Assessment of knee instability in ACL-injured knees using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT): a novel protocol and preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: To propose a protocol for assessing knee instability in ACL-injured knees using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled five patients with unilateral chronic ACL tears referred for WBCT. Bilateral images were obtained in four positions: bilateral knee extension, bilateral knee flexion, single-leg stance with knee flexion and external rotation, and single-leg stance with knee flexion and internal rotation. The radiation dose, time for protocol acquisition, and patients' tolerance of the procedure were recorded. A blinded senior radiologist assessed image quality and measured the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and femorotibial rotation (FTR) angle in the ACL-deficient and contralateral healthy knee. RESULTS: All five patients were male, aged 23-30 years old. The protocol resulted in a 16.2 mGy radiation dose and a 15-min acquisition time. The procedure was well-tolerated, and patient positioning was uneventful, providing good-quality images. In all positions, the mean ATT and FTR were greater in ACL-deficient knees versus the healthy knee, with more pronounced differences observed in the bilateral knee flexion position. Mean lateral ATT in the flexion position was 9.1±2.8 cm in the ACL-injured knees versus 4.0±1.8 cm in non-injured knees, and mean FTR angle in the bilateral flexion position was 13.5°±7.7 and 8.6°±4.6 in the injured and non-injured knees, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our protocol quantitatively assesses knee instability with WBCT, measuring ATT and FTR in diverse knee positions. It employs reasonable radiation, is fast, well-tolerated, and yields high-quality images. Preliminary findings suggest ACL-deficient knees show elevated ATT and FTR, particularly in the 30° flexion position.

Editorial Commentary: Time-Zero Biomechanical Studies Show Suture Augmentation of a Soft-Tissue Graft Improves Its Properties, But They Need to Be Interpreted With Caution.

There is emerging evidence in biomechanical studies that suture augmentation of a soft-tissue graft can improve its elongation, stiffness, and load to failure. However, all biomechanical studies have the intrinsic drawback of not considering loosening, accommodation, and mainly, healing. In the past, many very strong and stiff synthetic grafts produced poor results for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and synthetic material inside the joint was abandoned for awhile. Recent studies have shown that it is possible to use synthetic material to augment the graft instead of being the graft itself. But the question we need to ask ourselves is: Does it really work in the clinical scenario? Undoubtedly, there is still a way to go to incorporate suture augmentation into soft-tissue grafts in knee reconstruction, and it is mandatory to start high-level clinical studies to prove its real benefit to ligament reconstruction results.

Recovery of Full Hyperextension After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Better Functional Outcomes but Greater Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Related Laxity After a Minimum 24-Month Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients who had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with preoperative hyperextension and compare physical examination (KT-1000 and pivot shift) and patient-reported outcome measures of patients who recovered the entire hyperextension with patients who did not. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 60 years with more than 5° of knee hyperextension who had anatomic ACL reconstruction with any graft from June 2013 to June 2021 and at least a 24-month follow-up were evaluated retrospectively. Hamstrings and patellar tendon grafts were fixed around 20° to 30° of flexion and in full extension, respectively. Patients who could recover hyperextension were compared with patients who did not. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including physical examination and patient-reported outcome measures, were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients evaluated, 48 (21.3%) did not recover hyperextension, and 177 recovered full range of motion. Patients who did not recover hyperextension had a larger graft diameter (8.7 ± 0.7 mm [confidence interval, 8.502-8.898 mm] vs 8.3 ± 0.7 mm [confidence interval, 8.197-8.403 mm]; P = .018). Regarding the postoperative subjective variables, patients who recovered hyperextension showed improvement on all scales (International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Forgotten Joint Score, and Global Perceived Effect) evaluated compared with patients who did not recover the range of motion. Patients who recovered hyperextension also showed more laxity on physical examination, measured by the KT-1000 (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 1.0; P = .0006) and the pivot shift (62.1% [grade 0] and 37.9% [grade 1] vs 79.2% [grade 0] and 20.8% [grade 1]; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with knee hyperextension who regained range of motion after ACL reconstruction have worse knee laxity than patients who regained full extension but not hyperextension. However, patients who recover full range of motion showed higher scores on subjective function scales, including a greater number of patients who achieved patient acceptable symptom state for the International Knee Documentation Committee score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Patients With More Than 6.5° of Knee Hyperextension are 14.6 Times More Likely to Have Anterior Cruciate Ligament Hamstring Graft Rupture and Worse Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To create a cut-off point for hyperextension that best discriminates retear and to verify whether this cut-off point can predict retear regardless of other characteristics after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstrings autograft. METHODS: A cohort of patients submitted to primary isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autografts was retrospectively evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the degree of passive knee hyperextension measured in the normal contralateral knee. The following data were collected: patient age and sex, time from injury to surgery, knee hyperextension, KT-1000 and pivot-shift, associated meniscus injury, intra-articular graft size, follow-up time, graft failure, and postoperative Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores. RESULTS: Data from 457 patients were evaluated. Median age was 31 years. Thirty-two (7.0%) presented with retear. There was a significant difference in hyperextension between patients with and without retear (P < .001), with the cut-off point established by the receiver operating characteristic curve from 6.5°. Patients with greater hyperextension had a statistically greater frequency of women, longer injury time, greater intra-articular graft diameter, greater postoperative KT-1000, and greater frequency of retear, whereas the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores were statistically lower in patients with greater hyperextension. Only hyperextension showed a statistically significant association with re-rupture (P < .001). The odds of retear in patients with hyperextension greater than 6.5 was 14.65 times the odds of patients with hyperextension less than 6.5. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more than 6.5° of hyperextension are 14.6 times more likely to have a graft rupture than patients with lower hyperextension when submitted to ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons. Also, they present worse knee stability by the KT-1000 test and worse functional outcomes. Therefore, patients with this degree of hyperextension should not have isolated reconstruction with hamstrings as their first choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Anterolateral ligament MRI of the knee in ACL injuries: MRI abnormalities association with instability.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anterolateral ligament abnormalities (ALL) at MRI scans and correlate with data from clinical instability tests (Lachman and pivot shift) performed under anesthesia in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Furthermore, perform multivariate analysis with other variables to isolate the ALL contribution to instability from other abnormalities. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of MRI and instability tests of 95 patients with ACL tears. The ALL was classified as no abnormality, abnormality without discontinuity, and discontinuity. Injuries in other knee ligament structures and menisci were also assessed. Results of instability tests (pivot shift and Lachman) with the patient anesthetized for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were obtained from the patient database. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 22. RESULTS: ALL abnormalities and iliotibial band (ITB), lateral (LCL), and medial (MCL) collateral ligament injuries showed a statistically significant correlation with the pivot shift test. The ALL MRI abnormalities were associated with the high-grade pivot shift results (p < 0.0005), with an odds ratio of 55.9 for high degrees of pivot shift in patients with abnormal ALL. The logistic model for all variables analyzed with the results of the pivot shift test demonstrated that the ALL was the only variable with a statistically significant correlation in the model (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: MRI ALL abnormalities in patients with ACL injuries have a significant association with pivot shift test results in patients under anesthesia. The logistic model for high - grade pivot shift test results demonstrated that ALL abnormalities were the only variable with significant correlation. KEY POINTS: • Evaluating the anterolateral ligament with MRI in acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries is useful to predict higher grades of pivot shift test in the moment of the arthroscopic reconstruction. • An abnormal anterolateral ligament presented an odds ratio of 55 for high degrees of pivot shift. • ALL MRI abnormalities association with knee instability is independent from other internal knee injuries.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee anteromedial quadrant.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the possibility of characterizing an extra-articular thickening in the knee anteromedial quadrant in routine MRI scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Firstly, in a pilot study, for a better understanding of this extra-articular thickening trajectory in MRI, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes were attached to the ligament structure topography in two dissected pieces. Afterward, 100 knee MRI studies were randomly selected from our database, and 97 met the inclusion criteria. Two musculoskeletal radiologists interpreted the exams separately. Both had previously studied the ligament in the cadaveric knee MRI with the PTFE tube. RESULTS: The intraobserver and interobserver agreement for the ligament identification was calculated using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. The first radiologist identified the structure in 41 of the 97 scans (42.2%), and the second radiologist in 38 scans (39.2%). The interobserver agreement was substantial, with a Kappa of 0.68 and an agreement of 84.5%. The results suggest that this extra-articular thickening, recently called Anterior Oblique Ligament (AOL) in the literature, is a structure that can be frequently visualized on MRI scans with a high level of interobserver agreement in a relatively large number of exams. CONCLUSION: Therefore, this study indicates that MRI is a promising method for evaluating this anteromedial thickening, and it may be used for future studies of the Anterior Oblique Ligament.

Small Hamstring Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Results in the Same Failure Rate as Larger Hamstring Tendon Graft Reconstruction Alone.

PURPOSE: To compare patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring grafts 7 mm or less in diameter combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus isolated ACL reconstruction with grafts greater than 7 mm in diameter. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the descriptive data and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts from June 2013 to January 2020 and had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients with quadrupled or quintupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft 7 mm or less in diameter combined with single-strand ALL reconstruction (ACL-ALL group) were matched in a 1:2 propensity ratio to patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts greater than 7 mm (ACL group). RESULTS: We identified 30 patients in our database who met the criteria for the ACL-ALL group. The patients in this group were matched to 60 patients comprising the ACL group. Both groups were similar regarding all preoperative matched and unmatched variables. The mean ACL graft diameter was 6.8 ± 0.4 mm in the ACL-ALL group and 8.6 ± 0.6 mm in the ACL group (P < .001). The ACL-ALL group presented 1 failure (3.3%), and the ACL group presented 3 failures (5%) (P = .717). Postoperative KT-1000 measurements were similar between the groups (2.1 ± 1.1 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, P = .114), as were postoperative pivot-shift grades (P = .652). Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores and Lysholm scores did not present any differences between the groups (P = .058 and P = .280, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo combined ACL-ALL reconstruction with an ACL graft diameter of 7 mm or less can achieve similar results to patients who undergo isolated ACL reconstruction with a graft diameter greater than 7 mm. An associated ALL reconstruction can be performed to increase knee stability in patients with small-diameter hamstring grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative therapeutic trial.

The Addition of Either an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or an Iliotibial Band Tenodesis Is Associated With a Lower Failure Rate After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the failure rate in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alone or associated with an extra-articular procedure. Secondary objectives were to compare ACL laxity, patient-reported outcome measures, and complication rates in these patients and, subsequently, to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction associated with anatomical anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. Patients were classified into 2 groups, according to whether (group 2) or not (group 1) an extra-articular reconstruction was performed. Patients who underwent an extra-articular procedure were further divided into ALL reconstruction (group 2A) and LET (group 2B). Baseline demographic variables, operative data and postoperative data were evaluated. RESULTS: The groups with (86 patients) and without (88 patients) an associated extra-articular reconstruction had similar preoperative data. Group 2 had a lower failure rate (4.6% vs 14.7%; P = .038), better KT-1000, better pivot-shift, and better Lysholm. There was no difference regarding complications, except more lateral pain in group 2. Regarding the groups who underwent ALL reconstruction (41 patients) and LET (46 patients), group 2A showed better Lysholm scores. Both groups had similar failure rates and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with a laterally based augmentation procedure had a lower failure rate than patients who underwent isolated revision ACL reconstruction. KT-1000 and pivot-shift examination were also significantly better when a lateral augmentation was performed. Complications were similar except for an increase in lateral pain in the augmented group. No clinically important differences were found when comparing the LET group to the ALL group other than a statistical improvement in the Lysholm functional scale, likely not clinically meaningful, favoring the ALL group and an increased duration of post-operative lateral pain in the LET group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Surgical Timing Does Not Interfere on Clinical Outcomes in Combined Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament: A Comparative Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes, knee stability, failure rate and complication rates of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with hamstrings grafts between acute and chronic cases. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with hamstrings grafts were evaluated. Patients operated on less than 8 weeks after injury were allocated to group 1, and the others were allocated to group 2. Demographic data, knee stability, and functional outcomes of the 2 groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in the acute group and 96 in the chronic group were evaluated. The follow-up time was similar between the groups (28.7 ± 5.2 [24-43] months vs 29.4 ± 7.2 [24-58] months; P = 0.696). No differences were found between the groups in age, sex, trauma mechanism, presence of knee hyperextension, graft diameter, and meniscal injuries. There was no difference between the groups in the postoperative KT-1000 and in the pre- or postoperative pivot shift. The preoperative KT-1000 was higher in group 2 (7.9 ± 1.1 vs 7.4 ± 1.2; P = 0.031). There were no differences in the International Knee Documentation Committee or Lysholm. Three (2.3%) patients developed failure, 1 (2.9%) in group 1 and 2 (2.1%) in group 2. The total complication rate was 10% and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction has similar outcomes in patients undergoing surgery in the acute and chronic phases. Patients with chronic injury have similar knee stability, functional scores, and failure rates as acute-injury patients, and patients with acute injury have no more complications than chronic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Degenerative Medial Meniscus Tear With a Displaced Flap Into the Meniscotibial Recess and Tibial Peripheral Reactive Bone Edema Presents Good Results With Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment.

PURPOSE: To report the arthroscopic treatment results of a degenerative medial meniscus tear with a displaced flap into the meniscotibial recess, tibial peripheral reactive bone edema, and focal knee medial pain. As a secondary objective, we propose to identify possible factors associated with a good or poor prognosis of the surgical treatment of this lesion. METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, patients who had this specific meniscus pathology and underwent arthroscopic surgical treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification greater than 2 were excluded. KL classification, the presence of an Outerbridge grade III/V chondral lesion of the medial compartment, limb alignment, body mass index, and smoking were evaluated. The subjective outcomes included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, improvement in the pain reported by patients, and the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale score. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were evaluated. The mean age was 58.6 ± 7.1 years. The follow-up time was 48.7 ± 20.8 months. Fifty-five (79.7%) patients reported pain improvement. The postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee was 62.6 ± 15.4, and the mean GPE was 2.3 ± 2.6. Fourteen patients (20.3%) showed no improvement in pain, and 7 patients (10.2%) presented complications. Groups that improved (GPE > 0) and did not improve (GPE < 0) did not present differences regarding age, sex, follow-up time, chondral lesions, or body mass index. Patients without improvement had a greater incidence of smoking (P = .001), varus alignment (P = .008), and more advanced KL classification (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis based on the GPE score, KL classification (P = .038) and smoking (P = .003) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic surgical treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears with a meniscal flap displaced into the meniscotibial recess and adjacent focal bone edema in the tibia shows good results in approximately 80% of cases. Smoking and KL grade 2 were factors associated with poor prognosis of surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (case series).

The use of negative-pressure wound therapy after total knee arthroplasty is effective for reducing complications and the need for reintervention.

BACKGROUND: Wound healing complications are causal factors of prosthesis infection and poor postoperative evolution of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can be an option to minimize these complications. The aim of this study is to compare the complications of patients undergoing TKA who used a portable NPWT device in the immediate postoperative period with those of a control group. METHODS: A total of 296 patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: those who used NPWT for seven days in the postoperative period (Group 1 - prospective evaluated) and those who used conventional dressings (Group 2 - historical control group). Epidemiological data, comorbidities, local parameters related to the surgical wound and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in regard to sex, age and clinical comorbidities. Overall, 153 (51.7%) patients had at least one risk factor for wound complications. Patients who used NPWT had a lower rate of complications (28.5% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.001) and a lower rate of reintervention in the operating room (2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.001). Patients in group 1 had a lower incidence of hyperaemia (14.7% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.01), skin necrosis (2.1% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.04) and wound dehiscence (3.1% vs 10.1%, p = 0.03). The use of NPWT was a protective factor for the presence of complications, with an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% CI 0.206-0.629). CONCLUSION: The number of complications related to the wound after TKA is high; however, most of them are minor and have no impact on the treatment and clinical evolution of patients. The use of NPWT decreased the number of surgical wound complications, especially hyperaemia, dehiscence and necrosis, and reduced the need for reintervention.

Bacteria drug resistance profile affects knee and hip periprosthetic joint infection outcome with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the effect of bacteria drug resistance profile on the success rates of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention. METHODS: All early acute periprosthetic infections in hip and knee arthroplasties treated with DAIR at our institution over the period from 2011 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The success rate was evaluated according to the type of organism identified in culture: multidrug-sensitive (MSB), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRB) and according to other risk factors for treatment failure. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were analyzed; there were 37 in the multidrug-sensitive bacteria (MSB) group, 11 in the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) group and 9 in the other multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRB) group. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the treatment failure rate among the three groups: 8.3% for the MSB group, 18.2% for the MRSA group and 55.6% for the MRB group (p = 0.005). Among the other risk factors for treatment failure, the presence of inflammatory arthritis presented a failure rate of 45.1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DAIR showed a good success rate in cases of early acute infection by multidrug-sensitive bacteria. In the presence of infection by multidrug-resistant bacteria or association with rheumatic diseases the treatment failure rate was higher and other surgical options should be considered in this specific population. The MRSA group showed intermediate results between MSB and MRB and should be carefully evaluated.

Computed tomography (CT), X-ray, and MRI evaluation of two anterolateral knee reconstruction techniques: lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction.

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) and capsule of the knee are anatomical structures involved in rotational stability and pivot-shift control. As such, it has been demonstrated that the extra-articular anterolateral procedures improve clinical outcome when performed as an augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in specific groups of patients. This review describes the postoperative imaging findings of two techniques used to perform these procedures, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and radiography. The first technique described is the lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), which uses a strip of the iliotibial band that is harvested, passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and fixed posterior, and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE), preserving ITB insertion on Gerdy's tubercle. The second technique described is the ALL reconstruction, a procedure that attempts to recreate the anatomy of the ALL, using most often a gracilis autograft. In this procedure, femoral fixation is performed proximal and posterior to the LFE, and tibial fixation is slightly distal to the joint line, halfway from Gerdy's tubercle to the fibular head. The main objective of this review is to provide an overview of the postoperative imaging aspects of these two procedures with MRI, CT, and radiography and to describe possible complications. As they become more common, it is important for the radiologist and the orthopedic surgeon to understand their particularities in combination with the already well-known ACL reconstruction.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterolateral Ligament and the Iliotibial Band in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Associated With Segond Fractures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of Segond fractures, including the structures attached to the avulsed fragment, the integrity of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and iliotibial band (ITB), and fragment size and location. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study with MRI scans from 2016 to 2019 with the term "Segond" in the reports, signs of acute trauma, and a bony anterolateral tibial avulsion (Segond) fracture. Two experienced observers accessed images to evaluate fragment dimensions (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and craniocaudal) and distances from anatomic landmarks (Gerdy's tubercle, articular surface, and posterolateral tibial corner). ALLs and ITBs also were evaluated, both for integrity and for attachment to the avulsed bony fragment. Data were statistically evaluated for significant correlations. RESULTS: Forty-eight knee MRIs of patients suffering from a combined anterior cruciate ligament and Segond injury were evaluated. The ALL presented with edema in 28 cases (58.3%) and was torn in 3 cases (6.3%). The ALL was attached to the bone fragment in all cases and the ITB also was attached in 25 cases (52.1%). Receiver operating characteristic curves also demonstrated that the larger each of the dimensions and the volume of the fragment, the greater the probability of ITB fibers being inserted. Also, the narrower the distance from the fragment to the center of Gerdy's tubercle, the greater the probability of iliotibial band fibers being attached. Interobserver correlation varied from 0.87 to 0.97 for all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In all combined ACL injuries and Segond fracture MRI cases, the complete ALL inserted on the avulsed bony fragment, whereas the posterior part of the ITB was only attached in 52.1% of the cases. Segond fracture fragment size was predictive for the structures attached to it. The ALL was abnormal in 64.5% of cases and presented a clear discontinuity in 6.3%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Level IV.

Anterolateral ligament of the knee: a step-by-step dissection.

BACKGROUND: The number of studies and clinical interest in the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) has grown in recent years. A meticulous and accurate ALL dissection is vital in anatomic and biomechanical studies, and a standardized technique is not yet established. As such, the aim of this study was to describe a step-by-step ALL dissection technique that could help authors consistently identify the ALL. METHODS: Twenty knees from frozen adult cadavers, with no preference for sex or age, were included in the study. All the cadavers were dissected using the same technique to determine the incidence of the ALL. RESULTS: A transverse incision is performed in the iliotibial band (ITB), around 10 cm proximal to the topography of the lateral epicondyle of the femur. Next, the ITB undergoes anterograde blunt dissection until its insertion at Gerdy's tubercle in the tibia. Maintaining biceps femoris insertion, a dissection is performed anteriorly to it, until the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) is found. Using the LCL, internal rotation and 30 to 60° flexion as references, the ALL can be located in the anterolateral topography of the knee, with its origin near the lateral epicondyle (proximal and posterior) and insertion between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibula (4.0 mm to 7.0 mm below the tibial plateau), expanding to the lateral meniscus (between the body and anterior horn), exhibiting a mean length of 4.0 ± 0.4 cm and mean width of 5.5 ± 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The present article describes an effective and reproducible ALL dissection technique that made it was possible to identify the ligament in 100% of the cases in the present study.

Editorial Commentary: Extension of Knowledge-and the Knee! New Biomechanical Study Suggests the Clinical Practice of Anterolateral Ligament Fixation Near Extension.

The knee anterolateral ligament (ALL) is one of the most hotly debated topics in sports medicine in the last decade. Once one aspect of discussion regarding the ALL reaches a consensus, attention immediately turns to the next one. This has already happened with the existence of the ALL itself, its anatomic features, the ability to visualize the ALL with magnetic resonance imaging, and many other topics. In the end, the most important aspect must be clinical outcomes, and existing studies are trying to find the optimum surgical technique to best restore knee stability and reduce failure rates. It appears that, when doing an anatomic ALL reconstruction, fixation must be performed in full extension. The literature regarding ALL reconstruction shows promising results, with a strong tendency to present better knee stability, improved functional scores, and lower failure rates.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterolateral Ligament in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in an Adolescent Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in adolescent patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and characterize other potential intra- and extra-articular knee injuries that are associated with ALL injuries. METHODS: Patients between 14 and 17 years of age with acute ACL injuries (trauma for <3 weeks before examination) were retrospectively evaluated with MRI over 24 months (January 2016-December 2017). Among this population, ALL was classified as not visible, normal, or injured. Injuries were separated into strains (partial injuries), complete injuries, or Segond fractures. Possible abnormalities of the menisci, collateral ligaments, popliteal tendon, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), iliotibial tract (ITT), and bone injuries were evaluated. Associations were calculated between ALL injuries and injuries of these other knee structures, as well as age and gender. RESULTS: ALL was visible in 171 of the 184 MRI-evaluated knees (92.9%). ALL was considered normal in 68 (39.8%) and damaged in 103 (60.2%) patients. ALL injuries were considered partial in 56 (54.4%) and total in 44 (42.7%) cases. Only 3 (2.9%) cases were Segond fractures. ALL injuries were associated with ITT (P < .0001), lateral meniscus (P = .04), lateral collateral ligament (P = .01), popliteal tendon (P = .001), and medial collateral ligament (P = .009) injuries, in addition to bone contusions in the lateral compartment of the knee (P < .0001). There was no correlation between ALL injuries and medial meniscus (P = .054) or PCL (P = .16) injuries. CONCLUSIONS: MRI evaluation showed ALL injuries are present in 60.2% of acute ACL injuries in adolescent patients. These injuries are associated with the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, ITT, lateral meniscus injuries, and bone contusions, but they are not associated with medial meniscus or PCL injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Combined Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Ligamentous Hyperlaxity Leads to Better Clinical Stability and a Lower Failure Rate Than Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare functional outcomes, residual instability, and rupture rates in patients with ligamentous hyperlaxity undergoing isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or combined ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. METHODS: Two groups of patients were evaluated and compared retrospectively. Both groups consisted of patients with ACL injuries and associated ligamentous hyperlaxity, defined based on the modified Beighton scale with a minimum score of 5. Group 1 patients underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction, and group 2 patients underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction. Group 1 consisted of historical controls. The presence of associated meniscal injury, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm functional scores, KT-1000 measurements, the presence of a residual pivot-shift, and the graft rupture rate were evaluated. The study was performed at University of São Paulo in Brazil. RESULTS: Ninety patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with ligamentous hyperlaxity were evaluated. The mean follow up was 29.6 ± 6.2 months for group 1 and 28.1 ± 4.2 months for group 2 (P = .51). No significant differences were found between the groups regarding Beighton scale, gender, the duration of injury before reconstruction, follow-up time, preoperative instability, or associated meniscal injuries. The mean age was 29.9 ± 8.1 years in group 1 and 27.0 ± 9.1 years in group 2 (P = .017). In the final evaluation, group 2 patients showed better anteroposterior clinical stability as evaluated by KT-1000 arthrometry (P = .02), better rotational stability as evaluated by the pivot-shift test (P = .03) and a lower reconstruction failure rate (21.7% [group 1] vs 3.3% [group 2]; P = .03). Clinical evaluations of postoperative functional scales showed no differences between the 2 groups (P = .27 for International Knee Documentation Committee; P = .41 for Lysholm). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction in patients with ligamentous hyperlaxity resulted in a lower failure rate and improved knee stability parameters compared to isolated ACL reconstruction. No differences were found in the functional scales. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case control study.

Study of the Nerve Endings and Mechanoreceptors of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee.

PURPOSE: To describe the morphology and distribution of the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) nerve endings, aiming to understand the interaction between the proprioceptive system and knee mechanics. METHODS: Twenty ALLs were obtained from fresh frozen cadavers. The ligaments were measured, weighed, and cut. Sections (10 µm) were prepared in hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides to analyze tissue integrity, and 50-µm sections were subjected to immunofluorescence with the protein gene product 9.5 as primary antibody and Alexa Fluor 488 as secondary antibody, followed by microscopic analysis. RESULTS: The ALL was identified in 100% of the dissections, exhibiting a mean (± standard deviation) length of 4.0 ± 0.4 cm, a mean width of 5.5 ± 0.8 mm, and a mean weight of 0.9 ± 0.2 g. The histological sections in hematoxylin and eosin showed dense, well-organized collagen and the presence of vascular tissue. All the specimens analyzed contained type I (Ruffini-like) mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings (type IV), varying from parallel to intertwined fibers. Unclassified nerve endings with different irregular shapes were also found. The neural elements occupied 0.6% ± 0.3% of the ligament area, and most were observed near the origin of ALL insertions. CONCLUSION: The ALL exhibits a peripheral nerve structure, primarily type I and IV mechanoreceptors. These findings suggest that the ALL is important for the proprioception and anterolateral stabilization of the knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is important to understand ALL innervation and infer how an injury could compromise the proprioceptive role of the lateral compartment, as the ligaments contribute dynamically to stability through proprioceptive control of muscle forces. The findings confirm that the ALL is highly innervated by mechanoreceptors and may have a proprioceptive role in conjunction with the lateral collateral ligament in the lateral region of the knee.

Anatomy of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic literature review to search for studies on the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee, presenting the most accepted findings, as well as the evolution of anatomic information on this structure. METHODS: We reviewed the PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalKey databases for anatomic studies on the ALL, involving cadaveric, histologic, and biochemical dissection and/or anatomic imaging. The primary data researched were the presence of the ligament; measures of length, width, and thickness; ligament path; insertions; number of bands; histologic assessment; and innervation. RESULTS: We identified 53 studies. The ALL was found in 82.87% of adult dissections (more easily visualized in fresh cadavers), 74.07% of fetal dissections, and 84.80% of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. In 29 articles, the ALL was found in 100% of cases. There are 3 ALL insertion points: femoral, tibial, and meniscal. Histologic sections showed dense, well-organized collagen fibers, with an average of 121 fibroblasts/mm2 in adults, in addition to the presence of vascular and nervous tissue. MRI was shown to be a good examination tool to visualize the ALL, primarily in the coronal plane and with T2-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL is a distinct structure in the anterolateral portion of the knee. It exhibits typical ligament characteristics and can be visualized on imaging examinations, especially MRI. It has a femoral attachment near the lateral epicondyle, with a trend in recent years showing it to be located posterior and proximal to it, following an anteroinferior trajectory, with an insertion into the lateral meniscus and proximal tibia at the midpoint between the fibular head and Gerdy tubercle. Among the studies, the length of the ALL varied from 30.41 to 59.0 mm, the width ranged between 4.0 and 7.0 mm, and the thickness ranged between 1.0 and 2.0 mm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During the past few years, much controversy has been raised about the correct anatomy of the ALL. The main clinical relevance of this study is not only to end the discussion about the ALL's existence but also to clarify and synthesize the main evidence on the ALL's anatomy, mainly the currently most accepted attachments according to the recent literature, to enable more precise development of biomechanical settings and surgical techniques.