Magnetic resonance - guided treatment of low-flow vascular malformations and the technologies to potentiate adoption.

Vascular malformations are congenital, non-neoplastic lesions that arise secondary to defects in angiogenesis. Vascular malformations are divided into high-flow (arteriovenous malformation) and low-flow (venous malformations and lymphatic malformations). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for pre-and post-intervention assessments, while ultrasound (US), X-ray fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) are used for intra-procedural guidance. Sclerotherapy, an image-guided therapy that involves the injection of a sclerosant directly into the malformation, is typically the first-line therapy for treating low-flow vascular malformations. Sclerotherapy induces endothelial damage and necrosis/fibrosis with eventual involution of the malformation. Image-guided thermal therapies involve freezing or heating target tissue to induce cell death and necrosis. MRI is an alternative for intra-procedural guidance and monitoring during the treatment of vascular malformations. MR can provide dynamic, multiplanar imaging that delineates surrounding critical structures such as nerves and vasculature. Multiple studies have demonstrated that MR-guided treatment of vascular malformations is safe and effective. This review will detail (1) the use of MR for the classification and diagnosis of vascular malformations, (2) the current literature surrounding MR-guided treatment of vascular malformations, (3) a series of cases of MR-guided sclerotherapy and thermal ablation for the treatment of vascular malformations, and (4) a discussion of technologies that may potentiate interventional MRI adoption including high intensity focused ultrasound and guided laser ablation.

Effect of computed tomography angiography prior to bronchial embolization on radiation dose and recurrent hemoptysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether pre-procedure Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) improves radiation exposure, procedure complexity, and symptom recurrence after bronchial embolization for massive hemoptysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) for massive hemoptysis was performed for procedures between 2008 and 2019. Multi-variate analysis was performed to determine the significance of pre-procedure CTA and etiology of hemoptysis on patient radiation exposure (reference point air kerma, RPAK) and rate of recurrent hemoptysis. RESULTS: There were 61 patients (mean age 52.5 years; SD = 19.2 years, and 57.3% male) and CTA was obtained for 42.6% (26/61). Number of vessels selected was a mean of 7.2 (SD = 3.4) in those without CTA and 7.4 (SD = 3.4) in those with CTA (p = 0.923). Mean procedure duration was 1.8 h (SD = 1.6 h) in those without CTA and 1.3 h (SD = 1.0 h) in those with CTA (p = 0.466). Mean fluoroscopy time and RPAK per procedure were 34.9 min (SD = 21.5 min) and 1091.7 mGy (SD = 1316.6 mGy) for those without a CTA and 30.7 min (SD = 30.7 min) and 771.5 mGy (SD = 590.0 mGy) for those with a CTA (p = 0.523, and p = 0.879, respectively). Mean total iodine given was 49.2 g (SD = 31.9 g) for those without a CTA and 70.6 g (SD = 24.9 g) for those with a CTA (p = 0.001). Ongoing hemoptysis at last clinical follow up was 13/35 (37.1%) in those without CTA and 9/26 (34.6%) in those with CTA (p = 0.794). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedure CTA did not improve radiation effective dose and symptom recurrence after BAE and is associated with significant increases in total iodine dose.

Surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A systematic review of in-hospital mortality.

Objectives: Mesenteric malperfusion is a feared complication of aortic dissection, with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to systematically review in-hospital mortality (IHM) of endovascular and surgical management of acute and chronic Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBAD) complicated by mesenteric malperfusion (MesMP). Methods: A systematic search of English language articles was conducted in relevant databases. Data on patient demographics, procedure details, and survival outcomes were collected. Reports were classified by type of intervention performed. Studies that failed to report patient-level outcomes based on specific intervention performed or IHM were excluded. Retrospective chart review of previously published data from a single institution was also performed to further identify cases of TBAD that were managed endovascularly. The Fisher exact test was performed to determine statistical significance. Results: In total, 37 articles were suitable for inclusion in this systematic review, which yielded 149 patients with a median age 55.0 years (interquartile range, 46.5-65 years) and 79% being male. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 12.8% (19/149) and was similar between endovascular and open surgical interventions (13% vs 11%, P = .99). Among endovascular strategies, IHM was greater, although not statistically significant in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group compared with the fenestration/stenting without thoracic endovascular aortic repair group (24% vs 11%, P = .15). Conclusions: Multiple strategies exist for the management of TBAD with MesMP; however, a majority of cases were managed endovascularly. Despite advances in therapies, mortality remains high at 13%.