RESUMEN
Open spina bifida, also known as myelomeningocele (MMC), is the most challenging and severe birth defect of the central nervous system compatible with life and it is due to a failure in the dorsal fusion of the nascent neural tube during embryonic development. MMC is often accompanied by a constellation of collateral conditions, including hydrocephalus, Arnold - Chiari II malformation, brainstem disfunction, hydrosyringomyelia, tethered cord syndrome and scoliosis. Beyond early surgical repair of the dorsal defect, MMC requires lifelong cares. Several additional surgical procedures are generally necessary to improve the long-term outcomes of patients affected by MMC and multidisciplinary evaluations are crucial for early identification and management of the various medical condition that can accompany this pathology. In this chapter, the most common pathological entities associated with MMC are illustrated, focusing on clinical manifestations, treatment strategies and follow up recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Meningomielocele , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Humanos , Meningomielocele/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Fracturas por Compresión , Cifoplastia/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares , Mieloma Múltiple , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Anciano , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/epidemiología , Fracturas por Compresión/etiología , Fracturas por Compresión/fisiopatología , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/patología , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study OBJECTIVES: The AOSpine Sacral Classification System was proposed as a comprehensive and universally accepted new classification for Sacral Fractures, and was recently internally validated. However, an external, independent and multidisciplinary reports on validation of this classification is lacking. Aim of the present study is to analyze the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System for Sacral Fractures between orthopedic spinal and pelvic surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: Our institutional database was searched to retrieve patients with acute, traumatic sacral injury admitted from June 2017 to June 2020. For each patients, X-Rays and CT scans were collected. Three Orthopedic Pelvic Surgeons (Group A) and three Spine Surgeons (Group B), with different level of experience (Junior, ã 5 years; Middle, 5-10 years; Expert ã 10 years) independently classified all the sacral fractures included in the dataset, with two separate evaluation three weeks apart. Both intra and interobserver reliability were calculated with k-coefficient. RESULTS: Overall, 150 patients were included in the final dataset, for a total of 1800 different assessments, with all the subtypes reported. The intraobserver reproducibility for the whole group was substantial (κ=0.72). Overall, the interobserver reliability was moderate, with a κ=0.57. When only fracture type was taken in account, the κ value became substantial (κ=0.62). No significant differences were found comparing group A and group B (0.55 vs κ 0.55, p>0.05). No significant differences according to surgeon's experience were found; however, the κ value was slightly lower among the junior surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed the reliability and reproducibility of this classification in clinical practice. In the current study the surgeon's expertise (pelvic and spinal trauma) and the level of experience does not influence the reliability of the classification system.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Cuello , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Cirujanos , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. METHODS: An organizational model is presented based on case centralization in hub hospitals and early management of surgical cases to reduce hospital stay. Data from all the patients admitted for emergency spinal surgery from the beginning of the outbreak were prospectively collected and compared to data from patients admitted for the same reason in the same time span in the previous year, and treated by the same integrated team. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (11 males and eight females, with a mean age of 49.9 years (14 to 83)) were admitted either for vertebral fracture or spinal cord compression in a 19-day period, compared to the ten admitted in the previous year. No COVID-19 patients were treated. The mean time between admission and surgery was 1.7 days, significantly lower than 6.8 days the previous year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The structural organization and the management protocol we describe allowed us to reduce the time to surgery and ultimately hospital stay, thereby maximizing the already stretched medical resources available. We hope that our early experience can be of value to the medical communities that will soon be in the same emergency situation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):671-676.