Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 19(1): 60, 2020 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298064

RESUMEN

During bloodstream infections, rapid adaptation of empirical treatment according to the microorganism identified is essential to decrease mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the microbiological performances of a new rapid version of the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics) allowing identification of bacteria and yeast by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry directly from positive blood cultures in 10 min and of the specific MBT-Sepsityper module for spectra analysis, designed to increase identification performance. Identification rates were determined prospectively on 350 bacterial and 29 fungal positive blood cultures, and compared to conventional diagnostic method. Our rapid diagnosis strategy (Rapid Sepsityper® protocol: one spot with and one without formic acid extraction step) combined to MBT-Sepsityper module provided 65.4%, 78.9% and 62% reliable identification to the species level of monomicrobial positive blood cultures growing respectively Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria or yeast. Importantly, identification rates of Gram-positive bacteria were higher in anaerobic than in aerobic bottles (77.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.004), if formic acid extraction step was performed (60.8% vs 39.2%; p = 1.8e-6) and if specific MBT-Sepsityper module was used (76.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.041) while no significant differences were observed for Gram-negative bacteria. For yeasts identification, formic acid extraction step improved rapid identification rate by 37.9% while the specific MBT-Sepsityper module increased overall performances by 38%, providing up to 89.7% reliable identification if associated with the standard Sepsityper® protocol. These performances, associated with a reduce turnaround time, may help to implement a rapid identification strategy of bloodstream infections in the routine workflow of microbiology laboratories.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Tipificación Micológica/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Levaduras/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacterias/química , Sangre/microbiología , Cultivo de Sangre , Fungemia/microbiología , Humanos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/métodos , Levaduras/química
3.
Pathogens ; 13(6)2024 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38921773

RESUMEN

Thermophilic C. jejuni/coli is reported to be the first bacterial cause of gastroenteritis worldwide and the most common zoonosis in Europe. Although non-jejuni/coli Campylobacter sp. are increasingly suspected to be responsible for diarrhoea or to be involved in inflammatory bowel disease, they remain poorly isolated due to their fastidious and non-thermophilic nature. Additionally, they are not targeted by commercial syndromic PCR assays. In this study, we present routine diagnostic results over 6 years (2017-2019 and 2021-2023) of Campylobacter sp. and related species, obtained by optimised culture from 51,065 stools by both 0.65 µm pore filtration on antibiotic-free agar, incubated in an H2-enriched atmosphere at 37 °C (also known as the Cape Town protocol), and the use of selective inhibitory Butzler medium incubated at 42 °C. This allowed the isolation of 16 Campylobacter species, 2 Aliarcobacter species, and 2 Helicobacter species, providing a completely different view of the epidemiology of Campylobacterales, in which C. jejuni/coli represents only 30.0% of all isolates, while C. concisus represents 44.4%. C. ureolyticus, representing only 5.5% of all Campylobacterales pre-COVID-19, represented 20.6% of all strains post-COVID-19 (218% increase; p < 0.05). At the same time, the proportions of C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. concisus decreased by 37, 53, and 28%, respectively (p < 0.05).

4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1345354, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39267964

RESUMEN

Rat bite fever is characterized by a clinical triad of symptoms, fever, rash and arthritis. It is transmitted by rodents and mainly due to infection by Streptobacillus moniliformis, a fastidious bacterium carried by Rattus norvegicus. This case report presents the case of a patient who developed septic arthritis and fever after a wild rat bite, with subsequent isolation of S. moniliformis from the joint fluid. Upon reviewing 45 other published case reports of S. moniliformis osteoarticular infections following contact with either a rat or its secretions, it was firstly observed that the rat bite fever clinical triad was incomplete in over half of the cases, mainly because rash was infrequently observed among adult patients. Secondly, the clinical presentation of rat bite fever is quite non-specific and rodent exposure is not mentioned by patients in a third of cases upon admission. Altogether, diagnosing rat bite fever is a significant clinical challenge suggesting that it might be significantly underdiagnosed. In addition to these clinical aspects, no evidence was found supporting immunological mechanisms, as suggested in some literature. Instead, when excluding five improperly performed cultures, S. moniliformis was cultured in 25 reported cases and identified twice by direct PCR sequencing amounting to a detection rate of 90% (n = 27/30) on joint fluids. Cultures should be performed in medium containing yeast extract, complete peptic digest of animal tissue and at least 5% blood. Knowing that S. moniliformis is very sensitive to many antibiotics thereby making the culture negative, direct 16S rRNA gene sequencing on joint fluid is an alternative method in the case of clinical and cytological evidence of osteoarticular infections with sterile culture of joint fluid.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA