Understanding the barriers and enablers for postgraduate medical trainees becoming simulation educators: a qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION : There is increasing evidence that Simulation-based learning (SBL) is an effective teaching method for healthcare professionals. However, SBL requires a large number of faculty to facilitate small group sessions. Like many other African contexts, Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Uganda has large numbers of medical students, but limited resources, including limited simulation trained teaching faculty. Postgraduate medical trainees (PGs) are often involved in clinical teaching of undergraduates. To establish sustainable SBL in undergraduate medical education (UME), the support of PGs is crucial, making it critical to understand the enablers and barriers of PGs to become simulation educators. METHODS: We used purposive sampling and conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with the PGs, key informant interviews (KIIs) with university staff, and focus group discussions (FGDs) with the PGs in groups of 5-10 participants. Data collection tools were developed using the Consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) tool. Data were analyzed using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique. RESULTS: We conducted seven IDIs, seven KIIs and four focus group discussions. The barriers identified included: competing time demands, negative attitude towards transferability of simulation learning, inadequacy of medical simulation equipment, and that medical simulation facilitation is not integrated in the PGs curriculum. The enablers included: perceived benefits of medical simulation to medical students plus PGs and in-practice health personnel, favorable departmental attitude, enthusiasm of PGs to be simulation educators, and improved awareness of the duties of a simulation educator. Participants recommended sensitization of key stakeholders to simulation, training and motivation of PG educators, and evaluation of the impact of a medical simulation program that involves PGs as educators. CONCLUSION: In the context of a low resource setting with large undergraduate classes and limited faculty members, SBL can assist in clinical skill acquisition. Training of PGs as simulation educators should address perceived barriers and integration of SBL into UME. Involvement of departmental leadership and obtaining their approval is critical in the involvement of PGs as simulation educators.

Using CanMEDS to guide international health electives: an enriching experience in Uganda defined for a Canadian surgery resident.

BACKGROUND: Surgery residents who wish to travel during their residency will often seek an elective experience in a low-or middle-income country. Objectives for international health electives (IHEs) are often vague and poorly defined. Further, feedback to, and evaluation of, the resident after the IHE are often not specific because international preceptors are not familiar with the desired educational outcomes of Canadian residency programs. Residents who choose an elective in a low-income country usually anticipate that they will contribute some medical service to an existing impoverished health care system, and in this setting, they hope to gain exposure to a high operative volume with potentially fewer institutional and administrative obstacles. METHODS: In this paper, we describe one resident's elective experience in Mbarara, Uganda. In addition to her clinical experience, the resident performed a retrospective audit of surgical admissions. After her elective, we asked the resident to reflect on her experience and to use the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) framework to describe the challenges she encountered and to define the learning outcomes gained with respect to each CanMEDS role. RESULTS: We discovered that the resident had a rich and insightful educational experience when discussed in this context. As a result, we have created a guide for structuring postgraduate IHEs around the CanMEDS roles, using them to ask pre-and postelective questions to develop relevant and practical IHE objectives. CONCLUSION: We propose that this guide has the potential to improve both resident preparation before international experience and also subsequent evaluation of resident performance in this ill-defined area. More important, we found that IHEs are a useful vehicle to evaluate resident achievement of the CanMEDS competencies in a way that is reflective, realistic and representative of the multiple challenges involved when working in international health.