An observer tool to enhance learning of medical students during simulation training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Simulation training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is effective but active practice time is limited given the large number of students and the learning effect size remains small. To improve learning during observation, the use of an observer tool (OT) has been advocated. The aim was to assess the value of OT to improve medical students' learning outcomes during CPR simulation training. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study took place during CPR training of medical students. The workshop targeted recognition of unconsciousness, absence of breathing, call for help, cardiac massage and defibrillation. Students practicing in dyads were randomized to use an OT (i.e., a checklist summarizing CPR skills and step-by-step actions) (OT +) or not (OT-) when observing others. At the end of the training, the global performance of the dyad was assessed by an evaluator using the OT checklist (primary outcome). The non-technical skills (NTS), chest compression quality, perceived improvement in knowledge and skills and knowledge score (MCQ) were also recorded. RESULTS: The student dyads were included (OT + : n = 40 and OT-: n = 41). Immediately after training, the global performance was similar between the two groups: OT + : 24 [23-25] and OT-: 23 [21-24] (out of 25), p = 0.052. However, better learning of breathing assessment and cardiac massage performance, as well as a better knowledge score, were found in the OT + group. No significant difference was observed for NTS or perceived improvement in knowledge and skills. Satisfaction was higher in the OT- group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an OT during CPR simulation did not show any pedagogical benefit on the global performance of medical students. However, a potential benefit was found for several important secondary outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these positive results.

An observer tool to enhance learning of incoming anesthesia residents' skills during simulation training of central venous catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion using simulation is an essential skill for anesthesiologists. Simulation training is an effective mean to master this skill. Given the large number of residents and the limited duration of training sessions, the active practice time is limited and residents remain observers of their colleagues for much of the session. To improve learning during observation periods, the use of an observer tool (OT) has been advocated but its educational effectiveness is not well defined. METHODS: Incoming anesthesia residents were randomized to use an OT (i.e. procedural skill-based checklist) (OT+) or not (OT-) when observing other residents during a simulation bootcamp. The primary outcome was a composite score (total 60 points) evaluating CVC procedural skills rated immediately after the training. This score covers theoretical knowledge explored by multiple choice questions (MCQs) (/20), perceived improvement in knowledge and skills (/20), perceived impact on future professional life (/10) and satisfaction (/10). Measurements were repeated 1 month later. Residents in each group recorded the number of CVCs placed and their clinical outcomes (attempts, complications) during the first month of their clinical rotation using a logbook. RESULTS: Immediately after training, the composite score was similar between the two groups: 45.3 ± 4.2 (OT+, n = 49) and 44.4 ± 4.8 (OT-, n = 42) (p = 0.323). Analysis of sub-items also showed no difference. Results at 1 month were not different between groups. Analysis of the logbook showed no difference between groups. No serious complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a procedural task-based OT by incoming anesthesia residents and used during CVC insertion simulation training was not associated with better learning outcomes, neither immediately after the session nor when re-evaluated 1 month later. The training at least once on simulator of all residents could limit the impact of OT. Further studies are necessary to define the place of OT in simulation training.

Extended antibiotic prophylaxis after pancreatoduodenectomy reduces postoperative abdominal infection in high-risk patients: Results from a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative biliary stenting before pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with a greater risk of bacteribilia and thus could lead to more frequent and severe surgical site infections. We hypothesized that an extended antibiotic prophylaxis could reduce the risk of surgical site infections for these high-risk patients compared with standard antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016 were included in a tricentric retrospective cohort and classified according to the risk of surgical site infections (high or low) and the type of antibiotic prophylaxis (standard or extended). Extended antibiotic prophylaxis was defined by the use of high-rank ß-lactams >2 days after surgery. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis concerned all single dose of low-rank ß-lactams antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was postoperative surgical site infections. RESULTS: Three hundred and eight patients were included; 146 (47%) were high-risk patients, and 81 (55%) received extended antibiotic prophylaxis, mostly composed of piperacilline-tazobactam and gentamicin. There were significantly fewer surgical site infections in high-risk patients receiving extended antibiotic prophylaxis versus standard antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio = 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8; P = .011), even after adjusting on age, sex, and duration of the surgical procedure (adjusted odds ratio = 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.7; P = .0071). There was no statistical difference in 28-day mortality (P = .32) or 90-day mortality (P = .13). Microorganisms identified in bile culture were more often sensitive to antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk extended antibiotic prophylaxis group than in high-risk standard antibiotic prophylaxis group (64% versus 38%; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Extended antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infections for high-risk patients with no significant reduction on 28-day mortality. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal duration of extended antibiotic prophylaxis for these patients.

First description of herpes simplex virus type 1 epididymo-orchitis: A new clinical form of herpes simplex virus infection during septic shock?

Genital herpes is increasingly caused by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), but recurrences are less frequent than with HSV-2. Distinguishing between primary genital infection and reactivation can be difficult, but HSV-1 more often causes severe primary infections and fewer recurrences. However, as virus reactivation is common during septic shock, a severe form of HSV-1 reactivation can occur in locations other than the lungs, which remain the most common site. The case of a 79-year-old Caucasian man who presented with HSV-1 epididymo-orchitis after three episodes of severe sepsis or septic shock in the context of acute biliary necrotizing pancreatitis is described. This is the first reported case of HSV-1 epididymo-orchitis due to virus reactivation during sepsis.