Compassionate use of ruxolitinib in patients with SARS-Cov-2 infection not on mechanical ventilation: Short-term effects on inflammation and ventilation.

Ruxolitinib is an anti-inflammatory drug that inhibits the Janus kinase-signal transducer (JAK-STAT) pathway on the surface of immune cells. The potential targeting of this pathway using JAK inhibitors is a promising approach in patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ruxolitinib was provided as a compassionate use in patients consecutively admitted to our institution for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Inclusion criteria were oxygen saturation less than or equal to 92%, signs of interstitial pneumonia, and no need of mechanical ventilation. Patients received 5 mg b.i.d. of ruxolitinib for 15 days, data were collected at baseline and on days 4, 7, and 15 during treatment. Two main targets were identified, C-reactive protein (CRP) and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio. In the 31 patients who received ruxolitinib, symptoms improved (dyspnea scale) on day 7 in 25 of 31 patients (80.6%); CRP decreased progressively from baseline (79.1 ± 73.4 mg/dl) to day 15 (18.6 ± 33.2, p = 0.022). In parallel with CRP, PO2/FiO2 ratio increased progressively during the 3 steps from 183 ± 95 to 361 ± 144 mmHg (p < 0.001). In those patients with a reduction of polymerase chain reaction less than or equal to 80%, delta increase of the PO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly more pronounced (129 ± 118 vs. 45 ± 35 mmHg, p = 0.02). No adverse side effects were recorded during treatment. In patients hospitalized for COVID-19, compassionate-use of ruxolitinib determined a significant reduction of biomarkers of inflammation, which was associated with a more effective ventilation and reduced need for oxygen support. Data on ruxolitinib reinforces the hypothesis that targeting the hyperinflammation state, may be of prognostic benefit in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? Some evidence suggest that patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) present an exuberant inflammatory response represented by a massive production of type I interferons and different pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nonetheless, as for the present, there are no proven therapeutic agents for COVID-19, in particular anti-inflammatory and antiviral, with a significant and reproducible positive clinical response. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? Targeted therapeutic management of pro-inflammatory pathways appears to be a promising strategy against COVID-19, and ruxolitinib, due to its established broad and fast anti-inflammatory effect, appears to be a promising candidate worthy of focused investigations in this field. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Ruxolitinib rapidly reduces the systemic inflammation, which accompanies the disease, thereby improving respiratory function and the need of oxygen support. This effect may contribute to avoid progression of the disease and the use of invasive ventilation. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? Data on ruxolitinib contributes the reinforcement of the hypothesis that it is crucial to counteract the early hyperinflammation state, particularly of the lungs, induced by COVID-19 infection.

Effect of Combination Therapy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on Mortality in Patients With COVID-19.

Conflicting evidence regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection do exist. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study including 377 consecutive patients admitted for pneumonia related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Of these, 297 were in combination treatment, 17 were on HCQ alone, and 63 did not receive either of these 2 drugs because of contraindications. The primary end point was in-hospital death. Mean age was 71.8 ± 13.4 years and 34.2% were women. We recorded 146 deaths: 35 in no treatment, 7 in HCQ treatment group, and 102 in HCQ + azithromycin treatment group (log rank test for Kaplan-Meier curve P < 0.001). At multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.057, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.035-1.079, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation/continuous positive airway pressure (HR 2.726, 95% CI 1.823-4.074, P < 0.001), and C reactive protein above the median (HR 2.191, 95% CI 1.479-3.246, P < 0.001) were directly associated with death, whereas use of HCQ + azithromycin (vs. no treatment; HR 0.265, 95% CI 0.171-0.412, P < 0.001) was inversely associated. In this study, we found a reduced in-hospital mortality in patients treated with a combination of HCQ and azithromycin after adjustment for comorbidities. A large randomized trial is necessary to confirm these findings.

Transrectal-HIFU as primary minimally-invasive option for localized prostate cancer. Is spinal anaesthesia cost-effective? A single centre experience in over 100 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The management of Prostate cancer (PC), since PSA testing has been introduced in the clinical practice, has been significantly spoiled by a "leading-time bias" effect. As a consequence, this has brought to a dramatic diagnosis anticipation at the 4th-5th decade of life in sexually active and otherwise asymptomatic men. Standard options as radical prostatectomy or EBRT are hampered by a significant negative impact on patient's QoL. More recently several alternative minimally-invasive ablative treatment modalities have been proposed with promising results. Among these, TR-HIFU (Trans-Rectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound) is playing a growing role in the treatment of localized low-intermediate risk PC, although long-term oncologic outcome are still awaited. In order to achieve an optimal result, a specific TR-HIFU's requirement is given by an unchanging target throughout the whole procedure. Therefore, the ideal anaesthesia should be either minimally-invasive and allow to get a motionless target up to 3-4 hours. A retrospective evaluation of efficacy and safety of a spinal anaesthesia in this patient's setting was done. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 107 patients with localized prostate cancer treated in our institution from October 2004 to December 2007 with TR-HIFU procedure received a subarachnoidal anaesthesia with combined administration of 0.5% normobaric racemic bupivacaine (15 to 17.5 mg) and sufentanil 5 microg. RESULTS: This technique allowed covering the whole TR-HIFU procedure (analgesia and motor blockade up to 4-5 hours). It was well tolerated by patients who only rarely required additional sedative or analgesics. A low anaesthesia-related side effects rate, as arterial hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and no severe side effects of intrathecal opioids, as deep sedation, bradycardia, myosis, bradypnea and oxygen desaturation, occurred. Intraoperative employment of sedatives and postoperative need of analgesics was low. CONCLUSIONS: Using a low-dose intrathecal sufentanil an effective spinal block either on the sensitive and motor pathways was provided. Patients' tolerance to the procedure was good and the side-effect rate low. No adverse reactions to intrathecal sufentanil 5 microg were observed. In our experience TR-HIFU can be performed with neuraxial block in most of the cases and it's associated to a favorable cost-benefit rate.

Childhood thalidomide neuropathy: a clinical and neurophysiologic study.

Thalidomide was recently reintroduced to treat several immune-mediated pathologies. Peripheral neuropathy is a significant side effect limiting its clinical use. Our aims include: (1) describing and identifying the incidence of clinical or electrophysiologic peripheral neuropathy in children, (2) determining whether peripheral neuropathy correlates with cumulative dose of thalidomide and with age, and (3) defining its reversibility rate. We studied 13 children manifesting immune-mediated pathologies treated with thalidomide at doses ranging from 25-100 mg/day. Clinical and neurophysiologic evaluation was performed before and after starting treatment. Seven children (53.8%) showed neurophysiologic signs of sensory peripheral axonal polyneuropathy. Five presented associated clinical symptoms, while the other two only presented subclinical, neurophysiologic signs of peripheral neuropathy. We found a significant correlation between the incidence of peripheral neuropathy and thalidomide cumulative dose (P = 0.02). We observed a lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy at a cumulative dose <20 gm, and a correlation with age (P < 0.01). The clinical and electrophysiologic recovery rate was 40%, and clinical improvement alone was observed in another 40%. Thalidomide induces dose-dependent and age-dependent peripheral neuropathy at a significant frequency in childhood (53.8%). In our experience a cumulative dosage at >20 gm and long-term administration for >10 months seem to increase the risk of peripheral neuropathy. We propose clinical and neurophysiologic follow-up every 3 months to identify and monitor possible side effects.

Short latency evoked somatosensory potentials after stimulation of the median nerve in children: normative data.

Purpose of the present study was to investigate the early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials after median nerve stimulation and to determine normative data as a function of age. Two hundred forty subjects aged 1 day to 18 years were studied to determine standards of normality during maturation to establish the growth curve. The N9, N13, and N20 components were present in all patients. These components decreased in latency until 4 to 5 years of age because of central nervous system maturation after which latencies increased until adulthood, on the basis of brain and body growth.