Comparison of Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) dialysis with combined plasma exchange and haemodialysis in children with acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) is an extracorporeal liver support system eliminating albumin-bound and water-soluble substances. While it is increasingly applied in patients with acute liver failure (ALF), no comparison with standard dialysis methods has yet been performed. METHODS: This is an analysis of ten children (0.1-18 years) with ALF, who underwent a total of 22 MARS sessions. Standard adult MARS sets were used in seven (23.5-72 kg) and MARS Mini in three children (2.8-13 kg). In eight children, MARS was alternated with combined plasma exchange (PE) and haemodialysis (HD) treatments. Mean treatment duration was 7.2 (6-10) h for MARS and 5.7 (4.5-6.6) h for PE/HD. RESULTS: Standard MARS treatment only slightly decreased serum bilirubin (16.3 ± 6.5-13.8 ± 5.9 mg/dL) and ammonia (113 ± 62-99 ± 68 µmol/L) and international normalized ratio (INR) tended to increase (1.5 ± 0.3 and 2 ± 1.1). Mini-MARS did not reduce serum bilirubin (19.7 ± 3-20.5 ± 3.2 mg/dL), ammonia slightly decreased (70 ± 24-56 ± 9 µmol/L) and INR increased (2.5 ± 0.7-2.9 ± 1.1, all P = n.s.). In contrast, PE/HD reduced serum bilirubin (23 ± 8.4-14.7 ± 7 mg/dL), ammonia (120 ± 60-70 ± 40 µmol/L) and INR (2.4 ± 0.8-1.4 ± 0.1, all P < 0.05). Intraindividual comparison showed a slight increase in bilirubin by 2 ± 22% with MARS and a reduction by 37 ± 11% with PE/HD (P < 0.001 versus MARS) and a decrease in ammonia of 18 ± 27 and 39 ± 23% (P < 0.05). INR increased during MARS by 26 ± 41% and decreased with PE/HD by 37 ± 20% (P < 0.01). All treatment sessions were well tolerated. Five children died, including the three children treated with Mini-MARS. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests superior efficacy of combined PE/HD as compared to intermittent MARS therapy for treating ALF.

Safety and efficacy of tandem hemodialysis and plasma exchange in children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with immune-mediated kidney disease and liver failure often require plasma exchange (PE) and hemodialysis (HD). Combining both methods (i.e., connecting the PE and HD circuits in series [tandem dialysis]) should allow for a more efficient treatment. This work reviews the authors' experience with tandem blood purification. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Chart review was utilized to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and tolerability of 92 combined PE/HD (cPE/HD) sessions in 26 children in comparison with 113 sequential PE/HD (sPE/HD) treatments performed in 32 children between 1988 and 2012 at the University of Heidelberg Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. Eleven children received both treatment modalities. RESULTS: The mean treatment duration was 3.8 ± 2.2 hours per cPE/HD and 5.9 ± 1.6 hours per sPE/HD session (P<0.001). Dialyzer surface areas per body surface area (in meters squared) and blood flow rates were similar. Although a 3-fold higher initial bolus of heparin was administered with cPE/HD, the heparin dose per hour was similar with both modalities and the total heparin load was only slightly lower with cPE/HD, with a median 2939 IU/m(2) per session (interquartile range, 1868, 4189) versus 3341 IU/m(2) per session (interquartile range, 2126, 4792). In sessions with regional anticoagulation, equal citrate and calcium infusion rates were applied. Plasma turnover, ultrafiltration rates, and solute removal were comparable. Procedure-related problems developed in 14.0% of cPE/HD and 7.0% of sPE/HD sessions (P=0.37). Clinical symptoms occurred in 19.6% and 6.2% (P=0.05), necessitating treatment discontinuation in 12.0% and 5.3% of the sessions (P=0.14). Intra-individual comparison of both dialysis methods in 11 children reconfirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: cPE/HD is a time-saving procedure relative to sPE/HD, but may be associated with a higher rate of procedure-related and clinical adverse events.