RESUMEN
The IA-DUET study aimed to compare azole-echinocandin combination with azole monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis. Recruitment was hindered by patient ineligibility, competing studies, and guidelines favoring combination therapy when azole resistance was unknown. The low IA-attributable mortality suggests future trials may benefit from cluster randomization or composite endpoints to enhance efficiency.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases. METHODS: This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates. RESULTS: Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23.
Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato , Alanina , Antivirales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Alanina/efectos adversos , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/inducido químicamente , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The antiviral efficacy of Evusheld (AZD7442) in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. METHODS: We analysed the evolution of both the nasopharyngeal viral load and the serum neutralization activity against the variant of infection in 199 hospitalized patients (109 treated with Evusheld, 90 treated with placebo) infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and included in the randomized, double-blind, trial DisCoVeRy (NCT04315948). Using a mechanistic mathematical model, we reconstructed the trajectories of viral kinetics and how they are modulated by the increase in serum neutralization activity during Evusheld treatment. RESULTS: Our model identified that the neutralization activity was associated with viral kinetics. Reflecting the variant-dependent neutralization activity of Evusheld, the antiviral activity of Evusheld was larger in patients infected with pre-Omicron or Omicron BA.2 variants than in patients infected with Omicron BA.1 variant. More specifically, the model predicted that Evusheld reduced the median time to viral clearance compared with placebo-treated patients by more than 5â days in patients infected by pre-Omicron (median: 5.9; 80% PI: 2.1-13.6) or Omicron BA.2 (median: 5.4; 80% PI: 2.0-12.4), respectively. The effect was more modest in patients infected by the Omicron BA.1 variant, reducing the median time to viral clearance by 2â days (median: 2.2; 80% PI: 0.4-8.9). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients treated with Evusheld had a shorter median time to SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance. As Evusheld antiviral activity is mediated by the level of neutralization activity, its impact on viral clearance varies largely according to the variant of infection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A range of safe and effective vaccines against SARS CoV 2 are needed to address the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine SCB-2019. METHODS: This ongoing phase 2 and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in adults aged 18 years and older who were in good health or with a stable chronic health condition, at 31 sites in five countries (Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Philippines, and South Africa). The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a centralised internet randomisation system to receive two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses of SCB-2019 (30 µg, adjuvanted with 1·50 mg CpG-1018 and 0·75 mg alum) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride for injection supplied in 10 mL ampoules) 21 days apart. All study staff and participants were masked, but vaccine administrators were not. Primary endpoints were vaccine efficacy, measured by RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity with onset from 14 days after the second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants (the per-protocol population), and the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. This study is registered on EudraCT (2020-004272-17) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672395). FINDINGS: 30 174 participants were enrolled from March 24, 2021, until the cutoff date of Aug 10, 2021, of whom 30 128 received their first assigned vaccine (n=15 064) or a placebo injection (n=15 064). The per-protocol population consisted of 12 355 baseline SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (6251 vaccinees and 6104 placebo recipients). Most exclusions (13 389 [44·4%]) were because of seropositivity at baseline. There were 207 confirmed per-protocol cases of COVID-19 at 14 days after the second dose, 52 vaccinees versus 155 placebo recipients, and an overall vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 of 67·2% (95·72% CI 54·3-76·8), 83·7% (97·86% CI 55·9-95·4) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (97·86% CI 25·3-100·0) against severe COVID-19. All COVID-19 cases were due to virus variants; vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 due to the three predominant variants was 78·7% (95% CI 57·3-90·4) for delta, 91·8% (44·9-99·8) for gamma, and 58·6% (13·3-81·5) for mu. No safety issues emerged in the follow-up period for the efficacy analysis (median of 82 days [IQR 63-103]). The vaccine elicited higher rates of mainly mild-to-moderate injection site pain than the placebo after the first (35·7% [287 of 803] vs 10·3% [81 of 786]) and second (26·9% [189 of 702] vs 7·4% [52 of 699]) doses, but the rates of other solicited local and systemic adverse events were similar between the groups. INTERPRETATION: Two doses of SCB-2019 vaccine plus CpG and alum provides notable protection against the entire severity spectrum of COVID-19 caused by circulating SAR-CoV-2 viruses, including the predominating delta variant. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Compuestos de Alumbre/uso terapéutico , Bélgica , Brasil , Colombia , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligodesoxirribonucleótidos/uso terapéutico , Filipinas , Multimerización de Proteína , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Sudáfrica , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Setting-up a high quality, compliant and efficient pharmacovigilance (PV) system in multi-country clinical trials can be more challenging for academic sponsors than for companies. To ensure the safety of all participants in academic studies and that the PV system fulfils all regulations, we set up a centralized PV system that allows sponsors to delegate work on PV. This initiative was put in practice by our Inserm-ANRS MIE PV department in two distinct multinational European consortia with 19 participating countries: conect4children (c4c) for paediatrics research and EU-Response for Covid-19 platform trials. The centralized PV system consists of some key procedures to harmonize the complex safety processes, creation of a local safety officer (LSO) network and centralization of all safety activities. The key procedures described the safety management plan for each trial and how tasks were shared and delegated between all stakeholders. Processing of serious adverse events (SAEs) in a unique database guaranteed the full control of the safety data and continuous evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio. The LSO network participated in efficient regulatory compliance across multiple countries. In total, there were 1312 SAEs in EU-Response and 83 SAEs in c4c in the four trials. We present here the lessons learnt from our experience in four clinical trials. We managed heterogeneous European local requirements and implemented efficient communication with all trial teams. Our approach builds capacity for PV that can be used by multiple academic sponsors.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Farmacovigilancia , Humanos , Niño , Medición de Riesgo , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
Assess the incidence, risk factors, clinical and microbiological features, and outcome of both probable invasive and invasive group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections in children and adults in the BrusselsCapital Region between 2005 and 2020. A retrospective, multicentric study was performed in three university hospitals in Brussels. Patients were identified through the centralized laboratory information system. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected from patients' hospital records. A total of 467 cases were identified. Incidence has increased from 2.1 to 10.9/100,000 inhabitants between 2009 and 2019 in non-homeless adults while it was above 100/100,000 on homeless in years with available denominators. Most of GAS were isolated from blood (43.6%), and the most common clinical presentation was skin and soft tissue infections (42.8%). A third of all the patients needed surgery, a quarter was admitted to the intensive care unit, and 10% of the adult patients died. Wounds and chickenpox disease were the main risk factors for children. Tobacco, alcohol abuse, wounds or chronic skin lesion, being homeless, and diabetes were identified as major predisposing factors for adults. The most common emm clusters were D4, E4, and AC3; 64% of the isolates were theoretically covered by the 30-valent M-protein vaccine. The burden of invasive and probable invasive GAS infections is on the rise in the studied adult population. We identified potential interventions that could contribute to decrease this burden: appropriate care of wounds, specifically among homeless and patients with risk factors such as diabetes and systematic chickenpox vaccination for children.
Asunto(s)
Varicela , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Niño , Humanos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Streptococcus pyogenes , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Baricitinib has shown efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but no placebo-controlled trials have focused specifically on severe/critical COVID, including vaccinated participants. METHODS: Bari-SolidAct is a phase-3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling participants from June 3, 2021 to March 7, 2022, stopped prematurely for external evidence. Patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were randomised to Baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo, added to standard of care. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 60 days. Participants were remotely followed to day 90 for safety and patient related outcome measures. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were screened, 284 randomised, and 275 received study drug or placebo and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analyses (139 receiving baricitinib and 136 placebo). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years, 77% were male and 35% had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. There were 21 deaths at day 60 in each group, 15.1% in the baricitinib group and 15.4% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference and 95% CI - 0.1% [- 8·3 to 8·0]). In sensitivity analysis censoring observations after drug discontinuation or rescue therapy (tocilizumab/increased steroid dose), proportions of death were 5.8% versus 8.8% (- 3.2% [- 9.0 to 2.7]), respectively. There were 148 serious adverse events in 46 participants (33.1%) receiving baricitinib and 155 in 51 participants (37.5%) receiving placebo. In subgroup analyses, there was a potential interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on 60-day mortality. In a subsequent post hoc analysis there was a significant interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on the occurrence of serious adverse events, with more respiratory complications and severe infections in vaccinated participants treated with baricitinib. Vaccinated participants were on average 11 years older, with more comorbidities. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial was prematurely stopped for external evidence and therefore underpowered to conclude on a potential survival benefit of baricitinib in severe/critical COVID-19. We observed a possible safety signal in vaccinated participants, who were older with more comorbidities. Although based on a post-hoc analysis, these findings warrant further investigation in other trials and real-world studies. Trial registration Bari-SolidAct is registered at NCT04891133 (registered May 18, 2021) and EUClinicalTrials.eu ( 2022-500385-99-00 ).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , ARN Viral , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic tumours are frequently associated with obstructive jaundice requiring preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), exposing patients to infectious complications. This study aims to compare postoperative complications after PD with or without PBD and to analyse bile bacteriology and antibiotic susceptibility. METHODS: All patients undergoing PD between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated, and postoperative outcomes were compared according to PBD use. Prophylactic narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy was given for 24 h, then adapted according to bacteriologic profile. Intraoperative bile cultures and antibiograms were collected. RESULTS: Among 164 patients with intraoperative bile culture during PD (75 PBD+, 89 PBD-), an infected bile was observed in 95% and 70% of PBD + and PBD- groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality and severe morbidity including infectious complications were similar between groups (5% and 15%). The median duration of antibiotherapy was longer in PBD + compared to PBD- groups (9 vs. 2 days, p = 0.009). Malignant indication and PBD were associated with bile contamination using univariate analysis, and PBD was significantly relevant at multivariate analysis. Most common pathogens identified in bile cultures were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. Overall antibiotic susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics was decreased, including those used in our local guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: PBD exposes nearly 100% of patients undergoing PD to bile infection and an increased duration of postoperative antimicrobial therapy, without increasing infectious complications in this study. Adaptation of antimicrobial prophylaxis should be further evaluated according to performance of PBD and local epidemiology, in order to avoid overuse of antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , DrenajeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 hospitalized patients remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of remdesivir in blocking viral replication. METHODS: We analysed nasopharyngeal normalized viral loads from 665 hospitalized patients included in the DisCoVeRy trial (NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23), randomized to either standard of care (SoC) or SoC + remdesivir. We used a mathematical model to reconstruct viral kinetic profiles and estimate the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in blocking viral replication. Additional analyses were conducted stratified on time of treatment initiation (≤7 or >7â days since symptom onset) or viral load at randomization (< or ≥3.5 log10 copies/104 cells). RESULTS: In our model, remdesivir reduced viral production by infected cells by 2-fold on average (95% CI: 1.5-3.2-fold). Model-based simulations predict that remdesivir reduced time to viral clearance by 0.7â days compared with SoC, with large inter-individual variabilities (IQR: 0.0-1.3â days). Remdesivir had a larger impact in patients with high viral load at randomization, reducing viral production by 5-fold on average (95% CI: 2.8-25-fold) and the median time to viral clearance by 2.4â days (IQR: 0.9-4.5â days). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir halved viral production, leading to a median reduction of 0.7â days in the time to viral clearance compared with SoC. The efficacy was larger in patients with high viral load at randomization.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infection is a major driver of mortality in patients with advanced alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). The epidemiology and clinical course of patients infected with life-threatening forms of ALD, including severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (sAH) and decompensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis (DAC), and specific risk factors for infection remain mostly unknown. APPROACH AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we assessed all infectious episodes occurring within a 90-day period from diagnosis in all consecutive patients with biopsy-proven sAH (modified Maddrey's discriminant function ≥ 32, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] ≥ 18) and DAC (MELD ≥ 18) without alcohol-associated hepatitis in our tertiary hospital between 2003 and 2016. A total of 207 patients were included: 139 with sAH and 68 with DAC. One hundred seventeen (84%) patients with sAH and 41 (60%) patients with DAC experienced at least one infection episode at 90 days (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with the development of infection were the presence of sAH and baseline MELD score. Bacterial infections represented the most common infection in the two groups, and only the MELD score was independently associated with the occurrence of bacterial infection. In both groups, pneumonia was the most prevalent bacterial infection, and gram-negative bacilli were the main pathogens. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) occurred in 20 (14.5%) patients with sAH and 3 (4.5%) with patients with DAC (P < 0.05). Multivariable regression showed that younger age, higher MELD, and corticosteroid therapy were independently associated with IFI. The 90-day cumulative incidence of death in patients infected with sAH and patients infected with DAC was 46% and 41.5%, respectively (P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sAH are more susceptible to develop infection than those with DAC. In life-threatening forms of ALD, patients who were infected share a similar mortality rate. Corticosteroid treatment, not sAH, seems to be the main risk factor triggering IFI.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Hepatitis Alcohólica/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/complicaciones , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/inmunología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/inmunología , Femenino , Hepatitis Alcohólica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis Alcohólica/inmunología , Humanos , Incidencia , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Antibiotic underdosing in prophylactic antibiotic regimes after lung transplantation (LTx) can increase the risk of infection. We aimed to study whether ß-lactam concentrations achieved desirable pharmacodynamic targets in the early phase after LTx and the association between drug concentrations and the development of early infections or the acquisition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. We reviewed patients in whom broad-spectrum ß-lactam levels were measured after LTx during antibiotic prophylaxis. ß-Lactam concentrations were considered "insufficient" if drug levels remained below four times the clinical breakpoint of the minimal inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an infection and/or acquisition of MDR pathogens in the first 14 days after transplantation. A total of 70 patients were included. "Insufficient" drug concentrations were found in 40% of patients. In 27% of patients, an early MDR pathogen was identified and 49% patients were diagnosed with an early posttransplant infection. Patients with "insufficient" drug concentrations acquired more frequently MDR bacteria and/or developed an infection than others (22/28, 79% vs. 20/42, 48% - p = .01). ß-Lactam levels were often found to be below the desired drug targets in the early phase after transplantation and may be associated with the occurrence of early infectious complications.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , beta-Lactamas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-Lactamas/farmacologíaRESUMEN
To assess the incidence, clinical, microbiological features and outcome of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) infections in non-pregnant adults in three tertiary hospitals of the Brussels-Capital Region. All bacterial cultures positive for GBS, from 2005 to 2019 from 3 hospitals of the Brussels-Capital Region, were extracted, and only cases of invasive diseases were included. Medical files were retrospectively retrieved for risk factors, clinical manifestations and outcome and also antibiotic-susceptibility testing and GBS serotypes. Incidence rates were calculated based on the hospitals catchment populations. A total of 337 cases of GBS-invasive infections were included. The incidence of invasive GBS for the 3 hospitals increased from 3.7 to 8.2 cases per 100.000 inhabitants between 2009 and 2018 (p = 0.04). The most frequently identified risk factors were diabetes (36.8%), obesity (35.0%), cancer (21.7%), renal disease (20.8%), and advanced age (≥ 65 years; 47.2%). Isolated bacteremia (22%), osteoarticular infection (21.4%), abscesses (13.9%), and skin and soft tissue infections (18.4%) were the most frequent manifestations. Intensive care unit admission was required in 21.7% and overall mortality was 9.4%. All strains remained susceptible to penicillin over the years. Up to 20% of strains were resistant to clindamycin. Serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V represented 96.8% of the available serotypes (60/62). As reported in several countries, invasive GBS disease in non-pregnant adults represents an increasing burden, particularly among diabetic, obese, and elderly patients. Almost all serotypes identified are included in the upcoming hexavalent GBS conjugate vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bélgica/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Serogrupo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Streptococcus agalactiae/clasificación , Streptococcus agalactiae/efectos de los fármacos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
The prevalence of respiratory viruses in immunocompromised adult patients and the association with clinical outcomes is still underexplored. Our goal was to assess the epidemiology and the potential clinical impact of respiratory viral infections in a high-risk patient population. Two large hospitals performed a respiratory Taqman array card (TAC), targeting 24 viruses, 8 bacteria, and 2 fungi simultaneously, on 435 samples from 397 symptomatic immunocompromised patients. Clinical details were collected retrospectively using a structured case report form. An overall positivity rate of 68% was found (51% mono- and 17% co-infections). Pathogen distribution was as follows: influenza A (20.7%), rhinoviruses (15.2%), coronaviruses (7.8%), Pneumocystis jirovecii (7.4%), RSV (7.1%), and CMV (6.0%) were the most frequently encountered, followed by HSV (5.5%), hMPV (4.4%), parainfluenza viruses (3.9%), influenza B (3.7%), and Aspergillus species (3.7%). Other pathogens were not detected or detected only in ≤ 1% of samples. Hospital and ICU admission rates were 84% and 11%, respectively. The presence of a pathogen was strongly associated with higher need for supplemental oxygen (p = 0.001), but it had no impact on ICU admission, mechanical ventilation requirement, antibacterial therapy, or mortality. In conclusion, our study described the epidemiology of respiratory pathogens in a large group of symptomatic immunocompromised patients and provides evidence of a relationship between pathogen detection and the need for supplemental oxygen. This association was still found after the exclusion of the results positive for influenza viruses, suggesting that non-influenza viruses contribute to severe respiratory illness in patients with compromised immunity.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Micosis/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Virosis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Coinfección/microbiología , Coinfección/virología , Femenino , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Micromatrices , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/instrumentación , Prevalencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Virus/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Augmented renal clearance is commonly observed in septic patients and may result in insufficient ß-lactam serum concentrations. The aims of this study were to evaluate potential correlations between drug concentrations or total body clearance of ß-lactam antibiotics and measured creatinine clearance and to quantify the need for drug dosage adjustments in septic patients with different levels of augmented renal clearance. We reviewed 256 antibiotic measurements (512 drug concentrations) from a cohort of 215 critically ill patients who had a measured creatinine clearance of ≥120 ml/min and who received therapeutic drug monitoring of meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, or piperacillin from October 2009 until December 2014 at Erasme Hospital. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the data was performed using the Pmetrics software package for R. Fifty-five percent of drug concentrations showed insufficient ß-lactam serum concentrations to treat infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa There were significant, yet weak, correlations between measured creatinine clearance and trough concentrations of meropenem (r = -0.21, P = 0.01), trough concentrations of piperacillin (r = -0.28, P = 0.0071), concentrations at 50% of the dosage interval (r = -0.41, P < 0.0001), and total body clearance of piperacillin (r = 0.39, P = 0.0002). Measured creatinine clearance adequately explained changes in drug concentrations in population pharmacokinetic models for cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem but not for piperacillin. Therefore, specific PK modeling can predict certain ß-lactam concentrations based on renal function but not on absolute values of measured creatinine clearance, easily available for clinicians. Currently, routine therapeutic drug monitoring is required to adjust daily regimens in critically ill patients receiving standard dosing regimens.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica/fisiología , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Creatinina/metabolismo , Enfermedad Crítica , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Despite the development of new agents with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin remains one of the primary antibiotics for critically ill septic patients. Because sepsis can alter antimicrobial pharmacokinetics, the development of an appropriate dosing strategy to provide adequate concentrations is crucial. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate a new dosing regimen of vancomycin given by continuous infusion (CI) to septic patients. We included all adult septic patients admitted to a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2012 and May 2013, who were treated with a new vancomycin CI regimen consisting of a loading dose of 35 mg/kg of body weight given as a 4-h infusion, followed by a daily CI dose adapted to creatinine clearance (CrCL), as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (median dose, 2,112 [1,500 to 2,838] mg). Vancomycin concentrations were measured at the end of the loading dose (T1), at 12 h (T2), at 24 h (T3), and the day after the start of therapy (T4). Vancomycin concentrations of 20 to 30 mg/liter at T2, T3, and T4 were considered adequate. A total of 107 patients (72% male) were included. Median age, weight, and CrCL were 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48 to 71) years, 75 (IQR, 65 to 85) kg, and 94 (IQR, 56 to 140) ml/min, respectively. Vancomycin concentrations were 44 (IQR, 37 to 49), 25 (IQR, 21 to 32), 22 (IQR, 19 to 28), and 26 (IQR, 22 to 29) mg/liter at T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Concentrations were adequate in 56% (60/107) of patients at T2, in 54% (57/105) at T3, and in 73% (41/56) at T4. This vancomycin regimen permitted rapid attainment of target concentrations in serum for most patients. Concentrations were insufficient in only 16% of patients at 12 h of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections caused by MDR Gram-negative (GN) organisms in critically ill patients are a therapeutic challenge. The administration of high-dose aminoglycoside (HDA) therapy coupled with high-flow continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) could allow required high drug peaks to be achieved with acceptable drug elimination. METHODS: All adult patients present on the ICU between October 2009 and July 2014 who had MDR GN sepsis were considered for HDA and high-flow (>45 mL/kg/h) CVVHDF when an isolated pathogen was susceptible or had intermediate susceptibility to aminoglycosides and the patient's condition was not improving with conventional therapy. Optimal antibacterial activity was defined as a peak concentration of at least eight times the MIC. RESULTS: Fifteen patients infected with MDR GN pathogens (11 with Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 10 with abdominal infections and 5 with respiratory infections) were treated with amikacin (nâ=â11), gentamicin (nâ=â3) or tobramycin (nâ=â1) and high-flow CVVHDF. A favourable clinical response was observed in eight (53%) patients, including three in whom microbial eradication was obtained. Six patients were discharged alive from the ICU, and five from the hospital. No renal toxicity was observed among survivors. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of septic patients with MDR GN infections, HDA combined with high-flow CVVHDF represented a valuable therapeutic option. The effectiveness of this approach should be further evaluated in larger studies.
Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Sepsis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The pharmacokinetics of ß-lactam antibiotics have not been well defined in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We reviewed data from critically ill patients with cirrhosis and matched controls in whom routine therapeutic drug monitoring of two broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem) had been performed. Serum drug concentrations were measured twice by high-performance liquid chromatography. Antibiotic pharmacokinetics were calculated using a one-compartment model. We considered that therapy was adequate when serum drug concentrations were between 4 and 8 times the minimal inhibitory concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during optimal periods of time for each drug (≥ 50% for piperacillin/tazobactam; ≥ 40% for meropenem). RESULTS: We studied 38 patients with cirrhosis (16 for piperacillin/tazobactam and 22 for meropenem) and 38 matched controls. Drug dosing was similar in the two groups. The pharmacokinetics analysis showed a lower volume of distribution of meropenem (P = 0.05) and a lower antibiotic clearance of piperacillin/tazobactam (P = 0.009) in patients with cirrhosis than in the matched controls. Patients with cirrhosis were more likely than those without cirrhosis to have excessive serum ß-lactam concentrations (P = 0.015), in particular for piperacillin/tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: Standard ß-lactam antibiotics regimens resulted in excessive serum concentrations in two thirds of the patients with cirrhosis. This was particularly true for piperacillin/tazobactam, probably because of reduced drug clearance.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Sepsis/sangre , Tienamicinas/farmacocinética , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bélgica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Enfermedad Crítica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Ácido Penicilánico/farmacocinética , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tienamicinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infections are common complications in critically ill patients and are frequently treated with antibiotics. Unfortunately, delivery of optimal therapy is complicated because efficacy of antimicrobials is influenced by the timing of treatment initiation, the use of combination therapy, and the optimization of drug dosing. RECENT FINDINGS: Early diagnosis of infection is mandatory to provide a rapid and appropriate antibiotic therapy. The presence of less susceptible strains, in particular for hospital-acquired infections, or patients with severe disease, such as the presence of septic shock, may need combination antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic pharmacokinetics, notably volume of distribution and total body clearance, are significantly altered in these critically ill patients and can influence the attainment of adequate circulating levels when standard dosage regimens are administered. Higher dosing should be considered in such patients, although in case of renal impairment and reduced clearance, drug accumulation could also result in some side-effects. Nebulized antibiotics may provide a better clinical response than systemic antibiotics in ventilator-associated pneumonia because of multidrug-resistant pathogens. SUMMARY: The optimal use of antibiotics in the management of severe infections is an important challenge for ICU physicians. Antimicrobial therapy needs to be individualized according to specific patient characteristics, infecting organisms, and susceptibility patterns.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Crítica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
We present the case of a man with a bicuspid aortic valve who presented with persistent fever. Blood cultures yielded Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and the diagnosis of infected mycotic aneurysm was confirmed by detection of the bacterial genome in the aortic wall. The patient was cured with surgery and intravenous ceftriaxone.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/patología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aorta/patología , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Gonorrea/patología , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/etiología , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Aorta/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Fiebre/etiología , Gonorrea/complicaciones , Gonorrea/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Viaje , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The use of standard doses of ß-lactam antibiotics during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may result in inadequate serum concentrations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of unadjusted drug regimens (i.e., similar to those used in patients with normal renal function) in patients treated with CRRT and the influence of CRRT intensity on drug clearance. METHODS: We reviewed data from 50 consecutive adult patients admitted to our Department of Intensive Care in whom routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotics (ceftazidime or cefepime, CEF; piperacillin/tazobactam; TZP; meropenem, MEM) was performed using unadjusted ß-lactam antibiotics regimens (CEF = 2 g q8h; TZP = 4 g q6h; MEM = 1 g q8h). Serum drug concentrations were measured twice during the elimination phase by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV). We considered therapy was adequate when serum drug concentrations were between 4 and 8 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during optimal periods of time for each drug (≥70% for CEF; ≥ 50% for TZP; ≥ 40% for MEM). Therapy was considered as early (ET) or late (LT) phase if TDM was performed within 48 hours of antibiotic initiation or later on, respectively. RESULTS: We collected 73 serum samples from 50 patients (age 58 ± 13 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score on admission 21 (17-25)), 35 during ET and 38 during LT. Drug concentrations were above 4 times the MIC in 63 (90%), but above 8 times the MIC in 39 (53%) samples. The proportions of patients with adequate drug concentrations during ET and LT were quite similar. We found a weak but significant correlation between ß-lactam antibiotics clearance and CRRT intensity. CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients undergoing CRRT, doses of ß-lactam antibiotics similar to those given to patients with normal renal function achieved drug levels above the target threshold in 90% of samples. Nevertheless, 53% of samples were associated with very high drug levels and daily drug regimens may need to be adapted accordingly.