Explaining immigration casework in federal Members of Parliament's district offices in Canada.

In Canada, a majority of federal constituency offices deal primarily with immigration files. The few qualitative studies on the subject show that the resources dedicated to these files and the type of work carried out on the immigration files handled vary between offices, thus contributing to disparities in service between federal electoral districts. How can such variation be explained? Based on the quantitative analysis of unpublished administrative data, this article first highlights the diversity of files handled by constituency offices, as well as the types of intervention carried out by constituency assistants. It then aims to explain the variations in case processing according to the type of case and the volume of requests handled. Studies of constituents' files received and processed at constituency office level have argued that the political ideology, gender and ethnicity of the deputy as well as the demographics of the constituency are explanatory factors. This analysis shows that in the case of immigration files, constituency demography is the most important factor, while the MP's political affiliation plays a very limited role. These results shed new light on the factors involved in the processing of immigration cases at constituency level, and add nuance to previous, mainly qualitative analyses. Our results also contribute to understanding the work of constituency offices for constituents, which appears to be far less partisan than in other countries where similar offices exist.

Au Canada, une majorité de bureaux de circonscription fédérale traite principalement des dossiers d'immigration. Les quelques études qualitatives portant sur le sujet montrent que les ressources dédiées à ces dossiers et le type de travail effectué sur les dossiers dʼimmigration traités varient entre les bureaux, contribuant ainsi à des disparités de services entre les circonscriptions électorales fédérales. Comment expliquer une telle variation? En sʼappuyant sur lʼanalyse quantitative de données administratives inédites, cet article met dʼabord en évidence la diversité des dossiers traités par les bureaux de circonscription ainsi que les types d'intervention effectués par les adjoints de circonscription. Ensuite, il vise à expliquer les variations du traitement des dossiers en fonction du type de dossier et du volume des demandes traité. Les études sur les dossiers de commettants reçus et traités au niveau des bureaux de circonscription ont soutenu que lʼidéologie politique, le genre et lʼethnicité du député ainsi que la démographie de la circonscription sont des facteurs explicatifs. Cette analyse montre que dans le cas des dossiers dʼimmigration, la démographie de la circonscription est le facteur le plus important, tandis que l'appartenance politique du député joue un rôle très limité. Ces résultats apportent un nouvel éclairage sur les facteurs du traitement des dossiers dʼimmigration au niveau des circonscriptions et nuancent les analyses antérieures, principalement qualitatives. Nos résultats contribuent également à la compréhension du travail des bureaux de circonscription pour les commettants, qui semble être bien moins partisan que dans dʼautres pays où des bureaux semblables existent.

Relationship between COVID-19 pandemic-related experienced stress and lifestyle habits among university students from Québec, Canada.

Whether COVID-19-related experienced stress influenced lifestyle habits remains to be thoroughly evaluated among university students. This study examined the relationship between COVID-19-related experienced stress and subsequent lifestyle habits among undergraduate students. This cross-sectional study included 708 undergraduate students from Université Laval (Québec, Canada) participating in the Expériences Pandémiques (ExPan) cohort. Data on COVID-19-related experienced stress and lifestyle were self-reported using a questionnaire completed between February and April of 2022. A stress index (SI) was computed by summing scores associated with 31 situational statements related to the pandemic (e.g., not being able to see friends, dealing with job loss). A healthy lifestyle score (HLS) ranging from zero to seven was calculated based on seven lifestyle habits: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sleep quality, fruit and vegetable intake, tobacco and electronic cigarette use, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, and hard or sedative-hypnotic drugs use. In multivariable-adjusted models, a negative association between the SI and the HLS was found (ß10% increment SI = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.30, -0.16 HLS point; P < 0.0001). The SI was also negatively associated with sleep quality, and fruit and vegetable consumption, while being positively associated with at-risk alcohol consumption, cannabis use, and hard or sedative-hypnotic drug use. Subgroup analyses suggested a negative relationship between the SI and HLS among participants who did not receive academic accommodations (e.g., additional time for evaluations, personal notetaker), but not those who received such accommodations. This study suggests that COVID-19-related experienced stress was negatively associated with healthy lifestyle habits in this cohort of undergraduate students.