Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion are at increased risk of poor outcomes. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase might improve outcomes in this population. We aimed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase over non-thrombolytic standard of care in patients with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, parallel group, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were included at 48 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the UK. Eligible patients with minor acute ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5) and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality were enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or non-thrombolytic standard of care (control). Primary outcome was a return to baseline functioning on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group and who did not withdraw consent to participate) assessed at 90 days. Safety outcomes were reported in the ITT population and included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398656, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: The trial was stopped early for futility. Between April 27, 2015, and Jan 19, 2024, 886 patients were enrolled; 369 (42%) were female and 517 (58%) were male. 454 (51%) were assigned to control and 432 (49%) to intravenous tenecteplase. The primary outcome occurred in 338 (75%) of 452 patients in the control group and 309 (72%) of 432 in the tenecteplase group (risk ratio [RR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·04, p=0·29). More patients died in the tenecteplase group (20 deaths [5%]) than in the control group (five deaths [1%]; adjusted hazard ratio 3·8; 95% CI 1·4-10·2, p=0·0085). There were eight (2%) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in the tenecteplase group versus two (<1%) in the control group (RR 4·2; 95% CI 0·9-19·7, p=0·059). INTERPRETATION: There was no benefit and possible harm from treatment with intravenous tenecteplase. Patients with minor stroke and intracranial occlusion should not be routinely treated with intravenous thrombolysis. FUNDING: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the British Heart Foundation.

Factor XIa inhibition with asundexian after acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (PACIFIC-Stroke): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Asundexian (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany), an oral small molecule factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor, might prevent thrombosis without increasing bleeding. Asundexian's effect for secondary prevention of recurrent stroke is unknown. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-finding trial (PACIFIC-Stroke), patients with acute (within 48 h) non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke were recruited from 196 hospitals in 23 countries. Patients were eligible if they were aged 45 years or older, to be treated with antiplatelet therapy, and able to have a baseline MRI (either before or within 72 h of randomisation). Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using an interactive web-based response system and stratified according to anticipated antiplatelet therapy (single vs dual), to once daily oral asundexian (BAY 2433334) 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo in addition to usual antiplatelet therapy, and were followed up during treatment for 26-52 weeks. Brain MRIs were obtained at study entry and at 26 weeks or as soon as possible after treatment discontinuation. The primary efficacy outcome was the dose-response effect on the composite of incident MRI-detected covert brain infarcts and recurrent symptomatic ischaemic stroke at or before 26 weeks after randomisation. The primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. The efficacy outcome was assessed in all participants assigned to treatment, and the safety outcome was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04304508, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between June 15, 2020, and July 22, 2021, 1880 patients were screened and 1808 participants were randomly assigned to asundexian 10 mg (n=455), 20 mg (n=450), or 50 mg (n=447), or placebo (n=456). Mean age was 67 years (SD 10) and 615 (34%) participants were women, 1193 (66%) were men, 1505 (83%) were White, and 268 (15%) were Asian. The mean time from index stroke to randomisation was 36 h (SD 10) and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2·0 (IQR 1·0-4·0). 783 (43%) participants received dual antiplatelet treatment for a mean duration of 70·1 days (SD 113·4) after randomisation. At 26 weeks, the primary efficacy outcome was observed in 87 (19%) of 456 participants in the placebo group versus 86 (19%) of 455 in the asundexian 10 mg group (crude incidence ratio 0·99 [90% CI 0·79-1·24]), 99 (22%) of 450 in the asundexian 20 mg group (1·15 [0·93-1·43]), and 90 (20%) of 447 in the asundexian 50 mg group (1·06 [0·85-1·32]; t statistic -0·68; p=0·80). The primary safety outcome was observed in 11 (2%) of 452 participants in the placebo group versus 19 (4%) of 445 in the asundexian 10 mg group, 14 (3%) of 446 in the asundexian 20 mg group, and 19 (4%) of 443 in the asundexian 50 mg group (all asundexian doses pooled vs placebo hazard ratio 1·57 [90% CI 0·91-2·71]). INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2b trial, FXIa inhibition with asundexian did not reduce the composite of covert brain infarction or ischaemic stroke and did not increase the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with placebo in patients with acute, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke. FUNDING: Bayer AG.

Gapless Electrocardiogram-Monitoring in stroke at high risk of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies investigating prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG)-monitoring after ischemic stroke had significant gaps between the index event and the beginning of long-term monitoring. Atrial fibrillation (AF) detection might be higher if prolonged cardiac rhythm documentation is performed with a gapless approach without any interruption of monitoring time. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, prospective study included patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack at three study centers. Participants received gapless ECG-monitoring via telemetry during stroke-unit admission until implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) within the first days after the index event. Patients acted as their own controls and also received standard 24-72-h Holter ECG. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included, of whom 86 (78.2%) had an embolic stroke of unknown source, 14 (12.7%) had small-vessel disease, and 10 (9.1%) had large-artery disease. AF was newly diagnosed in 17 (15.5%) patients via ICM monitoring, compared to one (0.9%) patient via Holter ECG during 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.001). The detection rate of AF within the first 30 days was 10.0%, which accounted for 64% of all new AF diagnoses. The median duration of the detected episodes was 1.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-4.7) h. All patients with new onset AF were treated with oral anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Gapless ECG-monitoring is an effective strategy to significantly increase the detection rate of AF after ischemic stroke. This finding supports the use of long-term ECG-monitoring with a gapless approach without any interruption in monitoring time as the gold standard for clinical practice.

Temporal Trends of Functional Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis improves functional outcome in patients with acute stroke and frequencies of r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment have been increasing over time. We aimed to assess whether functional outcome in r-tPA-treated patients improved over time and to investigate the influence of clinical variables on functional outcome. METHODS: We analyzed data of r-tPA-treated patients in the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry from 2006 to 2019. Favorable functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Frequencies of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 were assessed for the overall population and in prespecified subgroups; multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations of baseline characteristics including clinically relevant interactions, and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 4865 out of 9409 r-tPA-treated patients (51.7%) achieved favorable functional outcome 3 months post stroke. Between 2006 and 2019, frequencies of favorable functional outcome increased from 45.9% to 56.8%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, year of treatment (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.15]) was associated with favorable functional outcome. Stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, adjOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.85-0.87]), age (61-70 years: adjOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.80], 71-80 years: adjOR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.35-0.50], >80 years: adjOR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.13-0.20]), female sex (adjOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]), and various comorbidities (eg, atrial fibrillation, prior stroke, diabetes) were negatively associated. Inclusion of interaction terms into the multivariable logistic regression model suggests a positive effect of year of treatment and endovascular treatment by increasing stroke severity on functional outcome (interaction between year of treatment and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: adjOR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.02], interaction between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and endovascular treatment: adjOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]). CONCLUSIONS: Frequencies of favorable functional outcome in r-tPA-treated patients have been increasing over time, likely driven by improved outcome in patients with more severe strokes receiving endovascular treatment. However, some subgroups are still less likely to achieve functional independency and deserve particular attention.

Prehospital triage optimization of patients with large vessel occlusion by Austrian Prehospital Stroke Scale.

OBJECTIVES: The Austrian Prehospital Stroke Scale (APSS) score was developed to predict large vessel occlusion (LVO) and improve prehospital transportation triage. Its accuracy has been previously analyzed retrospectively. We now aimed to investigate the accuracy, as well as the impact of the implementation of a triage strategy using this score on treatment times and outcome in a prospective study. MATHERIAL & METHODS: Prospective diagnostic test accuracy and before-after interventional study. EMS prospectively evaluated APSS in patients suspected of stroke. Accuracy was compared with other LVO scores. Patients with APSS ≥4 points were brought directly to the comprehensive stroke center. Treatment time frames, neurological, and radiological outcome before and after the APSS implementation were compared. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients with suspected stroke were included from October 2018 to February 2020. Treatable LVO was present in 79 (26%). Sensitivity of APSS to detect those was 90%, specificity 79%, positive predictive value 66%, negative predictive value 95%, and area under the curve 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91). This was similar to in-hospital NIHSS (AUC 0.89 95% CI 0.89-0.92, p = .06) and superior to CPSS (AUC 0.83 95% CI 0.78-0.87, p = .01). Implementation of APSS triage increased direct transportation rate for LVO patients (21% before vs. 52% after; p < .001) with a significant time benefit (alert to groin puncture time benefit: 51 min (95% CI 28-74; p < .001). Neurological and radiological outcome did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Austrian Prehospital Stroke Scale triage showed an accuracy comparable with in-hospital NIHSS, and lead to a significant optimization of prehospital workflows in patients with potential LVO.

Oral anticoagulant therapy and outcome in patients with stroke. A retrospective nation-wide cohort study in Austria 2012-2017.

PURPOSE: Patients with stroke are at high risk of recurrence of vascular events. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are used as secondary prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of NOAC and VKA, and their impact on re-stroke or death in Austria. METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data between 2012 and 2017 from medical services covered by the health insurance funds, which provides health care for all residents in Austria. Patients without anticoagulant medication 3 months preceding the index event were eligible. RESULTS: 76 354 patients were discharged with a hospital diagnosis of stroke. From these, 16 436 patients with a median age of 78 years received VKA or NOAC. After adjustment, the recurrence of stroke was less frequent in patients with NOAC compared to those with VKA (HR 0.87; 95%CI 0.77-0.97). However, there was no difference in mortality rate after adjustment for age, sex, and co-morbidities for patients with NOAC (HR 1.0; 95%CI 0.92-1.08). Diabetes (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.08-1.45; HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38) and cardiovascular disease (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.24-1.65; HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.16-1.39) were significantly associated with re-stroke or death. Younger age (p = 0.0028; HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99) was significantly associated with re-stroke, and advanced age (p < 0.0001; HR 1.09, 95%CI 1.08-1.09) with death. CONCLUSION: NOAC prescription is related with a reduced risk of re-stroke but increased mortality compared to patients with VKA. The event risk is associated with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and age.

Ultrasound Examination of the Pupil - A New Tool for the Neuro-Ophthalmological Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Pupil examination represents a diagnostic and prognostic test in the management of several neurological diseases. Infrared video pupillometry (IVP) is the gold standard, since it is not routinely available, a noninvasive bedside ultrasound assessment has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of ultrasound pupillometry (UP) in comparison with IVP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 81 subjects (43 men and 38 women, mean age: 52 ±â€Š20 years and 49 ±â€Š19 years, respectively) with no history of neurophthalmologic disease were enrolled. UP was performed with a 12-MHz linear probe according to current guidelines for orbital insonation. Light and painful stimuli were applied to test pupillary light reflex (PLR) and ciliospinal reflex (CR). In 30 of these subjects IVP examination was performed additionally to obtain intra-observer and inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Increasing age was associated with a decreased pupillary diameter (PD) at rest, after PLR and CR (R -0.728, p < 0.01, R -0.643, p < 0.01, R 0.674, p < 0.001 respectively), while no association was noticed with time to constriction/dilation. UP measurements were reproducible (rate of inter- and intra-observer agreement: R 0.979, p < 0.01, R 0.946, p < 0.01 respectively) and concordant with IVP (PLR R 0.831, p < 0.01; CR R 0.879, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: According to our study, ultrasound pupillometry is a feasible and reliable technique for bedside pupillary function assessment, and is a good alternative to infrared video pupillometry. Moreover, it represents the only way for functional pupillary assessment in patients with periorbital hematoma.

Trends of r-tPA (Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Treatment and Treatment-Influencing Factors in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background and Purpose- Frequencies of treatment with r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) are increasing over the past 15 years. However, published data on the influence of various demographic and clinical factors on r-tPA treatment as well as estimates of future trajectories are limited. We evaluated time trends and future trajectories of r-tPA treatment in patients with acute stroke and the influence of various factors on r-tPA treatment by analyzing data of 103 970 patients enrolled in the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry from 2006 to 2018, of which 18 953 were treated with r-tPA. Methods- Time trends of r-tPA-treatment were investigated in predefined subgroups (minor/major stroke, age, anterior/posterior circulation stroke); limited exponential time series models were calculated to estimate future trends of r-tPA-treatment. Logistic regression models were calculated to estimate the influence of clinical variables on r-tPA-treatment. Results- Overall, r-tPA treatment frequencies increased from 9.9% in 2006 to 21.8% in 2018. We observed a particular increase in patients >80 years, patients presenting with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score of 2 to 3, patients with posterior circulation stroke, patients with wake-up stroke, and patients without atrial fibrillation. Forecast of overall r-tPA frequencies predicted a further but flattened increase up to 24% by 2025. Logistic regression of time-dependent associations of clinical variables with r-tPA-treatment revealed increasing odds of r-tPA-treatment in patients with a posterior circulation stroke and decreasing odds of r-tPA-treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Conclusions- We observed a positive development of r-tPA-treatment frequencies mirroring increasing confidence with intravenous thrombolysis in clinical practice; however, decreasing odds of r-tPA-treatment over time in patients with atrial fibrillation deserve particular attention.

Is Functional Outcome Different in Posterior and Anterior Circulation Stroke?

Background and Purpose- Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) account for 20% of all ischemic strokes. There is limited evidence whether functional outcome of PCS is comparable to that of anterior circulation stroke (ACS). We aimed to analyze whether 3-month functional outcome is different in PCS and ACS. Methods- Patients with acute ischemic stroke prospectively enrolled within the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were stratified by infarct localization according to the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification. Propensity score matching was used to control for covariate imbalances and to match patients with PCS and ACS. Patients were matched for stroke severity, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment, and demographic and vascular risk factors. Main outcomes were the distribution of modified Rankin Scale after 3 months and multiple proportional odds models to estimate the influence of the infarct localization on the functional outcome. Results- From a total of 90 484 patients enrolled within the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, 9208 (4604 PCS/4604 ACS) were matched, of those 954 (477 in each group) were treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. We detected a significant shift towards better 3-month functional outcome in patients with ACS compared with PCS (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.1-1.28; P<0.0001). In particular, functional outcome was worse in PCS with onset-to-door-time >270 minutes (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54; P<0.0001) and in PCS with unknown onset-to-door-time (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; P<0.0001); however, we did not detect any difference in functional outcome between ACS and PCS in patients with an onset-to-door-time ≤270 minutes (1-180 minutes: OR, 0.92, 95% CI, 0.78-1.09, P=0.3554; 181-270 minutes: OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.79-1.37, P=0.7689). In patients treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, functional outcome was not significantly different between PCS and ACS. Conclusions- PCS was associated with worse outcome compared with ACS in patients arriving later than 4.5 hours at hospital or in those with unknown onset of symptoms. Our results urge for implementation of symptoms found in the posterior circulation into preclinical patient-triage tools.

Do Women With Atrial Fibrillation Experience More Severe Strokes? Results From the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic strokes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are more severe than those of other cause. We aim to study potential sex effects in this context. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 74 425 adults with acute ischemic stroke from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were included between March 2003 and January 2016. In 63 563 patients, data on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission to the stroke unit, presence of AF, vascular risk factors, and comorbidities were complete. Analysis was done by a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: Stroke severity in general increased with age. AF-related strokes were more severe than strokes of other causes. Sex-related differences in stroke severity were only seen in stroke patients with AF. Median (Q25,75) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score points were 9 (4,17) in women and 6 (3,13) in men (P<0.001). The interaction between AF and sex on stroke severity was independent of age, previous functional status, vascular risk factors, and vascular comorbidities and remained significant in various subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Women with AF do not only have an increased risk of stroke when compared with men but also experience more severe strokes.

Copeptin and Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Vascular Events After Transient Ischemic Attack and Ischemic Stroke: Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Copeptin, the c-terminal portion of provasopressin, is a useful prognostic marker in patients after myocardial infarction and heart failure. More recently, high levels of copeptin have also been associated with worse functional outcome and increased mortality within the first year after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, to date, there are no published data on whether copeptin predicts long-term risk of vascular events after TIA and stroke. METHODS: We measured copeptin levels in consecutive patients with TIA or ischemic stroke in a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study) recruited from 2002 to 2007 and followed up to 2014. Associations with risk of recurrent vascular events were determined by Cox-regression. RESULTS: During ≈6000 patient-years in 1076 patients, there were 357 recurrent vascular events, including 174 ischemic strokes. After adjustment for age, sex, and risk factors, copeptin was predictive of recurrent vascular events (adjusted hazard ratio per SD, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.64; P=0.0001), vascular death (1.85; 1.60-2.14; P<0.0001), all-cause death (1.75; 1.58-1.93; P<0.0001), and recurrent ischemic stroke (1.22; 1.04-1.44; P=0.017); and improved model-discrimination significantly: net reclassification improvement for recurrent vascular events (32%; P<0.0001), vascular death (55%; P<0.0001), death (66%; P<0.0001), and recurrent stroke (16%; P=0.044). The predictive value of copeptin was largest in patients with cardioembolic index events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.20 versus 1.31, 1.14-1.50 in noncardioembolic stroke; P=0.0025). In patients with cardioembolic stroke, high copeptin levels were associated with a 4-fold increased risk of vascular events within the first year of follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.13-7.70). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with TIA and ischemic stroke, copeptin predicted recurrent vascular events and death, particularly after cardioembolic TIA/stroke. Further validation is required, in particular, in studies using more extensive cardiac evaluation.

Biomarkers and mortality after transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke: population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Premature death after transient ischemic attack or stroke is more often because of heart disease or cancer than stroke. Previous studies found blood biomarkers not usefully predictive of nonfatal stroke but possibly of all-cause death. This association might be explained by potentially treatable occult cardiac disease or cancer. We therefore aimed to validate the association of a panel of biomarkers with all-cause death, particularly cardiac death and cancer death, despite the absence of associations with risk of nonfatal vascular events. METHODS: Fifteen biomarkers were measured in 929 consecutive patients in a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study), recruited from 2002 and followed up to 2013. Associations were determined by Cox regression. Model discrimination was assessed by c-statistic and the integrated discrimination improvement. RESULTS: During 5560 patient-years of follow-up, none of the biomarkers predicted risk of nonfatal vascular events. However, soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor-1, von Willebrand factor, heart-type fatty-acid-binding protein, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were independently predictive of all-cause death (n=361; adjusted hazard ratio per SD, 95% confidence interval: heart-type fatty-acid-binding protein: 1.31, 1.12-1.56, P=0.002; N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: 1.34, 1.11-1.62, P=0.002; soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor-1: 1.45, 1.26-1.66, P=0.02; von Willebrand factor: 1.19, 1.04-1.36, P=0.01). The independent contribution of the four biomarkers taken together added prognostic information and improved model discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement=0.028, P=0.0001). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was most predictive of vascular death (adjusted hazard ratio=1.80, 95% confidence interval, 1.34-2.41, P<0.0001), whereas heart-type fatty-acid-binding protein predicted cancer deaths (1.64, 1.26-2.12, P=0.0002). Associations were strongest in patients without known prior cardiac disease or cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Several biomarkers predicted death of any cause after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and heart-type fatty-acid-binding protein might improve patient selection for additional screening for occult cardiac disease or cancer, respectively. However, our results require validation in future studies.

Thrombolysis in patients with mild stroke: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Apart from missing the approved time window of 4.5 hours, one frequent cause for withholding recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treatment in patients with ischemic stroke is presentation with mild deficit on admission. We analyzed in a large cohort of patients whether rt-PA treatment is beneficial for this group of patients. METHODS: From a total of 54 917 patients with ischemic stroke prospectively enrolled in the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, 890 patients with mild deficit defined as ≤5 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale treated with and without rt-PA were matched for age, sex, prestroke disability, stroke severity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, stroke cause, and clinical stroke syndrome. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. For data visualization, weighted averages of outcome differences were computed for all age severity combinations and mapped to a color. For quantification of effect sizes, numbers need to treat were calculated. RESULTS: rt-PA-treated patients with mild deficit had a better outcome after 3 months compared with matched cases without rt-PA treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.89; P<0.001). In rt-PA-treated patients with mild deficit, the numbers need to treat ranged from 8 to 14. Improvement achieved by rt-PA treatment was observed along the entire age range. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, intravenous rt-PA treatment was beneficial for patients with mild deficit. Given the observational nature of these results, our data might serve as an incentive for future randomized controlled trials to provide a basis for optimal patient selection.

Risk of stroke in patients with prior VKA or DOAC: A population-based real-world registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To date, risk assessment of suffering ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in individuals under oral anticoagulation (OAC) is limited to hospital-based cohorts and patients with atrial fibrillation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the combination of three individual datasets, (1) the population-based Tyrolean Stroke Pathway database, prospectively documenting all (unselected) stroke patients in the entire federal state of the Tyrol and (2) nation-wide prescription data, detailing each reimbursed prescription in Austria as well as (3) the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, a nation-wide registry comprising data on all patients admitted to any of the 38 stroke units in Austria, we assessed risk of stroke in patients with prior oral anticoagulation and compared characteristics of patients taking direct oral anticoagulants and Vitamin-K-Antagonists. RESULTS: In Austria, oral anticoagulant prescription reimbursements increased from 292,475 in 2015 to 389,407 in 2021. In the Tyrol, prior oral anticoagulation treatment was evident in 586 of 3861 (15.2%) patients with ischemic and 131 of 523 (25.0%) with hemorrhagic stroke, with 20% and 35% of those stroke patients respectively having prior oral anticoagulation due to other indications than non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Considering prescription rates, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants was associated with a reduced stroke risk compared to Vitamin-K-Antagonists, especially in ischemic (1.05% vs 0.62%; RR 0.59, p < 0.001) but also in hemorrhagic stroke, even if less pronounced (0.21% vs 0.14%; RR 0.68, p = 0.06). In Austria, prior intake of direct oral anticoagulants was associated with lower risk of suffering acute large vessel occlusion stroke (RR 0.79, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: One in seven patients suffering ischemic and one in four suffering hemorrhagic stroke had prior oral anticoagulation treatment. Both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes are less frequent in those with direct oral anticoagulant intake compared to those taking Vitamin-K-Antagonists. Establishment of clear standard operating procedures on how to best care for acute stroke patients with oral anticoagulation is essential.

IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether IV thrombolysis (IVT) outperforms early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the acute setting of mild ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the early safety and efficacy of IVT with that of DAPT. METHODS: Data of mild noncardioembolic stroke patients with admission NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 who received IVT or early DAPT in the period 2018-2021 were extracted from a nationwide, prospective stroke unit registry. Study endpoints included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), early neurologic deterioration ≥4 NIHSS points (END), and 3-month functional outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 1,195 mild stroke patients treated with IVT and 2,625 patients treated with DAPT were included. IVT patients were younger (68.1 vs 70.8 years), had less hypertension (72.8% vs 83.5%), diabetes (19% vs 28.8%), and a history of myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 9.2%), and slightly higher admission NIHSS scores (median 2 vs median 1) when compared with DAPT patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, IVT was associated with sICH (4 [1.2%] vs 0) and END (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.5), and there was no difference in mRS 0-1 at 3 months (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.6). DISCUSSION: This analysis from a prospective nationwide stroke unit network indicates that IVT is not superior to DAPT in the setting of mild noncardioembolic stroke and may eventually be associated with harm. Further research focusing on acute therapy of mild stroke is highly warranted. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that IVT is not superior to DAPT in patients with acute mild (NIHSS score ≤3) noncardioembolic stroke. The study lacks the statistical precision to exclude clinically important superiority of either therapy.

Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in large-vessel ischemic stroke: A non-inferiority meta-analysis of 6 randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether thrombectomy alone is non-inferior to thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive, trial-level data, non-inferiority meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovascular thrombectomy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion of anterior circulation. METHODS: The prespecified primary efficacy outcome was functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS)score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. The two prespecified non-inferiority margins were risk differences of -10% and - 5%. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022361110) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Six trials were included in this analysis (DIRECT-MT, DEVT, SKIP, MR CLEAN-NO IV, DIRECT-SAFE and SWIFT DIRECT) comprising a total of 2334 patients. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved by 570 (49·0%) of 1164 patients in the thrombectomy alone group and 595 (50·9%) of 1170 patients in the thrombectomy with thrombolysis group (pooled risk difference - 0·02, [95% CI -0·06-0·02]). Combined thrombectomy and thrombolysis were associated with significantly higher rates of successful reperfusion (pooled risk ratio 0·96 [95% CI, 0·93-0·99], p = 0·006) but at the expense of a significantly increased risk of overall - but not symptomatic - intracranial haemorrhage (pooled risk ratio 0·87 [95% CI, 0·77-0·98], p = 0·02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a combined treatment approach, thrombectomy alone was non-inferior at -10% non-inferiority margin, but not at a - 5% inferiority margin for functional independence. Current evidence cannot exclude clinically important differences between the two treatment approaches.

Demographic and geographic vascular risk factor differences in European young adults with ischemic stroke: the 15 cities young stroke study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compared among young patients with ischemic stroke the distribution of vascular risk factors among sex, age groups, and 3 distinct geographic regions in Europe. METHODS: We included patients with first-ever ischemic stroke aged 15 to 49 years from existing hospital- or population-based prospective or consecutive young stroke registries involving 15 cities in 12 countries. Geographic regions were defined as northern (Finland, Norway), central (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, The Netherlands, Switzerland), and southern (Greece, Italy, Turkey) Europe. Hierarchical regression models were used for comparisons. RESULTS: In the study cohort (n=3944), the 3 most frequent risk factors were current smoking (48.7%), dyslipidemia (45.8%), and hypertension (35.9%). Compared with central (n=1868; median age, 43 years) and northern (n=1330; median age, 44 years) European patients, southern Europeans (n=746; median age, 41 years) were younger. No sex difference emerged between the regions, male:female ratio being 0.7 in those aged <34 years and reaching 1.7 in those aged 45 to 49 years. After accounting for confounders, no risk-factor differences emerged at the region level. Compared with females, males were older and they more frequently had dyslipidemia or coronary heart disease, or were smokers, irrespective of region. In both sexes, prevalence of family history of stroke, dyslipidemia, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and atrial fibrillation positively correlated with age across all regions. CONCLUSIONS: Primary preventive strategies for ischemic stroke in young adults-having high rate of modifiable risk factors-should be targeted according to sex and age at continental level.

Mean platelet volume may represent a predictive parameter for overall vascular mortality and ischemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: An increased mean platelet volume (MPV), as an indicator of larger, more reactive platelets resulting from an increased platelet turnover, may represent a risk factor for overall vascular mortality, including myocardial infarction. We intended to identify patients at higher risk of dying from vascular disease in a large, hospital-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 206 554 first-ever admissions to the Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien for determination of MPV between January 1996 and July 2003 were included. Primary end points were overall vascular mortality and death due to ischemic heart disease. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for sex, age, and platelet count was applied for analysis. MPV values were categorized into quintiles, with the lowest quintile serving as the reference category. Compared with individuals with lower MPV (<8.7 fL), hazard ratios for overall vascular mortality gradually increased to 1.5 in the highest category (≥11.01 fL). The relationship of MPV to ischemic heart disease was even stronger and increased from 1.2 (8.71 to 9.60 fL category) to 1.8 in the highest category (≥11.01 fL). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with an increased MPV (≥11.01 fL) are at higher risk of death due to ischemic heart disease, with hazard ratios comparable to those reported for obesity or smoking.

Time trends in stroke severity in the years 2005 to 2020: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With aging population, there is an increase of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other vascular risk factors. We investigated trends in stroke severity at hospital admission with respect to AF and other risk factors in a prospective national stroke registry from 2005 to 2020. METHODS: Data from the prospective Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were used to study demographic and clinical factors associated with the change in admission stroke severity over years. Time trends in admission stroke severity of patients with pre-stroke modified Rankin Score ≤ 3 were investigated with respect to clinical variables and predefined age groups 18-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥ 85 years. Time trends were studied using robust generalized linear models assuming normal distribution with a log link. Stroke severity on admission was assessed according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS). RESULTS: In total, 140,312 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in the analysis. Within the study period, mean patients' age increased from 70 to 72 years (p < 0.001) and median NIHSS at admission decreased from 4 to 3 (p < 0.001). The frequency of AF increased from 25 to 32% (p < 0.001). The decrease in median admission NIHSS was evident in all relevant subgroups but more pronounced in patients with risk factors including AF, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, elderly patients and those with pre-stroke disability. CONCLUSION: Despite an aging population and generally increasing AF frequency, we observed a consistent trend towards less disabling strokes on admission.

Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke with admission NIHSS score 0 or 1.

BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of stroke patients initially presenting with non-disabling or mild deficits may experience poor functional outcome. Despite, intravenous thrombolysis remains controversial in this subgroup of stroke patients due to its uncertain risk benefit ratio. AIM: We aimed to analyze the real-world experience with intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients presenting with very low NIHSS. METHODS: Data of stroke patients presenting with mild initial stroke severity (NIHSS 0-5) including vascular risk factors, stroke syndrome and etiology, early neurological deterioration, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), and functional outcome by modified Rankin Scale were extracted from a large nationwide stroke registry and analysed. Patients were categorized and compared according to admission severity NIHSS 0-1 versus NIHSS 2-5 and intravenous thrombolysis use. RESULTS: Seven hundred and three (2%) of 35,113 patients presenting with NIHSS 0-1 and 6316 (13.9%) of 45,521 of patients presenting with NIHSS 2-5 underwent intravenous thrombolysis. In the NIHSS 0-1 group, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with early neurological deterioration (adjusted OR 8.84, CI 6.61-11.83), sICH (adjusted OR 9.32, CI 4.53-19.15) and lower rate of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at three months (adjusted OR 0.67, CI 0.5-0.9). In stroke patients with NIHSS 2-5, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with early neurological deterioration (adjusted OR 1.7, 1.47-1.98), sICH (adjusted OR 5.75, CI 4.45-7.45), and higher rate of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at three months (adjusted OR 1.21, CI 1.08-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NIHSS 0-1, intravenous thrombolysis did not increase the likelihood of excellent outcome. Moreover, potential signals of harm were observed. Further research seems to be warranted.