Comparison of blood pressure monitoring by applanation tonometry and invasively assessed blood pressure in cardiological patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of non-invasive continuous blood pressure measurement by applanation tonometry (AT) in awake or anaesthetised cardiological intensive care patients. Patients suffering from highly impaired left ventricular function atrial fibrillation or severe aortic valve stenosis were included into the study. Arterial blood pressure was recorded by applanation tonometry (T-Line 400, Tensys Medical®, USA) and an arterial line in awake or anaesthetised patients. Discrepancies in mean (MAP), systolic (SAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure between the two methods were assessed as bias, limits of agreement and percentage error respectively. In 31 patients a total of 27,900 measurements were analyzed. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.23, 0.45 and 0.06 for MAP, SAP and DAP, respectively. For all patients bias for MAPAT compared to MAPAL was 14.96 mmHg (SAPAT 4.51 mmHg; DAPAT 19.12 mmHg) with limits of agreement for MAPAT of 46.25 and - 16.33 mm Hg (SAPAT 48.00 and - 38.98 mmHg; DAPAT 50.12 and - 11.89 mmHg). Percentage error for MAPAT was 56.8% (42.7% for SAPAT; 75.2% for DAPAT). We conclude that the AT method is not reliable in ICU patients with severe cardiac comorbidities.

Is applanation tonometry a reliable method for monitoring blood pressure in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of non-invasive continuous BP measurement by applanation tonometry in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: Arterial blood pressure (AP) was recorded intraoperatively both by applanation tonometry (AT) (T-Line 200pro, Tensys Medical(®), USA) and an arterial line (AL) after radial cannulation in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Discrepancies between the two methods were assessed as bias, limits of agreement and percentage error. Mean, systolic, and diastolic arterial pressures were assessed (MAP, SAP, DAP respectively). Trending ability was assessed by concordance based on four-quadrant plotting. RESULTS: Mean (sd) BMI of the 28 patients was 49.4 (9.7 kg m(-2)). A total of 201 907 time points were available for analysis. Bias for MAPAT compared with MAPAL was +3.97 mm Hg (SAPAT +3.45 mm Hg; DAPAT +3.66 mm Hg) with limits of agreement for MAPAT of -14.47 and +22.41 mm Hg (SAPAT -22.0 and +28.9 mm Hg; DAPAT -15.7 and +23.1 mm Hg). Percentage error for MAPAT was 23.5% (23.4% for SAPAT; 30.5% for DAPAT). Trending ability for MAP, SAP, and DAP revealed a concordance of 0.74, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous BP assessment by applanation tonometry is feasible in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, despite a low mean difference, 95% limits of agreement and trending ability indicate that the technology needs to be improved further, before being recommended for routine use in this group of patients.

Exercise program improves therapy-related side-effects and quality of life in lymphoma patients undergoing therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoma patients undergoing therapy must cope with the side-effects of the disease itself, therapy and associated immobility. Peripheral neuropathy (PNP), loss of balance control and weakness not only diminishes patients' quality of life (QOL), it can also affect planning and the dosage of therapy. Exercise may enable patients to reverse these declines, improving their performance level and QOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a randomized, controlled trial, assigning 61 lymphoma patients either to a control group (CG; N=31) or to a 36-week intervention (IG; N=30), consisting of sensorimotor-, endurance- and strength training twice a week. Primary end point was QOL; secondary end points included movement coordination, endurance, strength and therapy-induced side-effects. RESULTS: Intergroup comparison revealed improved QOL- (ΔT1-T0; P=0.03) and PNP-related deep sensitivity in the IG: 87.5% were able to reduce the symptom, compared with 0% in the CG (P<0.001). Significant differences in the change of balance control could be found between the groups, with the IG improving while the CG steadily declined (monopedal static ΔT3-T0; P=0.03; dynamic ΔT3-T0; P=0.007; perturbed mono-ΔT3-T0; P=0.009 and bipedal ΔT3-T0; P=0.006), failed attempts (monopedal static ΔT3-T0; P=0.02, dynamic ΔT3-T0; P<0.001and perturbed ΔT3-T0; P=0.006) and improved time to regain balance (ΔT3-T0; P=0.04). Moreover, the change in the aerobic performance level (ΔT3-T0; P=0.05) and additional amount of exercise carried out per week [metabolic equivalent (MET); P=0.02] differed significantly across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise, especially sensorimotor training, is a feasible and promising method to support cancer patients during therapy. It improves patients QOL, reduces restrictions from side-effects such as PNP and improves patients' balance control, physical performance level and mobility. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER NUMBER: DRKS00003894.

Drop the Likelihood Ratio. A Novel Non-electronic Tool for Interpreting Diagnostic Test Results.

OBJECTIVE: To present a geometric ruler to determine predictive values of binary diagnostic test results from prevalence, sensitivity and specificity without calculation. METHODS: On logarithmic scale the relationships between pre-/post-test odds and the likelihood ratio as well as sensitivity, specificity and the likelihood ratio appear as simple linear (additive) equations. RESULTS: Each of these additive equations can be solved geometrically in form of a ruler with three scales. By amalgamation we devise a novel non-electronic tool which omits the intermediate step of likelihood ratio determination. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a simple geometric method to aid in interpretation of diagnostic test results for both practical and educational purposes.