VA Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Home-and Community-Based Placement Post-Hospital Discharge.

This study identifies factors U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) staff perceived to promote or impede home- and community-based services (HCBS) placement post-hospital discharge among Veterans cared for within the VA. Data derive from 35 semi-structured interviews with staff from 12 VA medical centers from around the country. VA staff reported that Veteran's care needs and social and financial resources influence HCBS placement. They also reported prerequisites for successful placement, including housing, unpaid informal care, and non-VA services funded privately and by public programs such as Medicaid and the Older Americans Act. Lack of staffing and failure to offer the specific types of services needed limit referral to and use of HCBS. Budgetary imperatives influence the relative availability of HCBS across VA medical centers. Findings highlight patient-, provider-, and system-level constraints that impede successful placement at home and in the community of Veterans in need of long-term services and supports after hospitalization.

VA staff perceptions of the role of the extended care referral process in home and community-based services versus nursing home use posthospital discharge.

Little is known about how the extended care referral process-its structure and participants-influences Veterans' use of home and community-based services (HCBS) over nursing home care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). This study thus characterizes the extended care referral process within the VHA and its impact on HCBS versus nursing home use at hospital discharge. Data derive from 35 semistructured interviews at 12 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Findings indicate that the referral process is characterized by a commitment by care teams to consider HCBS if possible, varied practice depending on the clinician that most heavily influences care team recommendations, and care team emphasis on respecting Veteran/family preferences even when they are contrary to care team recommendations. Potential modifications include adopting systematic assessment practices; improving Veteran, family, and provider education; and promoting informed selection through shared decision making.

Collaborative capacity and patient-centered care in the Veterans' Health Administration Community Living Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research in acute care settings has shown that collaborative capacity, defined as the way providers collaborate as equal team members, can be improved by the ways in which an organization supports its staff and teams. This observational cross-sectional study examines the association between collaborative capacity and supportive organizational context, supervisory support, and person-centered care in nursing homes to determine if similar relationships exist. METHODS: We adapted the Care Coordination Survey for nursing homes and administered it to clinical staff in 20 VA Community Living Centers. We used random effects models to examine the associations between supportive organizational context, supervisory support, and person-centered care with collaborative capacity outcomes including quality of staff interactions, task independence, and collaborative influence. RESULTS: A total of 723 Community Living Center clinical staff participated in the Care Coordination Survey resulting in a response rate of 29%. We found that teamwork and collaboration-measured as task interdependence, quality of interactions and collaborative influence-did not differ significantly between Community Living Centers but did differ significantly across occupational groups. Moreover, staff members' experiences of teamwork and collaboration were positively associated with supportive organizational context and person-centered care. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that elements of organizational context are important to facilitating collaborative capacity. Additionally, investing in staffing, rewards, and person-centered care may improve teamwork.

Nursing Home Referral Within the Veterans Health Administration: Practice Variation by Payment Source and Facility Type.

Veterans enrolled within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may receive nursing home (NH) care in VHA-operated Community Living Centers (CLCs), State Veterans Homes (SVHs), or community NHs, which may or may not be under contract with the VHA. This study examined VHA staff perceptions of how Veterans' eligibility for VA and other payment impacts NH referrals within VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Thirty-five semistructured interviews were performed with discharge planning and contracting staff from 12 VAMCs from around the country. VA staff highlights the preeminent role that VA priority status played in determining placement in VA-paid NH care. VHA staff reported that Veterans' placement in a CLC, community NH, or SVH was contingent, in part, on potential payment source (VA, Medicare, Medicaid, and other) and anticipated length of stay. They also reported that variation in Veteran referral to VA-paid NH care across VAMCs derived, in part, from differences in local and regional policies and markets. Implications for NH referral within the VHA are drawn.

Staff Perceptions of Key Factors Guiding Nursing Home Search and Selection Within the Veterans Health Administration.

Background and Objectives: Veterans enter nursing homes (NHs) for short-term postacute, rehabilitation, respite, or end-of-life care. They also enter NHs on a long-term basis due to frailty, disability, functional deficits, and cognitive impairment. Little is known about how a particular NH is chosen once the decision to enter a NH has been made. This study identified VA staff perceptions of the key factors influencing the search and selection of NHs within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Research Design and Methods: Data derived from 35 semistructured interviews with discharge planning and contracting staff from 12 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Results: VA staff placed a premium on Veteran and family preferences in the NH selection process, though VA staff knowledge and familiarity with placement options established the general parameters within which NH placement decisions were made. Geographic proximity to Veterans' homes and families was a major factor in NH choice. Other key considerations included Veterans' specialty care needs (psychiatric, postacute, ventilator) and Veteran/facility demographics (age, race/ethnicity, Veteran status). VA staff tried to remain neutral in NH selection, thus instructing families to visit facilities and review publicly available quality data. VA staff report that amenities (private rooms, activities, smoking) and aesthetics (cleanliness, smell, layout, décor) often outweighed objective quality indicators in Veteran and family decision making. Discussion and Implications: Findings suggest that VAMCs facilitate Veteran and family decision making around NH selection. They also suggest that VAMCs endeavor to identify and recruit a broader array of higher quality NHs to better match the specific needs of Veterans and families to the choice set available.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in veterans residing in community living centers: have we gotten better?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of medications classified as inappropriate according to the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) in elderly veterans residing in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes from 2004 to 2009 and to identify participant-specific correlates of use. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study using VA administrative data merged with participant-specific data from the Minimum Data Set. SETTING: VA nursing homes (community living centers (CLCs)). PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 65 and older residing in CLCs at the time of the prescribed medication use (N = 176,168). MEASUREMENTS: The number of exposed veterans aged 65 and older per facility receiving at least one HEDIS high-risk medication was determined. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2009, 28,970 of 176,168 (mean 16.4 ± 9.5%) veterans received at least one HEDIS high-risk medication. Over the period, the number of veterans receiving high-risk medications decreased steadily from 23.9 ± 10.0% in 2004 to 10.0 ± 6.6% in 2009. Nevertheless, large facility variations remained in 2009, with rates from 0% to 44.4%. Certain characteristics were also associated with HEDIS high-risk medication use, including female sex (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.25-2.04), cancer (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.32), renal disease (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.33), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05-1.28), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.22). Protective characteristics included age 75 and older (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90) and having a diagnosis of moderate (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82) or severe (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61-0.85) cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: The use of HEDIS medications among elderly veterans residing in VA nursing homes has markedly improved. Nevertheless, significant variations between facilities and certain subpopulations remain. A low percentage of women at VA CLCs make comparisons with community nursing homes difficult.