Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 260: 200-209, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Female surgeons are highly underrepresented in Asian countries, where prescriptive gender norms are widespread and more deeply embedded in societies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nationwide structured questionnaire was completed by 1741 Singaporean third- and fifth-year medical students after the completion of an 8-week general surgery rotation, during 2015-2017. Results were analyzed using mixed-effects hierarchical models which took into account clustering of survey responses under the teaching hospitals which students were posted to and medical students' year of study. RESULTS: Female medical students had a poorer perception of general surgery than male students (3.22 ± 0.91 versus 3.41 ± 0.89; P < 0.0001) before the clerkship. However, the clerkship improved female students' opinion to a greater extent than male students (+0.84 ± 1.06 versus +0.59 ± 1.03; P < 0.0001), resulting in female and male students having comparable attitudes toward surgery after the clerkship (4.06 ± 0.79 versus 4.00 ± 0.87; P = 0.2435). A total of 40.4% of female students responded that they were inspired to pursue a surgical career after the clerkship, and we identified 13 pedagogical traits of faculty and resident mentors which were associated with female students' career aspirations. Female students were more likely to consider intellectual challenges arising from cases (ratio: 1.045 [95% confidence interval 1.004-1.088, P = 0.0292]) and the presence of role models (ratio: 1.068 [95% confidence interval: 1.020-1.118, P = 0.0048]) as "pull" factors compared with their male contemporaries, but were deterred from a surgical career to a greater extent by eight "push" factors. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical clerkship itself could be regarded as an effective intervention for improving female medical students' enthusiasm for surgery, which may help to address the "pipeline problem" of few female students applying for surgical training after medical school. A greater emphasis on "pull factors" and pedagogical qualities of mentors could be used to improve the clerkship experience, to attract more female students to surgery.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Prácticas Clínicas , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Cirugía General/educación , Mentores/psicología , Médicos Mujeres , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Características Culturales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sexismo , Singapur , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Surg ; 220(6): 1549-1556, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32591071

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies in Caucasian populations suggest that interest among medical students in pursuing a surgical career is dwindling. We sought to investigate these trends and to evaluate the impact of resident teaching in a multiethnic Asian population. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2015 and 2017, 1780 Singaporean third- and fifth-year medical students completed a structured anonymized questionnaire following the completion of an 8-week general surgery rotation. Medical students' impressions of their faculty and resident mentors were analyzed using hierarchical multilevel mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Respondents' opinions of general surgery improved from 3.31 ± 0.91 points to 4.03 ± 0.83 points on a 5-point Likert scale (P < 0.0001). Medical students were more likely to regard their interaction with residents as a "pull" factor compared to their interaction with faculty members (74.7% vs 65.6%; P < 0.0001). Our analyses revealed 9 statistically-significant "pull" factors and 5 "push" factors which attract or deter Asian medical students from a career in surgery. Comparing the pedagogical qualities of resident and faculty mentors, we found that residents surpassed faculty mentors in 9 domains, had comparable appraisal scores on 3 domains, and fared worse than faculty on 8 domains. Importantly, residents fared better at promoting interest in a surgical career (P = 0.0006) and influencing the career aspirations of medical students (P < 0.0001) compared with faculty members. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest study from a Southeast Asian country providing representative sample numbers. With this knowledge of pull and push factors, the surgical clerkship can be improved by emphasizing pull factors and preparing students to cope with the push factors. Finally, our findings suggest that roping in residents as mentors to medical students may improve the pipeline of students interested in pursuing surgery after medical school.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Selección de Profesión , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Rol del Médico , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Diversidad Cultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Singapur , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA