Do Postoperative Antibiotics Improve Skin Reactivity Following Percutaneous Auditory Osseointegrated Implant Placement?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the routine use of postoperative antibiotics following percutaneous auditory osseointegrated implant placement reduces skin reactivity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched case-controlled series. SETTINGS: Tertiary academic medical center. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients who underwent percutaneous auditory osseointegrated implant placement were divided into those who received 5 days of postoperative antibiotics (AB) and those who received no antibiotics (NAB). All surgery was performed using the same surgical technique (Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery). Variables recorded included patient demographics, Holgers skin reaction score, complications, and need for further intervention. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients received prophylactic postoperative antibiotics (AB) while 21 patients did not (NAB). At the first postoperative visit (AB 12.7 d versus NAB 12.3 d, p = 0.9) there were no differences in average Holgers score (AB 0.3 ±â€Š0.7 versus NAB 0.2 ±â€Š0.5, p = 0.27). The odds ratio for skin reactivity at the first visit was 0.11 (95% CI 0.01-2.32). There were also no statistical differences in Holgers score (AB 0.05 ±â€Š0.2 versus NAB 0.1 ±â€Š0.3, p = 0.25) at most recent followup visit (AB mean 97.5 d versus NAB 102.8 d, p = 0.84). The odds ratio for skin reactivity at the most recent visit was 0.16 (95% CI 0.01-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The use of postoperative antibiotics does not appear to confer significant difference in skin reactivity in patients receiving percutaneous osseointegrated auditory implants. Such findings support the theory that skin reactivity, when it does occur, may not be an infectious-mediated process.

An Analysis of Risk Factors in Unilateral Versus Bilateral Hearing Loss.

A retrospective review of children with confirmed hearing loss identified through universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) in Virginia from 2010 to 2014 was conducted in order to compare the incidence of Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) risk factors in children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) to bilateral hearing loss (BHL). Over the 5-year study period, 1004 children (0.20% of all births) developed a confirmed hearing loss, with 544 (51%) children having at least one JCIH risk factor. Overall, 18% of children with confirmed hearing loss initially passed UNHS. Of all children with risk factors, 226 (42%) demonstrated UHL and 318 (58%) had BHL. The most common risk factors for UHL were neonatal indicators (69%), craniofacial anomalies (30%), stigmata of HL syndromes (14%), and family history (14%). The most common risk factors in BHL were neonatal indicators (49%), family history (27%), stigmata of HL syndromes (19%), and craniofacial anomalies (16%). Children with the risk factor for positive family history were more likely to have BHL, while those with craniofacial anomalies were more likely to have UHL (P < .001). Neonatal indicators were the most commonly identified risk factor in both UHL and BHL populations. Children with UHL were significantly more likely to have craniofacial anomalies, while children with BHL were more likely to have a family history of hearing loss. Further studies assessing the etiology underlying the hearing loss and risk factor associations are warranted.

Analysis of risk factors associated with unilateral hearing loss in children who initially passed newborn hearing screening.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze 2007 Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) risk factors in children with confirmed unilateral hearing loss (UHL) who initially passed newborn hearing screening. METHODS: Retrospective record review of 16,108 infants who passed newborn hearing screening but had one or more JCIH risk factors prompting subsequent follow-up through the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program in Virginia from 2010 to 2012. The study was reviewed and qualified as exempt by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Virginia Department of Health. RESULTS: Over the 2-year study period, 14896 (4.9% of total births) children passed UNHS but had the presence of one or more JCIH risk factor. Ultimately, we identified 121 babies from this group with confirmed hearing loss (0.7%), with 48 babies (0.2%) showing UHL. The most common risk factors associated with the development of confirmed UHL after passing the initial screen were neonatal indicators, craniofacial anomalies, family history, and stigmata of syndrome associated with hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Neonatal indicators and craniofacial anomalies were the categories most often found in children with confirmed unilateral hearing loss who initially passed their newborn hearing screen. While neonatal indicators were also the most common associated risk factor in all hearing loss, craniofacial abnormalities are relatively more common in children with UHL who initially passed newborn hearing screening. Further studies assessing the etiology underlying the hearing loss and risk factor associations are warranted.

Destructive lesion of the temporomandibular joint: A case of tophaceous pseudogout.

Tophaceous pseudogout of the temporomandibular joint is a rare entity that clinically and radiographically mimics neoplastic or infectious conditions. Diagnosis requires histopathologic examination. Given the rarity of this condition, there is a paucity of information pertaining to the surgical approach, reconstructive options, and postoperative outcomes.