Colonoscopy Utilization in Elderly Patients with Dementia: Characteristics, Complications, and Charges in a National Matched-Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is projected that the elderly population will continue to increase. Many will develop chronic conditions such as dementia. AIMS: Our aims are to describe the utilization of colonoscopy among patients with dementia and compare outcomes in those with and without dementia. METHODS: This population-based analysis utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) during 2019. Patients with dementia over the age of 60 years receiving colonoscopy were identified utilizing ICD-10 codes. Logistic regression was used for propensity score matching between the comparison groups. A Greedy one-to-one matching algorithm was utilized along with standardized mean differences to assess balance. Mcnemar test, signed rank sum, and paired t-test were used to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: Initially, 50,692 patients without dementia were compared with 4323 patients with dementia. Patients with dementia were more likely to be female, older, less likely White, had lower income, and more likely to be on Medicare. In the matched comparison (4176 in each group), complication analysis showed that patients with dementia did not have higher colonoscopy-related complications. They did have higher rates of other complications including renal/AKI (p = 0.0042), pulmonary/pneumonia (p = 0.003), cerebrovascular accidents (p = 0.0063), and sepsis (< 0.0001). Patients with dementia were also less likely to have routine discharges (< 0.0001), had longer hospital stays (< 0.0001), and higher hospital costs (< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with dementia have similar colonoscopy-related complications as patients without dementia. However, they do have higher complications in general. The decision whether to perform colonoscopy in this patient population is multifactorial. A careful assessment of a dementia patient's history can help with this decision.

SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Esophageal Carcinoma: A Clinical Case Series and Literature Review.

PURPOSE: Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus (UEC) is a rare malignancy. Deficiency in SMARCA genes, critical for chromatin regulation, has been observed in cases of UEC. Research in UEC is sparse, however, and we present a case series along with a comprehensive review of the literature. CASE SERIES: Case 1 is a 49-year-old female with abdominal pain and dysphagia and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showing a friable mass at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Biopsies showed a poorly differentiated neoplasm and immunohistochemistry showed loss for SMARCA4. With metastatic disease, she agreed to undergo palliative chemotherapy and radiation, passing away at 4 months. Case 2 is an 88-year-old male with dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and distal esophageal mass with biopsy showing a malignancy with loss of SMARCA4 expression. Due to extensive metastases, he was counseled on hospice care. Case 3 is a 53-year-old male with extensive alcohol and smoking history presenting with hematemesis, passing away shortly. Posthumous histopathology consistent with undifferentiated SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma of the esophagus. Results of the literature review indicate a predilection towards males (75.0%) and a variable age range (39-88 years). Majority (76.2%) reported with a distal esophagus location. Metastatic disease was common at initial presentation. Median survival was 2.60 months. Some were managed with chemotherapy and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Research in SMARCA-deficient UEC is very limited. It is more common in men, age is variable, and associated with Barret's esophagus. Further research is necessary to better understand it and to establish treatment guidelines; however, it is clear that SMARCA4-deficient UEC carries a significantly poor prognosis.