Ultrasound Assessment of Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries in a Pediatric Population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine sensitivity and specificity for anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) integrity and tibiofibular clear-space (TFCS) cut-off points for dynamic evaluation using ultrasound (US) in a pediatric population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care university-affiliated pediatric hospital patients between the ages of 12 and 18 sustaining acute ankle trauma with syndesmotic injury. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were assigned to the syndesmotic injury protocol that included a standardized MRI and US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament integrity for static assessment and TFCS measurements for dynamic assessment on US. For dynamic assessment, the distance between the distal tibia and fibula was first measured in neutral position and then in external rotation for each ankle. The US results on AiTFL integrity were compared with MRI, considered as our gold standard. Optimal cut-off points of TFCS values were determined with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants were included. Mean age was 14.8 years (SD = 1.3 years). Sensitivity and specificity for AiTFL integrity were 79% and 100%, respectively (4 false negatives on partial tears). For dynamic assessment, the cut-off points for the differences in tibiofibular distance between the 2 ankles in 1) neutral position (TFCS N I-U ) and 2) external rotation (TFCS ER I-U ) were 0.2 mm (sensitivity = 83% and specificity = 80%) and 0.1 mm (sensitivity = 83% and specificity = 80%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Static US could be used in a triage context as a diagnostic tool for AiTFL integrity in a pediatric population as it shows good sensitivity and excellent specificity.

Are outdoor playgrounds the real culprit for elbow fractures in children? A lesson learned from COVID-19 sanitary measures.

BACKGROUND: The association between elbow fractures and outdoor playgrounds has always been anecdotal. We sought to determine the impact of closing outdoor playgrounds and other play areas during the COVID-19 lockdown on elbow fractures in a pediatric population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all elbow fractures from a single pediatric referral hospital between 2016 and 2020 for the months of April and May. The months chosen corresponded to the COVID-19 lockdown during which outdoor playgrounds were closed. Inclusion criteria were elbow fracture diagnosis based on radiography and age younger than 18 years. Fracture type, where the injury occurred and the mechanism of injury were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 370 fractures were reported, with an average of 83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-84) per year for 2016-19 and only 36 recorded in 2020. The average annual number of fractures before 2020 was 17 (95% CI 16-17) for schools, and 33 (95% CI 31-34) for outdoor playgrounds, including 22 (95% CI 21-24) falls from playground structures. No fracture was reported in schools in 2020, and only 3 were reported from outdoor playgrounds (including 1 associated with falling from playground structures). CONCLUSION: We found an association between elbow fractures in a pediatric population and outdoor playground accessibility, but also with indoor public locations. Our findings emphasize the importance of safety measures in those facilities.

Outcome of retroarticular drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in a pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of bone marrow stimulation for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the talus in pediatric patients is not optimal. The objective was to evaluate the retroarticular drilling technique for talar OCD. METHODS: A retrospective case-series study of pediatric cases treated for talar OCD with retroarticular drilling was done. Clinical and radiological outcome scores were recorded as follows: the percentage of patients who had a successful treatment, the percentage for every category of the Berndt and Harty treatment result grading and the percentage for every radiographical outcome score were computed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (18 girls; mean age: 14.6 ± 2.1 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 14.8 (±11.7) months. 26.3% required revision surgery. The Berndt and Harty scores were: 57.9% good, 10.5% fair, 31.6% poor. Radiological outcomes were: 21% healed, 47.4% partially healed, 31.6% no healing. The radiological outcome score was better for younger patients (P = 0.01) and those with an open physis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: 26.3% of patients needed revision surgery after talar OCD retroarticular drilling and 21% were healed radiographically. Skeletal immaturity and a younger age were associated to a better radiological outcome.

Decreasing Pain and Fear in Medical Procedures with a Pediatric Population (DREAM): A Pilot Randomized Within-Subject Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many children with injuries, including burns and fractures, experience moderate to severe pain during medical procedures. Recent studies claim that nonpharmacologic pain management using virtual reality (VR) could distract children from procedural pain by engaging multiple senses. AIMS: The aims of this pilot randomized clinical trial were to assess the acceptability and feasibility of VR distraction in children with burns or fractures undergoing painful medical procedures, as well as the staff nurses, and assess the preliminary efficacy of VR distraction on pain intensity, pain-related fear, and subsequent recall of both. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A within-subject study design, in which participants served as their own control, was used. A total of 20 children from 7 to 17 years old with an injury were recruited at the surgical-trauma outpatient clinics of the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHU Sainte-Justine). Each participant received both standard and experimental treatments through randomized order. Pain (numerical rating scale) and pain-related fear (Children's Fear Scale) measures were taken before the procedure and after each sequence, followed by a measure of children's (graphic rating scale) and nurses' acceptability of the intervention through their satisfaction level. Recall of pain intensity and pain-related fear were assessed 24 hours after the procedure. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used, with a significance level at 0.05. RESULTS: Results showed that VR distraction was an acceptable and feasible intervention for children and nurses of these outpatient clinics. Preliminary effects showed that, compared to standard of care, children participants reported a significant decrease in pain intensity (p = .023) and pain-related fear (p = .011) during VR as well as less recalled pain-related fear (p = .012) at 24 hours after the procedure. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: VR is a promising intervention with children undergoing painful procedures because it is immersive and engages multiple senses. It is a low-cost intervention well accepted by children and nursing staff at this clinical site and is easy to implement in daily practice for procedural pain management.

Outcomes of treatment of patella fractures in children and adolescents.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess clinical and functional outcomes in separate cohorts of operatively and nonoperatively managed pediatric patella fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was completed for patients aged 5-19 years treated for a unilateral patella fracture at a single pediatric level-1 trauma center. Patients were excluded for osteochondral fracture associated with patellar dislocation, polytrauma presentation with additional fractures, or <3 months of clinical follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed via the Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee form and the Marx Knee Activity Scale. Results: A total of 53 patients met inclusion criteria; 30 patients were treated operatively and 23 patients were treated nonoperatively. Patients with patellar sleeve/pole fractures were significantly younger by 5.2 years (p < 0.01) and presented with greater variability in mechanism of injury (p < 0.01). The nonoperative cohort achieved bony healing and returned to sports at a median (interquartile range) of 1.7 (1.2-2.3) months and 2.8 (2.3-3.3) months, respectively, post-injury. The operative group achieved bony healing and returned to sports at 2.8 (2.1-3.5) months and 5.9 (4.0-7.1) months, respectively, following surgery. Median (interquartile range) Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx scores were 98 (89-100) and 14 (10-16), respectively, for the nonoperative group, and 92 (84-99) and 13 (12-16), respectively, for the operative group. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed between fracture patterns or treatment cohorts. Conclusion: Pediatric and adolescent patients sustaining patella fractures reported long-term functional outcomes comparable to normative values, across multiple fracture patterns and with appropriate operative and nonoperative treatment. Fractures requiring surgery were expectedly associated with slower healing and return to sport timelines. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Development and validation of a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Pedi-IKDC is an English-language, knee-specific, paediatric questionnaire used by orthopaedic surgeons around the world as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The objective of this study was thus to extend the applicability of the Pedi-IKDC to French-speaking Canadian patients, for both clinical practice and research, by developing a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the original version. HYPOTHESIS: The French adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC is valid and reliable for evaluating French-speaking children with knee conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Pedi-IKDC was translated to French by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons then back-translated by a professional translator. The original English version and the back-translation were compared to assess their similarity and confirm the faithfulness of the French translation. The validity of the French version was then tested at a major paediatric hospital in French-speaking Canada, in 203 children, including 163 with knee pain and 40 without knee symptoms. Internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminant capacity of the French version were assessed. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the Pedi-IKDC adaptation was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.934 in the knee-pain group). Construct validity was robust, with all nine hypotheses adapted from the original Pedi-IKDC article demonstrating strong (n=7) or moderate (n=2) correlations (p<0.001). The evaluation of discriminant capacity identified no statistically significant score differences according to most of the respondent characteristics (body mass index, age group, type of diagnosis, and type of treatment). However, scores differed significantly between females and males. DISCUSSION: The French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC obtained using a universally recognized method for translating PROMs demonstrated good performance, with psychometric properties similar to those of the original Pedi-IKDC and of its Danish, Italian, and Russian adaptations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.