Failure to Rescue in Emergency General Surgery: Impact of Fragmentation of Care.

OBJECTIVE: Compare EGS patient outcomes after index and nonindex hospital readmissions, and explore predictive factors for nonindex readmission. BACKGROUND: Readmission to a different hospital leads to fragmentation of care. The impact of nonindex readmission on patient outcomes after EGS is not well established. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2017) was queried for adult patients readmitted after an EGS procedure. Patients were stratified and propensity-matched according to readmission destination: index versus nonindex hospital. Outcomes were failure to rescue (FTR), mortality, number of subsequent readmissions, overall hospital length of stay, and total costs. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed to account for clustering effect within hospitals and adjusting for patient- and hospital-level potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 471,570 EGS patients were identified, of which 79,127 (16.8%) were readmitted within 30 days: index hospital (61,472; 77.7%) versus nonindex hospital (17,655; 22.3%). After 1:1 propensity matching, patients with nonindex readmission had higher rates of FTR (5.6% vs 4.3%; P < 0.001), mortality (2.7% vs 2.1%; P < 0.001), and overall hospital costs [in $1000; 37 (27-64) vs 28 (21-48); P < 0.001]. Nonindex readmission was independently associated with higher odds of FTR [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (1.03-1.36); P < 0.001]. Predictors of nonindex readmission included top quartile for zip code median household income [1.35 (1.08-1.69); P < 0.001], fringe county residence [1.08 (1.01-1.16); P = 0.049], discharge to a skilled nursing facility [1.28 (1.20-1.36); P < 0.001], and leaving against medical advice [2.32 (1.81-2.98); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: One in 5 readmissions after EGS occur at a different hospital. Nonindex readmission carries a heightened risk of FTR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic. STUDY TYPE: Prognostic.

Early Thromboprophylaxis in Operative Spinal Trauma Does Not Increase Risk of Bleeding Complications.

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis in patients with spinal trauma is often delayed due to the risk of bleeding and expansion of the intraspinal hematoma (ISH). Our study aimed to assess the safety of early initiation of thromboprophylaxis in patients with operative spinal trauma (OST). METHODS: We performed a 2014-2017 retrospective analysis of our level I trauma registry and included all adult patients with isolated OST who received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Patients were stratified into early (≤48 h) and late (>48 h) initiation of LMWH groups. Outcomes were a decline in hemoglobin level, packed red blood cell transfusion, and progression of ISH. We performed multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified a total of 526 patients (early: 332, late: 194). Mean age was 46 ± 22y, and the median spine abbreviated injury scale was 3 [2-4]. After thromboprophylaxis, 1.5% (8) of the patients had progression of ISH and 1% (5) underwent surgical decompression of the spinal canal. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the rate of postprophylaxis ISH progression (1.5% versus 1.6%, P = 0.11) or surgical decompression (0.9% versus 1.1%, P = 0.19). Patients who received LMWH within 48 hrs had a lower incidence of clinically significant deep vein thrombosis (2.4% versus 6.8%, P = 0.02), but no difference in pulmonary embolism (0.6% versus 1.6%, P = 0.33) or mortality (1.2% versus 1.5%, P = 0.41). On regression analysis, there was no difference regarding decline in hemoglobin levels (ß = 0.079, [-0.253 to 1.025]; P = 0.23) or number of packed red blood cell units transfused (ß = -0.011, [-0.298 to 0.471]; P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH within the first 48 h in patients with OST is safe and efficacious. Prospective studies are needed to further validate their risk-benefit ratio. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III therapeutic.

Readmission With Major Abdominal Complications After Penetrating Abdominal Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in operative techniques, major abdominal complications (MACs) continue to occur after penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). This study aimed to evaluate the burden of MAC after PAT. METHODS: The (2012-2015) National Readmission Database was queried for all adult (age ≥18 y) trauma patients with penetrating injuries who underwent exploratory laparotomy and were readmitted within 6 mo of index hospitalization discharge. Patients were stratified by firearm injuries (FIs) and stab injuries (SIs). Primary outcomes were rates of MAC: intra-abdominal abscesses (IAAs), superficial surgical site infection (SSI), and fascial dehiscence within 6 mo after discharge. Secondary outcomes were both nonabdominal complications and mortality, postdischarge, and 6-mo readmission. Regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 4473 patients (FI, 2326; SI, 2147) were included in the study; the mean age was 32 ± 14 y, the Injury Severity Score was 19 (15-25), and 23% underwent damage control laparotomy (DCL). The rate of MAC within 6 mo was 22% (IAA 19%, SSI 7%, and fascial dehiscence 4%). Patients with FIs had a higher rate of IAA (27% versus 10%; P < 0.01), SSI (11% versus 3%; P < 0.01), fascial dehiscence (5% versus 3%; P = 0.03), nonabdominal complications (54% versus 24%; P < 0.01), and postdischarge mortality (8% versus 6%; P < 0.01) compared with patients with SIs . On regression analysis, DCL (P < 0.01), large bowel perforation (P < 0.01), biliary-pancreatic injury (P < 0.01), hepatic injury (P < 0.01), and blood transfusion (P = 0.02) were predictors of MAC. CONCLUSIONS: MAC developed in one in five patients after PAT. FIs have a higher potential for hollow viscus injury and peritoneal contamination, and are more predictive of MAC and nonabdominal complications, especially after DCL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Number and Type of Complications Associated With Failure to Rescue in Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is becoming a ubiquitous metric of quality care. The aim of our study is to determine the type and number of complications associated with FTR after trauma. METHODS: We reviewed the Trauma Quality Improvement Program including patients who developed complications after admission. Patients were divided as the following: "FTR" if the patient died or "rescued" if the patient did not die. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the effect of the type and number of complications on FTR. RESULTS: A total of 25,754 patients were included with 972 identified as FTR. Logistic regression identified sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 6.61 [4.72-9.27]), pneumonia (OR = 2.79 [2.15-3.64]), acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 4.6 [3.17-6.69]), and cardiovascular complications (OR = 24.22 [19.39-30.26]) as predictors of FTR. The odds ratio of FTR increased by 8.8 for every single increase in the number of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Specific types of complications increase the odds of FTR. The overall complication burden will also increase the odds of FTR linearly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Metabolic Syndrome Exponentially Increases the Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Operative Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined as the cluster: hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. Operative diverticulitis in the setting of MS can be challenging to manage. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of MS on outcomes in operative acute diverticulitis patients. METHODS: We analyzed the (2012-2015) NSQIP database. We identified acute diverticulitis patients who underwent surgery. MS was defined as follows: body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, hypertension, and diabetes. Our primary outcome measure was the occurrence of any adverse events (complications, 30-d readmission, and mortality). Secondary outcome measures were complications, hospital length of stay, 30-d readmission, and mortality. Regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 4572 patients were identified. Mean BMI was 29 ± 10 kg/m2. 14.6% (275) of obese patients had metabolic syndrome. Adverse events were higher in patients with MS (odds ratio [OR], 8.1; P < 0.001) versus the obese group and the obese and hypertensive group. Patients with MS had higher odds of reintubation (OR 1.9; P = 0.03), >48 h ventilator dependence (OR 3.5; P = 0.01), myocardial infarction (OR 2.3; P = 0.03), and superficial or deep surgical-site infections (OR 2.1; P = 0.01) compared with patients with no MS. MS patients had a longer length of stay (ß = 1.23; P = 0.02), higher 30-d readmissions (OR 1.7; P < 0.01), and mortality (OR 2.1; P < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of metabolic syndrome for predicting adverse outcomes was 0.797, which was higher than the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for BMI (0.58), hypertension (0.51), or diabetes (0.64) alone. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events in patients with MS after surgery for diverticulitis are higher than obesity, hypertension, or diabetes alone. Patients with MS have longer recovery, and higher rates of complications, readmissions, and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Preinjury Statins Are Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Statins have been shown to improve outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) in animal models. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of preinjury statins on outcomes in TBI patients. METHODS: We performed a 4-y (2014-2017) review of our TBI database and included all patients aged ≥18 y with severe isolated TBI. Patients were stratified into those who were on statins and those who were not and were matched (1:2 ratio) using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were skilled nursing facility disposition, Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended score, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: We identified 1359 patients, of which 270 were matched (statin: 90, no-statin: 180). Mean age was 55 ± 8y, median Glasgow Coma Scale was 10 (8-12), and median head-abbreviated injury scale was 3 (3-5). Matched groups were similar in age, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, neurosurgical intervention, type and size of intracranial hemorrhage, and preinjury anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 18%. Patients who received statins had lower rates of in-hospital mortality (11% versus 21%, P = 0.01), skilled nursing facility disposition (19% versus 28%; P = 0.04), and a higher median Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended (11 [9-13] versus 9 [8-10]; P = 0.04). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of hospital LOS (6 [4-9] versus 5 [3-8]; P = 0.34) and intensive care unit LOS (3 [3-6] versus 4 [3-5]; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury statin use in isolated traumatic brain injury patients is associated with improved outcomes. This finding warrants further investigations to evaluate the potential beneficial role of statins as a therapeutic drug in a TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Therapeutic.

Retrospective Analysis of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprophylaxis with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) are recommended to prevent Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) after trauma. Experimental work has shown beneficial effects of LMWH in animal models, but it is unknown if similar effects exist in humans. We hypothesized that treatment with LMWH is associated with a survival benefit when compared to UFH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our level I trauma center database from January 2009 to June 2018. Pediatric patients (age < 18) were included if they received either LMWH or UFH during their stay. Outcome measures included mortality, VTE complications, and hospital length of stay (HLOS). RESULTS: A total of 354 patients were included. Patients who received LMWH had lower mortality compared to those who received UFH. After multivariate logistic regression, LMWH was still independently associated with improved survival. No association was found between LMWH and UFH regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) rates. No association was found between LMWH with HLOS. CONCLUSIONS: LMWH was associated with improved survival compared to UFH in our pediatric trauma patients. This was independent of injury severity or VTE complications. Further studies are required to understand better the mechanisms by which LMWH improves survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Multicenter Validation of the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score for Predicting Massive Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion (MT) is a lifesaving treatment for hemorrhaging patients. Predicting the need for MT is crucial to improve survival. The aim of our study was to validate the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score to predict MT in a multicenter cohort of trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a (2015-2017) analysis of adult (age ≥ 18 year) trauma patients who had a high-level trauma team activation at three Level I trauma centers. The RABT was calculated using the 4-point score [blunt (0)/penetrating trauma (1), shock index ≥ 1 (1), pelvic fracture (1), and FAST positive (1)]. A RABT score of ≥ 2 was used to predict MT (≥ 10 units of packed red blood cells within 24 h). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the score's predictive power compared to the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score. RESULTS: We analyzed 1018 patients: 216 (facility I), 363 (facility II), and 439 (facility III). The mean age was 41 ± 19 year, and the injury severity score (ISS) was 29 [22-36]. The overall MT rate was 19%. The overall AUROC of RABT ≥ 2 was 0.89. The sensitivity of the RABT ≥ 2 was 78%, and the specificity was 91%. The RABT score had a higher sensitivity (78% vs. 69%) and specificity (91% vs. 82%) than the ABC score. CONCLUSION: The RABT score is a valid tool to predict MT in severely injured trauma patients. It is an objective score that aids clinicians in predicting the need for MT to mobilize blood products and minimize the waste of resources.

Beta-Blocker Therapy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have demonstrated improved outcomes in TBI patients receiving in-hospital beta-blockers. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of beta-blockers on outcomes in TBI patients. METHODS: Adult patients with severe TBI (intracranial AIS ≥ 3) were included in the study. Hemodynamically stable patients at 24 h after injury were randomized to receive either 20 mg propranolol orally every 12 h up to 10 days or until discharge (BB+) or no propranolol (BB-). Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score on discharge and at 6-month follow-up. Subgroup analysis including only isolated severe TBI (intracranial AIS ≥ 3 with extracranial AIS ≤ 2) was carried out. Poisson regression models were used. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen randomized patients of whom 45% received BB were analyzed. There were no significant demographic or clinical differences between BB+ and BB- cohorts. No significant difference in in-hospital mortality (adj. IRR 0.6 [95% CI 0.3-1.4], p = 0.2) or long-term functional outcome was measured between the cohorts (p = 0.3). One hundred fifty-four patients suffered isolated severe TBI of whom 44% received BB. The BB+ group had significantly lower mortality relative to the BB- group (18.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.012). On regression analysis, propranolol had a significant protective effect on in-hospital mortality (adj. IRR 0.32, p = 0.04) and functional outcome at 6-month follow-up (GOS-E ≥ 5 adj. IRR 1.2, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Propranolol decreases in-hospital mortality and improves long-term functional outcome in isolated severe TBI. This randomized trial speaks in favor of routine administration of beta-blocker therapy as part of a standardized neurointensive care protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; therapeutic. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic study.

The Hidden Burden of Mental Health Outcomes Following Firearm-related Injures.

OBJECTIVES: Examine the effect of different types of firearms on readmission due to acute stress disorder (ASD) and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in firearm-injury victims. BACKGROUND: Survivors of firearm-related injuries suffer long-term sequelae such as disability, work loss, and deterioration in the quality of life. There is a paucity of data describing the long-term mental health outcomes in these patients. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2011-2015) analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database. All adult patients with firearm injuries were stratified into 3 groups by firearm type: handgun, shotgun, and semiautomatic rifle. Outcome measures were the incidence and predictors of ASD/PTSD. RESULTS: A total of 100,704 victims of firearm-related injuries were identified, of which 13.3% (n = 13,393) were readmitted within 6 months of index hospitalization, 6.7% (n = 8970) of these due to ASD/PTSD. Mean age was 34 ±â€Š14 years, 88% were men. Of those readmitted due to ASD/PTSD, 24% (n = 2153) sustained a handgun-related injury on index hospitalization, 12% (n = 1076) shotgun, and 64% (n = 5741) semiautomatic gun (P = 0.039). On regression analysis, semiautomatic gun and shotgun victims had higher odds of developing ASD/PTSD upon readmission [odds ratio (OR): 2.05 (1.10-4.12) and OR: 1.41 (1.08-2.11)] compared to handgun. Female sex [OR: 1.79 (1.05-3.05)] and younger age representing those younger than 25 years [OR: 4.66 (1.12-6.74)] were also independently associated with higher odds of ASD/PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from the lives lost, survivors of semiautomatic rifle- and shotgun-related injuries suffer long-term mental health sequalae. These secondary and debilitating mental health outcomes are important considerations for capturing the overall burden of the disease.

Pediatric Liver Injury: Physical Examination, Fast and Serum Transaminases Can Serve as a Guide.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine if the combination of physical examination (PE), serum transaminases along with Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) would effectively rule out major hepatic injuries (HIs) after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in hemodynamically stable pediatric patients. METHODS: We conducted a 9-year retrospective study of pediatric patients (<18 y) with BAT. We collected data on liver enzymes (aspartate transaminase [AST] and alanine transaminase [ALT]), FAST, and PE findings. Definitive diagnosis and staging of HI were based on abdominal CT scanning. The sensitivity and specificity of ALT/AST, FAST, and PE were then calculated individually and in combination. RESULTS: We identified a total of 423 pediatric patients with BAT. Mean age was 11 y, median abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 [2-4], and mean ED-SBP was 132 mm Hg. One hundred ninety-eight patients had HI of which 107 were major HI, defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma as ≥grade III. Using ROC curve analysis, optimum ALT and AST thresholds were determined to be 90 U/L and 120 U/L, respectively. The sensitivity of FAST was 50% while that of PE was 40%. Combining PE with AST/ALT and FAST had an overall sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 87%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable pediatric blunt abdominal trauma patients, CT scanning can be avoided using a combination of readily available tests thus avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure. However, pediatric patients with positive PE, FAST, and elevated AST/ALT may eventually require CT scan to further evaluate liver injuries.

Chronic Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alcoholism is associated with variable effects on the coagulation system. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze the currently unknown association between chronic alcohol consumption and the risk of venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We performed a 2-y (2013-2014) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16 were included. We excluded patients with acute alcohol intoxication, hematologic disorders, and cancer. Patients were divided into two groups (alcoholic and nonalcoholic) and were matched using propensity score matching (1:1) for demographics, ISS, injury location, and admission vitals. Outcomes measures were the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in each group. RESULTS: Of the 91,066 trauma patients included in our analysis, 35,460 patients were matched (alcoholics: 17,730; nonalcoholics: 17,730). The mean was age 45 ± 18 y, and 81% were males. Matched groups were similar in age (P = 0.32), heart rate (P = 0.31), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.46), location of injury (P = 0.85), ISS (P = 0.76), and Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.38). Prevalence of DVT was lower in alcoholics compared with nonalcoholics (2.34% versus 5.12%, P = 0.01). The overall incidence of PE was 1.2%, and there was no difference between the two groups (1.1% versus 1.3%, P = 0.22). Similarly, there was no difference in mortality (14.8% versus 15.4%, P = 0.32) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic alcohol consumption is associated with a low risk of DVT in trauma patients. This association warrants further investigation of the possible physiological effects of alcohol in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

The role of frailty and prehabilitation in surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aging surgical population constitutes a unique challenge to clinicians across the spectrum of care. Frailty is a valuable tool for preoperative risk stratification and may guide targeted interventions, such as prehabilitation. The aim of this review is to revise the recent literature on the role of frailty and prehabilitation to optimize geriatric patients undergoing surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The concept of frailty became more refined over the past couple of decades, and its various dimensions have been operationalized into an array of different frailty scoring systems. The association between frailty and adverse perioperative events has been demonstrated in many surgical specialties. The use of multimodal prehabilitation of frail patients is expanding, and most prehabilitation programs (which focus on nutritional supplementation, feedback-based exercise regimens, and pulmonary optimization) have promising outcomes. SUMMARY: Frailty is a valuable risk stratification tool that better captures the state of augmented vulnerability of older adults. Frail patients benefit from targeted interventions, such as multimodal prehabilitation. Thus, the implementation of nationwide geriatric surgery standards can address ongoing challenges in performing surgery on older, frail patients.

Does it matter where you get your surgery for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: The influence of hospital-related factors on outcomes following colorectal surgery is not well-established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital factors on outcomes in surgically managed colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2014-2015) analysis of the NIS database. Adult (> 18 years) patients who underwent open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients were stratified based on hospital: volume (low vs. high), teaching status, and location (urban vs. rural). Outcome measures were complications and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 153,453 patients with CRC were identified of which 35.3% underwent surgical management. Mean age was 69 ± 13 years, 51.6% were female, and 67% were white. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were managed at a high-volume center, 48% at intermediate-volume center while 25% at a low-volume center. Complications and mortality rates were lower in patients who were managed at high-volume centers and urban hospitals, while no difference was noticed based on teaching status. On regression analysis, patients managed at high-volume centers (OR 0.76 [0.56-0.89]) and urban hospitals (OR 0.83 [0.64-0.91]) have lower odds of complications; similarly, high-volume centers (OR 0.79 [0.65-0.90]) and urban facility (OR 0.87 [0.70-0.92]) were associated with lower odds of mortality. However, there was no association between teaching status and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Hospital factors significantly influence outcomes in patients with CRC managed surgically. High-volume centers and urban facilities have relatively better outcomes. Regionalization of care along with the appropriate availability of resources may improve outcomes in patients with CRC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Observational Study.

Colon cancer in the young: contributing factors and short-term surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence in young patients has increased significantly over the last few decades. The aim of this study is to evaluate demographic and tumor characteristics of young patients and analyze the short-term surgical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a 2-year review (2015-2016) of the ACS-NSQIP and included all patients with CC who underwent surgical management. Patients were stratified into two groups: early-onset CC (< 50 years old) and late-onset CC (≥ 50 years old). Outcome measures were hospital length of stay, 30-day complications, mortality, and readmission. RESULTS: We included a total of 15,957 patients in the analysis. Mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 52% were male. Overall 10% of the patients had early-onset CC. Patients with early-onset CC were more likely to be black (11% vs 7%, p = 0.04) and Hispanic (8% vs 4%, p = 0.02). Additionally, they presented with a more aggressive tumor and higher TNM staging. Patients with early onset CC had lower 30-day complications (18% vs 22%, p = 0.02), shorter hospital length of stay (6[3-8] vs 8[5-11], p = 0.03) and lower 30-day mortality (0.4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.04) compared to their counterparts. However, there was no difference between the two groups regarding 30-day readmission. On regression analysis, there was no difference between the two groups regarding study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity does exist in the incidence of colon cancer in the young with higher incidence in blacks. Younger patients with CC tend to have better surgical outcomes on univariate analysis. On regression analysis, the surgical outcomes between the two groups are comparable.

Fragmentation of Care After Geriatric Trauma: A Nationwide Analysis of outcomes and Predictors.

The health care system for the elderly is fragmented, that is worsened when readmission occurs to different hospitals. There is limited investigation into the impact of fragmentation on geriatric trauma patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following readmissions after geriatric trauma. The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2017) was queried for elderly trauma patients (aged ≥65 years) readmitted due to any cause. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to readmission: index vs non-index hospital. Outcomes were 30 and 180-day complications, mortality, and the number of subsequent readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent predictors of fragmentation of care. A total of 36,176 trauma patients were readmitted, of which 3856 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) were readmitted: index hospital (3420; 89%) vs non-index hospital (436; 11%). Following 1:2 propensity matching, elderly with non-index hospital readmission had higher rates of death and MI within 180 days (P = .01 and .02, respectively). They had statistically higher 30 and 180-day pneumonia (P < .01), CHF (P < .01), arrhythmias (P < .01), MI (P < .01), sepsis (P < .01), and UTI (P < .01). On multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, pneumonia (OR 1.70, P = .03), congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR 1.80, P = .03), female gender (OR .72, P = .04), and severe Head and Neck trauma (AIS≥3) (OR 1.50, P < .01) on index admission were independent predictors of fragmentation of care. While the increase in time to readmission (OR 1.01, P < .01) was also associated independently with non-index hospital admission. Fragmented care after geriatric trauma could be associated with higher mortality and complications.

Non-operative management of cirrhotic patients with acute calculous cholecystitis: How effective is it?

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in patients with cirrhosis was proposed. We examined the outcomes of cirrhotic patients with ACC treated with cholecystectomy compared to NOM. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017-Nationwide Readmissions Database including cirrhotic patients with ACC. Patients were stratified: cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT), and antibiotics only. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: complications, failure of NOM. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mortality, length of stay (LOS), and charges. RESULTS: 3454 patients were identified. 1832 underwent cholecystectomy, 360 PCT, and 1262 were treated with antibiotics. PCT patients had higher mortality 16.9% vs. the antibiotics group 10.9% vs. cholecystectomy group 4.2%. PCT patients had longer LOS, but lower charges compared to the operative group. Failure of NOM was 28.2%. On regression, PCT was associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: ACC remains a morbid disease in cirrhosis patients. One in three failed NOM, had longer LOS, and higher mortality. Further studies are warranted to identify predictors of NOM failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

Improving blunt cerebrovascular injury screening in motor vehicle collision patients: Does airbag deployment matter?

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) can cause blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). Exploring MVC characteristics that increase BCVI may reduce missed injuries. This study aims to evaluate the association between airbag deployment and BCVI. METHODS: We analyzed the 2016-Trauma Quality Improvement Database including adult MVC drivers. Patients were stratified: airbag deployment(A+) and no-airbag deployment(A-). Outcomes were BCVI, and cervical spine injuries (CSI). RESULTS: A total of 122,973 patients were identified: A+: 106,492, and A-: 16,481. The incidence of BCVI was 1907 (1.6%): and CSI was 20,711 (16.8%). A+ patients had a higher rate of BCVI (1.6% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001), but a lower rate of CSI (16.2% vs. 21.4%; p < 0.001). On regression analysis, A+ was associated with BCVI (1.419[1.184-1.701]; p < 0.001) but was protective for CSI (0.767[0.672-0.878]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A+ may be an unrecognized risk factor for BCVI even for patients without a CSI. Expanding BCVI screening criteria to include A+ may reduce missed injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

Hospitalization Costs and Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Liver Resections.

INTRODUCTION: Most liver resections performed in the United States are open. With the ever-increasing role of robotic surgery, our study's role is to assess national outcomes based on the surgical approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2015 National Readmission Database (NRD). We selected patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, and robotic hepatectomy. Propensity score matching was performed to match the three groups in terms of demographics, hospital characteristics, and resection type. Our primary outcome was 6-month readmission rates and associated costs. RESULTS: 3,872 patients were included in the analysis (open = 3,420, laparoscopic = 343, and robotic = 109). Robotic liver resection has lower 6-month readmission rates (18.3%) than the laparoscopic (26.7%) and open (30%) counterparts. The robotic approach was more cost-effective ($127,716.56 ± 12,567.31) than the open ($157,880.82 ± 18,560.2) and laparoscopic approach ($152,060.78 ± 8,890.13) in terms of the total cost which includes cost per readmission. CONCLUSIONS: There is a financial benefit of using robotics in terms of cost, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates in patients undergoing liver resection, cost.