Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 79
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863337

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of anti-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (anti-CRE) agents such as ceftazidime/avibactam has been associated with improved clinical outcome in cohorts that primarily include patients infected with CRE that are resistant to meropenem (MCRE). OBJECTIVES: To clarify whether patients with CRE resistant to ertapenem but susceptible to meropenem (ertapenem-only-resistant Enterobacterales; EORE) benefit from therapy with anti-CRE agents. METHODS: Patients treated for CRE infection in hospitals in the USA between 2016 and 2019 and enrolled in the CRACKLE-2 study were included. The primary outcome was the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) assessed at 30 days after index cultures. RESULTS: The EORE group included 213 patients and the MCRE group included 643. The demographics were similar between the groups except for the patients' race and origin before admission. The MCRE group received anti-CRE agents for definitive therapy significantly more frequently compared with the EORE group (30% versus 5% for ceftazidime/avibactam). We did not observe a significant difference between the groups in the adjusted DOOR probability of a more desirable outcome for a randomly selected patient in the EORE group compared with the MCRE group (52.5%; 95% CI, 48.3%-56.7%). The MCRE group had a similar proportion of patients who died at 30 days (26% versus 21%) and who were discharged to home (29% versus 40%), compared with the EORE group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinical EORE infection rarely received anti-CRE agents, but attained similar outcomes compared with patients with MCRE infection. The findings support current IDSA treatment guidance for meropenem- or imipenem-based therapy for treatment of EORE infections.

2.
J Infect Dis ; 226(6): 1109-1119, 2022 09 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35249113

RESUMEN

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common side effect of antibiotics. We examined the gastrointestinal microbiota in children treated with ß-lactams for community-acquired pneumonia. Data were from 66 children (n = 198 samples), aged 6-71 months, enrolled in the SCOUT-CAP trial (NCT02891915). AAD was defined as ≥1 day of diarrhea. Stool samples were collected on study days 1, 6-10, and 19-25. Samples were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing to identify associations between patient characteristics, microbiota characteristics, and AAD (yes/no). Nineteen (29%) children developed AAD. Microbiota compositional profiles differed between AAD groups (permutational multivariate analysis of variance, P < .03) and across visits (P < .001). Children with higher baseline relative abundances of 2 Bacteroides species were less likely to experience AAD. Higher baseline abundance of Lachnospiraceae and amino acid biosynthesis pathways were associated with AAD. Children in the AAD group experienced prolonged dysbiosis (P < .05). Specific gastrointestinal microbiota profiles are associated with AAD in children.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Diarrea , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Neumonía , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Lactante , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(Suppl 1): S42-S49, 2021 01 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are under increasing scrutiny, in part due to limited clinical trial evidence. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Units (STAR*ICU) trial to model the use of contact precautions in individual intensive care units (ICUs). Data included admission and discharge times and surveillance test results. We used a transmission model to estimate key epidemiological parameters, including the effect of contact precautions on transmission. Finally, we performed multivariate meta-regression to identify ICU-level factors associated with contact precaution effects. RESULTS: We found that 21% of admissions (n = 2194) were placed on contact precautions, with most for MRSA and VRE. We found little evidence that contact precautions reduced MRSA transmission. The estimated change in transmission attributed to contact precautions was -16% (95% credible interval, -38% to 15%). VRE transmission was higher than MRSA transmission due to contact precautions, but not significantly. In our meta-regression, we did not identify associations between ICU-level factors and estimated contact precaution effects. Importation and transmission were higher for VRE than for MRSA, but clearance rates were lower for VRE than for MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: We found little evidence that contact precautions implemented during the STAR*ICU trial reduced transmission of MRSA or VRE. We did find important differences in the transmission dynamics between MRSA and VRE. Differences in organism and healthcare setting may impact the efficacy of contact precautions.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control
4.
Crit Care Med ; 48(10): e916-e926, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Children's Hospital Association's Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis definitions and the identified patients; evaluate the definition using a published framework for evaluating sepsis definitions. DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: Multicenter quality improvement collaborative of 46 hospitals from January 2017 to December 2018, excluding neonatal ICUs. PATIENTS: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis was defined by electronic health record evidence of suspected infection and sepsis treatment or organ dysfunction. A more severely ill subgroup, Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis, was defined, approximating septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Participating hospitals identified patients, extracted data, and transferred de-identified data to a central data warehouse. The definitions were evaluated across domains of reliability, content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, measurement burden, and timeliness. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty hospitals met data quality criteria across four electronic health record platforms. There were 23,976 cases of Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis, including 8,565 with Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The median age was 5.9 years. There were 10,316 (43.0%) immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients, 4,135 (20.3%) with central lines, and 2,352 (11.6%) chronically ventilated. Among Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis patients, 60.8% were admitted to intensive care, 26.4% had new positive-pressure ventilation, and 19.7% received vasopressors. Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days (3.0-13.0 d). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was 958 (4.0%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis; 541 (6.3%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated strengths in content validity, convergent construct validity, and criterion validity; weakness in reliability. Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions had significant initial measurement burden (median time from case completion to submission: 15 mo [interquartile range, 13-18 mo]); timeliness improved once data capture was established (median, 26 d; interquartile range, 23-56 d). CONCLUSIONS: The Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated feasibility for large-scale data abstraction. The patients identified provide important information about children treated for sepsis. When operationalized, these definitions enabled multicenter identification and data aggregation, indicating practical utility for quality improvement.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Sepsis/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/fisiología , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sepsis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(7): 1140-1146, 2018 03 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121202

RESUMEN

Clinical trials with adaptive designs use data that accumulate during the course of the study to modify study elements in a prespecified manner. The goal is to provide flexibility such that a trial can serve as a definitive test of its primary hypothesis, preferably in a shorter time period, involving fewer human subjects, and at lower cost. Elements that may be modified include the sample size, end points, eligible population, randomization ratio, and interventions. Accumulating data used to drive these modifications include the outcomes, subject enrollment (including factors associated with the outcomes), and information about the application of the interventions. This review discusses the types of adaptive designs for clinical trials, emphasizing their advantages and limitations in comparison with conventional designs, and opportunities for applying these designs to healthcare epidemiology research, including studies of interventions to prevent healthcare-associated infections, combat antimicrobial resistance, and improve antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Tamaño de la Muestra
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(35): 930-3, 2016 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27608169

RESUMEN

Baylisascaris procyonis, predominantly found in raccoons, is a ubiquitous roundworm found throughout North America. Although raccoons are typically asymptomatic when infected with the parasite, the larval form of Baylisascaris procyonis can result in fatal human disease or severe neurologic outcomes if not treated rapidly. In the United States, Baylisascaris procyonis is more commonly enzootic in raccoons in the midwestern and northeastern regions and along the West Coast (1). However, since 2002, infections have been documented in other states (Florida and Georgia) and regions (2). Baylisascariasis is not a nationally notifiable disease in the United States, and little is known about how commonly it occurs or the range of clinical disease in humans. Case reports of seven human baylisascariasis cases in the United States diagnosed by Baylisascaris procyonis immunoblot testing at CDC are described, including review of clinical history and laboratory data. Although all seven patients survived, approximately half were left with severe neurologic deficits. Prevention through close monitoring of children at play, frequent handwashing, and clearing of raccoon latrines (communal sites where raccoons defecate) are critical interventions in curbing Baylisascaris infections. Early treatment of suspected cases is critical to prevent permanent sequelae.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Ascaridida/veterinaria , Ascaridoidea/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Mapaches/parasitología , Adulto , Animales , Infecciones por Ascaridida/transmisión , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/parasitología , Niño , Oftalmopatías/parasitología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
7.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 17(7): 591-7, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27124562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Central-line-associated bloodstream infections comprise 25% of device-associated infections. Compared with other units, PICUs demonstrate a higher central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence. Prior studies have not investigated the association of central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence, central-line utilization, or maintenance bundle compliance between specific types of PICUs. DESIGN: This study analyzed monthly aggregate data regarding central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence, central-line utilization, and maintenance bundle compliance between three types of PICUs: 1) PICUs that do not care for cardiac patients (PICU); 2) PICUs that provide care for cardiac and noncardiac patients (C/PICU); or 3) designated cardiac ICUs (CICU). SETTING: The included units submitted data as part of The Children's Hospital Association PICU central-line-associated bloodstream infections collaborative from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to PICUs in collaborative institutions. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence was low (1.37 central-line-associated bloodstream infections events/1,000 central-line days) and decreased over the time of the study. Central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence was not related to the type of PICU although C/PICU tended to have a higher central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence (p = 0.055). CICU demonstrated a significantly higher central-line utilization ratio (p < 0.001). However, when examined on a unit level, central-line utilization was not related to the central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence. The central-line maintenance bundle compliance rate was not associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence in this unit-level investigation. Neither utilization rate nor compliance rate changed significantly over time in any of the types of units. CONCLUSIONS: Although this unit-level analysis did not demonstrate an association between central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence and central-line utilization and maintenance bundle compliance, optimization of both should continue, further decreasing central-line-associated bloodstream infections prevalence. In addition, investigation of patient-specific factors may aid in further central-line-associated bloodstream infections eradication.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/normas , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , Wisconsin
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(5): 800-6, 2015 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26113652

RESUMEN

Clinical trials that compare strategies to optimize antibiotic use are of critical importance but are limited by competing risks that distort outcome interpretation, complexities of noninferiority trials, large sample sizes, and inadequate evaluation of benefits and harms at the patient level. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group strives to overcome these challenges through innovative trial design. Response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (RADAR) is a novel methodology utilizing a superiority design and a 2-step process: (1) categorizing patients into an overall clinical outcome (based on benefits and harms), and (2) ranking patients with respect to a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR). DOORs are constructed by assigning higher ranks to patients with (1) better overall clinical outcomes and (2) shorter durations of antibiotic use for similar overall clinical outcomes. DOOR distributions are compared between antibiotic use strategies. The probability that a randomly selected patient will have a better DOOR if assigned to the new strategy is estimated. DOOR/RADAR represents a new paradigm in assessing the risks and benefits of new strategies to optimize antibiotic use.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Proyectos de Investigación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Pediatr Res ; 78(6): 683-90, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26322411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression and increased neutrophil CD64 expression have been proposed as biomarkers of infection. METHODS: From 2009-2011, blood samples from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients <1 y of age were collected at enrollment and during subsequent evaluation for suspected infection, if it occurred. Samples were analyzed for monocyte HLA-DR and neutrophil CD64 expression levels by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Forty-seven infants had study samples collected at enrollment; 26 infants had study samples collected at the time of a suspected infection. At enrollment, there was an inverse relationship between neutrophil CD64 expression and age (P ≤ 0.047). At the time of suspected infection, infants with an infection demonstrated a lower percentage of HLA-DR+ monocytes (P = 0.02, area under the curve (AUC) 0.78), higher percentage of CD64+ neutrophils (P = 0.009, AUC 0.81), and higher neutrophil CD64 expression levels (P = 0.04, AUC 0.75). CONCLUSION: Monocyte HLA-DR and neutrophil CD64 expression in critically ill infants are related to age and infection.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA-DR/sangre , Monocitos/inmunología , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Receptores de IgG/sangre , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Área Bajo la Curva , Biomarcadores/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Calcitonina/sangre , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Precursores de Proteínas/sangre , Curva ROC , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/inmunología
10.
N Engl J Med ; 364(15): 1407-18, 2011 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21488763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance cultures were obtained from patients in all participating ICUs; the results were reported only to ICUs assigned to the intervention. In intervention ICUs, patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to care with contact precautions; all the other patients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cultures obtained at admission were reported to be negative. RESULTS: During a 6-month intervention period, there were 5434 admissions to 10 intervention ICUs, and 3705 admissions to 8 control ICUs. Patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to barrier precautions more frequently in intervention ICUs than in control ICUs (a median of 92% of ICU days with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU days with contact precautions in control ICUs, P<0.001). In intervention ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts with patients assigned to barrier precautions; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and hand hygiene after 62% of contacts. The mean (±SE) ICU-level incidence of events of colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE per 1000 patient-days at risk, adjusted for baseline incidence, did not differ significantly between the intervention and control ICUs (40.4±3.3 and 35.6±3.7 in the two groups, respectively; P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was not effective in reducing the transmission of MRSA or VRE, although the use of barrier precautions by providers was less than what was required. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; STAR*ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00100386.).


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/transmisión , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Guantes Protectores/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Vestimenta Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Community Health ; 39(6): 1231-40, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24859735

RESUMEN

Despite the fact infectious diseases can spread readily in grade schools, few studies have explored prevention in this setting. Additionally, we lack valid tools for students to self-report knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. As part of an ongoing study of a curriculum intervention to promote healthy behaviors, we developed and evaluated age-appropriate surveys to determine students' understanding of influenza prevention. Surveys were adapted from adolescent and adult influenza surveys and administered to students in grades 2-5 (ages 7-11) at two Rochester public schools. We assessed student understanding by analyzing percent repeatability of 20 survey questions and compared percent "don't know" (DK) responses across grades, gender, and race. Questions thought to be ambiguous after early survey administration were investigated in student focus groups, modified as appropriate, and reassessed. The response rate across all surveys was >87%. Survey questions were well understood; 16 of 20 questions demonstrated strong pre/post repeatability (>70%). Only 1 question showed an increase in DK response for higher grades (p < .0001). Statistical analysis and qualitative feedback led to modification of 3 survey questions and improved measures of understanding in the final survey administration. Grade-school students' knowledge, attitudes and behavior toward influenza prevention can be assessed using surveys. Quantitative and qualitative analysis may be used to assess participant understanding and refine survey development for pediatric survey instruments. These methods may be used to assess the repeatability and validity of surveys to assess the impact of health education interventions in young children.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Niño , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Minnesota , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo
12.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(2): ofad688, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390459

RESUMEN

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an urgent public health threat in the United States. Objective: Describe the clinical and molecular epidemiology of CRE in a multicenter pediatric cohort. Methods: CRACKLE-1 and CRACKLE-2 are prospective cohort studies with consecutive enrollment of hospitalized patients with CRE infection or colonization between 24 December 2011 and 31 August 2017. Patients younger than age 18 years and enrolled in the CRACKLE studies were included in this analysis. Clinical data were obtained from the electronic health record. Carbapenemase genes were detected using polymerase chain reaction and whole-genome sequencing. Results: Fifty-one children were identified at 18 healthcare system study sites representing all U.S. census regions. The median age was 8 months, with 67% younger than age 2 years. Median number of days from admission to culture collection was 11. Seventy-three percent of patients had required intensive care and 41% had a history of mechanical ventilation. More than half of children had no documented comorbidities (Q1, Q3 0, 2). Sixty-seven percent previously received antibiotics during their hospitalization. The most common species isolated were Enterobacter species (41%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (27%), and Escherichia coli (20%). Carbapenemase genes were detected in 29% of isolates tested, which was lower than previously described in adults from this cohort (61%). Thirty-four patients were empirically treated on the date of culture collection, but only 6 received an antibiotic to which the CRE isolate was confirmed susceptible in vitro. Thirty-day mortality was 13.7%. Conclusions: CRE infection or colonization in U.S. children was geographically widespread, predominantly affected children younger than age 2 years, associated with significant mortality, and less commonly caused by carbapenemase-producing strains than in adults.

13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2413955, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837160

RESUMEN

Importance: Pediatric consensus guidelines recommend antibiotic administration within 1 hour for septic shock and within 3 hours for sepsis without shock. Limited studies exist identifying a specific time past which delays in antibiotic administration are associated with worse outcomes. Objective: To determine a time point for antibiotic administration that is associated with increased risk of mortality among pediatric patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from 51 US children's hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes collaborative. Participants included patients aged 29 days to less than 18 years with sepsis recognized within 1 hour of emergency department arrival, from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. Piecewise regression was used to identify the inflection point for sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality, and logistic regression was used to evaluate odds of sepsis-attributable mortality after adjustment for potential confounders. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2024. Exposure: The number of minutes from emergency department arrival to antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality. Sepsis-attributable 30-day mortality was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 19 515 cases (median [IQR] age, 6 [2-12] years) were included. The median (IQR) time to antibiotic administration was 69 (47-116) minutes. The estimated time to antibiotic administration at which 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased was 330 minutes. Patients who received an antibiotic in less than 330 minutes (19 164 patients) had sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality of 0.5% (93 patients) and 30-day mortality of 0.9% (163 patients). Patients who received antibiotics at 330 minutes or later (351 patients) had 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality of 1.2% (4 patients), 30-day mortality of 2.0% (7 patients), and increased adjusted odds of mortality at both 3 days (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.20-9.93; P = .02) and 30 days (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.59-8.30; P = .002) compared with those who received antibiotics within 330 minutes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of pediatric patients with sepsis, 3-day and 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased with delays in antibiotic administration 330 minutes or longer from emergency department arrival. These findings are consistent with the literature demonstrating increased pediatric sepsis mortality associated with antibiotic administration delay. To guide the balance of appropriate resource allocation with time for adequate diagnostic evaluation, further research is needed into whether there are subpopulations, such as those with shock or bacteremia, that may benefit from earlier antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sepsis , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Preescolar , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Adolescente , Recién Nacido , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
14.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 13(3): 159-185, 2024 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since November 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created challenges for preventing and managing COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Most research to develop new therapeutic interventions or to repurpose existing ones has been undertaken in adults, and although most cases of infection in pediatric populations are mild, there have been many cases of critical and fatal infection. Understanding the risk factors for severe illness and the evidence for safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of therapies for COVID-19 in children is necessary to optimize therapy. METHODS: A panel of experts in pediatric infectious diseases, pediatric infectious diseases pharmacology, and pediatric intensive care medicine from 21 geographically diverse North American institutions was re-convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys and a systematic review with meta-analysis of data for risk factors, a guidance statement comprising a series of recommendations for risk stratification, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19 was developed and refined based on expert consensus. RESULTS: There are identifiable clinical characteristics that enable risk stratification for patients at risk for severe COVID-19. These risk factors can be used to guide the treatment of hospitalized and non-hospitalized children and adolescents with COVID-19 and to guide preventative therapy where options remain available.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2 , Consenso , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 56(10): 1401-6, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23408679

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasing, even in populations previously thought to be at low risk, including children. Most incidence studies have included only hospitalized patients and are thus potentially influenced by referral or hospitalization biases. METHODS: We performed a population-based study of CDI in pediatric residents (aged 0-18 years) of Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1991 through 2009 to assess the incidence, severity, treatment response, and outcomes of CDI. RESULTS: We identified 92 patients with CDI, with a median age of 2.3 years (range, 1 month-17.6 years). The majority of cases (75%) were community-acquired. The overall age- and sex-adjusted CDI incidence was 13.8 per 100 000 persons, which increased 12.5-fold, from 2.6 (1991-1997) to 32.6 per 100 000 (2004-2009), over the study period (P < .0001). The incidence of community-acquired CDI was 10.3 per 100 000 persons and increased 10.5-fold, from 2.2 (1991-1997) to 23.4 per 100 000 (2004-2009) (P < .0001). Severe, severe-complicated, and recurrent CDI occurred in 9%, 3%, and 20% of patients, respectively. The initial treatment in 82% of patients was metronidazole, and 18% experienced treatment failure. In contrast, the initial treatment in 8% of patients was vancomycin and none of them failed therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort, CDI incidence in children increased significantly from 1991 through 2009. Given that the majority of cases were community-acquired, estimates of the incidence of CDI that include only hospitalized children may significantly underestimate the burden of disease in children.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Lactante , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 71, 2013 Feb 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23383620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low absolute humidity (AH) has been associated with increased influenza virus survival and transmissibility and the onset of seasonal influenza outbreaks. Humidification of indoor environments may mitigate viral transmission and may be an important control strategy, particularly in schools where viral transmission is common and contributes to the spread of influenza in communities. However, the variability and predictors of AH in the indoor school environment and the feasibility of classroom humidification to levels that could decrease viral survival have not been studied. METHODS: Automated sensors were used to measure temperature, humidity and CO2 levels in two Minnesota grade schools without central humidification during two successive winters. Outdoor AH measurements were derived from the North American Land Data Assimilation System. Variability in indoor AH within classrooms, between classrooms in the same school, and between schools was assessed using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Predictors of indoor AH were examined using time-series Auto-Regressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity models. Classroom humidifiers were used when school was not in session to assess the feasibility of increasing indoor AH to levels associated with decreased influenza virus survival, as projected from previously published animal experiments. RESULTS: AH varied little within classrooms (CCC >0.90) but was more variable between classrooms in the same school (CCC 0.81 for School 1, 0.88 for School 2) and between schools (CCC 0.81). Indoor AH varied widely during the winter (range 2.60 to 10.34 millibars [mb]) and was strongly associated with changes in outdoor AH (p < 0.001). Changes in indoor AH on school weekdays were strongly associated with CO2 levels (p < 0.001). Over 4 hours, classroom humidifiers increased indoor AH by 4 mb, an increase sufficient to decrease projected 1-hour virus survival by an absolute value of 30% during winter months. CONCLUSIONS: During winter, indoor AH in non-humidified grade schools varies substantially and often to levels that are very low. Indoor results are predicted by outdoor AH over a season and CO2 levels (which likely reflects human activity) during individual school days. Classroom humidification may be a feasible approach to increase indoor AH to levels that may decrease influenza virus survival and transmission.


Asunto(s)
Humedad , Orthomyxoviridae/fisiología , Instituciones Académicas , Dióxido de Carbono , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Humanos , Estaciones del Año , Temperatura , Ventilación
19.
NEJM Evid ; 2(11): EVIDmr2300191, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320528

RESUMEN

A 7-Year-Old Boy with Fever and Dark UrineA 7-year-old boy with surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot presented for evaluation of fever and dark urine. How do you approach the evaluation, and what is the diagnosis?


Asunto(s)
Tetralogía de Fallot , Masculino , Humanos , Niño , Tetralogía de Fallot/diagnóstico , Fiebre
20.
Pediatrics ; 152(2)2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37435672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to improve utilization of a sepsis care bundle and decrease 3- and 30- day sepsis-attributable mortality, as well as determine which care elements of a sepsis bundle are associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: Children's Hospital Association formed a QI collaborative to Improve Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) (January 2017-March 2020 analyzed here). IPSO Suspected Sepsis (ISS) patients were those without organ dysfunction where the provider "intended to treat" sepsis. IPSO Critical Sepsis (ICS) patients approximated those with septic shock. Process (bundle adherence), outcome (mortality), and balancing measures were quantified over time using statistical process control. An original bundle (recognition method, fluid bolus < 20 min, antibiotics < 60 min) was retrospectively compared with varying bundle time-points, including a modified evidence-based care bundle, (recognition method, fluid bolus < 60 min, antibiotics < 180 min). We compared outcomes using Pearson χ-square and Kruskal Wallis tests and adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Reported are 24 518 ISS and 12 821 ICS cases from 40 children's hospitals (January 2017-March 2020). Modified bundle compliance demonstrated special cause variation (40.1% to 45.8% in ISS; 52.3% to 57.4% in ICS). The ISS cohort's 30-day, sepsis-attributable mortality dropped from 1.4% to 0.9%, a 35.7% relative reduction over time (P < .001). In the ICS cohort, compliance with the original bundle was not associated with a decrease in 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality, whereas compliance with the modified bundle decreased mortality from 4.75% to 2.4% (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Timely treatment of pediatric sepsis is associated with reduced mortality. A time-liberalized care bundle was associated with greater mortality reductions.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Adhesión a Directriz , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Antibacterianos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA