RESUMEN
Background: The feasibility, benefit, and safety of multiport laparoscopic choledochal cyst (CDC) excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticoenterostomy (MPCH) have been consistently confirmed. Single-port laparoscopic CDC excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticoenterostomy (SPCH) has advantages of less traumatic and more cosmetic beneficial, it has been reported in some case series, but it is technically challenging. We propose a modified technique to reduce technical difficulty in performing SPCH. The safety and feasibility of modified SPCH were compared with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic CDC excision. Methods: A total of 43 consecutive patients who diagnosed with CDC by preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and underwent SPCH (n=24) and MPCH (n=19) for choledochal cyst (CDC) by a single surgeon between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2021, were enrolled. The baseline clinical characteristics, efficacy and safety outcomes of short-term were compared. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics of the MPCH and SPCH groups are comparable. Average postoperative length of hospital stay was shorter in the SPCH group than in the MPCH group, but the difference was not statistically significant (7.00 vs. 7.58 days; P>0.99). The operation time (281.75 vs. 277.3 min; P=0.58) and the amount of blood loss (9.33 vs. 16.68 mL; P=0.57) were similar in both groups. A significantly greater number of drainage tubes were placed in the MPCH group compared to the SPCH group (11 vs. 5; P=0.01). One patient suffered from hepaticoenterostomy anastomosis stricture in the SPCH group. Conclusions: The short-term outcome of modified SPCH is comparable with MPCH according to our study. It is easily adaptable treatment of CDC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative cholangitis (PC) is the most common and serious complication of biliary atresia (BA) patients post-Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). The duration of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics (IVA) after KPE varies with no clear consensus. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to explore the effects of IVA duration on preventing post-operative cholangitis and analyze the risk factors for cholangitis and short-term prognosis. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with BA and received KPE in Guangzhou Women and Children's Hospital in 2018, were included in this study. The patients received prophylactic IVA after KPE. Firstly, the patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of PC (PC and NPC group). The correlation between PC and the IVA duration was analyzed, followed by a comparison of short-term prognosis, outcome, and other risk factors between the groups. Next, the patients were divided based on the median IVA duration of 11 days (long IVA and short IVA group), followed by a comparison of the incidence of PC, short-term prognosis, outcome, and other risk factors between the two groups. RESULTS: Totally 89 patients were included in this study. Amount them, eleven patients who were lost during follow-up, were excluded from the study. The prophylactic IVA duration of the PC (n=52) and NPC (n=25) groups was 12.6±8.5 and 13.0±4.5 days, respectively (P=0.79). Further, the jaundice clearance rate of the two groups was similar (PC: 31/52, NPC: 13/25, P=0.53). There was no difference in the incidence and frequency of cholangitis between the short (n=42) and long (n=35) IVA groups (27/42, 25/35, P=0.51), and the duration of IVA had no effect on jaundice clearance (24/42, 20/35, P=1.00). The short IVA group had a significantly shorter hospital stay than the long IVA group (16.2±5.1, 25.3±8.3, P=8.95×10-8). Patients undergoing KPE at an older age were at a higher risk of cholangitis (NPC: 60.6±19.7, PC: 72.3±17.8, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A long duration of IVA after KPE for BA may not be necessary. Early diagnosed patients had timely surgery had a lower incidence of PC. Our findings may help in promoting the scientific use of antibiotics and reducing the LHS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the postoperative short-term and long-term outcomes in the management of type I esophageal atresia, and to explore the ideal operative strategy. METHODS: Clinical data of 22 patients with type I esophageal atresia treated from January 2005 to September 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 22 patients, 6 patients gave up the treatment. Two underwent primary repair after birth. Of 14 patients undergoing cervical esophagostomy and gastrostomy, 8 patients received esophageal replacement. Postoperative short-term and long-term complications, nutritional state and neurodevelopment were studied on above 10 children with radical operations. RESULTS: Of 10 patients with radical operation, the short-term complications were hydrothorax in 1 case, anastomotic leakage in 4, dumping syndrome in 1, anastomotic stricture in 1. The long-term complications were esophageal stricture in 2 cases, and repeated respiratory infection in 3. These complications could be managed successfully. The postoperative follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 62 months. Two cases were lost during follow-up after 2 years. Weight-for-age was normal in 2 patients, mild malnutrition in 5 patients, and moderate malnutrition in 1 patients. Neurodevelopment is significantly delayed as compared to normal children. CONCLUSIONS: Operative strategy should be chosen according to the distance between proximal and distal esophagus in the treatment of type I esophageal atresia. The efficacy of radical operation is relative satisfactory in terms of short-term and long-term complications and the quality of life.