RESUMEN
This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of colistin used in combination therapy for treating nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens in pediatric patients. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years consecutively hospitalized with healthcare-associated bloodstream infections necessitating the administration of intravenous colistin at Dr. Sami Ulus Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in the study. Patient-specific detailed clinical information, prognoses, and laboratory findings on days 1, 3, and 7 of colistin treatment were obtained from medical records. The study included 45 pediatric patients receiving intravenous colistin; 26 (57.8%) were male and 19 (42.2%) were female, with a median age of 18 months. While the clinical response was observed at 82.2% and microbiological response at 91.1% with colistin treatment, two patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects without assessing treatment response. The most common adverse effect associated with the use of colistin was nephrotoxicity, which occurred in eight patients (17.8%). Among these patients, only one had pre-existing chronic kidney failure. Conclusion: Colistin used in combination therapy may be effective and safe for treating nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria in pediatric patients, who often have high mortality rates and limited treatment options. What is Known: ⢠Colistin is an antibacterial agent used in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and is associated with significant adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. ⢠The increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections has led to the expanded use of colistin in clinical practice. What is New: ⢠The study demonstrates a high clinical and microbiological response rate to combination therapy with colistin in the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. ⢠The study highlights the importance of monitoring nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients receiving colistin, showing that these effects can be reversible after treatment cessation.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Colistina , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) is a crucial agent in the treatment of invasive fungal diseases caused by a wide variety of yeasts and molds. In the presence of an infection caused by a fungal agent resistant to alternative antifungal drugs, desensitization may be the only option to continue treatment. However, there is insufficient information and consensus with regard to amphotericin B desensitization protocols in the pediatric age group. Objective: We present our experience with five cases of patients in whom successful desensitization protocols were applied with LAMB, along with a review of the literature on pediatric cases. We also provide a sample desensitization protocol that we successfully applied. Methods: Pediatric patients who continued their treatment with the successful rapid desensitization protocol conducted at the Paediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic of the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between September 2019 and September 2023 were examined. Desensitization protocols were applied based on Castells' desensitization protocol. Results: Five patients ages between 5 and 12 years were referred to us due to the development of anaphylaxis during their treatment with LAMB. Anaphylaxis is diagnosed clinically, according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines: anaphylaxis (2021 update). A 16-step desensitization protocol was prepared by using LAMB solutions at four different dilutions (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/mL). Each solution consisted of four steps, with a 15-minute infusion for each step. The patients were premedicated with 1 mg/kg/dose methylprednisolone and an antihistamine. Conclusion: The data we present on the successful application of a sample protocol to five cases, particularly in a pediatric setting, are noteworthy valuable contributions to the field, which demonstrates the feasibility and success of rapid desensitization with LAMB in pediatric patients. This can provide important insights and potentially serve as a reference for medical professionals working with similar cases in the future.