Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: AKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited. METHODS: In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Institute; CAPItello-291 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04305496.).

HER2-low heterogeneity between primary and paired recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: Implications in treatment and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: With the largest sample size to date, the authors' objective was to investigate the incidence of primary-to-metastatic human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) conversion and the predictors for such conversion. Moreover, no previous studies have evaluated the prognosis of patients who have negative HER2 expression (HER2-0) versus low HER2 expression (HER2-low) when HER2 status was assessed based on all recurrent/metastatic lesions. METHODS: The authors included 1299 patients who had available HER2 status of primary breast tumors and paired recurrent/metastatic lesions at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and West China Hospital. RESULTS: In total, 370 patients (28.5%) experienced primary-to-metastatic HER2 conversion. Intrapatient intermetastasis spatial heterogeneity and temporal heterogeneity of HER2 were detected. When assessing HER2 based on recurrent/metastatic tumors, patients who had HER2-0 tumors had significantly shorter overall survival than those who had HER2-low tumors in the overall population and in the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative subgroup. However, when assessing HER2 based on primary tumors, there was no difference in overall survival between patients who had HER2-0 versus HER2-low tumors. Moreover, patients who had tumors that converted from HER2-0 to HER2-low had longer overall survival than those who had consistent HER2-0 status in the ER-negative subgroup. By combining four predictors (ER status, Ki67 index, biopsy site, and disease-free interval), the authors established the first prediction tool to estimate the probability of HER2-0 tumors converting to HER2-low/positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapatient primary-to-metastatic and intermetastatic HER2 heterogeneity were observed in this large-scale cohort study. When evaluating HER2 based on recurrent/metastatic tumors, an overall survival difference was observed between patients who had HER2-0 versus HER2-low, recurrent/metastatic breast tumors. The developed prediction tool might help clinicians screen out patients with primary HER2-0 tumors that have a high probability of HER2 status conversion and recommend them for re-biopsy, thus helping to screen out candidate patients for trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment.

Dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole versus placebo plus letrozole or anastrozole as first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (DAWNA-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Adding CDK4/6 inhibitor dalpiciclib to fulvestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer progressing after endocrine therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no previous systemic therapy in the advanced setting. METHODS: DAWNA-2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 42 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, of any menopausal status, had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and had pathologically confirmed hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative untreated advanced breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral dalpiciclib (150 mg per day for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off) or matching placebo. Both groups also received endocrine therapy: either 2·5 mg letrozole or 1 mg anastrozole orally once daily continuously. Randomisation was using an interactive web response system (block size of six) and stratified according to visceral metastasis, previous endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, and endocrine therapy partner. All investigators, patients, and the funders of the study were masked to group allocation. We present the results of the preplanned interim analyses for the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival, which was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who met the eligibility criteria by intention-to treat. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The superiority boundary was calculated as a one-sided p value of 0·0076 or less. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03966898, and is ongoing but closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between July 19, 2019, and Dec 25, 2020, 580 patients were screened and 456 were eligible and randomly assigned to the dalpiciclib group (n=303) or placebo group (n=153). At data cutoff (June 1, 2022), median follow-up was 21·6 months (IQR 18·3-25·9), and 103 (34%) of 303 patients in the dalpiciclib group and 83 (54%) of 153 patients in the placebo group had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the dalpiciclib group than in the placebo group (30·6 months [95% CI 30·6-not reached] vs 18·2 months [16·5-22·5]; stratified hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·38-0·69]; one-sided log-rank p<0·0001). Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 271 (90%) of 302 patients in the dalpiciclib group and 18 (12%) of 153 patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (259 [86%] in the dalpiciclib group vs none in the placebo group) and leukopenia (201 [67%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported for 36 (12%) patients in the dalpiciclib group and ten (7%) patients in the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, both in the dalpiciclib group (deaths from unknown causes). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole could be a novel standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, and is an alternative option to the current treatment landscape. FUNDING: Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Preclinical and clinical activity of DZD1516, a full blood-brain barrier-penetrant, highly selective HER2 inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are at high risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A potent and selective HER2 inhibitor with good blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration is highly desirable. METHODS: The design and structure-activity relationship of DZD1516 was described. The potency and selectivity of DZD1516 were determined by enzymatic and cellular assays. The antitumor activity of DZD1516 monotherapy or in combination with HER2 antibody-drug conjugate was assessed in CNS and subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. A phase 1 first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of DZD1516 in patients with HER2+ MBC who relapsed from standard of care. RESULTS: DZD1516 showed good selectivity against HER2 over wild-type EGFR in vitro and potent antitumor activity in vivo. Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received DZD1516 monotherapy treatment across six dose levels (25-300 mg, twice daily). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 300 mg, and thus 250 mg was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The most common adverse events included headache, vomiting, and hemoglobin decreased. No diarrhea or skin rash was observed at ≤ 250 mg. The mean Kp,uu,CSF was 2.1 for DZD1516 and 0.76 for its active metabolite DZ2678. With median seven lines of prior systemic therapy, the best antitumor efficacy in intracranial, extracranial and overall lesions was stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: DZD1516 provides positive proof of concept for an optimal HER2 inhibitor with high BBB penetration and HER2 selectivity. Further clinical evaluation of DZD1516 is warranted, with the RP2D being 250 mg BID. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT04509596. Registered on August 12, 2020; Chinadrugtrial: CTR20202424 Registered on December 18, 2020.

Incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases.

ER, PgR and HER-2 status are the cornerstones of choosing systemic therapy for breast cancer, but can change during the disease course. Guidelines recommended the biopsy of the metastatic tumor to reassess receptor status. Bone is the most frequent metastatic site of breast cancer but remained technically difficult to biopsy. Our study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases. One hundred and fifty-five breast cancer patients were diagnosed with pathology-confirmed bone metastasis at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Ninety-three patients with receptor status available on both primary tumor and bone metastases were included in our study. ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from positive to negative in 10.8% (10/93), 28.0% (26/93) and 8.6% (8/93) of the patients, while ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from negative to positive in 3.2% (3/93), 4.3% (4/93) and 1.1% (1/93) of the patients, respectively. 40.4% (17/42) of the HER2-0 tumors converted to HER2-low, which enabled them to receive the treatment of new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Prior endocrine and anti-HER2 therapy were the independent risk factors for receptor conversion. Loss of HR expression in bone metastases was significantly associated with worse first-line PFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.271, P-value = .039) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 6.09, P-value = .011). In conclusion, our study confirmed that patients may experience receptor conversion between primary breast cancer and bone metastases, possibly influenced by prior treatments, which significantly influenced prognosis. The rebiopsy of bone metastases in patients with primary HER2-0 tumors may benefit from the new ADC drugs.

Landscape of DNA damage response gene alterations in breast cancer: A comprehensive investigation.

BACKGROUND: DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations are prevalent in breast cancer (BC) and important for treatment decisions. Intensive studies on DDR alterations in BC are still needed. METHODS: The authors included 438 patients with metastatic breast cancer from their next-generation sequencing database and 1091 patients with early-stage breast cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database in the analysis to characterize molecular alterations in the DDR pathway. RESULTS: Germline DDR mutations were more prevalent in younger patients and those with HER2-negative cancers. Tumors with germline DDR mutations more commonly had somatic DDR mutations, especially those with germline Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway mutations. Notably, 66.67% (four of six) of patients with germline PALB2 mutations had tumors that harbored somatic PALB2 mutations. No differences in prognosis were observed in patients with germline or tumor somatic DDR mutations compared to patients and tumors that were wild-type. Compared to early BC, the frequency of somatic DDR mutations in metastatic cancers was significantly higher (24.89% vs. 16.02%, p < .001). Higher tumor mutation burdens were observed in cancers with somatic DDR mutations, but not in cancers with germline DDR mutations. Furthermore, tumors with somatic DDR mutations showed an abundance of anticancer immunological phenotypes. Somatic FA and mismatch repair pathway mutations were associated with increased expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Although most DDR genes were significantly positively associated with expression of proliferation-related genes, PARP3 expression was negatively correlated with MKI67 expression. Lower PARP3 expression was associated with a worse prognosis in TCGA database by multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with germline FA mutations more frequently have tumors with somatic DDR mutations. Somatic DDR mutations lead to anticancer immunological phenotypes in BC. No differences in prognosis according to germline or somatic DDR mutations were found.

Phase I study of MSB2311, a novel pH-dependent anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, treating patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma.

MSB2311 is a novel pH-dependent humanized anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody. This phase I study primarily aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose level (RP2D) of MSB2311 in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. MSB2311 was intravenously administered at 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) and 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) using 3 + 3 design. During expansion phase, eligible patients with either PD-L1 overexpression, Epstein-Barr Virus positive, microsatellite instability high/mismatch repair deficient, or high tumor mutation burden tumors were treated at RP2D. A total of 37 Chinese patients were treated, including 31 with solid tumors and 6 lymphoma. No dose limiting toxicity was reported and MTD was not reached. The trial was expanded at 20 mg/kg Q3W or 10 mg/kg Q2W, both of which were determined as RP2D. Most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (43.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (27.0%), proteinuria (21.6%), alanine aminotransferase increase and hypothyroidism (18.9% each), thyroid stimulating hormone increased and hyperglycemia (16.2% each). Out of 20 efficacy evaluable patients with biomarker positive solid tumors, 6 achieved confirmed partial response with the median duration of response of 11.0 months (95% CI 7.0-11.4) and 4 had stable disease, resulting an objective response rate of 30.0% (95% CI 11.9, 54.3) and disease control rate of 50.0% (95% CI 27.2, 72.8). One partial response was also observed among 6 patients with lymphoma. MSB2311 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (PICTURE): a single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer and primary resistance to trastuzumab have a poor clinical outcome and lack good evidence to inform clinical decision. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in this population. METHODS: This phase 2 trial was conducted at 16 sites in China. Patients received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between June 2019 and September 2021, 100 patients were enrolled with a median age of 51 years (range, 24-69). All patients had been treated with trastuzumab and 21 (21.0%) patients had prior use of pertuzumab. As of August 31, 2022, the median follow-up duration was 20.1 months (range, 1.3-38.2). The median PFS was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-15.1), which crossed the pre-specified efficacy boundary of 8.0 months. The objective response rate was 70.0% (70/100), with a median duration of response of 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.2-19.3). The disease control rate was 87.0% (87/100). The median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (24 [24.0%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib plus capecitabine can be considered to be a treatment option in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients who have shown primary resistance to trastuzumab. Even in the era of modern anti-HER2 treatments, this clinical setting warrants more investigations to meet unmet needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04001621. Retrospectively registered on June 28, 2019.

Analysis of clinical features, genomic landscapes and survival outcomes in HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates prompt the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of HER2-low expression in breast cancer is unclear. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data of 579 metastatic breast cancer patients were reviewed from our next-generation sequencing (NGS) database and genomic analysis of early breast cancer patients from TCGA was also analyzed. FINDINGS: First, the clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-low patients were profoundly influenced by HR status and no difference of prognosis was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients when paired by HR status, but notably HER2-low patients showed similar metastatic patterns to HER2-positive patients in the HR-positive (HR+ ) subgroup, with more brain and initial lung metastases and more cases of de novo stage IV breast cancer than HER2-zero patients. Second, among patients with primary HER2-low or HER2-zero tumors, the discordance of HER2 status between primary and metastatic tumors was significant, with 48.4% of patients with HER2-zero primary tumors exhibiting HER2-low phenotype in metastatic tumors in the HR+ subgroup. Third, within HR+ and HR-negative subtypes, HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors showed no substantial differences in mutation alterations and copy number variations. Forth, germline BRCA2 mutations were observed only in HER2-low patients in our NGS database, especially in HR+ HER2-low tumors. Finally, three molecular subtypes based on genomic alterations in HER2-low breast cancer were identified, which provided novel insights into heterogeneity in HER2-low breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: After correcting for HR expression, only marginal differences in clinical and molecular phenotypes were determined between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer. Therefore, HER2-low breast cancer is insufficient to be defined as a distinct molecular entity, but rather a heterogenous disease.

Comprehensive analysis of cancer of unknown primary and recommendation of a histological and immunohistochemical diagnostic strategy from China.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on cancer of unknown primary (CUP) mainly focus on treatment and prognosis in western populations and lacked clinical evaluation of different IHC markers, so this study aimed to evaluate characteristics of CUP and recommend a diagnostic strategy from a single center in China. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 625 patients with CUP were retrospectively collected and reviewed. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 91 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.3:1. The predominant histological type was poor or undifferentiated adenocarcinomas (308; 49.3%). The results of Canhelp-Origin molecular testing for the identification of the tissue of origin in 262 of 369 patients (71.0%) were considered predictable (similarity score > 45), with the most common predicted primary tumor site being the breast (57, 21.8%). Unpredictable molecular results correlated with more aggressive clinical parameters and poor survival. Thee positivity rates of several targeted antibodies (GATA3, GCDFP15, TTF1, Napsin A, and PAX8), based on the clinically predicted site, were lower than those reported for the corresponding primary tumors. Nonetheless, TRPS1 and INSM1 were reliable markers of predicted breast carcinoma (75.0%) and neuroendocrine tumors (83.3%), respectively. P16 expression, as well as HPV and EBER testing contributed significantly to the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinomas. Survival analysis revealed that older ages (> 57), ≥ 3 metastatic sites, non-squamous cell carcinomas, bone/liver/lung metastases, unpredictable molecular results, and palliative treatment correlated with poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a CUP diagnostic strategy involving the use of targeted antibody panels as per histological findings that is potentially applicable in clinical practice. The markers TRPS1, INSM1, and P16 expression, as well as HPV and EBER testing are particularly valuable in this aspect. Molecular testing is also predictive of survival rates.

Polarity protein Par3 sensitizes breast cancer to paclitaxel by promoting cell cycle arrest.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel, belongs to tubulin-binding agents (TBAs), shows a great efficacy against breast cancer via stabilizing microtubules. Drug resistance limits its clinical application. Here we aimed to explore a role of Polarity protein Par3 in improving paclitaxel effectiveness. METHODS: Breast cancer specimens from 45 patients were collected to study the relationship between Par3 expression and paclitaxel efficacy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Cell viability was measured in breast cancer cells (SK-BR-3 and T-47D) with Par3 over-expression or knockdown. The flow cytometry assays were performed to measure cell apoptosis and cell cycle. BrdU incorporation assay and Hoechst 33,258 staining were performed to measure cell proliferation and cell apoptosis, respectively. Immunofluorescence was used to detect microtubule structures. RESULTS: Par3 expression was associated with good response of paclitaxel in breast cancer patients. Consistently, Par3 over-expression significantly sensitized breast cancer cells to paclitaxel by promoting cell apoptosis and reducing cell proliferation. In Par3 overexpressing cells upon paclitaxel treatment, we observed intensified cell cycle arrests at metaphase. Further exploration showed that Par3 over-expression stabilized microtubules of breast cancer cells in response to paclitaxel and resists to microtubules instability induced by nocodazole, a microtubule-depolymerizing agent. CONCLUSION: Par3 facilitates polymeric forms of tubulin and stabilizes microtubule structure, which aggravates paclitaxel-induced delay at the metaphase-anaphase transition, leading to proliferation inhibition and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Par3 has a potential role in sensitizing breast cancer cells to paclitaxel, which may provide a more precise assessment of individual treatment and novel therapeutic targets.

Exosomal MMP-1 transfers metastasis potential in triple-negative breast cancer through PAR1-mediated EMT.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with high risk of distant metastasis, in which the intercellular communication between tumor cells also plays a role. Exosomes can be released by tumor cells and promote distant metastasis through intercellular communication or changes in tumor microenvironment, it is an optimized transportation facility for biologically active payloads. This was a hypothesis-generating research on role of exosomal payload in TNBC distant metastasis. METHODS: Exosomes isolated from supernatant of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-231-HM (a highly pulmonary metastatic variant of parental MDA-MB-231 cells) were characterized. MMP-1 level was detected using mass spectrometry and western blot. Transwell assay, wound healing and CCK-8 assay were employed to explore the effect of exosomal MMP-1 on the metastatic capability of TNBC cells in vitro. Human breast cancer lung metastasis model in nude mice was established to observe the effect of exosomal MMP-1 in vivo. Tissue microarray and blood samples of TNBC patients were applied to analyze the relevance between MMP-1 with metastasis. RESULTS: MDA-MB-231-HM cells secrete exosomes enriched MMP-1, which can be taken up and enhance invasion and migration activities of TNBC cells, including MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and BT549. After ingesting exosomes enriched with MMP-1, cells secret more MMP-1, which may interact with membrane G protein receptor protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1), thereby initiating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to enhance capability of migration and invasion. The lung colonization model shows that the expressions of MMP-1 and PAR1 in the metastases of the 231-HM-exo treated mice were both upregulated. Clinically, the enrichment of MMP-1 can be detected in exosomes extracted from serum of patients with metastasis at higher concentration than that in pre-operative patients. Moreover, in patients with multiple distant metastases, the level of MMP-1 in exosomes is also higher than that in patients with single lesion. CONCLUSION: MMP-1 from TNBC cells of high metastasis potential can promote the distant metastasis of transform those with low metastasis potential through PAR1-mediated EMT and is likely to be a potential molecular marker.

Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, single-center, phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection (Lipo-MIT) in advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled, single-center, phase II clinical trial, eligible patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive Lipo-MIT or mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection (MIT) intravenously. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to receive Lipo-MIT or MIT. The ORR was 13.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8-30.7%) for Lipo-MIT and 6.7% (95% CI: 0.8-22.1%) for MIT. The DCR was 50% (95% CI: 31.3-68.7%) with Lipo-MIT vs. 30% (95% CI: 14.7-49.4%) with MIT. The median PFS was 1.92 months (95% CI: 1.75-3.61) for Lipo-MIT and 1.85 months (95% CI: 1.75-2.02) for MIT. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression. Lipo-MIT resulted in an incidence of 86.7% of leukopenia and 80.0% of neutropenia, which was marginally superior to MIT (96.7% and 96.7%, respectively). Lipo-MIT showed a lower incidence of cardiovascular events (13.3% vs. 20.0%) and increased cardiac troponin T (3.3% vs. 36.7%); but higher incidence of anemia (76.7% vs. 46.7%), skin hyperpigmentation (66.7% vs. 3.3%), and fever (23.3% vs. 10.0%) than MIT. Conclusions The clinical benefit parameters of Lipo-MIT and MIT were comparable. Lipo-MIT provided a different toxicity profile, which might be associated with the altered distribution of the drug. Additional study is needed to elucidate the potential benefit of Lipo-MIT in ABC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02596373) on Nov 4, 2015.

A phase I pharmacokinetic study of lenvatinib in Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim: This phase I study assessed the pharmacokinetic profile, safety and antitumor activity of lenvatinib in Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials & methods: Bodyweight-based lenvatinib dosing was administered (patients <60 kg: 8 mg/day, n = 13; patients ≥60 kg: 12 mg/day, n = 12). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during the first cycle. Efficacy and safety were assessed. Results: There was considerable overlap between individual exposure values at steady-state in the 8 and 12 mg groups. The most common adverse events were increased blood bilirubin and decreased platelet count (48.0%). Two patients had partial responses, and 16 patients attained stable disease. Conclusion: No significant pharmacokinetic differences between dose groups were detected. Lenvatinib was tolerable, showing promising antitumor activities in Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; liver cancer) is common in Chinese patients. Lenvatinib is a drug approved to treat HCC, and patients with higher bodyweights are given a higher dose than patients with lower bodyweights. This trial in Chinese patients with HCC looked at lenvatinib pharmacokinetics (what the body does to a drug) after one dose and multiple doses, and at lenvatinib's antitumor activity and side effects. Meaningful differences in pharmacokinetics between the higher and lower doses after a single dose or multiple doses of daily lenvatinib were not observed. Lenvatinib partially shrank the tumors of 2 out of 21 patients whose tumors were assessed. The side effects seen matched those from other studies of lenvatinib in HCC and other cancers. ClinicalTrial Registration: NCT02953743 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic advances in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, resistance to trastuzumab inevitably develops. In the PHOEBE study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor) plus capecitabine after previous trastuzumab. METHODS: This is an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done at 29 hospitals in China. Patients with pathologically confirmed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, aged 18-70 years, who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had been previously treated with trastuzumab and taxanes were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral pyrotinib 400 mg or lapatinib 1250 mg once daily plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Randomisation was done via a centralised interactive web-response system with a block size of four or six and stratified by hormone receptor status and previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival according to masked independent central review. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. Results presented here are from a prespecified interim analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03080805. FINDINGS: Between July 31, 2017, and Oct 30, 2018, 267 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. 134 patients received pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 132 received lapatinib plus capecitabine. At data cutoff of the interim analysis on March 31, 2019, median progression-free survival was significantly longer with pyrotinib plus capecitabine (12·5 months [95% CI 9·7-not reached]) than with lapatinib plus capecitabine (6·8 months [5·4-8·1]; hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·27-0·56]; one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (41 [31%] in the pyrotinib group vs 11 [8%] in the lapatinib group) and hand-foot syndrome (22 [16%] vs 20 [15%]). Serious adverse events were reported for 14 (10%) patients in the pyrotinib group and 11 (8%) patients in the lapatinib group. No treatment-related deaths were reported in the pyrotinib group and one sudden death in the lapatinib group was considered treatment related. INTERPRETATION: Pyrotinib plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival compared with that for lapatinib plus capecitabine, with manageable toxicity, and can be considered an alternative treatment option for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab and chemotherapy. FUNDING: Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine and National Key R&D Program of China. TRANSLATIONS: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Functional consequences of a rare missense BARD1 c.403G>A germline mutation identified in a triple-negative breast cancer patient.

We identified a rare missense germline mutation in BARD1 (c.403G>A or p.Asp135Asn) as pathogenic using integrated genomics and transcriptomics profiling of germline and tumor samples from an early-onset triple-negative breast cancer patient who later was administrated with a PARP inhibitor for 2 months. We demonstrated in cell and mouse models that, compared to the wild-type, (1) c.403G>A mutant cell lines were more sensitive to irradiation, a DNA damage agent, and a PARP inhibitor; (2) c.403G>A mutation inhibited interaction between BARD1 and RAD51 (but not BRCA1); and (3) c.403G>A mutant mice were hypersensitive to ionizing radiation. Our study shed lights on the clinical interpretation of rare germline mutations of BARD1.

Profile and outcome of receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases: a nation-wide multicenter epidemiological study.

Although receptor status including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) of the primary breast tumors was related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients, little information is yet available on whether patient management and survival are impacted by receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases. Using data from the nation-wide multicenter clinical epidemiology study of advanced breast cancer in China (NCT03047889), we report the situation of retesting ER, PR and HER2 status for breast cancer metastases and evaluate the patient management and prognostic value of receptor conversion. In total, 3295 patients were analyzed and 1583 (48.0%) patients retesting receptor status for metastasis. Discordance in one or more receptors between the primary and the metastatic biopsy was found in 37.7% of women. Patients who remained hormone receptor (HR) positive in their metastases had similar progression-free survival of first-line and second-line treatment compared to patients with HR conversion (P > .05). In multivariate analysis, patients who showed ER conversion from negative to positive had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who remained negative in their metastases (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.90; P < .001). Patients with PR remained positive and had longer DFS than patients with PR conversion from negative to positive (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; P = .004). Patients with PR conversion have shorter overall survival than patients with PR remained positive or negative (P = .016 and P = .041, respectively). Our findings showed that the receptors' conversions were common in metastatic breast cancer, and the conversion impacted the survival.

Everolimus-Related Pneumonitis in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Incidence, Radiographic Patterns, and Relevance to Clinical Outcome.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the incidence, radiographic patterns, and relevance to clinical outcome of everolimus-related pneumonitis (ERP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients with MBC treated with everolimus who had baseline and at least one follow-up chest computed tomography (CT) were obtained from a medical electronic database system. An independent review of the CT scans of these patients was conducted by two radiologists (NCT03730428). Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used for time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: ERP was radiographically detected in 45 of 86 patients (52.3%). In more than 80% of these patients, ERP occurred during the first 4 months of everolimus treatment. Only 14 of the 45 patients with ERP were symptomatic (31.1%). Symptoms included cough, fever, and shortness of breath. Bilateral and lower distribution of the pneumonitis was most common. In most of the cases, ground-glass opacities and reticular opacities were noticed. Elderly patients were more likely to develop ERP. Patients with ERP had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; 6.8 vs. 4.1 months, p = .024) and overall survival (OS; 42.8 vs. 21.3 months, p = .016). ERP was a predictor of OS improvement confirmed by multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.97; p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: ERP was noted in half of the patients with MBC treated with everolimus. Our data suggested that ERP was associated with improved prognosis and may be used as a biomarker for the efficacy of everolimus in MBC. Close monitoring, prompt diagnosis, and proper treatment for ERP are essential to maintain the quality of life of patients and achieve maximum treatment benefits. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Everolimus-related pneumonitis (ERP) is one of the most worrying drug adverse events, especially in Asian patients. However, little has been known about the clinical and radiographic details of ERP in patients with metastatic breast cancers (MBCs) treated with everolimus. The present study investigated the clinical characteristics, radiographic patterns, and its correlation with treatment outcome in patients with MBC. ERP was identified in more than half of patients with MBC during everolimus therapy and was associated with improved outcome. Close monitoring and prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment for ERP are critical for the preservation of patients' quality of life and achievement of maximal treatment benefits.

Loss of polarity protein Par3 is mediated by transcription factor Sp1 in breast cancer.

Loss of polarity protein Par3 promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis. The underlying molecular mechanisms of Par3 down-regulation and related prognostic significance in breast cancer remain unclear. Here, we discovered that Par3 down-regulation was associated with shorter relapse-free survival in Luminal A subtype of breast cancer. Par3 knockdown promoted breast cancer cells migration and invasion. Importantly, we identified that transcription factor Sp1 bound to PARD3 promoter region and induced Par3 expression. Breast cancer patients with low Sp1 showed significantly worse RFS and low expression level of Par3. Par3 over-expression partially reversed Sp1 knockdown induced migration and invasion. Together, decreased Sp1 level mediates Par3 down-regulation, which correlated with poor prognosis of ER + breast cancer patients, via reduced binding with PARD3 promoter.

Phase 1a study of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, FCN-437c, in Chinese patients with HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Purpose This phase 1a, first-in-human study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of FCN-437c, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Methods The study enrolled female patients with HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer (BC) who failed standard of care therapy. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was utilized with a starting dose of 50 mg daily for 3 weeks on and 1 week off treatment in 28-day cycles. Patients received escalating doses of FCN-437c monotherapy (50, 100, 200, 300, and 450 mg). Results Seventeen patients received FCN-437c 50 mg (n = 3), 100 mg (n = 3), 200 mg (n = 3), 300 mg (n = 6), and 450 mg (n = 2). Two patients who received the 450-mg dose experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia); no DLT was observed at any other dose level. Frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were hematological: leukopenia (94.1%), neutropenia (88.2%), anemia (64.7%), and thrombocytopenia (47.1%). Grade 3-4 TEAEs included neutropenia (64.7%) and leukopenia (47.1%). Exposure of FCN-437c increased almost proportionally to doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg. At doses from 200 to 450 mg, there appeared to be a trend of saturation. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg. Of 15 patients with measurable disease, nine (60.0%) patients experienced stable disease; no complete or partial responses were observed. Conclusions These results established an acceptable safety profile for FCN-437c in patients with advanced BC, and there were no unexpected signals relative to other CDK4/6 inhibitors. (NCT04488107; July 13, 2020).