I-CARE, a European Prospective Cohort Study Assessing Safety and Effectiveness of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a need to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of current therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients to provide the best quality of care. The primary objective of I-CARE (IBD Cancer and serious infections in Europe) was to assess prospectively safety concerns in IBD, with specific focus on the risk of cancer/lymphoma and serious infections in patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor and other biologic monotherapy as well as in combination with immunomodulators. METHODS: I-CARE was designed as a European prospective longitudinal observational multicenter cohort study to include patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or IBD unclassified established at least 3 months prior to enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 10,206 patients were enrolled between March 2016 and April 2019, including 6169 (60.4%) patients with Crohn's disease, 3853 (37.8%) with ulcerative colitis, and 184 (1.8%) with a diagnosis of IBD unclassified. Thirty-two percent of patients were receiving azathioprine/thiopurines, 4.6% 6-mercaptopurine, and 3.2% methotrexate at study entry. At inclusion, 47.3% of patients were treated with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, 8.8% with vedolizumab, and 3.4% with ustekinumab. Roughly one-quarter of patients (26.8%) underwent prior IBD-related surgery. Sixty-six percent of patients had been previously treated with systemic steroids. Three percent of patients had a medical history of cancer prior to inclusion and 1.1% had a history of colonic, esophageal, or uterine cervix high-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: I-CARE is an ongoing investigator-initiated observational European prospective cohort study that will provide unique information on the long-term benefits and risks of biological therapies in IBD patients. (EudraCT, Number: 2014-004728-23; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02377258).

Early MOnitoring of REsponse (MORE) to Golimumab Therapy: Results of a Multicentre, Prospective Observational Trial.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic goal of clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is achieved after biological therapy only in 16-39%. Individualization of therapeutic intervention would benefit from prediction of early response. STUDY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to assess golimumab (GLM) trough serum level of ≥2.5 µg/mL in combination with a reduction of faecal calprotectin (FC) of ≥50% at week 6 compared to baseline to predict clinical response at week 26 after regular GLM intake. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe active UC and planned GLM treatment were recruited for a prospective, multicentre, observational study in Germany. Prediction of clinical response was assessed by FC and GLM trough level. Missing data were imputed as therapy failure according to the last observation carried forward method. RESULTS: Fifty nine patients have been enrolled. 54% of patients were anti-TNF naïve. Clinical response at week 6 was a significant predictor for achieving clinical response at week 26 (odds ratio [OR] 10.97, confidence interval [CI], 2.96-40.68; p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with a GLM trough level of ≥2.5 µg/mL and a ≥50% reduction of FC at week 6 had an OR of 5.33 (95% CI, 0.59-47.84) to achieve clinical response at week 26. CONCLUSION: Clinical response at week 6 is the best predictive marker for achieving clinical response at week 26. Consideration of significant reduction of FC and trough GLM serum levels could improve prediction of response.

[Position paper on reporting of intestinal ultrasound findings in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]. / Positionspapier zur Befunderhebung von Darmultraschallbefunden bei chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal ultrasound is increasingly used for primary diagnosis, detection of complications and monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Standardization of reporting is relevant to ensure quality of the methodology and to improve communication between different specialties. The current manuscript describes the features required for optimized reporting of intestinal ultrasound findings in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: An expert consensus panel of gastroenterologists, radiologists, pathologists, paediatric gastroenterologists and surgeons conducted a systematic literature search. In a Delphi- process members of the Kompetenznetz Darmerkrankungen in collaboration with members of the German Society for Radiology (DRG) voted on relevant criteria for reporting of findings in intestinal ultrasound. Based on the voting results statements were agreed by expert consensus. RESULTS: Clinically relevant aspects of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) findings have been defined to optimize reporting and to standardize terminology. Minimal requirements for standardized reporting are suggested. The statements focus on description of disease activity as well as on complications of IBD. Attributes of intestinal inflammation are described and illustrated by exemplary images. CONCLUSION: The current manuscript provides practical recommendations on how to standardize documentation and reporting from intestinal ultrasound findings in patients with IBD.

Comparative Analysis of 3-Year Persistence With Vedolizumab Compared With Antibodies Against Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Germany: Retrospective Analysis of a Large Prescription Database.

AIMS: The goal of the study was to compare persistence with vedolizumab versus adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab in biologics-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated in gastroenterological practices and outpatient clinics in Germany. METHODS: Patients aged 18 or older who had initiated a biological therapy (vedolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab) were included in the present study. Prescriptions between July 2014 and March 2017 of the respective biological drug emerging from gastroenterological practices or outpatient clinics in Germany were retrieved from the longitudinal prescription (LRx) database. Patients treated with vedolizumab were matched with patients treated with infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab on the basis of age, gender, medication before biologic therapy, and index year. The primary outcome variable of the study was the rate of persistence with vedolizumab compared with antitumor necrosis factor biologics (infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab) within 3 years of the first prescription in outpatient settings. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed in 15,984 patients naïve to biologics revealing the statistically lower risk of discontinuation for vedolizumab compared with adalimumab, golimumab, or infliximab. In matched-pairs analyses, within 3 years after the first prescription, 39.5% of 2076 patients were persistent to vedolizumab compared with 33.5% of matched patients persistent to adalimumab (P<0.001). 37.6% of 716 patients were persistent to vedolizumab compared with 24.7% of matched patients persistent to golimumab (P<0.001). 35.7% of 2055 patients were persistent to vedolizumab compared with 30.2% of matched patients persistent to infliximab (P=0.119). Vedolizumab was associated with a significantly lower risk of therapy discontinuation compared with adalimumab [hazard ratio (HR)=0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.93] and golimumab (HR=0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.67), respectively; the vedolizumab risk of therapy discontinuation was numerically lower than infliximab but statistical significance was not achieved (HR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02). CONCLUSION: In biologics-naïve IBD patients treated in outpatient settings in Germany, matched-pair analyses showed that vedolizumab was associated with significantly improved drug persistence compared with adalimumab or golimumab, whereas numerical improvement was shown in comparison with infliximab.

A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Fructose Malabsorption in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) might have a higher prevalence of fructose malabsorption than healthy controls. This study's aim was to determine the prevalence and symptom severity of fructose malabsorption in patients with active and inactive IBD. METHODS: The present study was a multicenter noninterventional diagnostic pilot trial. Two hundred fifty-one participants were recruited from 12 outpatient clinics for internal medicine across Germany and from the University of Kiel. Fructose malabsorption was diagnosed by hydrogen breath testing. Patients diagnosed with bacterial overgrowth, non-H2 producers, and patients who were tested positive for lactose malabsorption were excluded. Gastrointestinal symptoms during breath testing were evaluated using four-point subjective items to determine severity of bloating, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients (45 with active IBD, 80 with IBD in remission, and 81 healthy controls) were analyzed. The number of patients diagnosed with fructose malabsorption - 35/44 (79.6%) in patients with active IBD, 59/80 (73.8%) inactive IBD, and 66/81 (81.5%) in healthy controls - did not differ between the groups (χ2 [2, N = 205] = 1.48, p = 0.48). However, abdominal pain was more frequent in patients with active IBD than patients with IBD in remission (z = -2.936, p = 0.010), and diarrhea was more frequent in patients with active IBD than in healthy controls (z = 2.489, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Fructose malabsorption is not more common among patients with IBD than healthy subjects. However, the greater prevalence of patient-reported symptoms among patients with IBD may be of pathological and therapeutic relevance.

Expression of the fructose transporter GLUT5 in patients with fructose malabsorption.

BACKGROUND: Patients with abdominal symptoms are frequently diagnosed with fructose malabsorption (FM). Fructose is absorbed by monosaccharide transporters located in the brush border of the human small intestine. The aim of this study was to investigate the histoanatomical distribution of the main fructose transporter GLUT5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 223 patients diagnosed with FM by a hydrogen breath test and grouped according to their response to a fructose-free diet. The control group were 42 healthy individuals and 29 patients with celiac disease (CD). The fructose breath test was done with 50 g fructose. The expression of Glut5 in duodenal biopsy specimens was studied by immunohistochemistry. The Kruskal-Wallis-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to carry out the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The histoanatomical expression pattern of GLUT5 did not differ significantly between those patients with FM who responded completely to a fructose-free diet (n = 183) and healthy individuals (n = 42); nor did it correlate to H2 production measured in fructose breath testing. In patients with FM, the GLUT5 expression pattern did not differ between those individuals responding to a fructose-free diet and those who did not. However, GLUT5 expression pattern was significantly different in patients with CD (n = 29) compared to patients with FM and to healthy individuals (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: GLUT5 expression patterns are not be related to adult patients with FM. However, in secondary malabsorption, a decreased GLUT5 expression was found. Further investigation is needed to understand the essential factors in FM and the influence on functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Intestinal ultrasound for monitoring therapeutic response in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from the TRUST&UC study.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective evaluation of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) for disease monitoring of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in routine medical practice. DESIGN: TRansabdominal Ultrasonography of the bowel in Subjects with IBD To monitor disease activity with UC (TRUST&UC) was a prospective, observational study at 42 German inflammatory bowel disease-specialised centres representing different care levels. Patients with a diagnosis of a proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis or pancolitis currently in clinical relapse (defined as Short Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≥5) were enrolled consecutively. Disease activity and vascularisation within the affected bowel wall areas were assessed by duplex/Colour Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: At baseline, 88.5% (n=224) of the patients had an increased bowel wall thickness (BWT) in the descending or sigmoid colon. Even within the first 2 weeks of the study, the percentage of patients with an increased BWT in the sigmoid or descending colon decreased significantly (sigmoid colon 89.3%-38.6%; descending colon 83.0%-42.9%; p<0.001 each) and remained low at week 6 and 12 (sigmoid colon 35.4% and 32.0%; descending colon 43.4% and 37.6%; p<0.001 each). Normalisation of BWT and clinical response after 12 weeks of treatment showed a high correlation (90.5% of patients with normalised BWT had symptomatic response vs 9.5% without symptomatic response; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IUS may be preferred in general practice in a point-of-care setting for monitoring the disease course and for assessing short-term treatment response. Our findings give rise to the assumption that monitoring BWT alone has the potential to predict the therapeutic response, which has to be verified in future studies.

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients: a German retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Real-world comparisons of biologic treatment outcomes for ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) patients are limited. We sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) in UC and CD patients in Germany. METHODS: A retrospective chart review (15 sites) investigated UC and CD patients who were biologic-treatment naïve (biologic-naïve) or had received no more than one prior anti-TNFα before initiating treatment with VDZ or anti-TNFα between 15 July 2014 and 20 October 2015. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed time to first chart-documented clinical remission (CR) and symptom resolution (UC: rectal bleeding [RB], stool frequency [SF]; CD: abdominal pain [AP], liquid stools [LS]) and outcome duration. RESULTS: A total of 133 UC (76 VDZ; 57 anti-TNFα) and 174 CD (69 VDZ; 105 anti-TNFα) patients were included. By Week 26, estimated cumulative rates of patients achieving CR or symptom resolution with VDZ vs anti-TNFα treatment were for UC: CR, 53.7% vs 31.7%; RB, 66.8% vs 55.8%; and SF, 59.8% vs 50.7%, respectively; and for CD: CR, 14.4% vs 32.8%; AP, 62.5% vs 56.0%; and LS, 29.9% vs 50.3%, respectively. Outcomes were sustained similarly between treatments, except RB (VDZ vs anti-TNFα: median 38.1 vs 15.1 weeks, P = 0.03). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5.3% vs 7.0% (UC) and 8.7% vs 19.0% (CD) of VDZ vs anti-TNFα patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences in CR, symptom resolution, and safety profiles, real-world data support both VDZ and anti-TNFα as effective treatment options in UC and CD.

Comparative Analysis of the 3-Year Persistence Rate with Second-Line Vedolizumab and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Followed in Gastroenterology Practices in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to investigate the 3-year persistence rates with second-line vedolizumab and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors (i.e., adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were followed in gastroenterology practices in Germany. METHODS: This study included patients aged ≥18 years who had received prescriptions for second-line biological drugs in Germany between 2014 and 2017 (n = 5,150) retrieved from the longitudinal prescription database. Vedolizumab users were matched to adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab users based on age, sex, and index year. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of persistence with vedolizumab compared with the rate of persistence with adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab within 3 years of second-line therapy initiation in IBD patients. Persistence was estimated as therapy time without discontinuation, with discontinuation being defined as at least 90 days without any prescription for the biological drug of interest. RESULTS: After matching patients who had received vedolizumab with those who had received adalimumab, the rate of persistence after 3 therapy years was 30.3% for vedolizumab and 27.9% for adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.005). The corresponding figures were 27.8 and 20.8% in the vedolizumab-golimumab matched-pair analysis (log-rank p < 0.001) and 29.5 and 25.2% in the vedolizumab-infliximab matched-pair analysis (log-rank p value = 0.008). Vedolizumab was associated with a significant 0.85-, 0.72-, and 0.86-fold decrease in the risk of discontinuation within 3 years of therapy initiation compared to adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment persistence was higher for vedolizumab than for TNF-α inhibitors up to 3 years after initiating second-line biological therapy.

Addendum to S3-Guidelines Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: Management of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the COVID-19 Pandemic - open questions and answers.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a global outbreak of new onset infections with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. To date, more than 3.4 million people have been infected throughout the world. In Germany, approximately 450,000 patients suffer from inflammatory bowel disease; these patients generally require continuous expert care and support. Against the background of a rapidly accumulating knowledge base on SARS-CoV-2, 68 expert authors of the current DGVS guidelines for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis took part in a virtual meeting to compile up-to-date, practice-orientated recommendations aimed at improving the care of patients with IBD. These recommendations address the risk of infection, including the risk for specific patient groups, the possible course of the disease, and consequences for pharmacological and surgical therapies of the underlying disease, as well as general measures for infection prevention and adjuvant prophylactic and therapeutic options.

Predictive parameters for the clinical course of Crohn's disease: development of a simple and reliable risk model.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to identify clinical parameters in recently diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) patients for prediction of their disease course. METHODS: EPIC (Early Predictive parameters of Immunosuppressive therapy in Crohn's disease) is a prospective, observational study in 341 patients with a recent CD diagnosis (≤ 6 months), and naïve to immunosuppressants (IS) and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) agents. Patient characteristics were documented up to 2 years. In line with national and international guidelines, a complicated disease course was defined as need for immunosuppressants and/or anti-TNF agents, and CD-related hospitalization with or without immunosuppressants and/or anti-TNF agents. RESULTS: A total of 212 CD patients were analyzed of whom 57 (27%) had an uncomplicated disease within 24 months, while 155 (73%) had a complicated disease course: need for IS and/or anti-TNF agents (N = 115), CD-related hospitalization with or without IS/anti-TNF agents (N = 40). Identified risk predictors for a complicated disease were as follows: age at onset < 40 years (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.2-4.5), anemia (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.2), and treatment with systemic corticosteroids at first flare (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.7). These three parameters were used to develop a risk model allowing prediction of the future disease course. CONCLUSION: Our three-parameter model enables an assessment of each CD patient's risk to develop a complicated disease course. Due to the easy accessibility of these parameters, this model can be utilized in daily clinical care to assist selecting the initial treatment for each individual patient.

The Predictive Value of the Hydrogen Breath Test in the Diagnosis of Fructose Malabsorption.

BACKGROUND: Fructose malabsorption is commonly diagnosed by the hydrogen fructose (H2) breath test. However, the mechanisms behind fructose malabsorption in humans are not well understood and the clinical relevance of this test is considered controversial. Hence, the main aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of the H2 breath test. METHODS: Regarding exclusion criteria, the study enrolled 562 consecutive patients, enlisted to a gastroenterology clinic between 2009 and 2011 for testing malabsorption. In the final data analysis, 246 patients were included. Ecotrophologists used 3 categories to rate dietary success: complete response, partial response and no response to the diet. They also rated the occurrence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea and bloating during the H2 breath test. Ordinal regression analysis using SPSS was performed to evaluate whether H2 breath test results - measured as the maximum H2 level, the maximum increase in H2, and the area under the curve (AUC) - predicted dietary success or failure. Correlation analyses were applied to test whether symptoms of fructose malabsorption correlated with the H2 breath test measures. Finally, we evaluated whether cut-off-values of 40 or 60 parts per million (ppm) serve better than the test measure of 20 ppm to diagnose fructose malabsorption. RESULTS: When a fructose-free diet was administered it was found that 103 patients (41.9%) were complete responders, 116 (47.2%) were partial responders and 27 (11%) were non-responders. The H2 breath test with the 20 ppm cut-off-value, that is, the maximum H2 level, the maximum increase in H2, and the AUC did not predict dietary response (all 95% CI ns). This was also the case when using 40 or 60 ppm as cut-off-values (all 95% CI ns). Abdominal pain during the test correlated significantly with the AUC. Diarrhoea and bloating correlated significantly with the AUC, the maximum H2 level and the maximum increase in H2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The H2 breath test produced no predictive value for the fructose-free diet outcomes; its value as a predictive test is therefore questionable. However, the symptoms of fructose malabsorption correlated significantly with the H2 breath test measures, and this is an indication that there is at least a degree of validity of the H2 breath test beyond the simple detection or exclusion of fructose malabsorption.

Identification of clinically relevant cytomegalovirus infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Several lines of evidence indicate that cytomegalovirus infection can be substantially associated with onset of inflammatory bowel disease, especially in patients refractory to immunosuppressive treatment. As cytomegalovirus is widely spread in the population, here we present a quantitative detection system suitable to differentiate clinically relevant cytomegalovirus infection from common latent cytomegalovirus. Using a quantitative real-time PCR approach, cytomegalovirus viral load was evaluated in 917 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded colon biopsy samples of 136 patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. Besides initial cytomegalovirus testing, the PCR system was also used to monitor therapy response after antiviral treatment. Cytomegalovirus DNA was detected in 37 patients (27%) with varying viral loads ranging from 5 to 8.7 × 105 copies/105 cells. Thereof, 13 patients (35%) received an antiviral treatment with 12 of them going into remission (92%). Later, five patients displayed a relapse and three patients who agreed to restart antiviral treatment again showed positive therapy response. A retrospective comparison of viral loads with antiviral therapy response revealed a threshold of 600 cytomegalovirus copies/105 cells as indicative for clinically relevant infection. Of note, sensitivity of cytomegalovirus detection by immunohistochemistry was found to be insufficient to reliably identify antiviral therapy responders. In conclusion, quantitative real-time PCR using formalin-fixed biopsy samples is suitable for detection of cytomegalovirus infection in tissue samples of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Moreover, it allows the definition of a viral load threshold, predictive for clinical relevance concerning antiviral therapy response.

Use of Intestinal Ultrasound to Monitor Crohn's Disease Activity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a multicenter study to determine whether transabdominal bowel wall ultrasonography, a noninvasive procedure that does not require radiation, can be used to monitor progression of Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We performed a 12-month prospective, noninterventional study at 47 sites in Germany, from December 2010 through September 2014. Our study included 234 adult patients with CD who experienced a flare, defined as Harvey-Bradshaw index score of ≥7. All patients received treatment intensification, most with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Ultrasound parameters and clinical data were assessed at baseline and then after 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in ultrasound parameters within 12 months of study enrollment. RESULTS: All patients included had bowel wall alterations either within the terminal ileum and/or segments of the colon. After 3 and 12 months, ultrasonographic examination showed significant improvements of nearly all ultrasound parameters, including reductions in bowel wall thickening or stratification, decreased fibrofatty proliferation, and increased signals in color Doppler ultrasound (P < .01 for all parameters at months 3 and 12). Median Harvey-Bradshaw index scores decreased from 10 at baseline to 2 after 12 months. Improvement in bowel wall thickness correlated with reduced levels of C-reactive protein after 3 months (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter prospective study, we found that ultrasonographic examination can be used to monitor disease activity in patients with active CD. Bowel ultrasonography seems to be an ideal follow-up method to evaluate early transmural changes in disease activity, in response to medical treatment. German Clinical Trials Register: drks.de/DRKS00010805.

Proposal for an anti-TNF-exit strategy based on trough serum level.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate, if the strategy to stop anti-TNF treatment after determination of low trough serum levels and exclusion of inflammation is associated with lower relapse rates. METHODS: Since 2013 we followed an exit strategy in patients treated with anti-TNF treatment for inflammatory bowel disease based on trough serum levels. The relapse rates were observed prospectively, data analysis was performed in a retrospective manner of the collected clinical data. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled, who stopped anti-TNF therapy. 13 Patients followed the clinical algorithm, 27 patients were used as control group (13 patients with ulcerative colitis and 14 patients with Crohn's disease). 19 patients received Infliximab, 21 Adalimumab. The median follow-up time after discontinuation was 19 months (IQR 18). Relapses were observed in 22/40 patients (55%). Among the 13 patients with a targeted discontinuation of therapy based on the algorithm, three relapses were observed (23%), compared to 19/27 (70%) from the non-algorithm group (OR: 7.9; 95%-CI: 1.7-36.5). Relapse-free-survival after anti-TNF discontinuation was significantly higher in patients treated by the algorithm compared to the non-algorithm group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: An exit strategy based on trough serum levels significantly reduces the relapse rate.

CT-P13 (Inflectra™, Remsima™) monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

The approval of infliximab biosimilars Remsima™ and Inflectra™ (CT-P13) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a promising step to reduce treatment costs. Since monitoring of Remicade™ serum trough levels and anti-Remicade™ immunogenicity hold an important significance in treatment modalities, no data about monitoring of drug serum trough levels or anti-drug antibody levels in IBD patients treated with Remsima™ or Inflectra™ are present to date. Therefore, in this study we applied a Remicade™-validated ELISA to determine drug serum levels of Remsima™ or Inflectra™. Serum concentrations were measured at identical levels compared to Remicade™ at multiple time points over 38 weeks, suggesting that the monitoring of serum trough levels is equally feasible for patients receiving Remsima™ or Inflectra™ and Remicade™. Additionally, anti-drug antibody levels were not significantly different in patients treated with Remsima™ or Inflectra™ compared to patients treated with Remicade™. To our knowledge this is the first real-life experience demonstrating the feasibility of drug monitoring in IBD patients treated with the infliximab biosimilars Remsima™ and Inflectra™.