Pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: a French multicentre cohort study.

AIMS: While pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be a major issue in COVID-19, data remain sparse. We aimed to describe the risk factors and baseline characteristics of patients with PE in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective multicentre observational study, we included consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-proven PE diagnosis and those who were directly admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Among 1240 patients (58.1% men, mean age 64 ± 17 years), 103 (8.3%) patients had PE confirmed by CTPA. The ICU transfer and mechanical ventilation were significantly higher in the PE group (for both P < 0.001). In an univariable analysis, traditional venous thrombo-embolic risk factors were not associated with PE (P > 0.05), while patients under therapeutic dose anticoagulation before hospitalization or prophylactic dose anticoagulation introduced during hospitalization had lower PE occurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.91, P = 0.04; and OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.18, P < 0.001, respectively]. In a multivariable analysis, the following variables, also statistically significant in univariable analysis, were associated with PE: male gender (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.003-1.069, P = 0.04), anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.85, P < 0.001) or a therapeutic dose (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92, P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.001), and time from symptom onset to hospitalization (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.006-1.038, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: PE risk factors in the COVID-19 context do not include traditional thrombo-embolic risk factors but rather independent clinical and biological findings at admission, including a major contribution to inflammation.

[Outpatient coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions before and after the COVID-19 pandemic : experience of the Versailles hospital centre]. / Coronarographie et angioplastie coronaire ambulatoire avant et après la pandémie de COVID-19 : expérience du centre hospitalier de Versailles.

BACKGROUND: Same day discharge (SDD) diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are increasingly performed, and indications extend to more complex procedures and more fragile patients. We report the evolution of SDD interventional cardiology activity in our centre since 2016, particularly before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondarily, we analysed the feasibility and safety of SDD PCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the number and percentage of SDD coronary angiograms and PCIs (elective or ad hoc), during 4 periods of 11 months each, from September 2016 to July 2024. Periods 1 and 2 took place before COVID-19, periods 3 and 4 after. We also compared the rate of complications and conversion to hospitalisation between periods 1-2 and 4. RESULTS: A total of 9587 procedures were analysed, including 1558 SDD procedures. The total number of SDD interventional cardiology procedures increased progressively over the 4 periods, from 146 SDD procedures (7.5%) in 2016-2017 to 620 (27.2%) in 2023-2024. This increase included both diagnostic coronary angiograms (respectively: 10.9%; 12.2%; 33.6% then 28.9%) and PCIs (respectively: 0.9%; 5.6%; 16.1% then 24.4%). In the immediate post-COVID-19 period, a significant increase, uncorrelated with the natural progression, was observed for SDD diagnostic coronary angiography and ad-hoc PCI. There were no deaths or serious complications, the rate of minor complications (1.1%) and conversion to conventional hospitalisation (4.5%) were low. CONCLUSION: Provided a careful patient selection and rigorous organisation, SDD coronary angiography and PCI can safely be performed. The increase in the SDD interventional procedures, favoured by organisational (COVID-19) or economic constraints, need to be amplified.