Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention in Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed organ-transplant recipients have an increased incidence of, and mortality from, skin cancer. Nicotinamide (vitamin B3) enhances the repair of ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced DNA damage, reduces the cutaneous immunosuppressive effects of UV radiation, and reduces the incidence of keratinocyte cancers (including squamous-cell and basal-cell carcinomas) and actinic keratoses among high-risk immunocompetent patients. Whether oral nicotinamide is useful for skin-cancer chemoprevention in organ-transplant recipients is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, organ-transplant recipients who had had at least two keratinocyte cancers in the past 5 years to receive 500 mg of nicotinamide or placebo twice daily for 12 months. Participants were examined for skin lesions by dermatologists at 3-month intervals for 12 months. The primary end point was the number of new keratinocyte cancers during the 12-month intervention period. Secondary end points included the numbers of squamous-cell and basal-cell carcinomas during the 12-month intervention period, the number of actinic keratoses until 6 months after randomization, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 158 participants were enrolled, with 79 assigned to the nicotinamide group and 79 to the placebo group. The trial was stopped early owing to poor recruitment. At 12 months, there were 207 new keratinocyte cancers in the nicotinamide group and 210 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.3; P = 0.96). No significant between-group differences in squamous-cell and basal-cell carcinoma counts, actinic keratosis counts, or quality-of-life scores were observed. Adverse events and changes in blood or urine laboratory variables were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-month, placebo-controlled trial, oral nicotinamide therapy did not lead to lower numbers of keratinocyte cancers or actinic keratoses in immunosuppressed solid-organ transplant recipients. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; ONTRANS Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12617000599370.).

Remote cutaneous confocal microscopy: A multicentric prospective study evaluating diagnostic accuracy for melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma in tertiary settings.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous confocal microscopy (CCCM) facilitates in vivo visualisation of skin at a cellular level. Use of a "store and forward" approach for remote CCM interpretation (Remote-CCM) across multiple sites has not been tested and may increase access to non-invasive diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To test the diagnostic accuracy and safety of Remote-CCM. METHODS: We prospectively recruited lesions selected for biopsy for skin malignancy across five Australian tertiary dermatology centres. CCM, clinical and dermoscopy images were acquired pre-biopsy and accessed by a cloud-based platform for interpretation by CCM readers. CCM diagnosis was compared to histopathology results. RESULTS: Amongst the 201 lesions included, melanoma was the most common malignancy (34/72, 47.2%). Of the 89 lesions (44.8%) potentially 'saved' from biopsy, 80 (90%) were truly benign lesions and 9 (10.1%) were missed malignant lesions of MIS (n=7) and SCC (n=2). No invasive melanomas were missed. Sensitivity of remote-CCM for detection of malignancy was 89% (95%CI 79-95%) and specificity was 64% (95%CI 55-73%). LIMITATIONS: The study recruited from high-risk populations and excluded lesions that were not biopsied. CONCLUSION: Remote-CCM has comparable accuracy to bedside-CCM and safely reduces unnecessary biopsies. Potential SCCs are not appropriate for remote-CCM. Follow-up of borderline melanocytic lesions is recommended.

Response to 'The essential role of dermatology publications in enhancing professional diversity, equity and inclusion'.

LINKED ARTICLE: Burgin et al. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:473-4.