In-vivo testing of a novel wireless intraspinal microstimulation interface for restoration of motor function following spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury causes a drastic loss in motor and sensory function. Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) is an electrical stimulation method developed for restoring motor function by activating the spinal networks below the level of injury. Current ISMS technology uses fine penetrating microwires to stimulate the ventral horn of the lumbar enlargement. The penetrating wires traverse the dura mater through a transdural conduit that connects to an implantable pulse generator. OBJECTIVE: A wireless, fully intradural ISMS implant was developed to mitigate the potential complications associated with the transdural conduit, including tethering and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. METHODS: Two wireless floating microelectrode array (WFMA) devices were implanted in the lumbar enlargement of an adult domestic pig. Voltage transients were used to assess the electrochemical stability of the interface. Manual flexion and extension movements of the spine were performed to evaluate the mechanical stability of the interface. Post-mortem 9T MRI imaging was used to confirm the location of the electrodes. RESULTS: The WFMA-based ISMS interface successfully evoked extension and flexion movements of the hip joint. Stimulation thresholds remained stable following manual extension and flexion of the spine. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrate the surgical feasibility as well as the functionality of the proposed wireless ISMS system.

Controversies in the Management of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections: An International Viewpoint.

Pediatric musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) are a major contributor to the global burden of musculoskeletal disease in children and young adults. If untreated, or treated inappropriately or inadequately, pediatric bone and joint infections can be fatal or result in morbidity that causes significant functional disabilities to the patient and economic burden to the family and the community at large. The past decade has witnessed many advances in this field with respect to early diagnosis, management, and prevention of complications. It is important to discuss the current controversies in the management of pediatric MSIs with an international perspective. This discussion should include the controversies associated with the early diagnosis and identification of pediatric MSI in diverse settings; the controversies involved in the nonsurgical and surgical management of acute pediatric MSIs; and the controversies associated with the management of sequelae of pediatric MSI.

Vascular Safe Zone During Percutaneous Pinning of the Distal Femur.

PURPOSE: During percutaneous pinning of the pediatric distal femur, iatrogenic vascular damage in the medial thigh is a frequent concern. The proximity of a proximal-medial pin to these vessels has never been studied in children. This study describes a radiologic vascular safe zone that is easily visualized during surgery (wherein the superficial femoral vessels are safely posterior). METHODS: Patients ≤16 years old with magnetic resonance imaging of one or both femora between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The "at-risk level" (ARL) was defined as the distal-most axial image with a femoral vessel anterior to the posterior condylar axis. A standardized retrograde lateral-to-medial pin was templated. A correlation matrix and least squares regression identified age and physeal width (PW) as ideal independent variables. A vascular safe zone above the medial femoral condyle (MFC) was modeled as a multiple of PW (i.e. x*PW) and needed to satisfy 3 age-dependent criteria: (1) at the ARL, the pin is medial to the vessels, (2) the pin exits the medial thigh before the ARL, and (3) the chosen "vascular safe zone" (x*PW) is always distal to the ARL. RESULTS: Forty-three patients averaging 7.1±3.9 (0.3-16) years old were included. Intra-Class correlation coefficients were excellent (0.92-0.98). All measurements strongly correlated with age ( r =0.76-0.92, P <0.001) and PW ( r =0.82-0.93, P <0.001). All patients satisfied criteria 1. Criteria 2 was satisfied in all patients ≥6 years old, 86% of children 4-5, and only 18% of children ≤3. In children >3 years old, the largest safe zone that satisfied criteria 3 was 2×PW. On average, the ARL was 2.5×PW (99% CI 2.3-2.7) above the MFC. The average ARL in children ≥6 years old was significantly higher than 2×PW (162 mm vs. 120 mm, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: During passage of a distal femur pin into the medial thigh, children ≥6 years old have a vascular safe zone that extends 2×PW proximal to the MFC. Surgeons should be cautious with medial pin placement in children 4-5 years old and, if possible, avoid this technique in children ≤3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A Standardized Protocol for Cervical Spine Evaluation in Children Reduces Imaging Utilization: A Pilot Study of the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries (CSI) have the potential to cause severe morbidity in children. Multiple imaging studies are used during evaluation of CSIs but come at a cost, both financially and in radiation exposure. To reduce resource utilization and radiation exposure, we implemented the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group (PCSCWG) standardized protocol (SP) for evaluating CSIs in children. METHODS: Children below 18 years old presenting with concern for CSI at a level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed before (July 2015 to May 2016) and after (November 2017 to June 2018) protocol implementation. Demographics, injuries, and imaging utilization were extracted. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients cleared with clinical exam, and the proportion undergoing x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance image. The secondary outcome was the estimated difference in imaging charges based on the annual reduction in radiographic studies. RESULTS: During the study 359 children were evaluated for CSIs (248 pre-SP, 111 post-SP). Patients were similar with respect to age, injury severity score, and mechanism of injury. Protocol adherence was 87.4%. The prevalence of CSI was similar in the preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts (2.8% vs. 1.8%, P=0.567). Children treated after protocol implementation were significantly more likely to be cleared by clinical exam (15.3% vs. 43.2%, P<0.001). Significantly fewer children had x-rays (70.2% vs. 55.0%, P=0.005) and computed tomography scans (14.5% vs. 5.4%, P=0.013) in the postprotocol period. There was no difference in the utilization of magnetic resonance image (6.9% vs. 7.2%, P=0.904) or the proportion of children discharged with a cervical collar (10.1% vs. 12.6%, P=0.476). No patients in either group were found to have a previously undiagnosed injury at follow-up. The reduction in radiographic studies translates to an estimated annual reduction in imaging charges of $396,476. CONCLUSIONS: The PCSCWG protocol for evaluating CSIs reduced the number of radiographic studies performed and estimated imaging charges while reliably identifying CSIs.

Intramedullary Fixation of Both Bone Forearm Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Healing Correlates With Development of the Olecranon Apophysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether healing of both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures in children and adolescents is associated with the stage of the olecranon apophysis development as described by the Diméglio modification of the Sauvegrain method. METHODS: Records were reviewed from 2 children's hospitals from 1997 to 2008 to identify all patients younger than 18 years of age who had BBFA fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Sixty-three patients were identified meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The stage of the olecranon apophysis was noted on the lateral radiograph at the time of the injury. Data were statistically analyzed to assess the olecranon stage at which the increased rate of delayed union becomes more prevalent using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Time to union, complications, and need for reoperation were recorded for each group. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred ninety-eight patient records were reviewed with 63 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, a cutoff of olecranon stage > 3 (stages 4 to 7) was a significant predictor of the increased rate of delayed union time compared with olecranon stages 0 to 3 (P=0.004). Non-healing-related complication rates for each group were 2/28 (7.1%) for olecranon stages and 0 to 3 and 6/35 (17.1%) for olecranon stages 4 to 7. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of delayed union for BBFA fractures that have been treated with intramedullary nail fixation is increased in children with more mature olecranon apophyses as compared with those with younger olecranon stages. We propose the use of the stage of olecranon apophysis development when choosing the surgical approach and implant for when treating operative BBFA fractures in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Staying Out of Trouble: Complications of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

Supracondylar fractures are among the most common fractures in children that require surgery. These fractures are also associated with some of the most serious complications of all fractures seen in children. Timely recognition and careful management can mitigate the potentially poor outcomes of these complications. Pin-site irritation and superficial infections are the most common complications seen. Cubitus varus remains another common complication, even with the use of closed reduction and pinning for management of most displaced fractures. Neurapraxias are seen in almost 10% of patients, with most resolving spontaneously. The worst complications are those that may be catastrophic for patients, causing substantial loss of function or even amputation of the limb; for example, vascular injury and compartment syndrome. Diagnosis and management of these complications should focus on strategies to ensure the best possible outcomes.

Challenges in Pediatric Trauma: What We All Need to Know About Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures.

Diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna are common injuries in children and often result from a fall on an outstretched hand. Fractures are classified by completeness, angular and rotational deformity, and displacement. The goal of management is to correct the deformity to the anatomic position or within acceptable alignment parameters as defined in the literature. This is primarily achieved by closed reduction and immobilization. Greenstick fractures are reduced by rotation of the palm toward the apex of the deformity. Complete fractures are reduced with sustained traction and manipulation. All fractures are immobilized in a cast, applied with the proper molding technique to ensure adequate stabilization, and maintained until healing is evident. Follow-up radiographs should be obtained weekly during the first 3 weeks after reduction to assess loss of reduction. Generally, postreduction malalignment greater than 20° is unacceptable, but these parameters vary based on age, fracture pattern, and the location and plane of angulation. Surgical intervention, with intramedullary nailing or plate fixation, is indicated for open fractures, for those with substantial soft-tissue injury, and when acceptable alignment cannot be achieved or maintained. Successful outcomes are seen in most forearm fractures in children, based on bone healing and restoration of functional forearm range of motion.

Pediatric Polytrauma: What Is the Role of Damage Control Orthopaedics in the Pediatric Population?

Severe pediatric trauma can be complicated for clinicians to manage because it is unusual and behaves somewhat differently from severe trauma in adults. Damage control orthopaedics is a philosophy that has gained traction in the past 30 years and has become standard in unstable adult trauma patients. Studies have failed to demonstrate clear utility for this approach in pediatric patients. Clinicians should understand the concepts of early total care and damage control orthopaedics for the patient with polytrauma, the physiologic factors associated with trauma in both children and adults who sustain severe trauma, and the role of early total care versus damage control orthopaedics in the treatment of the pediatric patient with polytrauma.

Fracture Remodeling in Children: Which Fractures Remodel and Which Do Not?

Children have the capacity to remodel fractures because of their active physis and periosteum. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the general guidelines that injuries in younger children, children with less displaced fractures, and children with injuries closer to the growth plate are likely to remodel better than in older children with injuries more distant from the growth plate and with more initial deformity. It is also important to recognize that deformity in the plane of motion is generally better tolerated than deformity outside the plane of motion. Rotational malalignment tends to remodel poorly if at all. When evaluating an injury, the physician should consider the growth potential of the physes in the area local to the injury and their likely contribution to the remodeling and healing process when deciding what management is right and what reduction is acceptable.

"Next Day" Examination Reduces Radiation Exposure in Cervical Spine Clearance at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center: Preliminary Findings.

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective clearance of the pediatric cervical spine presents a challenging problem due to a myriad of reasons, which has often led to further imaging studies such as computed tomographic (CT) scans being performed, exposing the pediatric patient to significant radiation with a potential increased cancer risk. The goal of this study is to develop an effective algorithm for cervical spine clearance that minimizes radiation exposure. METHODS: A cervical spine clearance protocol had been utilized in our institution from 2002 to 2011. In October 2012, the protocol was revised to provide indications for appropriate imaging by utilizing repeat "next day" physical examination. In 2014, the protocol was again revised with the desired goal of decreasing the use of CT scans through increased involvement of the Spine Service. A retrospective review was commenced using information from the Trauma Database from 2011 to 2014. Three groups were analyzed according to which protocol the patients were evaluated under: 2011, 2012, and 2014 protocols. RESULTS: During the study period, 762 patients underwent cervical spine clearance; 259 (2011 protocol), 360 (2012 protocol), and 143 (2014 protocol). The average age of all patients was 8.8 years, with 28% of patients younger than 5 years of age. There were no missed or delayed diagnoses of cervical spine injury. The use of CT scans decreased during the study period from 90% (2011 protocol) to 42% (2012 protocol) to 28.7% (2014 protocol). There was an increase in time to removal of the cervical collar at 13 to 24 hours from 8% (2011 protocol) to 22% (2012 protocol) to 19% (2014 protocol). This was not associated with an increase in hospital length of stay, which averaged 2.51 days (2011 protocol), 2.45 days (2012 protocol), and 2.27 days (2014 protocol). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat "next day" clinical examinations and increased involvement of the Spine Service decreased radiation exposure without compromising the diagnosis of cervical spine injury or increasing the length of stay at a Level One Pediatric Trauma Center in this pilot study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-case series.

Treatment of Closed Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Aged 6 to 10.

BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children's hospitals. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children's hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types. RESULTS: The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children's hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P<0.001). In addition, patients treated at general hospitals were more likely to receive open reduction with internal fixation (45.3% vs. 41.1%) or external fixation (4.1% vs. 2.3%), and less likely to be managed with closed reduction with internal fixation (32.0% vs. 39.7%) than those treated at children's hospitals (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children's hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren's hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II.

Variation Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Diagnosing and Treating Pediatric and Adolescent Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are the most common injury in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine the variation among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when diagnosing and treating distal radius fractures. METHODS: Nine pediatric orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 100 sets of wrist radiographs and were asked to describe the fracture, prescribe the type of treatment and length of immobilization, and determine the next follow-up visit. κ statistics were performed to assess the agreement with the chance agreement removed. RESULTS: Only fair agreement was present when diagnosing and classifying the distal radius fractures (κ=0.379). There was poor agreement regarding the type of treatment that would be recommended (κ=0.059). There was no agreement regarding the length of immobilization (κ=-0.004).Poor agreement was also present regarding when the first follow-up visit should occur (κ=0.088), whether or not new radiographs should be obtained at the first follow-up visit (κ=0.133), and if radiographs were necessary at the final follow-up visit (κ=0.163). Surgeons had fair agreement regarding stability of the fracture (κ=0.320).A subgroup analysis comparing various traits of the treatment immobilization showed providers only had a slight level of agreement on whether splint or cast immobilization should be used (κ=0.072). There was poor agreement regarding whether long-arm or short-arm immobilization should be prescribed (κ=-0.067).Twenty-three of the 100 radiographs were diagnosed as a torus/buckle fracture by all 9 surgeons. κ analysis performed on all the treatment and management questions showed that each query had poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver reliability of diagnosing pediatric distal radius fractures showed only fair agreement. This study demonstrates that there is no standardization regarding how to treat these fractures and the length of immobilization required for proper fracture healing. Better classification systems of distal radius fractures are needed that standardize the treatment of these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Variation Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Treating Medial Epicondyle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Medial epicondyle fractures are a common pediatric and adolescent injury accounting for 11% to 20% of elbow fractures in this population. This purpose of this study was to determine the variability among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to determine which patient and injury attributes influence the management of medial epicondyle fractures by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. A convenience sample of 13 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 60 case vignettes of medial epicondyle fractures that included elbow radiographs and patient/injury characteristics. Displacement was incorporated into the study model as a fixed effect. Surgeons were queried if they would treat the injury with immobilization alone or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed effect regression model. In addition, surgeons filled out a demographic questionnaire and a risk assessment to determine if these factors affected clinical decision-making. RESULTS: Elbow dislocation and fracture displacement were the only attributes that significantly influenced surgeons to perform surgery (P<0.05). The presence of an elbow dislocation had the largest impact on surgeons when choosing operative care (ß=-0.14; P=0.02). In addition, for every 1 mm increase in displacement, surgeons tended to favor ORIF by a factor of 0.09 (P<0.01). Sex, mechanism of injury, and sport participation did not influence decision-making. In total, 54% of the surgeons demonstrated a preference for ORIF for the included scenarios. On the basis of the personality Likert scale, participants were neither high-risk takers nor extremely risk adverse with an average-risk score of 2.24. Participant demographics did not influence decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating medial epicondyle fractures. The decision to operate is significantly based on the degree of fracture displacement and if there is a concomitant elbow dislocation. There is no standardization regarding how to treat medial epicondyle fractures and better treatment algorithms are needed to provide better patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Keeping Up With the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: National Survey on Orthopaedic Residency Training in Practice Management.

The evolving health care environment warrants its physicians to be competent in basic practice management (PM) areas. A manifestation of this importance was reflected in the inaugural inclusion of a PM subsection on the 2017 Orthopaedic In-Training Examination. The purpose of this orthopaedic resident national survey study was to gain insight on the current state of formal residency education in PM. This study surveyed 500 orthopaedic residents nationwide in 2016. Resident participation was online, anonymous, and voluntary. Only complete survey responses were included, yielding a 49.2% (246/500) response rate. The majority of orthopaedic residents (72.4%, 178/246) reported no formal education in PM topics, and 86.2% (212/246) responded that they do not receive direct feedback on individual accuracy of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code case logging. Of the residents without formal education in PM, 87.1% (155/178) desire its implementation. The evolving health care system is becoming increasingly reliant on physicians to provide cost-effective, value-based health care to its patients. Consideration should be given to formally incorporating basic teaching elements on important PM topics at the residency training level. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(2):81-88, 2019).

Office Pediatric Orthopaedics for the General Orthopaedic Surgeon: Staying Current and Avoiding Mistakes.

Pediatric and adolescent patients frequently are seen in the outpatient practices of general orthopaedic surgeons. Orthopaedic conditions may be a challenge to diagnose and manage in pediatric and adolescent patients. To avoid complications, general orthopaedic surgeons should understand current diagnostic techniques, evaluation methods, and treatment options for orthopaedic spine, hip, and lower extremity conditions that are common in pediatric and adolescent patients. General orthopaedic surgeons should understand the indications for surgical treatment in this patient population. In addition, general orthopaedic surgeons must understand methods to accurately, efficiently, and safely evaluate and manage orthopaedic conditions in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Does the Modified Gartland Classification Clarify Decision Making?

HYPOTHESIS: The modified Gartland classification system for pediatric supracondylar fractures is often utilized as a communication tool to aid in determining whether or not a fracture warrants operative intervention. This study sought to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Gartland classification system, as well as to determine whether there was agreement that a fracture warranted operative intervention regardless of the classification system. METHODS: A total of 200 anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures were retrospectively reviewed by 3 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and 2 orthopaedic residents and then classified as type I, IIa, IIb, or III. The surgeons then recorded whether they would treat the fracture nonoperatively or operatively. The κ coefficients were calculated to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: Overall, the Wilkins-modified Gartland classification has low-moderate interobserver reliability (κ=0.475) and high intraobserver reliability (κ=0.777). A low interobserver reliability was found when differentiating between type IIa and IIb (κ=0.240) among attendings. There was moderate-high interobserver reliability for the decision to operate (κ=0.691) and high intraobserver reliability (κ=0.760). Decreased interobserver reliability was present for decision to operate among residents. For fractures classified as type I, the decision to operate was made 3% of the time and 27% for type IIa. The decision was made to operate 99% of the time for type IIb and 100% for type III. SUMMARY: There is almost full agreement for the nonoperative treatment of Type I fractures and operative treatment for type III fractures. There is agreement that type IIb fractures should be treated operatively and that the majority of type IIa fractures should be treated nonoperatively. However, the interobserver reliability for differentiating between type IIa and IIb fractures is low. Our results validate the Gartland classfication system as a method to help direct treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures, although the modification of the system, IIa versus IIb, seems to have limited reliability and utility. Terminology based on decision to treat may lead to a more clinically useful classification system in the evaluation and treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic studies.

Avoiding Errors in the Management of Pediatric Polytrauma Patients.

Management of pediatric polytrauma patients is one of the most difficult challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. Multisystem injuries frequently include complex orthopaedic surgical problems that require intervention. The physiology and anatomy of children and adolescent trauma patients differ from the physiology and anatomy of an adult trauma patient, which alters the types of injuries sustained and the ideal methods for management. Errors of pediatric polytrauma care are included in two broad categories: missed injuries and inadequate fracture treatment. Diagnoses may be missed most frequently because of a surgeon's inability to reliably assess patients who have traumatic brain injuries and painful distracting injuries. Cervical spine injuries are particularly difficult to identify in a child with polytrauma and may have devastating consequences. In children who have multiple injuries, the stabilization of long bone fractures with pediatric fixation techniques, such as elastic nails and other implants, allows for easier care and more rapid mobilization compared with cast treatments. Adolescent polytrauma patients who are approaching skeletal maturity, however, are ideally treated as adults to avoid complications, such as loss of fixation, and to speed rehabilitation.

Common Errors in the Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures and Lateral Condyle Fractures.

Supracondylar humerus fractures and lateral condyle fractures are the two most common pediatric elbow fractures that require surgical intervention. Although most surgeons are familiar with supracondylar humerus fractures and lateral condyle fractures, these injuries present challenges that may lead to common errors in evaluation and management and, thus, compromise outcomes. It is well agreed upon that nondisplaced supracondylar fractures (Gartland type I) are best managed nonsurgically with cast immobilization. Errors may be made, however, in the treatment of type II fractures because the extent of displacement and instability are difficult to assess. Although some type II fractures are stable after closed reduction, many are not and benefit from closed reduction and percutaneous pinning to prevent late displacement and cubitus varus deformity. Stable fixation must be achieved and errors related to pin placement must be avoided to prevent the failure of type III fractures after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Many potential errors and pitfalls also are seen in the management of lateral condyle fractures. Radiographic assessment of displacement can be improved by obtaining an internal oblique view of the elbow. Surgical treatment with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning may be indicated for minimally displaced fractures (2 to 4 mm) that show evidence of increasing displacement over time or demonstrate intra-articular extension on an arthrogram. Displaced fractures are best treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Errors in surgical dissection, fracture reduction, and fixation are common and may result in osteonecrosis, malunion, and nonunion.

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations: Avoiding Problems and Managing Complications.

Monteggia fracture-dislocations typically involve a dislocation of the radial head with an associated fracture of the ulnar shaft. The prompt diagnosis and treatment of these acute injuries result in excellent outcomes. Unfortunately, a Monteggia fracture-dislocation is often missed during diagnostic testing and results in a chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation. The subsequent timing and treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocations are debatable because outcomes are suboptimal. Therefore, it is critical that the initial injury be correctly diagnosed and treated as close to the time of injury as possible to ensure excellent outcomes.

Reliability and Effectiveness of Smartphone Technology for the Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Pediatric Elbow Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Mobile imaging, such as viewing radiographs as text messages, is increasingly prevalent in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether remote diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures using smartphone technology is reliable. In addition, this study aimed to determine whether the assessment regarding the decision for operative treatment is affected by evaluation of images on a mobile device as opposed to standard picture archiving and communication system (PACS). METHODS: Standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 50 pediatric elbow trauma cases were evaluated by 2 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and 2 senior orthopaedic residents. Raters were asked to classify the case as any of 6 diagnoses: supracondylar humerus, lateral condyle, medial epicondyle, radial neck fracture, positive posterior fat pad sign, or normal pediatric elbow. Raters were asked to choose operative or conservative treatment. After 1 week, photographs of the same images were taken from a standardized distance from a computer monitor with an iPhone 5 camera and transmitted by multimedia messaging to each rater. The same questions were again posed to raters. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated by Cohen κ-statistics with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability of classification of injuries on PACS compared with smartphone images was excellent, with an overall κ of 0.91. Treatment decision also demonstrated excellent intraobserver reliability (PACS vs. smartphones) with a κ of 0.86 for all raters. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of pediatric elbow injuries can be made equally reliably based on either PACS or transmitted multimedia messaging images taken with an iPhone camera from a computer screen and viewed on a smartphone. Treatment decisions can also be made reliably based on either image modality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using smartphones to transmit and display radiographs, which is common in current clinical practice, is effective and reliable for diagnosis and treatment planning of pediatric elbow injuries.