Response to random apheresis platelets versus HLA-selected platelets versus pooled platelets in HLA-sensitized patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how pooled platelets (PPs) compare to random apheresis platelets (RAPs) when HLA-selected platelets (PLTs) are unavailable for HLA-sensitized patients. The aim of this study was to compare patient responses to RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs in HLA-sensitized patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients from January 2014 to April 2017 with a class I calculated panel-reactive antibody of 60% or more. Response to transfusion was determined by a corrected count increment (CCI) up to 1 hour after completion of transfusion. A CCI of 5 or more was considered successful. RESULTS: Seventy-seven units of RAPs, 412 units of HLA-selected PLT, and 388 units PPs were transfused. Mean CCIs when transfusing RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs were 2.82, 11.44, and 4.77, respectively (p < 0.0001). Posttest comparison between RAPs and PPs revealed no significant difference in mean CCI while there was a significant difference between HLA-selected PLTs versus RAPs and HLA-selected PLTs versus PPs. The success rates of RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs were 31%, 80%, and 35% respectively. There was no significant association of type of PLT and success rate when comparing RAPs versus PPs (p = 0.51) while there was a significant association between success rate and type of PLT transfusion when comparing HLA-selected PLTs with RAPs and PPs. CONCLUSION: HLA-selected PLTs resulted in higher mean CCIs and more successful transfusions. There was no significant difference in mean CCI or success rate when transfusing RAPs versus PPs to HLA-sensitized patients. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes in HLA-sensitized patients receiving each type of PLT product.

An Audit of Thrombophilia Testing in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The Futility of Testing.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients admitted with an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) undergo thrombophilia testing. There is limited evidence to support this practice. We examined the effect of thrombophilia testing on management of patients admitted with an ischemic stroke or TIA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational single-center study, we identified patients who were admitted with stroke or TIA and underwent thrombophilia testing over a 45-month period. We reviewed their electronic medical records to assess whether testing affected clinical management, defined as anticoagulation treatment by the time of discharge due to a positive test result. Secondary endpoints included potential misdiagnosis due to false positive results and cost of testing. RESULTS: Testing was performed in 143 patients with a stroke or TIA. Forty-four patients (31%) had at least 1 positive test result. The most common positive tests were an elevated factor VIII activity (18% of patients tested) and decreased protein S activity (11% of patients tested). Both of these tests are subject to acute phase effects. Testing altered clinical management in only 1 patient (1% of total patients tested). Thirty-three patients (75%) have the potential for carrying a misdiagnosis due to a positive test that was never repeated for confirmation or repeated too soon after the initial positive test. The annual cost of testing was approximately $62,000. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombophilia testing in the acute inpatient setting rarely impacted the clinical management of patients admitted with a stroke or TIA. By avoiding thrombophilia testing, both the potential for misdiagnosis and health care costs can be reduced. Therefore, we have discontinued thrombophilia testing in in-patients with a diagnosis of stroke.

A case of autoimmune severe acquired von Willebrand syndrome (type 3-like).

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common congenital bleeding disorder and is due to quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Acquired defects of VWF, termed acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS), are due to a host of different mechanisms. Autoantibody-mediated AVWS may be associated with lymphoproliferative or immunological disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A large majority of AVWS cases are type 1 or type 2A-like and patients tend to have a mild to moderate bleeding tendency. We report a case of severe autoimmune AVWS in a woman with SLE who presented with clinical and laboratory features of type 3 VWD (undetectable VWF antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, and VWF multimers). A mixing study demonstrated an inhibitor to VWF (6BU/mL). Her bleeds were managed with antifibrinolytics, recombinant activated factor VII, and activated prothrombin complex concentrate. She was initially treated with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. However, her bleeding symptoms continued until she was treated with rituximab, and her VWF parameters normalized. She relapsed two years later due to non-compliance with her immunosuppressive medications and expired another two years later secondary to complications of sepsis and uremic pericarditis. This case emphasizes the importance of aggressive initial therapy of SLE to reduce secondary complications, frequent patient monitoring, and continued treatment of the underlying autoimmune disorder in patients with AVWS.

How do we transfuse blood components in cirrhotic patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures?

The liver plays a pivotal role in hemostasis. Consequently, patients with cirrhosis frequently demonstrate abnormal coagulation profiles on routine laboratory tests. These tests mainly reflect decreased procoagulant proteins. However, in cirrhosis, complex changes also occur in anticoagulant and fibrinolytic pathways. Recent evidence demonstrates that patients with cirrhosis exist in a state of hemostatic rebalance. Accordingly, routine tests inadequately represent hemostatic alterations in these patients. Unfortunately, these tests are regularly used to guide the transfusion of blood components with the assumption that they will correct laboratory abnormalities and improve hemostasis in a bleeding patient or prevent excessive bleeding following a procedure. With an absence of both accurate laboratory testing to assess hemostasis and evidence-based guidelines to direct the transfusion of blood components, management of patients with cirrhosis poses a significant challenge to clinicians. Therefore, we developed multidisciplinary guidelines for the periprocedural transfusion of blood components in patients with cirrhosis based on concurrent evidence and personal experience at our medical center.

Transfusion management of factor V deficiency: three case reports and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Factor V (FV) deficiency may be inherited as an autosomal recessive disease or acquired as a result of autoantibody formation, either spontaneously or secondary to exposure to bovine thrombin or medications. Congenital FV deficiency has traditionally been treated with plasma transfusions. However, recent evidence has suggested that platelet (PLT) transfusions may be a better alternative as FV stored within PLT alpha granules has greater procoagulant potential and is released locally at sites of vascular injury. We report three cases of FV deficiency, one congenital and two acquired, and emphasize the different management approaches. CASE REPORTS: Patient 1 was a 30-year-old man with congenital FV deficiency who presented with a trauma-induced hematoma of his lower extremity. He was treated with 5 PLT units over 48 hours. Patient 2 was a 64-year-old woman who presented with an upper-extremity thrombus and was discovered to have a FV inhibitor, likely secondary to antibiotics. Patient 3 was a 75-year-old woman with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who presented with minor ecchymosis and was found to have a FV inhibitor secondary to either HCV or antibiotic exposure. Corticosteroids alone were able to eradicate the inhibitors in both patients with acquired inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: FV deficiency can present with a diverse range of symptoms. For bleeding patients, PLT transfusions should be the initial therapy. In patients with thrombosis, the risks and benefits of anticoagulation must be carefully assessed before treatment. For patients with minor bleeds, transfusions may be withheld, and elimination of the inhibitor should be the primary objective.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for hypertriglyceridemia induced pancreatitis: A rapid and practical approach.

OBJECTIVES: Acute hypertriglyceridemia induced pancreatitis (HTP) presents with a more severe clinical course compared to other etiologies of pancreatitis. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a potential treatment option for lowering plasma triglycerides and possibly decreasing morbidity and mortality. However, clinical data regarding its effectiveness are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical data and outcomes of 13 consecutive episodes of HTP in which TPE was employed to reduce plasma triglycerides during a 15-month period. RESULTS: The TPE was initiated at a median of 19 hours from the time of presentation. We performed 1.2-1.5 volume TPEs with 5% albumin as the replacement fluid. After only one TPE procedure, the mean plasma triglycerides values decreased from 2993 mg/dl to 487 mg/dl with a reduction of 84%. All 13 patients survived with a mean length of hospital stay of 9.5 days. There were no complications related to TPE. CONCLUSIONS: One TPE procedure is an effective method for reducing plasma triglycerides and possibly decreases the length of hospital stay in patients admitted with HTP.

Ischemic stroke in a patient with moderate to severe inherited factor VII deficiency.

Thrombosis is known to occur in patients with rare inherited bleeding disorders, usually in the presence of a thrombotic risk factor such as surgery and/or factor replacement therapy, but sometimes spontaneously. We present the case of a 72-year-old African American male diagnosed with congenital factor VII (FVII) deficiency after presenting with ischemic stroke, presumably embolic, in the setting of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis. The patient had an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 at presentation, with FVII activity of 6% and normal Extem clotting time in rotational thromboelastometry. He was treated with aspirin (325 mg daily) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) with no additional bleeding or thrombotic complications throughout his admission. This case provides further evidence that moderate to severe FVII deficiency does not protect against thrombosis.

A clinical audit of thrombophilia testing in pediatric patients with acute thromboembolic events: impact on management.

Routine testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilia defects is frequently performed in pediatric patients with thromboembolic events (TEEs). No consensus guidelines exist regarding the timing of testing or the type of patients to be tested. The primary objective of our study, therefore, was to determine whether thrombophilia testing during the acute TEE setting affected clinical management in pediatric patients. A secondary aim included estimation of potential harm from thrombophilia testing. We retrospectively reviewed data on all pediatric patients diagnosed with a TEE during a 1-year period. Fifty-two (51%) of 102 patients with a TEE underwent thrombophilia testing during the acute phase, with 26 patients (50%) having a positive test result during the acute phase. Only 12% of patients tested were confirmed to have a thrombophilia eventually, yielding a false-positive rate of ∼7% for testing when performed in the acute setting. There were no changes to the acute management, regardless of a positive or negative result. Testing resulted in unnecessary blood loss in 12 patients younger than 1 year and acute testing cost approximately $82 000. Our data show that thrombophilia testing during acute TEEs in pediatric patients did not impact clinical management. There is also a potential for false-positive tests leading to unnecessary long-term anticoagulation. These findings suggest against thrombophilia testing during acute TEE setting in children.

Analysis of Thrombophilia Test Ordering Practices at an Academic Center: A Proposal for Appropriate Testing to Reduce Harm and Cost.

Ideally, thrombophilia testing should be tailored to the type of thrombotic event without the influence of anticoagulation therapy or acute phase effects which can give false positive results that may result in long term anticoagulation. However, thrombophilia testing is often performed routinely in unselected patients. We analyzed all consecutive thrombophilia testing orders during the months of October and November 2009 at an academic teaching institution. Information was extracted from electronic medical records for the following: indication, timing, comprehensiveness of tests, anticoagulation therapy at the time of testing, and confirmatory repeat testing, if any. Based on the findings of this analysis, we established local guidelines in May 2013 for appropriate thrombophilia testing, primarily to prevent testing during the acute thrombotic event or while the patient is on anticoagulation. We then evaluated ordering practices 22 months after guideline implementation. One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the study. Only 34% (58/173) had appropriate indications (unprovoked venous or arterial thrombosis or pregnancy losses). 51% (61/119) with an index clinical event were tested within one week of the event. Although 46% (79/173) were found to have abnormal results, only 46% of these had the abnormal tests repeated for confirmation with 54% potentially carrying a wrong diagnosis with long term anticoagulation. Twenty-two months after guideline implementation, there was an 84% reduction in ordered tests. Thus, this study revealed that a significant proportion of thrombophilia testing was inappropriately performed. We implemented local guidelines for thrombophilia testing for clinicians, resulting in a reduction in healthcare costs and improved patient care.