Potential clinical utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for detection and response assessment in cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin receptor is expressed in sarcoid granulomas, and preliminary clinical studies have shown that myocardial sarcoidosis can be identified on somatostatin receptor-targeted PET. We examined the potential clinical use of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for diagnosis and response assessment in cardiac sarcoidosis compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Eleven cardiac sarcoidosis patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT were prospectively enrolled for cardiac 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The two PET/CT studies were interpreted independently and were compared for patient-level and segment-level concordance, as well as for the degree of radiotracer uptake. Follow-up 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed in eight patients. RESULTS: Patient-level concordance was 91%: ten patients had multifocal DOTATATE uptake (active cardiac sarcoidosis) and one patient showed diffuse DOTATATE uptake. Segment-level agreement was 77.1% (Kappa 0.53 ± 0.07). The SUVmax-to-blood pool ratio was lower on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (3.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.006 on paired t test). Follow-up 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed one case of complete response and one case of partial response, while 18F-FDG PET/CT showed four cases of response, including three with complete response. CONCLUSION: Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can identify active cardiac sarcoidosis with high patient-level concordance, but with moderate segment-level concordance, low signal-to-background ratio, and underestimation of treatment response.

Mental health disorders and emergency resource use and outcomes in ventricular assist device supported patients.

There are limited data describing the prevalence of mental health disorders (MHDOs) in patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs), or associations between MHDOs and resource use or outcomes. We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample administrative database to analyze 44,041 ED encounters for VAD-supported adults from 2010 to 2017, to assess the relationship between MHDOs and outcomes in this population. MHDO diagnoses were present for 23% of encounters, and were associated with higher charges and rates of admission, but lower mortality.

The pleiotropic cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Throughout the history of medicine, scientists and clinicians have observed unanticipated drug effects leading at times to an entirely new use for a drug class, and other times eliminating them from practice. The sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are one such class of drugs. These agents were initially studied as diabetic agents and their unanticipated and significant cardiovascular benefit has now created a new class of drugs for an entirely new population. Here we review the pleiotropic cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, the potential mechanisms of action, side effect profile and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Large clinical trials have evaluated the cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors including myocardial infarction and strokes as well as new onset and worsening systolic heart failure. SUMMARY: SGLT2 inhibitors are being incorporated into the guidelines for the treatment of heart failure with the goal of preventing heart failure hospitalizations and promoting positive ventricular remodeling in patients with or without diabetes. The reduction in cardiovascular events including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and other atherosclerotic effects appears to be driven by baseline risk with those who have known atherosclerosis seeing a reduction in events but those without disease seeing less benefit.

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined. METHODS: TPNS responses among PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated patients from the remede® System Pivotal Trial were assessed. Of 151, 56 (37%) used PAP therapy before enrolling in the trial. Patients were implanted with a TPNS device and randomized to either active or deferred (control) therapy for 6 months before therapy activation. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months following active therapy. RESULTS: Patients had moderate-severe CSA at baseline, which was of greater severity and more symptomatic in the PAP-treated vs. PAP-naïve group (median AHI 52/h vs. 38, central apnea index (CAI) 32/h vs. 18, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 13 vs. 10, fatigue severity scale 5.2 vs. 4.5). Twelve months of TPNS decreased AHI to <20/h and CAI to ≤2/h. Both groups showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and fatigue, improved well-being by patient global assessment, and high therapeutic acceptance with 98% and 94% of PAP-treated and PAP-naïve patients indicating they would undergo the implant again. Stimulation produced discomfort in approximately one-third of patients, yet <5% of prior PAP-treated participants discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Polysomnographic and clinical responses to TPNS were comparable in PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated CSA patients. TPNS is a viable therapy across a broad spectrum of CSA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01816776; March 22, 2013.

Treatment With Impella Increases the Risk of De Novo Aortic Insufficiency Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.

BACKGROUND: Impella (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) is a temporary mechanical support device positioned across the aortic valve, and can be used to support patient before LVAD implantation. There are no data on the incidence of aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients supported with Impella as a bridge to durable LVAD implantation. We sought to assess the incidence of AI in patients with Impella support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing primary LVAD implantation at the University of Pennsylvania from January 2015 onward, comparing those supported with Impella as temporary mechanical support with those supported by either venoarterial extracorporeal life support or an intra-aortic balloon pump. We reviewed transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively, as well as at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: A total of 215 echocardiograms were analyzed in 41 patients. Eleven patients were supported with Impella before LVAD implant-6 patients with Impella alone (5 with Impella CP, 1 with Impella 5.0) and 5 with Impella in conjunction with venoarterial extracorporeal life support (2 with Impella 2.5, 2 with Impella CP, and 1 with Impella 5.0). After LVAD implant, mild or moderate AI developed in 82% of patients supported with Impella (9 of 11) compared with 43% of those without Impella (13 of 30) (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Patients supported by Impella as a bridge to durable LVAD have a higher risk of developing AI. Further studies are needed to assess this risk as the use of the Impella increases.

Transplant Volume Is Associated With Graft Acceptance Threshold and Center Resource Availability.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant volume varies significantly among centers. We hypothesized that centers where the transplant team routinely accepts organs previously declined by other centers and where operating room availability is unrestricted have higher transplant volumes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the potential transplant recipient sequence number in the United Network for Organ Sharing database as a surrogate for graft acceptance threshold and the number of transplantations occurring on weekends and 8 major holidays as a marker of center resource availability. Centers were classified as low-, medium-, or high-volume if the average annual number of transplants were, respectively, <10, 10-30, or >30 over a 10-year period. From July 12, 2006, to December 31, 2015, 19,054 transplants were performed by 142 centers. There were 59 low-volume centers, 69 medium-volume centers, and 14 high-volume centers with median potential transplant recipient sequence numbers for transplanted candidates of 7 (interquartile range 3-11), 7 (5-10), and 15 (7-40), respectively (P = .002). The median proportion of off-hours transplantations performed by medium-volume centers was 28% (25%-31%) compared with 32% (29%-33%) by high-volume centers (P = .009). Five-year survival was equivalent among all centers (P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: Transplants for candidates with high sequence numbers and unrestricted operating room availability are associated with increased center volume without sacrificing post-transplantation survival.

Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality.

The prelisting variables essential for creating an accurate heart transplant allocation score based on survival are unknown. To identify these we studied mortality of adults on the active heart transplant waiting list in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from January 1, 2004 to August 31, 2015. There were 33 069 candidates awaiting heart transplantation: 7681 UNOS Status 1A, 13 027 Status 1B, and 12 361 Status 2. During a median waitlist follow-up of 4.3 months, 5514 candidates died. Variables of importance for waitlist mortality were identified by machine learning using Random Survival Forests. Strong correlates predicting survival were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum albumin, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist device, mechanical ventilation, peak oxygen capacity, hemodynamics, inotrope support, and type of heart disease with less predictive variables including antiarrhythmic agents, history of stroke, vascular disease, prior malignancy, and prior tobacco use. Complex interactions were identified such as an additive risk in mortality based on renal function and serum albumin, and sex-differences in mortality when eGFR >40 mL/min/1.73 m. Most predictive variables for waitlist mortality are in the current tiered allocation system except for eGFR and serum albumin which have an additive risk and complex interactions.

Transplanting hepatitis C virus-infected hearts into uninfected recipients: A single-arm trial.

The advent of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has generated tremendous interest in transplanting organs from HCV-infected donors. We conducted a single-arm trial of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) from HCV-infected donors into uninfected recipients, followed by elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment after recipient HCV was first detected (NCT03146741; sponsor: Merck). We enrolled OHT candidates aged 40-65 years; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and liver disease were exclusions. We accepted hearts from HCV-genotype 1 donors. From May 16, 2017 to May 10, 2018, 20 patients consented for screening and enrolled, and 10 (median age 52.5 years; 80% male) underwent OHT. The median wait from UNOS opt-in for HCV nucleic-acid-test (NAT)+ donor offers to OHT was 39 days (interquartile range [IQR] 17-57). The median donor age was 34 years (IQR 31-37). Initial recipient HCV RNA levels ranged from 25 IU/mL to 40 million IU/mL, but all 10 patients had rapid decline in HCV NAT after elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment. Nine recipients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR-12). The 10th recipient had a positive cross-match, experienced antibody-mediated rejection and multi-organ failure, and died on day 79. No serious adverse events occurred from HCV transmission or treatment. These short-term results suggest that HCV-negative candidates transplanted with HCV-infected hearts have acceptable outcomes.

Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Transitioning to Adult Care (TRANSIT): Feasibility of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Young-adult heart transplant recipients transferring to adult care are at risk for poor health outcomes. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of and to test a transition intervention for young adults who underwent heart transplantation as children and then transferred to adult care. METHODS: Participants were randomized to the transition intervention (4 months long, focused on heart-transplant knowledge, self-care, self-advocacy, and social support) or usual care. Self-report questionnaires and medical records data were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months after the initial adult clinic visit. Longitudinal analyses comparing outcomes over time were performed using generalized estimating equations and linear mixed models. RESULTS: Transfer to adult care was successful and feasible (ie, excellent participation rates). The average patient standard deviation of mean tacrolimus levels was similar over time in both study arms and < 2.5, indicating adequate adherence. There were no between-group or within-group differences in percentage of tacrolimus bioassays within target range (> 50%). Average overall adherence to treatment was similarly good in both groups. Rates of appointment keeping through 6 months after transfer declined over time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the study was demonstrated. Our transition intervention did not improve outcomes.

Incorporating patient-centered factors into heart failure readmission risk prediction: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Capturing and incorporating patient-centered factors into 30-day readmission risk prediction after hospitalized heart failure (HF) could improve the modest performance of current models. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, we developed a patient-centered survey and evaluated the additional predictive utility of the survey compared to a traditional readmission risk model (the Krumholz et al. model). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic quantified the performance of both models. We measured the amount of model improvement with the addition of patient-centered factors to the Krumholz et al. model with the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). In an exploratory analysis, we used hierarchical clustering algorithms to identify groups with similar survey responses and tested for differences between clusters using standard descriptive statistics. RESULTS: From 3/24/2014 to 3/12/2015, 183 patients hospitalized with HF were enrolled from an urban, academic health system and followed for 30days after discharge. The Krumholz et al. plus patient-centered factors model had similar-to-slightly lower performance (AUC [95%CI]:0.62 [0.52, 0.71]; goodness-of-fit P=.10) than the Krumholz et al. model (AUC [95%CI]:0.66 [0.57, 0.76]; goodness-of-fit P=.19). The IDI (95%CI) was 0.003 (-0.014,0.020). We identified three patient clusters based on patient-centered survey responses. The clusters differed with respect to gender, self-rated health, employment status, and prior hospitalization frequency (all P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of patient-centered factors did not improve 30-day readmission model performance. Rather than designing interventions based on predicted readmission risk, tailoring interventions to all patients, based on their characteristics, could inform the design of targeted, readmission reduction strategies.

Heart Failure Home Management Challenges and Reasons for Readmission: a Qualitative Study to Understand the Patient's Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure patients have high 30-day hospital readmission rates. Interventions designed to prevent readmissions have had mixed success. Understanding heart failure home management through the patient's experience may reframe the readmission "problem" and, ultimately, inform alternative strategies. OBJECTIVE: To understand patient and caregiver challenges to heart failure home management and perceived reasons for readmission. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Heart failure patients were recruited from two hospitals and included those who were hospitalized for heart failure at least twice within 30 days and those who had been recently discharged after their first heart failure admission. APPROACH: Open-ended, semi-structured interviews. Conclusions vetted using focus groups. KEY RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews with 31 patients revealed a combination of physical and socio-emotional influences on patients' home heart failure management. Major themes identified were home management as a struggle between adherence and adaptation, and hospital readmission as a rational choice in response to distressing symptoms. Patients identified uncertainty regarding recommendations, caused by unclear instructions and temporal incongruence between behavior and symptom onset. This uncertainty impaired their competence in making routine management decisions, resulting in a cycle of limit testing and decreasing adherence. Patients reported experiencing hopelessness and frustration in response to perceiving a deteriorating functional status. This led some to a cycle of despair characterized by worsening adherence and negative emotions. As these cycles progressed and distressing symptoms worsened, patients viewed the hospital as the safest place for recovery and not a "negative" outcome. CONCLUSION: Cycles of limit testing and despair represent important patient-centered struggles in managing heart failure. The resulting distress and fear make readmission a rational choice for patients rather than a negative outcome. Interventions (e.g., palliative care) that focus on methods to address these patient-centered factors should be further studied rather than methods to reduce hospital readmissions.

Single-center outcomes of combined heart and liver transplantation in the failing Fontan.

Long-term outcomes of the Fontan operation include Fontan failure and liver disease. Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is an option for select patients although limited data exist on this strategy. A retrospective review of Fontan patients 18 years or older referred for cardiac transplant evaluation between 2000 and 2013 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania was performed. All patients were considered for potential CHLT. Clinical variables such as demographics, perioperative factors, and short-term outcomes were reviewed. Of 17 referrals for cardiac transplantation, seven Fontan patients underwent CHLT. All patients who underwent CHLT had either advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on liver biopsy. There were no perioperative deaths. The most common postoperative morbidity was acute kidney injury. Short-term complications include one episode of acute liver rejection but no cardiac rejection greater than 1R. CHLT is an acceptable therapeutic option for patients with failing Fontan physiology who exhibit concomitant advanced liver fibrosis. However, optimal patient selection is currently undefined, and long-term outcomes are not known.

Transplantation of Center for Disease Control "High-Risk" Donor Hearts Does Not Adversely Impact Long-Term Outcomes in Adults.

BACKGROUND: The "high-risk donor" (HRD) label was applied to donors who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for high-risk behavior in 2004. The number of potential recipients who die awaiting orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) has increased. Despite organ shortages, HRD grafts are often declined given infectious concerns. We hypothesized that recipients would have equivalent outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the United Network of Organ Sharing adult heart transplant data from June 2004 to December 2013. OHT recipients were divided into 2 cohorts by donor status. RESULTS: During the study period, 37,408 OHTs were performed and 3196 (8.5%) patients received HRD grafts. Recipients of HRD were significantly older (P < .0001) and had a higher body mass index (P < .0001) compared with standard-risk donor recipients. No significant difference in waitlist time (P = .69) or blood type (P = .07) was noted. A higher number of HRD recipients were on mechanical circulatory support (35.6%) compared with standard-risk donor (33.3%, P = .009). Both grafts manifested similar, low rates of rejection before discharge (P = .88). One1 (84.3 vs 83%) and 5-year (71.2 vs 65.5%) survival was similar in the cohorts (log-rank P = .7571). CONCLUSIONS: HRD status does not significantly affect recipient outcomes after OHT. Increased use of HRD grafts could augment donor pool and decrease the mortality associated with long waitlist times.

Comparing Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers, and Clinicians on Heart Failure Management.

BACKGROUND: Although substantial effort has been devoted to reducing readmissions among heart failure (HF) patients, little is known about factors identified by patients and caregivers that may contribute to readmissions. The goal of this study was to compare the perspectives of HF patients, their caregivers, and their care team on HF management and hospital admissions. Understanding these perspectives may lead to better strategies for improving care during the post-hospital transition and for reducing preventable readmissions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed freelisting, an anthropologic technique in which participants list items in response to a question, with hospitalized HF patients (n = 58), their caregivers (n = 32), and clinicians (n = 67). We asked about home HF management tasks, difficulties in managing HF, and perceived reasons for hospital admission. Results were analyzed with the use of Anthropac. Salience indices (measures of the most important words for defining the domain of interest) were calculated. Patients and clinicians described similar home HF management tasks, whereas caregivers described tasks related to activities of daily living. Clinicians cited socioeconomic factors as challenges to HF management, whereas patients and caregivers cited limited functional status and daily activities. When asked about reasons for hospitalization, patients and caregivers listed distressing symptoms and illness, whereas clinicians viewed patient behaviors to be primarily responsible for admission. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight that although some similarities exist, there are important differences among patients, caregivers, and clinicians in how they perceive the challenges of HF management and reasons for readmission. Understanding these differences may be critical to developing strategies to reduce readmissions.

Design of the remede System Pivotal Trial: A Prospective, Randomized Study in the Use of Respiratory Rhythm Management to Treat Central Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnea is common in patients with cardiovascular disease and worsens outcomes. There is a lack of established therapies for central sleep apnea, and those available are limited by poor patient adherence and potentially adverse cardiovascular effects, at least in a subset of patients. The remede System (Respicardia, Minnetonka, Minnesota) is a new physiologic treatment that uses transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to contract the diaphragm, thereby stabilizing gas exchange and restoring normal breathing throughout the sleep period. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter randomized trial with blinded end points evaluating the safety and efficacy of the remede System. Up to 173 patients with central sleep apnea will be randomized 1:1 to remede System therapy initiated at 1 month after implantation (treatment) or to an implanted remede System that will remain inactive for 6 months (control). Primary efficacy end point is the percentage of patients who experience a reduction in apnea-hypopnea index by a ≥ 50% at 6 months (responder analysis). Primary safety end point is freedom from serious adverse events through 12 months. Secondary end points include sleep-disordered breathing parameters, sleep architecture, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and Patient Global Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the 1st randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of the remede System for the treatment of central sleep apnea.

Incidence, risk, and consequences of atrial arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Although atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common in heart failure, the incidence of AAs subsequent to the placement of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has not been elucidated. METHODS: Patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD in the bridge to transplant (n = 490) and destination therapy (n = 634) trials were included (n = 1125). AAs requiring treatment were recorded, regardless of symptoms. Using Cox models with and without a 60-day blanking period, risk factors for early and late AAs were determined. RESULTS: In total, there were 271 AAs in 231 patients (21%), most of which occurred within the first 60 days. Patients with and without AAs had similar survival (p = 0.16). Serum creatinine (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49 per unit increase, 1.18 to 1.88; p < 0.001) and ejection fraction (HR = 0.98 per 1% increase, 0.95 to 0.999; p = 0.04) were associated with AAs in a multivariable model. Although quality of life (QoL) and functional status improved in all patients, those with AAs had worse unadjusted QoL (p < 0.001) and a decreased rate of improvement in six-minute walk distance over six to 24 months postimplant (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-fifth of LVAD patients have AAs, most commonly within the first 60 days of support. Preoperative creatinine is a strong risk factor for early and late AAs. Although AAs do not impact survival, they are associated with decreased functional status and QoL improvements during LVAD support.

Heart Transplantation for Uhl Anomaly in an Adult.

Uhl anomaly is characterized by the morphologic absence of right ventricular myocardium and is an exceedingly rare cause of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. We report the first case of a successful heart transplantation in a 41-year-old patient who presented in cardiogenic shock from Uhl anomaly causing decompensated right ventricular failure.

An observational study of ezetimibe in cardiac transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac transplant patients are at risk for developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and dyslipidemia in this patient population has been associated with increased risk. Data evaluating the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe in this population are minimal. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of ezetimibe, alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering agents, in cardiac transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective chart review. Data on demographics, medications prescribed for dyslipidemia and prevention of transplant rejection, results of lipid panels, CNI blood concentrations, and adverse effects were extracted from medical records of cardiac transplant recipients who were prescribed ezetimibe, either alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering agents, and seen at least once in a 12-month period at a cardiac transplantation clinic of an 800-bed teaching hospital. RESULTS: There were 71 patients prescribed ezetimibe in whom a safety analysis was performed. Approximately 49% (n = 35) were included in the analysis for lipid lowering. Ezetimibe significantly decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 129 mg/dL vs 94 mg/dL, P < .0001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C; 170 mg/dL vs 127.5 mg/dL, P = .0058), and total cholesterol (236 mg/dL vs 200 mg/dL, P < .0001). There was no significant change in HDL-C and triglycerides as compared with baseline. The proportion of patients achieving goal LDL-C < 100 mg/dL significantly increased from 11.5% at baseline to 60.5% after the addition of ezetimibe (P < .0001). Ezetimibe had no measurable effect on blood CNI concentrations or doses. Adverse effects were reported by 15.5% of patients (n = 11), with 4% (n = 3) of patients discontinuing therapy. The most common complaints were gastrointestinal intolerance and myalgia. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe was associated with lower LDL-C in cardiac transplant recipients either as combination therapy in patients with elevated LDL-C or as monotherapy, with a low frequency of adverse effects.

Early Cardiopulmonary Fitness after Heart Transplantation as a Determinant of Post-Transplant Survival.

BACKGROUND: Decreased peak oxygen consumption during exercise (peak Vo2) is a well-established prognostic marker for mortality in ambulatory heart failure. After heart transplantation, the utility of peak Vo2 as a marker of post-transplant survival is not well established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult heart transplant recipients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing within a year of transplant between the years 2000 to 2011. Using time-to-event models, we analyzed the hazard of mortality over nearly two decades of follow-up as a function of post-transplant percent predicted peak Vo2 (%Vo2). A total of 235 patients met inclusion criteria. The median post-transplant %Vo2 was 49% (IQR 42 to 60). Each standard deviation (±14%) increase in %Vo2 was associated with a 32% decrease in mortality in adjusted models (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p = 0.002). A %Vo2 below 29%, 64% and 88% predicted less than 80% survival at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant peak Vo2 is a highly significant prognostic marker for long-term post-transplant survival. It remains to be seen whether decreased peak Vo2 post-transplant is modifiable as a target to improve post-transplant longevity.