Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy versus active symptom control for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-06): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract cancer has a poor prognosis. Cisplatin and gemcitabine is the standard first-line chemotherapy regimen, but no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the benefit derived from second-line FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS: The ABC-06 clinical trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial done in 20 sites with expertise in managing biliary tract cancer across the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had histologically or cytologically verified locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder or ampullary carcinoma) with documented radiological disease progression to first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally to active symptom control (ASC) and FOLFOX or ASC alone. FOLFOX chemotherapy was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, L-folinic acid 175 mg [or folinic acid 350 mg], fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 [bolus], and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h continuous intravenous infusion). Randomisation was done following a minimisation algorithm using platinum sensitivity, serum albumin concentration, and stage as stratification factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is complete and the final results are reported. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01926236, and EudraCT, 2013-001812-30. FINDINGS: Between March 27, 2014, and Jan 4, 2018, 162 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to ASC plus FOLFOX (n=81) or ASC alone (n=81). Median follow-up was 21·7 months (IQR 17·2-30·8). Overall survival was significantly longer in the ASC plus FOLFOX group than in the ASC alone group, with a median overall survival of 6·2 months (95% CI 5·4-7·6) in the ASC plus FOLFOX group versus 5·3 months (4·1-5·8) in the ASC alone group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·69 [95% CI 0·50-0·97]; p=0·031). The overall survival rate in the ASC alone group was 35·5% (95% CI 25·2-46·0) at 6 months and 11·4% (5·6-19·5) at 12 months, compared with 50·6% (39·3-60·9) at 6 months and 25·9% (17·0-35·8) at 12 months in the ASC plus FOLFOX group. Grade 3-5 adverse events were reported in 42 (52%) of 81 patients in the ASC alone group and 56 (69%) of 81 patients in the ASC plus FOLFOX group, including three chemotherapy-related deaths (one each due to infection, acute kidney injury, and febrile neutropenia). The most frequently reported grade 3-5 FOLFOX-related adverse events were neutropenia (ten [12%] patients), fatigue or lethargy (nine [11%] patients), and infection (eight [10%] patients). INTERPRETATION: The addition of FOLFOX to ASC improved median overall survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer after progression on cisplatin and gemcitabine, with a clinically meaningful increase in 6-month and 12-month overall survival rates. To our knowledge, this trial is the first prospective, randomised study providing reliable, high-quality evidence to allow an informed discussion with patients of the potential benefits and risks from second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Based on these findings, FOLFOX should become standard-of-care chemotherapy in second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer and the reference regimen for further clinical trials. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, StandUpToCancer, AMMF (The UK Cholangiocarcinoma Charity), and The Christie Charity, with additional funding from The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation and the Conquer Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award for translational research.

Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The ESPAC-3 trial showed that adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard of care based on similar survival to and less toxicity than adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Other clinical trials have shown better survival and tumour response with gemcitabine and capecitabine than with gemcitabine alone in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We did a phase 3, two-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised clinical trial at 92 hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had undergone complete macroscopic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (R0 or R1 resection). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) within 12 weeks of surgery to receive six cycles of either 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine alone administered once a week for three of every 4 weeks (one cycle) or with 1660 mg/m2 oral capecitabine administered for 21 days followed by 7 days' rest (one cycle). Randomisation was based on a minimisation routine, and country was used as a stratification factor. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Toxicity was analysed in all patients who received trial treatment. This trial was registered with the EudraCT, number 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN, number ISRCTN96397434. FINDINGS: Of 732 patients enrolled, 730 were included in the final analysis. Of these, 366 were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine and 364 to gemcitabine plus capecitabine. The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee requested reporting of the results after there were 458 (95%) of a target of 480 deaths. The median overall survival for patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group was 28·0 months (95% CI 23·5-31·5) compared with 25·5 months (22·7-27·9) in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98], p=0·032). 608 grade 3-4 adverse events were reported by 226 of 359 patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group compared with 481 grade 3-4 adverse events in 196 of 366 patients in the gemcitabine group. INTERPRETATION: The adjuvant combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine should be the new standard of care following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.

Oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and single-center retrospective review.

AIMS: Sorafenib is the only standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but has a low response rate. Leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has a superior response rate versus doxorubicin among Asian sorafenib-naive patients. We aimed to retrospectively review the outcome of 20 consecutive patients treated with FOLFOX at a single European center. MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients had symptomatic disease burdens unlikely to regress with sorafenib or had no proven treatment options (sorafenib-refractory or recurrence post liver transplantation). RESULTS: One sorafenib-refractory patient had a complete response and two liver transplant patients experienced partial responses. Median overall survival was 6.3 months. There was one chemotherapy death due to neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, FOLFOX can induce clinically relevant responses, but needs prospective validation.

Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis. METHODS: TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235. FINDINGS: From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. Maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 250 (74%) of 338 participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 257 (75%) of 342 in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The most common maximum grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (70 [21%] vs 86 [25%]), anaemia (64 [19%] vs 64 [19%]), and neutropenia (63 [19%] vs 68 [20%]). INTERPRETATION: Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed robust and sustained overall survival benefit with no new safety signals. Findings continue to support the regimen as a standard of care for people with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Redefining the R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumour lymph nodal burden and lymph node ratio are the only prognostic factors associated with survival.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of positive nodal disease (LND) and the number of lymph nodes involved (LNB) are known to be significant prognostic markers for resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. In addition, the ratio of the number of involved nodes to the number of nodes resected known as the lymph node ratio (LNR) is emerging as an important prognostic marker. The role of the resection margin (RM) as presently defined (R1 ≤ 1 mm) is unclear as results differ based on the dataset. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nodal disease and a redefined RM on outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of pancreatic head resections for adenocarcinomas from 2003-2009. The RM was re-analysed based on tumour clearance and categorized into: histopathological evidence of a tumour; ≤ 0.5 mm, ≤ 1 mm, ≤ 1.5 mm, or ≤ 2.0 mm of the actual surgical resection margin. The impact of histopathological variables on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed. RESULTS: LND, LNB and LNR were independent prognostic markers for CSS (P = 0.048, 0.003, 0.016) but, did not influence DFS. A LNR < 0.143 was associated with a higher CSS [38.16 ± 4.69 versus 20.59 ± 2.20 months, P = 0.0042, hazard ratio (HR) 3.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-9.23)]. An R1 RM was not associated with CSS or DFS on multivariate analysis, irrespective of the distance. LNB and LNR maintained independent significance irrespective of the size of the RM. CONCLUSION: LNB and LNR are the only prognostic factors for CSS in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, but do not predict recurrence. Microscopic RMs does not seem to influence the outcome even when redefined. Further prospective studies are indicated to substantiate these findings.

Metastatic breast cancer and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance resembling multiple myeloma.

Radiological evidence of lytic bone lesions has a wide differential diagnosis including metastatic bone disease, multiple myeloma, primary bone cancers and infection. Here, we present the case of a woman in her 80s found to have lytic bone lesions associated with an IgA paraproteinaemia who was thus presumed to have a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. However, bone marrow biopsy results were indicative of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. She was subsequently referred to the 'carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) team', and ultimately diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer following a repeat trephine biopsy. A range of conditions may present with lytic bone lesions and these differentials must be suitably investigated even in the presence of paraproteinaemia. Early CUP team involvement is pivotal to ensure appropriate clinical management and patient support.

Clinical experience with pemigatinib for previously treated metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: practical considerations from clinical cases.

The management of advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is challenging. In patients with advanced CCA, gemcitabine/cisplatin combination is the standard frontline chemotherapy, with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens preserved for subsequent lines; however, the expected survival is poor. Pemigatinib was approved for locally advanced or metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangement. Pemigatinib has a manageable safety profile and achieves a durable response. Nearly 50 patients with CCA have been treated with pemigatinib in the United Kingdom. However, clinical experience with pemigatinib is lacking. We present our experience with three clinical cases to illustrate the position of pemigatinib in the management of CCA and related toxicities.

EASL and mRECIST responses are independent prognostic factors for survival in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with transarterial embolization.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Standard RECIST criteria may not be the optimal method to assess response to loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular cancer (HCC). EASL and mRECIST, which measure changes in arterialized tumor, have been proposed. Here we compare the three criteria and their associations with survival. METHODS: Response was determined using RECIST 1.1, EASL, and mRECIST criteria in 83 consecutive patients with HCC undergoing palliative therapy with transarterial (chemo) embolization. Results were compared at the first assessment after therapy. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to explore differences in overall survival between the responders and non-responders defined by each method. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between EASL and mRECIST with overall response rates; 58% and 57%, and target lesion responses; 74% and 73%, respectively. There was a poor correlation with RECIST 1.1 with overall and target response rates of 7%. Overall and target lesion progression rates were similar for all three assessments; 27% and 2% for both EASL and mRECIST and 28% and 6% for RECIST 1.1. There was a significant association between survival and overall EASL and mRECIST responses, which was retained in multivariate analysis. EASL response was associated with a 44% risk reduction and mRECIST with a 42% reduction. There was no significant association between survival for RECIST 1.1 responses or target EASL and mRECIST responses. CONCLUSIONS: When measured at a single, early time point post-therapy, EASL and mRECIST overall response rates are associated with survival and should be used in preference to RECIST 1.1 or target responses.

Development of a Wilms' tumor antigen-specific T-cell receptor for clinical trials: engineered patient's T cells can eliminate autologous leukemia blasts in NOD/SCID mice.

BACKGROUND: The Wilms' tumor antigen (WT1) is an attractive target for immunotherapy of leukemia. In the past, we isolated and characterized the specificity and function of a WT1-specific T-cell receptor. The goal of this translational study was to develop a safe and efficient WT1-T-cell receptor retroviral vector for an adoptive immunotherapy trial with engineered T cells. DESIGN AND METHODS: We generated a panel of retroviral constructs containing unmodified or codon-optimized WT1-T-cell receptor alpha and beta genes, linked via internal ribosome entry sites or 2A sequences, with or without an additional inter-chain disulfide bond in the T-cell receptor constant domains. These constructs were functionally analyzed in vitro, and the best one was tested in an autologous primary leukemia model in vivo. RESULTS: We identified a WT1-T-cell receptor construct that showed optimal tetramer staining, antigen-specific cytokine production and killing activity when introduced into primary human T cells. Fresh CD34(+) cells purified from a patient with leukemia were engrafted into NOD/SCID mice, followed by adoptive immunotherapy with patient's autologous T cells transduced with the WT1-T-cell receptor. This therapeutic treatment evidently decreased leukemia engraftment in mice and resulted in a substantial improvement of leukemia-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that patient's T cells, engineered to express the WT1-T-cell receptor, can eliminate autologous leukemia progenitor cells in an in vivo model. This study provides a firm basis for the planned WT1-T-cell receptor gene therapy trial in leukemia patients.

IL15 can reverse the unresponsiveness of Wilms' tumor antigen-specific CTL in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The Wilms' tumor antigen 1 (WT1) is overexpressed in several leukemias and solid tumors, but there is currently limited information regarding its role in prostate cancer. This study aimed to investigate WT1 expression in prostate cancer, and to determine the number and function of WT1-specific T cells in the peripheral blood of patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Immunohistochemistry was used to assess WT1 expression in cancer tissues. Human leukocyte antigen A2 (HLA-A2) tetramers served to detect WT1-specific T cells, and peptide-specific stimulation was used to assess T-cell function in vitro. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry of tissue arrays comprising 36 cancer and 8 normal prostate samples revealed nuclear WT1 staining in 39% of cancer samples, but not in normal prostate tissues. Tetramer analysis revealed a low frequency of WT1-specific T cells in 20 of 38 HLA-A2-positive patients. In vitro stimulation with WT1 peptide plus interleukin 2(IL2) and interleukin 7 (IL7) did not lead to an accumulation of WT1-specific T cells in any of the patient samples, although all patients were able to generate T-cell responses against Melan-A/MART1 control peptide. Stimulation with WT1 peptide in the presence of interleukin 15 (IL15), a cytokine that was shown to reverse tolerance of murine tumor-specific T cells, was able to restore the expansion and IFNgamma production of WT1-specific T cells in a subgroup of prostate cancer patients. CONCLUSION: The observation that IL15 can restore the function of WT1-specific T cells that were unresponsive to IL2 has implications for vaccination and immunotherapeutic strategies that aim to enhance WT1-specific T cell immunity in patients.

ULBP1 Is Elevated in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Predicts Outcome.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and despite recent immunotherapeutic advances there remains a need for improved diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools. UL-16 binding protein 1 (ULBP1) is a ligand of the activatory receptor Natural Killer cell Group 2 receptor D (NKG2D) and is found as a cell-surface protein on some malignant cells including on human hepatocellular carcinomas. We aimed to explore the biological and clinical significance of NKG2D ligands in the circulation of patients with HCC. We measured ULBP1 in the serum of two retrospective cohorts of patients with HCC from the PROLIFICA cohort in The Gambia (n = 43) and from a tertiary care setting in the UK (n = 72) by sandwich ELISA. Exosome isolation by size exclusion was used to compare ULBP1 concentration in exosomes and as free protein. Survival analysis was performed and multiple linear regression and Poisson regression were used to assess the independent effect of ULBP1 concentration. ULBP1 was raised in both cohorts with HCC regardless of the underlying liver disease, and was not associated with markers of cirrhosis such as platelet count or serum albumin. ULBP1 was present predominantly as free protein rather than bound to exosomes. Serum ULBP1 > 2000 pg/ml was associated with a significantly reduced survival in both cohorts (hazard ratios in Gambian and UK cohorts 2.37 and 2.1, respectively). The effect remained significant after adjustment for BCLC staging (p = 0.03). These data suggest that ULBP1 merits further investigation as a prognostic marker in HCC in diverse settings and should also be explored as a therapeutic target.

Metastatic bone disease from an occult renal primary.

We report a rare presentation of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a 71-year-old man who presented with persistent shoulder pain. MRI revealed widespread lytic lesions within the bones suggestive of metastatic disease but extensive imaging including CT chest, abdomen and pelvis with contrast and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography did not identify a primary cancer. The diagnosis was ultimately made from a targeted bone and subsequently targeted liver biopsy, whereby immunohistochemistry was consistent with metastatic RCC (mRCC). While bone metastases in RCC are very common, it is extremely rare for patients to present with mRCC and no identifiable renal primary.

Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the ESPAC-4 Randomized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial.

Importance: The patterns of disease recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. Objective: To define patterns of recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy and the association with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospectively collected data from the phase 3 European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 4 adjuvant clinical trial, an international multicenter study. The study included 730 patients who had resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Data were analyzed between July 2017 and May 2019. Interventions: Randomization to adjuvant gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus capecitabine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, recurrence, and sites of recurrence. Results: Of the 730 patients, median age was 65 years (range 37-81 years), 414 were men (57%), and 316 were women (43%). The median follow-up time from randomization was 43.2 months (95% CI, 39.7-45.5 months), with overall survival from time of surgery of 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.8-29.9 months) with gemcitabine and 30.2 months (95% CI, 25.8-33.5 months) with the combination (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P = .03). The 5-year survival estimates were 17.1% (95% CI, 11.6%-23.5%) and 28.0% (22.0%-34.3%), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 479 patients (65.6%); another 78 patients (10.7%) died without recurrence. Local recurrence occurred at a median of 11.63 months (95% CI, 10.05-12.19 months), significantly different from those with distant recurrence with a median of 9.49 months (95% CI, 8.44-10.71 months) (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45; P = .04). Following recurrence, the median survival was 9.36 months (95% CI, 8.08-10.48 months) for local recurrence and 8.94 months (95% CI, 7.82-11.17 months) with distant recurrence (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09; P = .27). The median overall survival of patients with distant-only recurrence (23.03 months; 95% CI, 19.55-25.85 months) or local with distant recurrence (23.82 months; 95% CI, 17.48-28.32 months) was not significantly different from those with only local recurrence (24.83 months; 95% CI, 22.96-27.63 months) (P = .85 and P = .35, respectively). Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had a 21% reduction of death following recurrence compared with monotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: There were no significant differences between the time to recurrence and subsequent and overall survival between local and distant recurrence. Pancreatic cancer behaves as a systemic disease requiring effective systemic therapy after resection. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00058201, EudraCT 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN 96397434.

Detection of Wilms' tumor antigen--specific CTL in tumor-draining lymph nodes of patients with early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The Wilms' tumor antigen (WT1) is overexpressed in approximately 90% of breast tumors and, thus, is a potential target antigen for the immunotherapy of breast cancer. We have tested the working hypotheses that WT1 can be immunogenic in patients with breast cancer and can stimulate CTL of sufficient avidity to kill tumor cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paired tumor-draining lymph node and peripheral blood samples were analyzed from five HLA-A2-positive patients with stage I/II breast cancer. Fluorescent HLA-A*0201/WT1 tetramers were used to quantify WT1-specific CTL and the functional capacity of the CTL was assessed using cytotoxicity assays and intracellular cytokine staining. RESULTS: WT1 tetramer-binding T cells expanded from all lymph node samples but none of the corresponding peripheral blood samples. Functional assays were carried out on T cells from the patient who had yielded the highest frequency of HLA-A*0201/WT1 tetramer-positive cells. The cytotoxicity assays showed WT1 peptide--specific killing activity of the CTL, whereas intracellular cytokine staining confirmed that the tetramer--positive T cells produced IFN-gamma after stimulation with WT1 peptide. These WT1-specific T cells killed HLA-A2-positive breast cancer cell lines treated with IFN-gamma but no killing was observed with untreated tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that WT1-specific CTL can be expanded from the tumor-draining lymph nodes of breast cancer patients and that they can display peptide-specific effector function. However, the CTL only killed IFN-gamma-treated tumor targets expressing high levels of HLA-A2 and not tumor cells with low HLA expression. This suggests that induction of autologous WT1-specific CTL may offer only limited tumor protection and that strategies that allow a high level of peptide/MHC complex presentation and/or improve CTL avidity may be required.

Ki-67 index and response to chemotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

Chemotherapy (CT) is widely used for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), but there are no validated biomarkers to predict response. The Ki-67 proliferation index has been proposed as a means of selecting patients for CT, but robust data are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between response to chemotherapy and Ki-67 in NET. We reviewed data from 222 NET patients treated with CT. Tumours were graded according to Ki-67 index: G1 ≤2%, G2 3-20% and G3 >20%. Response was assessed according to RECIST and survival calculated from start of chemotherapy to death. To explore Ki-67 as a marker of response, we calculated the likelihood ratio and performed receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall, 193 patients had a documented Ki-67 index, of which 173 were also evaluable for radiological response: 10% were G1, 46% G2 and 43% G3; 46% were pancreatic NET (PNET). Median overall survival was 22.1 months. Overall response rate was 30% (39% in PNET vs 22% in non-PNET) and 43% of patients had stable disease. Response rate increased with grade: 6% in G1 tumours, 24% in G2 and 43% in G3. However, maximum likelihood ratio was 2.3 at Ki-67=35%, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.60. As reported previously, a high Ki-67 was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival. In conclusion, response to CT increases with Ki-67 index, but Ki-67 alone is an unreliable means to select patients for CT. Improved methods to stratify patients for systemic therapy are required.

Routine terminations of pregnancy--should we screen for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?

After termination of pregnancy for non-medical reasons, the products of conception are often not routinely examined for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Between 1995 and 2001 we identified 15 women without and 36 women with a pathological diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at the time of their pregnancy termination. Women without a diagnosis were significantly more likely to have subsequent life-threatening complications of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (four of 15 vs none of 36; p=0.003), and to require surgical intervention (15 of 15 vs one of 36; p<0.0001) and chemotherapy (nine of 15 vs two of 36; p<0.0001). All women should be screened for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after termination of pregnancy.

Neurological symptoms from a brain metastasis as the first presentation of colorectal cancer.

A 63-year-old man, a wheelchair user, from primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), presented with an episode of expressive dysphasia and confusion. Cerebral imaging revealed a solitary cerebral mass that was radiologically felt to be a primary brain tumour, but a brain biopsy demonstrated an adenocarcinoma in keeping with brain metastasis. Further immunohistochemistry suggested a probable colorectal primary. Subsequent staging confirmed a primary cancer within the caecum/terminal ileum, with extensive bilobar unresectable liver metastases. Unfortunately, as a consequence of the heavy tumour burden and rapid disease progression, the patient deteriorated rapidly and, due to his poor performance status, palliative chemotherapy was not deemed suitable. He was offered palliative whole brain radiotherapy to help control his symptoms, but he declined. He subsequently died at home a few weeks later, as per his wishes.

Peritoneal lymphomatosis: a rare presentation of follicular lymphoma mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Patients presenting with ascites associated with peritoneal disease have a wide differential diagnosis including both malignant and non-malignant related causes. We present the unusual case of a patient, clinically deteriorating, whose malignant peritoneal disease was due to an underlying follicular lymphoma. An urgent staging CT scan followed by a peritoneal biopsy allowed the patient to start chemotherapy within days of acute presentation to the hospital. This case emphasises the importance of obtaining tissue diagnosis urgently in these patients to ensure that the correct treatment can be started in a timely manner.

Chemotherapy for trophoblastic disease: current standards.

Gestational trophoblastic diseases comprise a rare spectrum of disorders in which the normal regulatory mechanisms controlling the behavior of trophoblastic tissue are lost. They vary from the benign complete and partial hydatidiform moles to the frankly malignant choriocarcinoma and placental site trophoblastic tumors. The majority will be cured by suction curettage, followed by human chorionic gonadotrphin screening but some will go on to need chemotherapy. The majority of patients will be cured even despite the presence of metastatic disease. Patients should have their treatment stratified according to various prognostic factors in order to ensure firstly their disease is eliminated and secondly to reduce the incidence of long-term treatment complications.