Impact d'une consultation de médecine des voyages sur les attitudes et les pratiques des voyageurs.

Introduction : Traveling regularly to malaria endemic areas increasingly exposes travelers to various risks which could be mitigated by a pre-travel health consultation. The objective was to study the impact of advice provided during a pre-travel consultation on travelers’ behaviors and practices to identify travelers’ profiles and adapt the prevention recommendations before trave-ling to intertropical zones.Methods : Two self-assessment questionnaires (Q1-before and Q2-after travelling) were proposed to 271 individuals over 5 months of traveler consultations to assess behaviors (Q1) and practices (Q2). Questionnaires gathered travelers’ profiles, source of information, travel diet and lifestyle, personal vector control, malaria chemoprophylaxis and other frequent risks.Results : Diet recommendations were the least followed (16 %), especially for people<55 (p<0.03) as well as Visiting Friends and Relatives (VFR) (p<0,001). A correlation between behaviors and practices for personal vector control and immunization and malaria chemoprophylaxis were found (resp. 89% and 78%). Mosquito nets and long sleeve clothes were underused. Changes of opinion resulting from concerns of potential side effects and lack of efficiency (<7%) explained the non-compliance to the pre-travel recommendations. During the stay, although 24% of travelers got sick, medical consultations (<5%) and hospital admissions (<1%) remained low. The General Practitioner remains the main point of contact (41%).Discussion : Better identifying travelers’ characteristics would allow to improve travel consultation, to refer to their knowledge and focus on preventive measures. It is crucial to highlight the importance of diet measures and insist on the low likelihood of adverse effects in Malaria Chemoprophylaxis.

Factors associated with delayed revascularization in patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective study in one French region.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Optimizing the care pathway of stroke is crucial for the revascularization of ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVES: to identify factors associated with (1) a time interval over 4 h between the symptom onset and cerebral imaging in suspected stroke patients and (2) the absence of revascularization in patients with ischemic stroke. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients over 18 years old with a suspected stroke admitted in 22 emergency rooms or stroke units in one French region between 1 March 2019 and 30 April 2019 were prospectively included by filling a dedicated form. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: Factors associated with the previously mentioned outcome measures were identified using logistic regression models. MAIN RESULTS: In total 991 patients were included; 537 patients (64% of 845 with available time intervals) were admitted more than 4 h after symptom onset. Three predictors were identified: not calling emergency medical services (EMS) [odds-ratio (OR) 5.2; 95% confidence interval (3.4-8.1)], a preexisting autonomy loss [2.0 (1.3-2.9)] and atypical clinical presentation [2.0 (1.3-3.1)]. A total of 385 patients had an ischemic stroke of whom 93 underwent a revascularization procedure (24%). The same three predictors were associated with the absence of revascularization procedure, added to an initial admission in a hospital without stroke unit [3.1 (1.1-8.6)]. CONCLUSION: This study shows that efforts to organize the care chain for stroke need to be intensified in the region to reduce treatment time intervals, which could include information campaigns focused on the impact of EMS call and the clinical presentation recognition.

Case fatality inequalities of critically ill COVID-19 patients according to patient-, hospital- and region-related factors: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 sanitary crisis inflicted different challenges regarding the reorganization of the human and logistic resources, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU). Interdependence between regional pandemic burden and individual outcome remains unknown. The study aimed to assess the association between ICU bed occupancy and case fatality rate of critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in France, using the national hospital discharge database from March to May, 2020. All patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19 were included. Case fatality was described according to: (i) patient's characteristics (age, sex, comorbid conditions, ICU interventions); (ii) hospital's characteristics (baseline ICU experience assessed by the number of ICU stays in 2019, number of ICU physicians per bed), and (iii) the regional outbreak-related profiles (workload indicator based on ICU bed occupancy). The determinants of lethal outcome were identified using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: 14,513 COVID-19 patients were admitted to ICU; 4256 died (29.3%), with important regional inequalities in case fatality (from 17.6 to 33.5%). Older age, multimorbidity and clinical severity were associated with higher mortality, as well as a lower baseline ICU experience of the health structure. Regions with more than 10 days with ≥ 75% of ICU occupancy by COVID-19 patients experienced an excess of mortality (up to adjusted OR = 2.2 [1.9-2.6] for region with the highest occupancy rate of ICU beds). CONCLUSIONS: The regions with the highest burden of care in ICU were associated with up to 2.2-fold increase of death rate.

Does helicopter transport delay prehospital transfer for STEMI patients in rural areas? Findings from the CRAC France PCI registry.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyse delays in emergency medical system transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres according to transport modality in a rural French region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the prospective multicentre CRAC / France PCI registry were analysed for 1911 STEMI patients: 410 transferred by helicopter and 1501 by ground transport. The primary endpoint was the percentage of transfers with first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the 90 minutes recommended in guidelines. The secondary endpoint was time of first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. With helicopter transport, time of first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in under 90 minutes was less frequently achieved than with ground transport (9.8% vs. 37.2%; odds ratio 5.49; 95% confidence interval 3.90; 7.73; P<0.0001). Differences were greatest for transfers under 50 km (13.7% vs. 44.7%; P<0.0001) and for primary transfers (22.4% vs. 49.6%; P<0.0001). The median time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and from symptom onset to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (total ischaemic time) were significantly higher in the helicopter transport group than in the ground transport group (respectively, 137 vs. 103 minutes; P<0.0001 and 261 vs. 195 minutes; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in inhospital mortality between the helicopter and ground transport groups (6.9% vs. 6.6%; P=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport of STEMI patients was five times less effective than ground transport in maintaining the 90-minute first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention time recommended in guidelines, particularly for transfer distances less than 50 km.

Factors associated with delay in transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from first medical contact to catheterization laboratory: Lessons from CRAC, a French prospective multicentre registry.

BACKGROUND: It is critical to minimize the time between the first medical contact and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. AIMS: To identify factors associated with a delay of>120min between first medical contact and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: Data were analysed from a regional French registry of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction<24h after symptom onset. Patients (n=2081) were grouped according to transfer times from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention:>120min; or≤120min. Independent predictors of delay were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The median transfer time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention was 112min; 892 patients (42.9%) had a transfer time>120min. A delay of>120min was significantly associated with:≥75km distance from interventional cardiology centre at symptom onset (odds ratio 7.9); more than one medical practitioner involved before interventional cardiology centre (odds ratio 4.5); first admission to a hospital without an interventional cardiology centre (odds ratio 2.9); absence of emergency call (odds ratio 1.6); ≥90min between symptom onset and first medical contact (odds ratio 1.3); Killip class at admission>1 (odds ratio 1.8); lateral ischaemia (odds ratio 1.8); diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 1.6); and hypertension (odds ratio 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, a transfer time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention of>120min was associated with geographic, systemic and comorbid factors, several of which appear reasonably actionable.