Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Hematol ; 93(1): 89-98, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135804

RESUMEN

Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown synergistic preclinical anti-myeloma activity when combined with other agents, recently exhibiting synergy with the alkylating agent melphalan (Sanchez et al., Leuk Res 35(3):373-379, 2011). This phase 1/2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of panobinostat in combination with melphalan for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. There were four different trial treatment schedules due to tolerability issues, with the final treatment schedule (treatment schedule D) consisting of panobinostat (15 or 20 mg) and melphalan (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg), both administered on days 1, 3, and 5 of a 28-day cycle. A total of 40 patients were enrolled; 3 in treatment schedule A, 9 in schedule B, 7 in schedule C, and finally 21 schedule D. Patients had been treated with a median of four regimens (range, 1-16) and two prior bortezomib-containing regimens (range, 0-9). Maximum-tolerated dose was established at 20 mg panobinostat and 0.05 mg/kg melphalan in treatment schedule D. Overall, 3 patients (7.5 %) achieved ≥partial response (two very good PRs and one PR) while 23 exhibited stable disease and 14 showed progressive disease. All three responders were enrolled in cohort 2 of treatment schedule B (panobinostat 20 mg thrice weekly continuously with melphalan 0.05 mg/kg on days 1, 3, and 5). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were common, with 30.8 and 23.1 % of patients exhibiting ≥grade 3, respectively. Panobinostat + melphalan appears to have tolerability issues in a dosing regimen capable of producing a response. Care must be taken to balance tolerability and efficacy with this combination.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Hematológicas/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/efectos adversos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Infecciones/etiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Panobinostat , Recurrencia , Terapia Recuperativa
2.
Cancer Med ; 5(12): 3445-3453, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27882724

RESUMEN

Data on efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa (DA) administered at hemoglobin (Hb) ≤10 g/dL are limited. In this analysis, we examined DA's efficacy and safety in patients with Stage IV cancers and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) initiated on DA at Hb ≤10 g/dL. Data for patients with Stage IV cancers and CIA and who initiated DA at Hb ≤10 g/dL were extracted from three phase 3 trials identified in a central database of Amgen-sponsored DA studies in CIA. Efficacy outcomes were assessed by achievement of Hb increases of ≥1 g/dL and ≥2 g/dL and red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion requirements. Data were analyzed for all patients with baseline Hb ≤10 g/dL, and by the subgroups of patients with baseline Hb ≥9 to ≤10 g/dL versus <9 g/dL. Crude and Kaplan-Meier proportions of patients who experienced each outcome and time (days) to each outcome were summarized by treatment. Meta-analysis (fixed-effects inverse-variance model) was performed to compare outcomes for DA versus placebo. Safety was assessed by occurrence of adverse events. Data from 213 patients were analyzed: DA, n = 115; placebo, n = 98. More patients in the DA versus the placebo subgroup achieved Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL (72% vs. 36%; HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.95, 4.39) and ≥2 g/dL (44% vs. 18%; HR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.71, 5.21) during the first 12 treatment weeks. Median times to Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL and ≥2 g/dL were 36 days and 78 days for DA, respectively. RBC or whole blood transfusions were less common in patients in the DA versus the placebo subgroup (24% vs. 45%; HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.73). No new safety issues were reported. Our results confirm that DA use in patients with Stage IV cancer and CIA is more effective than placebo at increasing Hb levels and at reducing transfusion needs when DA treatment is initiated at Hb ≤10 g/dL.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia/etiología , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/diagnóstico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Darbepoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Darbepoetina alfa/efectos adversos , Índices de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA