Postoperative ileus after digestive surgery: Network meta-analysis of pharmacological intervention.

AIMS: Several medicinal treatments for avoiding postoperative ileus (POI) after abdominal surgery have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different treatments on ileus outcome measures. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify RCTs comparing treatments for POI following abdominal surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Direct and indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 38 RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis reporting on 6371 patients. Our network meta-analysis shows that prokinetics significantly reduce the duration of first gas (mean difference [MD] = 16 h; credible interval -30, -3.1; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 0.418), duration of first bowel movements (MD = 25 h; credible interval -39, -11; SUCRA 0.25) and duration of postoperative hospitalization (MD -1.9 h; credible interval -3.8, -0.040; SUCRA 0.34). Opioid antagonists are the only treatment that significantly improve the duration of food recovery (MD -19 h; credible interval -26, -14; SUCRA 0.163). CONCLUSION: Based on our meta-analysis, the 2 most consistent pharmacological treatments able to effectively reduce POI after abdominal surgery are prokinetics and opioid antagonists. The absence of clear superiority of 1 treatment over another highlights the limits of the pharmacological principles available.

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery has been associated with encouraging survival results in some patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were eligible for complete macroscopic resection. We aimed to assess the specific benefit of adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 17 cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had histologically proven colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases, WHO performance status of 0 or 1, a Peritoneal Cancer Index of 25 or less, and were eligible to receive systemic chemotherapy for 6 months (ie, they had adequate organ function and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks). Patients in whom complete macroscopic resection or surgical resection with less than 1 mm residual tumour tissue was completed were randomly assigned (1:1) to cytoreductive surgery with or without oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation, and stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction, number of previous systemic chemotherapy lines, and timing of protocol-mandated systemic chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was administered by the closed (360 mg/m2) or open (460 mg/m2) abdomen techniques, and systemic chemotherapy (400 mg/m2 fluorouracil and 20 mg/m2 folinic acid) was delivered intravenously 20 min before HIPEC. All individuals received systemic chemotherapy (of investigators' choosing) with or without targeted therapy before or after surgery, or both. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received surgery. This trial is registed with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00769405, and is now completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2008, and Jan 6, 2014, 265 patients were included and randomly assigned, 133 to the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 132 to the cytoreductive surgery alone group. After median follow-up of 63·8 months (IQR 53·0-77·1), median overall survival was 41·7 months (95% CI 36·2-53·8) in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 41·2 months (35·1-49·7) in the cytoreductive surgery group (hazard ratio 1·00 [95·37% CI 0·63-1·58]; stratified log-rank p=0·99). At 30 days, two (2%) treatment-related deaths had occurred in each group.. Grade 3 or worse adverse events at 30 days were similar in frequency between groups (56 [42%] of 133 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group vs 42 [32%] of 132 patients in the cytoreductive surgery group; p=0·083); however, at 60 days, grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group (34 [26%] of 131 vs 20 [15%] of 130; p=0·035). INTERPRETATION: Considering the absence of an overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery and more frequent postoperative late complications with this combination, our data suggest that cytoreductive surgery alone should be the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal metastases. FUNDING: Institut National du Cancer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique du Cancer, Ligue Contre le Cancer.

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Pelvic Perineal Reconstruction by Perineal Colostomy and Malone Procedure After Abdominoperineal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection is the standard curative surgical technique for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal after chemoradiotherapy. However, it requires a definitive abdominal colostomy that modifies the body appearance. OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to evaluate the combination of abdominoperineal resection with perineal colostomy reconstruction and Malone antegrade continence enema. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Toulouse Hospital Digestive Surgery Department. PATIENTS: All of the patients with advanced adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent abdominoperineal resection with perineal colostomy reconstruction and Malone antegrade continence enema (n = 80) between December 1999 and December 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the 5-year overall survival rate. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival was 74.89% (95% CI, 62.91%-83.50%), and the median recurrence-free survival was 107.6 months (95% CI, 65.1-198.1 mo). The median follow-up was 91.0 months (95% CI, 70.4-116.6 mo). R0 resection was obtained in 64 patients (80.0%). The median Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (to assess the functional outcomes) was 9.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-18.0), and it was lower in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma than with squamous cell carcinoma (7.0 (interquartile range, 2.0-18.0) vs 11.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-17.0); p = 0.01). Eleven patients (13.8%) reported perineal stains during the night, and 19 patients (23.8%) needed drugs to reduce colon motility. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo >II) was 11.7% (n = 9). Definitive colostomy was performed in 15 patients (18.8%). LIMITATIONS: This retrospective study included a small number of patients from a single center. Moreover, the functional outcome was tested with self-report questionnaires (risk of response bias). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that abdominoperineal resection associated with perineal reconstruction by perineal colostomy and Malone antegrade continence enema is safe and may improve patient quality of life. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B629. RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS Y FUNCIONALES DE LA RECONSTRUCCIN PLVIPERINEAL MEDIANTE COLOSTOMA PERINEAL Y PROCEDIMIENTO DE MALONE DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN ABDOMINOPERINEAL: ANTECEDENTES:La resección abdominoperineal es la técnica quirúrgica curativa estándar para el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma localmente avanzado del recto inferior y el carcinoma a células escamosas del canal anal, después de radio-quimioterapia. Sin embargo, requiere una colostomía abdominal definitiva que modifica la apariencia corporal.OBJETIVO:El propósito del presente estudio fue el evaluar la combinación de la resección abdominoperineal con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Servicio de Cirugía Digestiva del Hospital de Toulouse, Francia.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con adenocarcinoma avanzado o carcinoma de células escamosas que se sometieron a resección abdominoperineal con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone (n = 80) entre diciembre de 1999 y diciembre de 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El principal resultado fue la tasa de sobrevida global a 5 años.RESULTADOS:La sobrevida global a 5 años fue de 74,89% (IC del 95%, 62,91 a 83,50) y la mediana de supervivencia libre de recurrencia fue de 107,6 meses (IC del 95%, 65,1 a 198,1). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 91,0 meses (IC del 95%, 70,4-116,6). La resección R0 se obtuvo en 64 pacientes (80,0%). La mediana de puntuación de la escala de incontinencia de la Cleveland Clinic (para evaluar los resultados funcionales) fue de 9,0 [1,0; 18,0], y fue menor en pacientes con adenocarcinoma avanzado que con carcinoma de células escamosas (7,0 [2,0; 18,0] versus 11,0 [1,0; 17,0]; p = 0,01). Once pacientes (13,8%) refirieron manchado perineal nocurno y 19 pacientes (23,8%) necesitaron fármacos para reducir la motilidad del colon. La tasa de complicaciones graves (Clavien-Dindo > II) fue del 11,7% (n = 9). Se realizó colostomía definitiva en 15 (18,8%) pacientes.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó un pequeño número de pacientes y de un solo centro. Además, el resultado funcional se probó con cuestionarios de autoinforme (riesgo de sesgo de respuesta).CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio sugiere que la resección abdominoperineal asociada con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone es segura y puede mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B629.

Second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus surveillance in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases (PROPHYLOCHIP-PRODIGE 15): a randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases at an early stage, before the onset of signs, could improve patient survival. We aimed to compare the survival benefit of systematic second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with surveillance, in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study in 23 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had a primary colorectal cancer with synchronous and localised colorectal peritoneal metastases removed during tumour resection, resected ovarian metastases, or a perforated tumour. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to surveillance or second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC (oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2, or oxaliplatin 300 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2, plus intravenous fluorouracil 400 mg/m2), or mitomycin-HIPEC (mitomycin 35 mg/m2) alone in case of neuropathy, after 6 months of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with no signs of disease recurrence. Randomisation was done via a web-based system, with stratification by treatment centre, nodal status, and risk factors for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Second-look surgery consisted of a complete exploration of the abdominal cavity via xyphopubic incision, and resection of all peritoneal implants if resectable. Surveillance after resection of colorectal cancer was done according to the French Guidelines. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to peritoneal or distant disease recurrence, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, analysed by intention to treat. Surgical complications were assessed in the second-look surgery group only. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01226394. FINDINGS: Between June 11, 2010, and March 31, 2015, 150 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to a treatment group (75 per group). After a median follow-up of 50·8 months (IQR 47·0-54·8), 3-year disease-free survival was 53% (95% CI 41-64) in the surveillance group versus 44% (33-56) in the second-look surgery group (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·61-1·56). No treatment-related deaths were reported. 29 (41%) of 71 patients in the second-look surgery group had grade 3-4 complications. The most common grade 3-4 complications were intra-abdominal adverse events (haemorrhage, digestive leakage) in 12 (23%) of 71 patients and haematological adverse events in 13 (18%) of 71 patients. INTERPRETATION: Systematic second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC did not improve disease-free survival compared with standard surveillance. Currently, essential surveillance of patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases appears to be adequate and effective in terms of survival outcomes. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute.

Synchronous liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: different strategies for curative treatment?

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with resectable hepatic metastases (HMs) and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is not currently standardised. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and hepatic surgery for patients with CRPC with synchronous hepatic metastases (HM), and its impact on survival rates. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, including patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPC from 2007 to September 2016 in two groups, with (HM+) and without (HM-) synchronous hepatic metastases. Patients with extra-abdominal metastases were excluded. The hepatic strategy was described. Morbimortality and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRPC with or without hepatic surgery with curative intent: 33 patients with (HM+) and 76 patients without (HM-) synchronous HM. The median follow-up was 30 months. All patients with HM (HM+) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. 88.1% in the HM- group (p = 0.04) associated with monoclonal antibody in 66.6% of cases in the HM+ group vs. 57% in the HM- group (p = 0.01). In the HM+ group, two steps were implemented to treat peritoneal and hepatic metastases in 15 patients (45%). In this group, planned hepatic resection in two procedures was performed for eight patients, all presenting bilobar HM. Postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups. No deaths occurred. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 31 and 65 months (p = 0.188), versus 21 and 24 months (p = 0.119), respectively, in the HM+ versus HM- groups. In multivariate analysis, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was the only significant prognostic factor whereas synchronous HM was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Curative surgical treatment for CRPC with synchronous HM seems to be feasible and safe, and could facilitate long survival rates, compared to patients without HM. The hepatic strategy is not standardised. However, a "two-step" surgical strategy could be proposed in order to reduce postoperative morbidity rates.

Survival analysis and prognostic factors of retroperitoneal liposarcoma curative surgery in a single centre. Analysis of adjacent organ invasion between imaging and definitive histopathology.

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPL) is a rare primary mesenchymal tumour that develops in retroperitoneal adipose tissue. Unlike the majority of published series, this homogeneous cohort focuses on RPL. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall and recurrence-free survival of RPLs who underwent excision surgery and the prognostic factors involved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 82 patients from a single centre, who underwent curative surgery for histologically confirmed retroperitoneal liposarcoma between 2008 and 2020, were analysed in the study. Compartmental surgical excision was advised as per the guidelines. The primary endpoints were 5 years of overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Predictable tumour invasion of adjacent organs, based on a pre-operative CT scan, was also investigated to test the correlation between pre-operative imaging and pathological data. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 61.6 months. Five year overall survival was 71.9% [95% CI: 59.8; 80.9] and 5 year recurrence-free survival was 49% [95% CI: 36.4; 60.5]. Following multivariable analysis, the factors influencing overall survival were tumour rupture and onset of severe complications (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥3). Factors influencing recurrence-free survival were neoadjuvant radiotherapy and tumour rupture. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was found between predicted invasion based on a CT scan of the colon, spleen, adrenal gland, posterior abdominal wall and diaphragm, and pathological invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Curative compartmental surgery remains the gold standard treatment for RPL. This study, highlights the fact that the quality of the surgical excision is a crucial factor in patient prognosis.

Randomised clinical trial for the cost-utility evaluation of two strategies of perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection in the context of anorectal carcinoma: biological mesh repair versus primary perineal wound closure, study protocol for the GRECCAR 9 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominoperineal resections performed for anorectal tumours leave a large pelvic and perineal defect causing a high rate of morbidity of the perineal wound (40%-60%). Biological meshes offer possibilities for new standards of perineal wound reconstruction. Perineal fillings with biological mesh are expected to increase quality of life by reducing perineal morbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised and single-blinded study with a blinded endpoint evaluation, the experimental arm of which uses a biological mesh and the control arm of which is defined by the primary closure after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Patients eligible for inclusion are patients with a proven history of rectal adenocarcinoma and anal canal epidermoid carcinoma for whom abdominoperineal resection was indicated after a multidisciplinary team discussion. All patients must have social security insurance or equivalent social protection. The main objective is to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of two strategies of perineal closure after an abdominoperineal resection performed for anorectal cancer treatment: perineal filling with biological mesh versus primary perineal closure (70 patient in each arm). The secondary objectives focus on quality of life and morbidity data during a 1-year follow-up. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be performed in order to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the ICUR. CIs will be constructed using the non-parametric bootstrap approach. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve will be built so as to estimate the probability of efficiency of the biological meshes given a collective willingness-to-pay threshold. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board of 'Nord Ouest 1' (protocol reference number: 20.05.14.60714; national number: 2020-A01169-30).The results will be disseminated through conventional scientific channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02841293).

Perineal Wound Closure Following Abdominoperineal Resection and Pelvic Exenteration for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic exenteration (PE) for the treatment of cancer require extensive pelvic resection with a high rate of postoperative complications. The objective of this work was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAMf) and mesh closure on perineal morbidity following APR and PE (mainly for anal and rectal cancers). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE for eligible studies as of the year 2000. After data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed to compare perineal wound morbidity. The studies were distributed as follows: Group A comparing primary closure (PC) and VRAMf, Group B comparing PC and mesh closure, and Group C comparing PC and VRAMf in PE. RESULTS: Our systematic review yielded 18 eligible studies involving 2180 patients (1206 primary closures, 647 flap closures, 327 mesh closures). The meta-analysis of Groups A and B showed PC to be associated with an increase in the rate of total (Group A: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.71; p < 0.01/Group B: OR 0.54, CI 0.17-1.68; p = 0.18) and major perineal wound complications (Group A: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68; p < 0.001/Group B: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.17; p < 0.01). PC was associated with a decrease in total (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.39-4.35; p < 0.01) and major (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.90-3.08; p = 0.1) perineal complications in Group C. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the contribution of the VRAMf in reducing major complications in APR. Similarly, biological prostheses offer an interesting alternative in pelvic reconstruction. For PE, an adapted reconstruction must be proposed with specialized expertise.

[Surgical treatment of recurrent locoregional rectal cancer]. / Traitement chirurgical des récidives locorégionales du cancer du rectum.

Local recurrence (LR) after curative surgery for rectal cancer occurs in 4 to 33% of cases especially if surgery is sub-optimal (without total excision of the mesorectum). In many cases, diagnosis of LR is made at a late stage because of the high rate of asymptomatic patients, 56% in the experience of the Mayo Clinic. MRI and PETscan are most effective for assessing local and general extension, with a high diagnostic accuracy. Surgical treatment alone or with radiation (preoperative and/or intraoperative) is the only curative treatment of LR with R0 resectability rates of 30% to 45%. Morbidity and mortality rates are high, especially for total exenteration and abdomino-sacral resection. After curative surgery, 5-year global survival is between 30% and 40%. Palliative resection of macroscopic residues is not recommended. Careful patient selection for curative surgery is the best way to optimize treatment in these cases.

Pelvic exenterations for specific extraluminal recurrences in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?: a single-center review of patients with extraluminal pelvic recurrence for rectal cancer from March 2004 to November 2010.

BACKGROUND: The benefits in terms of curative resection and survival of pelvic exenterations for specific extraluminal pelvic recurrences from rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision were assessed. METHODS: We conducted a single-center review of patients with extraluminal pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer between March 2004 and November 2010. Twenty-seven pelvic exenterations (13 posterior and 14 total) were performed. Independent predicative factors such as age, sex, local control on first surgery, pelvic sidewall excision, initial International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging, sphincter-preserving resection at first surgery, tumor presentation on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (pelvis sidewall involvement, number of fixation sites, ureteral involvement), local disease-free interval, previous symptoms, and postoperative treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: No operative mortality was noted in this series. Overall morbidity rate was 74%; 22% of the patients developed severe complications. Complete surgical clearance (R0) was obtained in 63% of the patients. The rate of R0 resections was lower in total pelvic exenteration (57%) than in posterior pelvic exenteration (69%). Three years overall survival and disease-free survival were 76% and 59%, respectively. Curative resection (R0) was the only independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = .0016) and disease-free survival (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Pelvic exenterations for extraluminal pelvic recurrences from rectal cancer afford a high R0 resection rate with acceptable morbidity.

Laparoscopic exclusion of a splenic artery aneurysm--a case report.

Splenic artery aneurysm is a rare but serious vascular disease. The mortality risk is 36% when one is ruptured. Surgical therapy has traditionally consisted in resection through a laparotomy. The authors' experience of a case of laparoscopic exclusion of a splenic artery aneurysm is reported. This surgical approach is simple, safe, and minimally invasive. This procedure should increase the indication for surgical treatment of a splenic artery aneurysm.

[Periampullar gangliocytic paraganglioma resected by surgical ampullectomy: a case report]. / Paragangliome gangliocytique péri-ampullaire traité par ampullectomie chirurgicale.

We report the case of a 40-Year-old woman with duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma of the ampulla of Vater. Preoperative diagnosis was periampullar tumor. Final diagnosis of duodenal gangliocytic paragangioma of the ampulla of Vater with negative margins was made by histological and immunohistochemical study of surgical ampullectomy specimen. This case report stresses the yield of immunohostochemical study in the diagnosis of duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma, a rare entity.

Recurrence risk after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy for cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the profile of tumor recurrence for patients operated on for cancer of oesophagogastric junction or oesophagus by Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing potentially curative Ivor-Lewis oesophageal resection between January 1999 to December 2008 at a single center institution were retrospectively analyzed. Their clinical records, details of surgical procedure, postoperative course, pathological findings, recurrence and long term survival were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were analyzed. Fifty three patients (44%) presented recurrence during median follow-up of 58 months. Five-year relapse free survival (RFS) rate was 51% (95%CI = [46; 65%]). On multivariate analysis, pT stage > 2 (HR = 2.42, 95%CI = [1.22; 4.79] p = 0.011), positive lymph node status (HR = 3.69; 95% CI = [1.53; 8.96] p = 0.004) and lymph node ratio > 0.2 (HR = 2.57; 95%CI = [1.38; 4.76] p = 0.003) were associated with a poorer RFS and their combination was correlated to relapse risk. Moreover, preoperative tumor stenosis was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence (HR = 3.46; 95% CI = [1.38; 8.70] p = 0.008) whereas poor or undifferentiated tumor was associated with an increased risk of distant recurrence (HR = 3.32; 95% CI = [1.03; 10.04] p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: pT stage > 2, positive lymph node status and lymph node ratio > 0.2 are independent prognostic factors of recurrence after Ivor-Lewis surgery for cancer. Their combination is correlated with an increasing risk of recurrence that may argue favorably, in addition with preoperative tumor stenosis assessment, for adjuvant treatment or reinforced follow-up.

Simplified identification of Lynch syndrome: a prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Recommended strategies to screen for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer are not applied in daily practice and most of Lynch cases remain undiagnosed. AIMS: We investigated in routine conditions a strategy that uses simplified clinical criteria plus detection of MisMatch Repair deficiency in tumours to identify Lynch carriers. METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients that met at least one of three clinical criteria were included: (1) colorectal cancer before 50 years, (2) personal history of colorectal or endometrial cancer, (3) first-degree relative history of colorectal or endometrial cancer. All tumours underwent an MisMatch Repair test combining microsatellite instability analysis and MisMatch Repair immunohistochemistry. Patients with an MisMatch Repair-deficient tumour were offered germline testing. RESULTS: Of the 307 patients fulfilling the clinical criteria, 46 (15%) had a MisMatch Repair-deficient tumour. Amongst them 27 were identified as Lynch carriers (20 with germline mutation: 12 MLH1, 7 MSH2, 1 MSH6; 7 highly suspected cases despite failure of genetic testing). The simplified clinical criteria selected a population whose MisMatch Repair-deficient status was highly predictive (59%) of Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSION: This bio-clinical strategy based on simplified clinical criteria combined with an MisMatch Repair test efficiently detected LS cases and is easy to use in clinical practice, outside expert centres.

Malone antegrade colonic irrigation: ileal neoappendicostomy is the preferred procedure in adults.

BACKGROUND: Antegrade colonic enema, via a caecal access [Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE)], is proposed to selected patients suffering from incontinence and/or constipation when other therapeutic modalities have failed. METHODS: We compared complication rates after three MACE techniques: appendicostomy, caecal neoappendicostomy, and ileal neoappendicostomy in 28 adult patients having 31 MACE operations. RESULTS: Stenoses and leakages occurred more frequently after appendicostomy and caecal flap than after ileal neoappendicostomy. This latter technique appears to reduce morbidity for adult patients.

Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy alone or with combined chemotherapy is the first therapeutic option for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Failure of this conservative treatment may benefit of salvage abdominoperineal resection. This study was designed to analyze postoperative outcome and oncologic results in a single anticancer institution. METHODS: Medical charts of 36 patients (median age, 57.9 years) who underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment between 1987 and 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 15 patients treated for immediate failure (Group I) and 21 patients for recurrence (Group II). Twenty-two patients have undergone primary use of flap reconstruction of the perineal wound. There were ten rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, nine omental flaps, two gracilis muscular flaps, and one combined flap. RESULTS: There was no postoperative mortality. Median follow-up was 67 (range, 15-155) months. Primary closure of the perineum was obtained in 33 patients (92 percent). Secondary wound breakdown occurred in 23 of 33 patients (70 percent). Complications unrelated to the perineal wound occurred in 13 patients. The overall crude five-year survival after salvage abdominoperineal resection was 69.4 percent. The crude five-year survival in Group I and Group II was 60.7 and 71.5 percent respectively (P = 0.28). The crude five-year, disease-free survival in Groups I and II was 31.1 and 48.2 percent respectively (P = 0.10). Twenty-three patients experienced recurrences after salvage abdominoperineal resection (64 percent) with a mean delay of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high incidence of perineal morbidity, salvage abdominoperineal resection for epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal has a high long-term survival rate.