Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Poult Sci ; 95(11): 2690-2695, 2016 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27389063

RESUMEN

Marination is an effective method that can be used to improve the tenderness of early deboned breast fillets. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of pre- and post-marination aging of 2 h postmortem (PM) deboned chicken fillets to get optimum meat quality. In this study, a total of 300 broilers (43 to 46 d of age) were processed using an in-line system and deboned at 2 h PM. Fillets were marinated, at either 2.5, 4, 6, 8 or 24 h PM, using vacuum tumbling (20 min) with a 15% marinade (final concentration of 0.5% salt and 0.45% phosphate). A non-marinated control (CON) was included. The left (HOLD) fillets were aged (held at 4°C for 24 h) prior to freezing post-marination while the right (NO HOLD) fillets were frozen immediately after marination to simulate various commercial practices. Marination pickup (MPU), total marinade retained after thawing (TMR), total purge loss after thawing (TPL), cook loss (CL), and Meullenet-Owens Razor Shear energy (MORSE) values were measured. Both in HOLD and NO HOLD fillets, there was an increase (P < 0.05) in MPU and TMR as the time of marination increased from 2.5 to 24 h PM. Furthermore, the HOLD fillets had a higher (P < 0.05) TPL when compared to the NO HOLD group. There was a higher (P < 0.05) CL for the CON fillets when compared to all marinated fillets suggesting that marination resulted in better water holding capacity. However, both in HOLD and NO HOLD groups, the MORSE values for the marinated fillets decreased (P < 0.05) from 4 h PM onwards, with 8 and 24 h PM having lower (P < 0.05) values than all other treatments. The results of this study suggest that pre-marination aging (aging after deboning prior to marination) of early (2 h PM) deboned fillets to 8 h PM can provide better tumble marination pickup and retention as well as tenderness (or lower shear values).


Asunto(s)
Manipulación de Alimentos/métodos , Carne/análisis , Animales , Pollos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Poult Sci ; 95(9): 1980-8, 2016 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27339298

RESUMEN

Chickens provided with outdoor access often do not fully use the range area. Natural cover, such as trees, can provide shelter and increase range use, but may not be practical for use in all free-range operations. A study was conducted to determine whether constructed enrichments that simulate natural structures increase range use and impact behavior of meat chickens. Slow-growing Delaware chickens were raised in floor pens (17 birds/pen) in a naturally ventilated house, with a pophole in each pen that allowed daily access to a vegetation-covered outdoor area. Feed and water were provided inside and outside. Birds were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments: no range enrichment (control; NON) or range enrichment (ENR), which had roosts made of plastic pipe or screened shelters placed 7.6 m and 22.9 m from the house and overhead shade panels at 15.2 m. There were 4 replications. The numbers of birds inside and in the 4 quadrants of the range were counted in 7-min intervals 3 times daily (0900 h, 1300 h, and 1600 h) for 3 consecutive d when the birds were 7 and 10 wk of age; the numbers of birds performing various behaviors also were counted. On average, only 12.9% of birds used the range at any given time. The behavior of the birds was strongly affected by location (inside vs. outside), with birds mainly foraging and walking while outside and feeding, standing, and sitting while inside. Time of d impacted the number of birds that ranged (P ≤ 0.0001), with fewest birds outside during mid-day. Overall, birds using the range were most often (71%) observed in the quadrant nearest the house (zero to 7.6 m). However, in the ENR treatment, more birds (13%; P ≤ 0.0001) were observed in the farthest 2 quadrants (15.2 to 30.5 m from the house) than in the NON treatment (6%). This indicates that adding constructed enrichments to the range encouraged meat chickens to use it more fully.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/instrumentación , Pollos/fisiología , Vivienda para Animales , Actividad Motora , Agricultura Orgánica , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA