Optical imaging compared to clinical examination in 484 rheumatoid arthritis patients: the Leeuwarden Handscan Registry.

The Handscan is a novel objective optical imaging device for disease follow-up and management in rheumatoid arthritis patients. We aim to examine the association between the baseline outcomes of the Handscan, disease activity levels and joint swelling. The Handscan measures differences in laser light absorption between joints of fingers and wrists and adjacent reference tissue, indicating the presence or absence of inflammation. The device gives an optical spectral transmission (OST) index per joint. The average of these indices is represented in the total optical score (TOS). Associations between TOS and DAS28 at subject level and OST and swelling at joint level were examined. 484 RA patients were included. Compared to patients with high disease activity (defined by DAS28), TOS was significantly lower in patients with moderate (estimated coefficient B: - 7.09, P < 0.001), low disease activity (B: - 6.99, P < 0.001) and patients in remission (B: - 7.72, P < 0.001) but could not distinguish between the latter three disease states. TOS was significantly lower in females (B: - 3.2, P < 0.001). OST was significantly higher in swollen than non-swollen joints (B: 0.28, P < 0.001). TOS was significantly higher in patients with high disease activity than in those in remission or with low and moderate disease activity. The difference in TOS between males and females should be accounted for in the interpretation of this outcome. The OST at joint level discriminates swollen from non-swollen joints and could be a more promising tool than the overall optical activity reflected in TOS.

Patient-reported outcomes in newly diagnosed early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated to target with a tocilizumab- or methotrexate-based strategy.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of initiation of tocilizumab, with or without MTX, compared with MTX alone on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in DMARD-naïve patients with early RA. Methods: In U-Act-Early, patients initiated treat-to-target step-up MTX, tocilizumab or tocilizumab plus MTX therapy. PROs assessed included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, 36-item Short Form (SF-36), five dimensional EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire. Differences between strategy groups over time and proportions of patients exceeding minimum clinically important differences (MCID) were evaluated. Results: During the 2-year study period, significant improvements were found in the tocilizumab strategies in the SF-36 physical component score (tocilizumab, P = 0.012; tocilizumab plus MTX, P = 0.044) and EQ-5D score (tocilizumab plus MTX, P = 0.020) when compared with the MTX strategy. No significant differences were noted in other PROs (P ⩾ 0.052, except for the domain 'identity' in the Illness Perception Questionnaire; tocilizumab vs MTX, P = 0.048). The proportions of patients achieving MCID in SF-36 physical component score were significantly higher at 12 and 52 weeks (P ⩽ 0.049) in the tocilizumab arms when compared with the MTX arm. At week 24, the proportion achieving MCID in EQ-5D was significantly higher in the tocilizumab plus MTX arm vs the MTX arm (P = 0.045). Conclusion: Initiation of treat-to-target tocilizumab therapy resulted in significantly improved PROs, especially within the first 24 weeks, when compared with initiation of MTX therapy. Also on the patients' level, initiating tocilizumab may be considered as a valuable strategy in DMARD-naïve patients with early RA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01034137.

Performance of the Dutch SF-36 version 2 as a measure of health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the measurement properties of the Dutch SF-36 version 2 (SF-36v2) health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Scaling assumptions, internal reliability, and internal construct validity were examined using available data from 1884 RA patients included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry. External construct validity and responsiveness to change were examined using baseline and 6-month follow-up data from a subset of 387 early RA patients participating in the DREAM remission induction cohort. RESULTS: The individual items of the SF-36v2 adequately met scaling assumptions, although four items correlated too highly with items from different scales. Internal consistency was high for all eight scales and the physical and mental health components underlying the scales were replicated, supporting the use of the standard scoring algorithms. The SF-36v2 scales demonstrated minimal floor effects and ceiling effects were noteworthy only for the role-physical, social functioning, and role-emotional scales. Correlations with other core measures were as expected and the SF-36v2 showed excellent known-groups validity in distinguishing between patients with low or moderate-high disease activity. All scales related to physical health showed moderate to large responsiveness to change in patients that achieved low disease activity at six months. CONCLUSION: The SF-36v2 appears to be a psychometrically sound tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life of Dutch patients with RA.

Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose treatment with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is failing, several biological treatment options are available. Often, another TNFi or a biological with another mode of action is prescribed. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three biologic treatments with different modes of action in patients with RA whose TNFi therapy is failing. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, 1-year randomised trial in a multicentre setting. Patients with active RA despite previous TNFi treatment were randomised to receive abatacept, rituximab or a different TNFi. The primary outcome (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints) and the secondary outcomes (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and 36-item Short Form Health Survey scores) were analysed using linear mixed models. Cost-effectiveness was analysed on the basis of incremental net monetary benefit, which was based on quality-adjusted life-years (calculated using EQ-5D scores), and all medication expenditures consumed in 1 year. All analyses were also corrected for possible confounders. RESULTS: Of 144 randomised patients, 5 were excluded and 139 started taking abatacept (43 patients), rituximab (46 patients) or a different TNFi (50 patients). There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to multiple measures of RA outcomes. However, our analysis revealed that rituximab therapy is significantly more cost-effective than both abatacept and TNFi over a willingness-to-pay range of 0 to 80,000 euros. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatment options were similarly effective; however, when costs were factored into the treatment decision, rituximab was the best option available to patients whose first TNFi treatment failed. However, generalization of these costs to other countries should be undertaken carefully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register number NTR1605. Registered 24 December 2008.

Determinants associated with work participation in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced work participation (WP) is a common problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and generates high costs for society. Therefore, it is important to explore determinants of WP at the start of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, and for changes in WP after 2 years of TNFi treatment. METHODS: Within the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) biologic register, WP data were available from 508 patients with RA younger than 65 years and without an (early) retirement pension. WP was registered at start of TNFi treatment and after 2 years of followup and was measured by single patient-reported binary questions whether they had work, paid or voluntary, or had a disability allowance or a retirement pension. Determinants measured at baseline were age, sex, disease duration, functional status [through Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), rheumatoid factor, presence of erosions, number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and number of comorbidities. During the 2 years of followup, HAQ-DI response and European League Against Rheumatism response were measured. Univariate analyses (excluded if p value was > 0.2) and multivariate (excluded if p value was > 0.1) logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Determinants associated with WP at baseline were having a better HAQ-DI (OR 0.32, p = 0.000) and male sex (OR 0.65, p = 0.065). After 2 years of TNFi therapy, 11.8% (n = 60) started to work and 13.6% (n = 69) stopped working. Determinants associated with starting to work were better baseline HAQ-DI (OR 0.58), positive RF (OR 2.73), and young age (OR 0.96); and for stopping work, worse baseline HAQ-DI (OR 2.74), low HAQ-DI response (OR 0.31), and comorbidity (OR 2.67), all with p < 0.1. CONCLUSION: Young patients with RA and a high functional status without any comorbidity will have a better chance of working. This supports the main goal in the management of RA: to suppress disease activity as soon and as completely as possible to prevent irreversible destruction of the joints, and thus maintain a good functional status of the patient. Because of the low proportion of variance explained by the models in this study, other factors besides the ones studied are associated with WP.