3, M0 IBC from 2012 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression were used to assess mortality by receptor subtype and nodal status. RESULTS: We identified 5265 patients; 37% hormone receptor (HR) +/HER2 - , 19% HR +/HER2 + , 18% HR -/HER2 + , and 26% triple-negative, and 5-year overall survival was 51.6%. Only 34% were treated according to guidelines with NAC, modified radical mastectomy, and adjuvant radiation. Pathologically positive lymph nodes (ypN +) after NAC varied by subtype and clinical nodal status (cN) ranging from 82% in cN + HR +/HER2 - patients to 19% in cN0 HR -/HER2 + patients. ypN + strongly correlated with survival in all subtypes with the most pronounced impact in HR +/HER2 + patients, with 90% 5-year overall survival in ypN0 versus 66% for ypN + (HR 4.29, 95% CI 1.58-11.70, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year survival in M0 IBC is 51.6%. Positive nodes after NAC varied by subtype and clinical N status but is sufficiently high and provided meaningful prognostication in all subtypes to support continued routine pathologic assessment. Future study is warranted to identify reliable, less morbid, methods of staging the axilla in IBC patients appropriate for deescalation of axillary surgery.

The Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Invasive Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Intraductal Papilloma without Atypia on Core Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry (TBCRC 034).

BACKGROUND: Available retrospective data suggest the upgrade rate for intraductal papilloma (IP) without atypia on core biopsy (CB) ranges from 0 to 12%, leading to variation in recommendations. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional trial (TBCRC 034) to determine the upgrade rate to invasive cancer (IC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excision for asymptomatic IP without atypia on CB. METHODS: Prospectively identified patients with a CB diagnosis of IP who had consented to excision were included. Discordant cases, including BI-RADS > 4, and those with additional lesions requiring excision were excluded. The primary endpoint was upgrade to IC or DCIS by local pathology review with a predefined rule that an upgrade rate of ≤ 3% would not warrant routine excision. Sample size and confidence intervals were based on exact binomial calculations. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic concordance for IP between local and central pathology review and upgrade rates by central pathology review. RESULTS: The trial included116 patients (median age 56 years, range 24-82) and the most common imaging abnormality was a mass (n = 91, 78%). Per local review, 2 (1.7%) cases were upgraded to DCIS. In both of these cases central pathology review did not confirm DCIS on excision. Additionally, central pathology review confirmed IP without atypia in core biopsies of 85/116 cases (73%), and both locally upgraded cases were among them. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of 116 IPs without atypia on CB, the upgrade rate was 1.7% by local review, suggesting that routine excision is not indicated for IP without atypia on CB with concordant imaging findings.

Limited Reporting of Histopathologic Details in a Multi-Institutional Academic Cohort of Phyllodes Tumors: Time for Standardization.

BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms that are classified by tiered histopathologic features. While there are protocols for the reporting of cancer specimens, no standardized reporting protocol exists for phyllodes. METHODS: We performed an 11-institution contemporary review of phyllodes tumors. Granular histopathologic details were recorded, including the features specifically considered for phyllodes grade classification. RESULTS: Of 550 patients, median tumor size was 3.0 cm, 68.9% (n = 379) of tumors were benign, 19.6% (n = 108) were borderline, and 10.5% (n = 58) were malignant. All cases reported the final tumor size and grade classification. Complete pathologic reporting of all histopathologic features was present in 15.3% (n = 84) of cases, while an additional 35.6% (n = 196) were missing only one or two features in the report. Individual details regarding the degree of stromal cellularity was not reported in 53.5% (n = 294) of cases, degree of stromal atypia in 58.0% (n = 319) of cases, presence of stromal overgrowth in 56.2% (n = 309) of cases, stromal cell mitoses in 37.5% (n = 206) of cases, and tumor border in 54.2% (n = 298) of cases. The final margin status (negative vs. positive) was omitted in only 0.9% of cases, and the final negative margin width was specifically reported in 73.8% of cases. Reporting of details was similar across all sites. CONCLUSION: In this academic cohort of phyllodes tumors, one or more histopathologic features were frequently omitted from the pathology report. While all features were considered by the pathologist for grading, this limited reporting reflects a lack of reporting consensus. We recommend that standardized reporting in the form of a synoptic-style cancer protocol be implemented for phyllodes tumors, similar to other rare tumors.

Nodal positivity decreases with age in women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite data demonstrating the safety of omitting axillary surgery in older women with early-stage breast cancer, the incidence of axillary surgery remains high. It was hypothesized that the prevalence of nodal positivity would decrease with advancing age. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to construct a cohort of adult women with early-stage, clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated between 2013 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between age and nodal positivity, and this was stratified by the axillary surgery category. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the proportion of women receiving adjuvant therapy according to age and nodal status. RESULTS: The incidence of axillary surgery among women aged 70 and older (n = 51,917) remained high nationwide (86%). There was a significant decrease in nodal positivity with advancing age in women with early-stage, ER+, clinically node-negative breast cancer from the youngest cohort up to patients aged 70 to 89 years, and this was independent of histologic subtype (ductal vs lobular), race, comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Overall, less than 10% of women aged 70 or older who underwent surgery had node-positive disease, regardless of axillary surgery type, and almost 95% of node-positive patients aged 70 or older were at pathological stage N1mi or N1. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary surgery may be safely omitted for many older women with ER+, clinically node-negative, early-stage breast cancer. Nodal positivity declines with advancing age, and this suggests varied biology in older patients versus younger patients.

Survival Outcomes of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Elderly Women.

BACKGROUND: Elderly women (≥ 70 years old) form a significant proportion of patients affected by breast cancer (BC); however, the treatment decisions for this patient population are complicated, owing to the presence of comorbidities, limited life expectancy, reduced tolerability of therapy, and limited enrollment in clinical trials. A growing body of evidence suggests equivalent outcomes in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer receiving primary endocrine therapy only or surgery with subsequent endocrine therapy. Whether these results are reproduced in the larger BC population outside of a clinical trial currently remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women ≥ 70 years old diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer between January 2008 and December 2013 with tumor size T1 or T2, minimal nodal involvement (N0 and N1), and estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positivity who started endocrine therapy within a year of diagnosis were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked datasets. Endocrine therapy was identified using outpatient prescription fills for anastrozole, exemestane, fulvestrant, letrozole, raloxifene, tamoxifen, and toremifene; the first fill date was used as the treatment initiation date. Surgical intervention included either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Women who received chemotherapy were excluded. Trends in the use of primary endocrine therapy only were assessed using Poisson regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the association between undergoing surgery within a year of diagnosis and 5-year all-cause mortality, after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical cancer characteristics. Similar methods were used to assess 5-year cancer-specific mortality, where noncancer mortality was treated as a competing risk. RESULTS: Overall, 8784 women were included in the analysis: 8006 (91%) received surgery with endocrine therapy and 778 (9%) received primary endocrine therapy alone. The proportion of women not receiving surgery remained consistent between 2008 and 2013 (p = 0.10). The 5-year mortality was 11% (n = 619), and 19% of all deaths were due to cancer causes (n = 117). After adjustment, 5-year mortality was lower among women undergoing surgery (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.74, p < 0.0001). Similar results were found when looking at 5-year cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly breast cancer patients with early-stage hormone-receptor-positive disease receiving primary surgical intervention plus endocrine therapy may have significantly improved survival than those receiving primary endocrine therapy alone. This study suggests the importance of surgical intervention for elderly breast cancer patients and warrants further investigation and comprehensive geriatric assessment to identify subsets of elderly breast cancer patients who may benefit significantly from surgical intervention.

Trends in Surgical Axillary Management in Early Stage Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: Continued Over-Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: In the past two decades, three prospective randomized trials demonstrated that elderly women with early stage hormone positive breast cancer had equivalent disease-specific mortality regardless of axillary surgery. In 2016, the Choosing Wisely campaign encouraged patients and providers to reconsider the role of axillary surgery in this population. We sought to identify factors that contribute to adopting non-operative management of the axilla in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of women ≥ 70 years old with cT1/T2, hormone positive invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent partial or total mastectomy, with/without axillary surgery, and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. We used multivariable log-binomial regression to model the risk of undergoing axillary surgery across region, care setting, and Charlson-Deyo scores, and analyzed temporal trends using Poisson regression. From 2004 to 2015, 87,342 of 99,940 women who met inclusion criteria (83%) had axillary surgery. Over time, axillary surgery increased from 78% to 88% (p < 0.001). This rise was consistent across region (p = 0.81) and care setting (p = 0.09), but flattened as age increased (p < 0.001). Omitting axillary surgery was more likely in patients treated in New England (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86, 0.89) and patients ≥ 85 (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.65, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary surgery continues to be the preferred option of axillary management in elderly women with early stage, clinically node negative, hormone-positive, invasive breast cancer despite no survival benefit. Identifying factors to improve patient selection and dissemination of current recommendations can improve adoption of current evidence on axillary surgery in the elderly.

Germline Genetic Mutations in a Multi-center Contemporary Cohort of 550 Phyllodes Tumors: An Opportunity for Expanded Multi-gene Panel Testing.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists regarding inherited mutations associated with phyllodes tumors (PT); however, some are reported (TP53, BRCA1, and RB1). A PT diagnosis does not meet NCCN criteria for testing, including within Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (TP53). We sought to determine the prevalence of mutations associated with PT. METHODS: We performed an 11-institution review of contemporary (2007-2017) PT practice. We recorded multigenerational family history and personal history of genetic testing. We identified patients meeting NCCN criteria for genetic evaluation. Logistic regression estimated the association of select covariates with likelihood of undergoing genetic testing. RESULTS: Of 550 PT patients, 59.8% (n = 329) had a close family history of cancer, and 34.0% (n = 112) had ≥ 3 family members affected. Only 6.2% (n = 34) underwent genetic testing, 38.2% (n = 13) of whom had only BRCA1/BRCA2 tested. Of 34 patients tested, 8.8% had a deleterious mutation (1 BRCA1, 2 TP53), and 5.9% had a BRCA2 VUS. Of women who had TP53 testing (N = 21), 9.5% had a mutation. Selection for testing was not associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, p = 0.55) or PT size (p = 0.12) but was associated with grade (malignant vs. benign: OR 9.17, 95% CI 3.97-21.18) and meeting NCCN criteria (OR 3.43, 95% confidence interval 1.70-6.94). Notably, an additional 86 (15.6%) patients met NCCN criteria but had no genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Very few women with PT undergo germline testing; however, in those selected for testing, a deleterious mutation was identified in ~ 10%. Multigene testing of a PT cohort would present an opportunity to discover the true incidence of germline mutations in PT patients.

Disparities in the Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Early Stage Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have long established the long-term safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in patients with clinically node-negative early stage breast cancer. The variations in utilization of SLND and ALND in this patient population, however, are currently unknown. METHODS: Adult female patients (40 years and older) within the National Cancer Database diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2013 and December 2015, who had clinical T1-T2 and N0 disease, and who underwent either SLND (with or without subsequent ALND) or ALND were included. Differences in utilization across race, ethnicity, insurance type, facility, and residential characteristics were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 271,689 patients were included, of which 26,527 (10%) received ALND and 245,162 (90%) underwent SLND. After adjusting for demographics and cancer characteristics, black (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06-1.17) and Hispanic women (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24) were more likely to receive ALND. Patients without health insurance (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.47), compared with private health insurance, and those receiving treatment at community cancer centers (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.53-1.67), compared with academic/research centers, were also more likely to receive ALND. CONCLUSIONS: Although the vast majority of women undergo SLND, significant disparities exist in its utilization for early stage breast cancer, with traditionally underserved patients receiving unwarranted extensive axillary surgery. Increased patient and surgeon education is needed to decrease variations in care that can affect patient's quality of life.

Surgical Approach to Lymphedema Reduction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For patients who have or may develop lymphedema due to oncologic resection, surgical options are available to prevent and treat this chronic disease. Here, we review the current pathophysiology, classification systems, surgical preventive techniques, and treatment options for lymphedema reduction. RECENT FINDINGS: Preventive surgical techniques, including de-escalation of axillary surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary reverse mapping (ARM), and lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA), have been shown to reduce the incidence of lymphedema. Water displacement remains the gold standard for measuring limb volume and classification of lymphedema; however, lymphoscintigraphy and ICG lymphography are two novel imaging techniques that are now utilized to characterize lymphedema and guide management. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) remains the mainstay of treatment. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) and lymphovenous bypass have shown promising results, particularly in advanced lymphedema stages. Combination therapy, incorporating both surgical and non-surgical approaches to lymphedema, yields best patient outcomes. Lymphedema is a chronic disease wherein management requires a combination of surgical and conservative treatments. Standardization in lymphedema staging, key outcome indicators, and quantitative data will be critical to establish the absolute best practices in lymphedema diagnosis and treatment.

Are You on the Right Platform? A Conjoint Analysis of Social Media Preferences in Aesthetic Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Social media has become an indispensable tool for patients to learn about aesthetic surgery. Currently, procedure-specific patient preferences for social media platforms and content are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate social media preferences of patients seeking aesthetic surgery. METHODS: We utilized a choice-based conjoint analysis survey to analyze the preferences of patients seeking 3 common aesthetic procedures: breast augmentation (BA), facial rejuvenation (FR), and combined breast/abdominal surgery (BAB). Participants were asked to choose among social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Pinterest, Tumblr, YouTube), information extent (basic, moderate, comprehensive), delivery mechanism (prerecorded video, live video, photographs, text description), messenger (surgeon, nurse/clinic staff, patient), and option for interactivity (yes/no). The survey was administered using an Internet crowdsourcing service (Amazon Mechanical Turk). RESULTS: A total of 647 participants were recruited: 201 in BA, 255 in FR, and 191 in BAB. Among attributes surveyed, participants in all 3 groups (BA, FR, BAB) valued social media platform as the most important (30.9%, 33.1%, 31.4%), followed by information extent (23.1%, 22.9%, 21.6%), delivery mechanism (18.9%, 17.4%, 18%), messenger (16%, 17%, 17.2%), and interactivity (11.1%, 9.8%, 11.8%). Within these attributes, Facebook ranked as the preferred platform, with comprehensive information extent, live video as the delivery mechanism, and surgeon as the messenger as most preferred. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of social media platform is the most important factor for patients, and they indicated a preference for comprehensive information delivered by the surgeon via live video on Facebook. Our study elucidates social media usage in common aesthetic populations, which can help improve aesthetic patient outreach.

Erratum: Multidisciplinary Management of Breast Cancer During Pregnancy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0208.].

Does Axillary Reverse Mapping Prevent Lymphedema After Lymphadenectomy?

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that disconcerting lymphedema rates in both sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be because of unrecognized vunerable variations in arm lymphatic drainage within the axilla. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) facilitates identification and avoidance of arm lymphatics within the axilla and its use may reduce lymphedema. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved study from June 2007 to December 2013 involved patients undergoing SLNB with or without ALND, or ALND alone. Technetium is injected subareolarly for localization of the breast SLN and isosulfan blue dye (5 mL) is injected in the ipsilateral upper arm for localization of nonbreast lymphatics. Data were collected on identification and preservation of arm lymphatics, crossover rates, blue node metastases, axillary recurrence, and lymphedema as measured by volume displacement. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients prospectively underwent 685 ARM procedures with a SLNB and/or ALND. Objective lymphedema rates for SLNB and ALND were 0.8% and 6.5% respectively, with 26-month median follow up. Blue lymphatics were identified in 29.2% (138/472) of SLNB and 71.8% (153/213) of ALND. Crossover was seen in 3.8% (18/472) of SLNB and 5.6% (12/213) of ALND. Blue node metastases rate was 4.5% (2/44). Axillary recurrence rate was 0.2% and 1.4% for SLNB and ALND, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ARM allows frequent identification of arm lymphatics in the axilla, which would have been transected during routine surgery. Rates of metastases in noncrossover nodes and axillary recurrences are low. Lymphedema rates are dramatically reduced using ARM when compared with accepted standards.