Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Surg ; 46(1): 207-214, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is being adopted increasingly worldwide. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent MIDP versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent a DP in our institution between 2005 and 2019 was performed. Propensity score matching based on relevant baseline factors was used to match patients in the ODP and MIDP groups in a 1:1 manner. Outcomes reported include operative duration, blood loss, postoperative length of stay, morbidity, mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula rates, reoperation and readmission. RESULTS: In total, 444 patients were included in this study. Of 122 MIDP patients, 112 (91.8%) could be matched. After matching, the median operating time for MIDP was significantly longer than ODP [260 min (200-346.3) vs 180 (135-232.5), p < 0.001], while postoperative stay for MIDP was significantly shorter [median 6 days (5-8) versus 7 days (6-9), p = 0.015]. There were no significant differences noted in any of the other outcomes measured. Over time, we observed a decrease in the operation times of MIDP performed at our institution. CONCLUSION: Adoption of MIDP offers advantages over ODP in terms of a shorter postoperative hospital stay, without an increase in morbidity and/or mortality but at the expense of a longer operation time.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 41(1): e30-e35, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phalangeal neck fractures account for 13% of pediatric finger fractures. Al Qattan type I (undisplaced) fractures are treated nonoperatively. There is increasing evidence that Type 2 (displaced) fractures achieve remarkable fracture remodeling with nonoperative treatment and patients frequently make a full functional recovery. The options available for nonoperative management of these fractures are either a plaster cast or a removable splint. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in radiologic outcome in pediatric phalangeal neck fractures (Types I and II) treated with splint or cast immobilization. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients aged 18 and below with phalangeal neck fractures treated nonoperatively from 2008 to 2017. Radiographs were compared at <1 week and >3 weeks after injury. Translation and angulation in coronal and sagittal planes were measured and compared using Student t tests. Baseline variables were compared using χ or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: There were 47 patients with phalangeal neck fractures treated nonoperatively during the study period. There were 9 type I and 38 type II fractures. The mean age was 10 years with 40 males and 7 females. Fractures occurred in 33 dominant and 14 nondominant hands and involved 29 proximal and 18 middle phalanges. Nineteen children were treated in casts and 28 with removable splints. The mean duration of follow-up was similar between the 2 groups. The most affected phalanx was the proximal phalanx of the small finger and the most common fracture pattern was type IIA. There was no significant difference in clinical and radiologic outcomes between children who were treated in casts and those treated in removable splints. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the clinical and radiologic outcomes in pediatric phalangeal neck fractures treated with cast or splint immobilization. Splinting has the added benefits of increased comfort and hygiene and we routinely offer splinting as a viable alternative in the nonoperative treatment of Al Qattan type I and type II phalangeal fractures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic studies.


Asunto(s)
Moldes Quirúrgicos , Traumatismos de los Dedos/terapia , Falanges de los Dedos de la Mano/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Férulas (Fijadores) , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Mano , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA