[Personnel assessment in psychiatry and psychotherapy : Results of a feasibility study on the platform model]. / Personalbemessung in der Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie : Ergebnisse einer Machbarkeitsstudie zum Plattform-Modell.

The topic of personnel assessment in psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychosomatics is currently of great importance in terms of health policy. Sufficient empirical evidence for the development of a comprehensive system for staffing is not yet available. The platform model developed by the psychiatric psychosomatic societies and associations pursues a combined empirical normative approach for a future-oriented assessment instrument for the various professional groups. The concept presented has been proven in the health policy discussion as a sensible system of comprehensive personnel assessment; however, an empirically sound control is still lacking as to whether this system can be used practically for the task described and thus can withstand the task of a resilient and future-proof measurement instrument for the necessary personnel. The task of the present study was to examine the extent to which the assumptions of the platform model are confirmed, whether methodological indications can be identified and whether there are limitations of the study that can be used in the validation and foundation of the model. The study confirmed the feasibility of the model and refers to a number of methodological findings and limitations that can be used for the further development of the model. The developed model allows the necessary staffing to be derived and justified, regardless of diagnoses and settings. It is future-oriented and dynamic.

[Religious beliefs and spirituality in medical residency : A survey among physicians in charge of training psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Religiosität und Spiritualität in der Facharztweiterbildung : Eine Umfrage bei den Weiterbildungsermächtigten für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

Religion and spirituality (R/S) as empirically measurable and treatment-relevant variables are growing in significance in psychiatry and psychotherapy worldwide. In a survey conducted among physicians in charge of psychiatric residency training in Germany respondents were asked about the integration of R/S in their curricula. Data suggest that subjects (n = 285) attach considerable importance to R/S and especially to existential issues. The importance of R/S in psychiatric training is essentially linked to the trainers' personal views of the world and the corporate culture of the training centers. A possible selection bias and the need to integrate R/S in psychiatric training on the basis of scientific evidence and ethical considerations are discussed.

[The German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics participation compass II : Implementation of social participation for people with mental illnesses]. / Der DGPPN-Teilhabekompass II : Umsetzung sozialer Teilhabe für Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen.

For most people living with mental illnesses, participating in society is of existential importance; however, psychosocial care often fails to recognize its significance and therefore rarely includes the patient's interaction with society in the course of treatment. The reasons for this are both substantial and organizational in nature. The endless opportunities for participating in society, current areas as well as ways of taking part in social life even beyond the terms of the social legislative definition are, in addition to institutional variety and regional differences, all too often barriers to providing the very urgently needed support. Further aspects are insufficient knowledge of therapists about established options of rehabilitative treatment and about responsibilities related to participation in specialized training and further education for professional caregivers. The presented compass of participation for social integration of persons with mental illnesses starts at this point: it provides guidelines for psychiatric and psychotherapeutic practitioners, general practitioners as well as for physicians working in residential or day care institutions with a psychiatric and psychotherapeutic background. Both this article and planned online versions should help professionals to timely and successfully assist people, particularly those with severe mental illnesses, to navigate the broad spectrum of services for social and vocational integration in Germany.

[Internet-based self-management interventions : Quality criteria for their use in prevention and treatment of mental disorders]. / Internetbasierte Selbstmanagementinterventionen : Qualitätskriterien für ihren Einsatz in Prävention und Behandlung psychischer Störungen.

BACKGROUND: Internet-based self-management interventions are effective in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders; however, for those affected as well as treating clinicians and decision makers in the healthcare sector, it is difficult to identify safe and effective interventions. AIM: Development of quality criteria for self-management interventions. METHODS: Based on a non-specific assessment matrix, a task force from two scientific societies formulated specific quality criteria for self-management interventions for mental disorders. Patients and other relevant stakeholders were involved in the process. RESULTS: A total of 8 key criteria with 17 subordinate points were developed. These must be met for the certification of an intervention. The criteria focus on therapeutic quality requirements, patient safety, data protection and security as well as proof of efficacy in at least one randomized study. A further five criteria are only descriptive and are not required for certification. DISCUSSION: These quality criteria serve as a starting point for the establishment of a certification process. This could help to make internet-based self-management interventions for mental disorders part of routine care in the German healthcare system.

[On the legalization debate of non-medical cannabis consumption : Position paper of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics]. / Zur Legalisierungsdebatte des nichtmedizinischen Cannabiskonsums : DGPPN-Positionspapier.

Calls are increasing for the legalization of cannabis. Some legal experts, various politicians, political parties and associations are demanding a change in drug policy. The legalization debate is lively and receiving wide coverage in the media. The German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) comments on the most important questions from a medical scientific perspective: can cannabis consumption trigger mental illnesses, what consequences would legalization have for the healthcare system and where is more research needed?

[DGPPN recommendations on quality indicators for schizophrenia]. / Aktuelle Empfehlungen der DGPPN für Schizophrenie-Qualitätsindikatoren.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, several quality indicators have been proposed for the measurement of quality of mental healthcare. Some of these quality indicators have been tested in feasibility studies. The German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) established the "Task Force Quality Indicators (QI)" that, based on previous experience in the development and pilot testing of indicators, considered the further development and practical realization of QI for schizophrenia. AIM: The aim was to select a set of QI for schizophrenia that can also be applied to other diagnoses or used in generic measurements. Another goal was to focus on high feasibility of indicators. METHODS: In a multistage selection process, the DGPPN Task Force selected QI that focus on essential quality aspects from an inventory of 161 existing QI developed by national and international research groups. Indicators were adapted in consultation with the "trialogic forum" of the DGPPN. RESULTS: The DGPPN proposes the following ten indicators for quality measurement in mental healthcare for schizophrenia: QI1 Long-term treatment/Monitoring of side effects, QI2 Seclusion and restraint, QI3 Number of suicides, QI4 Psychoeducational-oriented intervention for significant others, QI5 Timely beginning of outpatient treatment after discharge from inpatient treatment, QI6 Aggression management - inpatient treatment, QI7 Diagnostic procedures/Physical examination, QI8 Antipsychotic polypharmacy, QI9 Rehabilitation/Vocational rehabilitation, QI10 Diagnostic procedures/Psychosocial functioning. DISCUSSION: Most of our proposed QI have to be measured by means of additional data documentation. Based on prior experience in the pilot testing of QI, the DGPPN estimates that the additional efforts in data documentation would be manageable, but have to be refinanced. The indicators will be tested in feasibility studies in different mental healthcare hospitals in Germany.

[Interpersonal violence in the context of affective and psychotic disorders]. / Zwischenmenschliche Gewalt im Kontext affektiver und psychotischer Störungen.

Some mental and neurobiological disorders are associated with an increased risk for violence against others. The stigmatization of people with mental illnesses essentially emerges from a distorted perception of this condition. This review article summarizes the available literature on the determinants, prevention, therapy and tools for prediction of serious interpersonal aggression in the context of people with mental disorders. The risks for violence against other people show substantial variation between the various diagnoses. Schizophrenia and mania carry a clearly increased risk particularly at the onset of the disorder but disease-specific pharmacological therapy can reduce these risks. The highest risk factors are in particular previous violence, misuse of alcohol and drugs, male gender and young age. Probabilistic predictions of subsequent aggression against others on an individual-specific basis are only feasible in enriched populations (especially persons with mental illnesses and a previous history of assaults). Valid individual-specific predictions of future violence in the general population or on the basis of diagnoses of mental illness are, however, currently not feasible with sufficient accuracy.

[DGPPN compass of participation for vocational integration of persons with mental illnesses]. / DGPPN-Teilhabekompass zu beruflichen Integrationsmaßnahmen für Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen.

Working and living for persons with mental illnesses are a major concern of rehabilitative psychiatry. In Germany the definition of rehabilitation for persons with mental illnesses is closely linked to different sectors of social welfare and to the strongly organized supply chain of prevention, acute treatment, rehabilitation and care. In successfully supporting people with mental health problems in terms of vocational integration, professionals face various obstacles. Besides finding the correct content, structural and organizational difficulties can also arise. The welfare system with its specific institutions and settings is complicated which often leads to delays in the onset of rehabilitation. Some essential reasons are insufficient knowledge about established options of rehabilitative treatment and about responsibilities related to participation in specialized training and further education for professional caregivers. Also information and (positive) experiences from pilot projects working in an inclusive, cross-sectional way and across different settings are practically unavailable in Germany. The presented compass of participation from the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) for vocational integration of persons with mental illnesses starts at this point: it provides guidelines for psychiatric and psychotherapeutic practitioners, general practitioners as well as for physicians working in residential or day care institutions with a psychiatric and psychotherapeutic background. Both the paper and planned online versions should help professionals to help people, particularly those with severe mental illnesses to navigate the system of services for vocational integration in Germany.

[Internet-based interventions in the treatment of mental disorders : Overview, quality criteria, perspectives]. / Internetbasierte Interventionen in der Behandlung psychischer Störungen : Überblick, Qualitätskriterien, Perspektiven.

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are frequently not or only insufficiently treated. Internet-based interventions offer the potential of closing the existing gaps in the treatment of mental disorders; however, it is very difficult for patients and providers to choose from the numerous interventions available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality criteria that can help patients and care providers to identify recommendable internet-based interventions. METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out and the existing evidence on internet-based interventions in the treatment of mental disorders was collated. A panel of experts then developed quality criteria based on existing models for the systematic assessment of telemedicine applications. RESULTS: Internet-based interventions are effective in the treatment of a broad range of mental disorders. The best evidence is available for depression and anxiety disorders. A set of criteria is proposed for the evaluation of available internet-based interventions using a checklist. These criteria have to be developed further with input from other stakeholders. DISCUSSION: When taking these quality criteria into account, evidence-based interventions available on the internet can make an important contribution to improvement of the care of patients with mental disorders.

[Structural quality in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic hospitals]. / Strukturqualität in psychiatrischen und psychotherapeutischen Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: The new German flat rate reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) is primarily based on the diagnostic classification and the costs of therapeutic processes. In 2019 the current normative standard for calculating the therapeutic staff in psychiatric clinics (Psych-PV) will be substituted by a stepwise adaptation process over 5 years. Using regionally calculated remuneration factors, all clinic budgets should eventually converge to comparable values. AIM: Major factors influencing the structural quality of therapy in psychiatric clinics are identified and recommendations are given to support the work of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) which has been appointed to develop new recommendations for the minimum setting of personnel requirements. RESULTS: The full reimbursement of the necessary staff and of the costs resulting from outsourcing of day clinics and outpatient departments in the community, including the obligation to treat psychiatric emergency patients is mandatory and currently not sufficiently guaranteed in the new PEPP system. A workflow which opens the possibility to finance therapeutic innovations (e.g. psychotherapy) and helps to overcome the financial sectorial boundaries between inpatient and outpatient treatment is also missing. DISCUSSION: A mandatory recommendation for minimum staff settings needs a guaranteed full financing from the political side. Additionally, important would be an option for financing of therapeutic innovations and increased costs because of changed patient structures with respect to diagnosis and severity. Moreover, a sufficient remuneration for regional treatment responsibilities and for additional financial outlay resulting from structural costs for regionally outsourced departments is needed to avoid supplementary financing by reducing the budget for the therapeutic staff.

[Features of regional mandatory psychiatric care in Germany: analysis using the VIPP databank]. / Merkmale einer regionalen Pflichtversorgung in Deutschland: Eine Analyse mithilfe der VIPP-Datenbank.

BACKGROUND: The regional mandatory care is a central element of psychiatric treatment in Germany. Therefore, it is possible to realize care near to the place of residence of psychiatric patients and good contact to the outpatient health system. Up to now the new payment system in psychiatry in Germany does not explicitly include this central factor. AIM: The article investigates which criteria possibly describe psychiatric mandatory care and whether they can be ascertained from routine data. MATERIAL: The results are based on the so-called § 21 records of 47 psychiatric and psychosomatic clinics all of which participated in the German VIPP (healthcare indicators in psychiatry and psychosomatics) project. It is obligatory to send the standardized § 21 record to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) annually. RESULTS: The study identified two factors which could describe clinics with regional mandatory care. Many patients attend these hospitals outside the core time of Monday to Friday, 8 am to 5 pm and the distance to their place of residence is shorter. This is associated with a higher day-related valuation, the so-called day mix index (DMI). DISCUSSION: Routine data contain information describing regional mandatory psychiatric care. Patients treated in this system show a higher DMI. This means higher proceeds for the hospitals but it is not clear if these proceeds are able to cover the higher costs in clinics with regional mandatory care. Therefore, it is necessary for the InEK to set up a new cost center for all clinics which participate as a so-called calculation site. By posting all structural costs of mandatory care in this cost center it will be possible to compare them with the income of psychiatric clinics in the future.

[Treatment pathways in the care of patients with schizophrenia and depression]. / Behandlungspfade in der Versorgung von Patienten mit Schizophrenie und Depression.

BACKGROUND: In mental healthcare the concept of pathways addresses diverse issues and problem areas, such as heterogeneous health service offers, the regional variability of treatment concepts and clear-cut guidelines on how and where to obtain treatment for a particular mental disorder. The ambiguous aspects of the concept require international and national definitions and consensus which must also cover quality criteria. METHODS: This article gives an overview of currently available evidence for the analysis of clinical pathways and pathways to care in international mental healthcare, covering studies on schizophrenia and depression from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The ambiguity of the concept impedes the overview and does not provide unequivocal results. The development, implementation and analyses of guidelines or clear-cut clinical and pathways to care must consider individual, clinical and care system aspects as well as the interplay of these factors. Results suggest that system aspects tend to dominate over clinical factors of schizophrenia and depression. As a consequence, the definition, implementation and evaluation of clinical pathways or pathways to mental healthcare is first and foremost a responsibility of the respective national mental healthcare system and must be understood on that level, before findings are summarized internationally and models of best practice are debated.

[Reality of treatment in psychotherapy: Results of a survey of German psychiatric hospitals]. / Versorgungsrealität in der Psychotherapie : Ergebnisse der Befragung deutscher psychiatrischer Versorgungskliniken.

OBJECTIVES: Since the introduction of the qualification as specialist for psychiatry and psychotherapy, in addition to psychopharmacotherapy psychotherapy is an integral component of the treatment of mentally ill people. A survey was carried out to evaluate the reality of clinical routine use of psychotherapy in German psychiatric hospitals. METHODS: Between October 2011 and March 2012 German hospitals of psychiatry and psychotherapy were contacted by the head organization, the conference of national directors (Bundesdirektorenkonferenz), to participate in a survey regarding the application of psychotherapy in the real clinical world of daily treatment. With an anonymous questionnaire, data were requested as either a printed form or online version. RESULTS: Data from 25 psychiatric hospitals in the year 2010 could be analysed (average number of beds 300 of which 53 were for psychosomatic/psychotherapeutic patients) and a total of 87,000 inpatients were treated whereby 34 % were diagnosed as F1 addictive disorders and 24 % as F3 affective disorders. More than 80 % of the hospitals applied group therapies of relaxation, cognitive behavior therapy, social competence training and specific techniques, such as dialectic-behavior therapy. As individual treatment methods, patients with depressive disorders were treated with cognitive behavior therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy or psychodynamic therapy in more than 50 % of the cases. Relaxation techniques were offered in most cases by the nursing staff, behavior therapy by psychologists and physicians and psychodynamic therapy mainly by psychiatrists.

[Where is convergence of psychiatry budgets leading to? A comparison of staffing regulations and actual personnel resources]. / Wohin führt die Konvergenz der Psychiatriebudgets? Ein Vergleich von Psych-PV-Vorgaben und tatsächlichen Personalressourcen.

BACKGROUND: Staffing regulations have determined the number of qualified staff required for sufficient, appropriate and economical inpatient mental health care in Germany since 1991. This minimum level of structural quality will probably be abolished in the context of the convergence of hospital budgets starting in 2019. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the current fulfilment of staffing regulations in terms of time per patient in a large nationwide sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The required minutes of staff time as defined by staffing regulations were calculated for each patient using the treatment classifications provided by a large nationwide database. The actual use of staff time was calculated on the basis of average costs published by the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement. Both figures were compared to calculate the fulfilment of staffing regulations. RESULTS: The study included approximately 95,000 inpatient episodes from 46 psychiatric hospitals and departments with a total length of stay of almost 2.5 million days. On average, the weekly use of staff resources per patient was 190 min (10 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. The largest gap in absolute terms was found in nursing staff where the weekly time per patient was 189 min (14 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. CONCLUSION: The convergence of psychiatric hospital budgets starts in 2019 below a level of funding required to fulfil staffing regulations. This would perpetuate inadequately funded structures and should initially be opposed with a demand for complete fulfilment of staffing regulations. Thereafter, a normative consent should be reached to define the resources required for current inpatient mental health care.

[Calculating personnel allocation at 100 % implementation of the Psychiatry Personnel Act. Can it be done on the basis of existing routine data?]. / Berechnung der Personalbemessung bei einer Umsetzung von 100 % Psych-PV. Kann diese auf der Grundlage vorliegender Routinedaten erfolgen?

From 1 January 2019, after completion of the convergence phase, the Psychiatry Personnel Act (Psych-PV) will no longer be the basis of budget negotiations of psychiatric hospitals and departments with the health insurance funds in Germany. Instead, the new compounding remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic inpatient institutions (PEPP) will provide a new framework. The Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) has been given the task of elaborating a directive on the basis of the expiring Psych-PV in order to redefine standards for personnel allocation within this new framework. This task presupposes the existence of reliable data in the psychiatric hospitals and departments for categorizing patients following the Psych-PV. It presupposes further that these data allow an exact calculation of the personnel to which the clinics are entitled. This article shows that the so-called §-21 dataset from the database of the VIPP project (indicators of patient care in psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities) allows this calculation. The VIPP dataset was used as a basis to calculate the personnel requirements. Exemplary analyses illustrate that the information available regarding the Psych-PV can be transformed in minutes per day, minutes per month and full time positions. Therefore, this information would also be available to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK).

[Indicators of patient care in Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Facilities (VIPP project)--a database project]. / Versorgungsindikatoren in der Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik (VIPP)--Ein Datenbank-Projekt.

INTRODUCTION: In Germany a new and unique remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic stationary treatments (PEPP system) was introduced in 2013 on an optional basis. From 2015 it will be mandatory for psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. The introduction of the PEPP system brings up different questions regarding the possible incentives of the new remuneration system and its effects on the supply of psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments. To conduct these necessary analyses a reliable database is needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The goal of the project "Indicators of patient care in Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Facilities" (VIPP project) is to gather a representative database which reflects the situation of day-to-day patient care performed by German psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. The §â€Š21 data set represents the basis of this database which will be complemented by other data sources (i. e., financial statements and other economic data). A number of more than 100 ,000 cases per year has already been exceeded. These case data were provided by a wide range of psychiatric hospitals, departments and universities that participate in this project. The dataset is anonymised and by pooling the data it is not possible to identify the cases of a specific clinic. Participants receive a web-based access and have the possibility to analyse the data independently. RESULTS: Using the examples of coding accuracy and rehospitalisation rates the variety as well as the enormous potential of this database can be demonstrated. DISCUSSION: On the base of the VIPP database valid patient care indicators can be identified and cross-sectional analyses can be conducted. From such results key data on health economic strategies can be derived and the incentives, strengths and limitations of this constantly changing system can be identified.

[Lump sum payment system in psychiatry and psychosomatics: concomitant research - quo vadis?]. / Pauschalierendes Entgeltsystem in der Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik : Begleitforschung - quo vadis?

The new lump sum payment scheme for psychiatric and psychosomatic services is coming into force in 2013. This constitutes another step on the way to performance-based financial compensation of inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals in Germany. This fundamental change needs to be accompanied by scientific evaluation with regards to its effects. This article reflects on the legal foundations of such evaluations and the current progress of preparation. Furthermore, own approaches for analysing the effects of the new finance scheme are presented.

Effect of standardized post-coercion review on subjective coercion: Results of a randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Post-coercion review has been increasingly regarded as a useful intervention in psychiatric inpatient setting. However, little is known about its effect on perceived coercion. METHODS: A multicenter, two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted, aiming at analyzing the effect of post-coercion review on perceived coercion. People with severe mental disorders, who experienced at least one coercive measure during inpatient treatment, were randomized using Zelen's design to an intervention group receiving standardized post-coercion review, or a control group treated as usual. The MacArthur admission experience scale (AES) and the coercion ladder (CL) were used to assess perceived coercion during inpatient treatment. The coercion experience scale (CES) measured experienced coercion during the coercive intervention. Analyses of covariance were performed to determine group differences. RESULTS: Of 422 randomized participants, n = 109 consented to participate in the trial. A restricted intention-to-treat analysis of all individuals who consented revealed no significant effect of the intervention on perceived coercion. A significant interaction effect between the factors gender and intervention on the AES scores was found. Sensitivity analysis revealed significant effects of the intervention on both AES and CL scores and an interaction effect between intervention and gender, indicating a higher efficacy in women. No effect of the intervention on CES scores was found. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized post-coercion review sessions did not alleviate the subjective perception of coercion in the total sample. However, post hoc analysis revealed a significant effect of the intervention in women. Results indicate the need to further address gender-specific issues related to coercion.