Psychometrics of the Korean Version of the screen for adult anxiety related disorders (SCAARED).

BACKGROUND: For enhanced management of anxiety disorders, early screening and accurate diagnostic differentiation are essential. The Screen for Adult Anxiety Related Disorders (SCAARED) has been developed to identify and categorize anxiety disorders, thereby facilitating timely and appropriate interventions. In line with this, we aimed to translate and validate the Korean version of the SCAARED questionnaire for the Korean population. METHODS: The original SCAARED was translated into Korean and administered to community adult population (N = 119) ages 18-45 years old in South Korea. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SCAARED were evaluated. In addition, its factor structure was examined using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing SCAARED with the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS), the Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Test-retest reliability was evaluated one week after the first assessment. RESULTS: The SCAARED showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.945) and test-retest reliability (γ = 0.883). The SCAARED had significant correlation with DASS-21 subscales (γ = 0.655-0.701), BAI (γ = 0.788) and STAI subscales (γ = 0.548-0.736), confirming good concurrent validity. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis showed four factors comparable to the original SCAARED (Generalized anxiety, Somatic/Panic/Agoraphobia, Social anxiety, and Separation anxiety). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of total and each of the factor scores ranged from 0.724 to 0.942. CONCLUSIONS: The Korean version of the SCAARED is a reliable and valid instrument to screen for anxiety disorders in the Korean adult populations.

Validation of a Brief Internet-Based Self-Report Measure of Maladaptive Personality and Interpersonal Schema: Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Existing digital mental health interventions mainly focus on the symptoms of specific mental disorders, but do not focus on Maladaptive Personalities and Interpersonal Schemas (MPISs). As an initial step toward considering personalities and schemas in intervention programs, there is a need for the development of tools for measuring core personality traits and interpersonal schemas known to cause psychological discomfort among potential users of digital mental health interventions. Thus, the MPIS was developed. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to validate the MPIS by comparing 2 models of the MPIS factor structure and to understand the characteristics of the MPIS by assessing its correlations with other measures. METHODS: Data were collected from 234 participants who were using web-based community sites in South Korea, including university students, graduate students, working professionals, and homemakers. All the data were gathered through web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare a single-factor model with a 5-factor model. Reliability and correlation analyses with other scales were performed. RESULTS: The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-factor model (χ2550=1278.1; Tucker-Lewis index=0.80; comparative fit index=0.81; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.07) was more suitable than the single-factor model (χ2560=2341.5; Tucker-Lewis index=0.52; comparative fit index=0.54; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.11) for measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship patterns. The internal consistency of each factor of the MPIS was good (Cronbach α=.71-.88), and the correlations with existing measures were statistically significant. The MPIS is a validated 35-item tool for measuring 5 essential personality traits and interpersonal schemas in adults aged 18-39 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduced the MPIS, a concise and effective questionnaire capable of measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship schemas. Through analysis, the MPIS was shown to reliably assess these psychological constructs and validate them. Its web-based accessibility and reduced item count make it a valuable tool for mental health assessment. Future applications include its integration into digital mental health care services, allowing easy web-based administration and aiding in the classification of psychological therapy programs based on the obtained results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05952063; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05952063.

Morning glory disc anomaly-associated maculopathy: multimodal imaging.

Morning glory disc anomaly (MGDA) is most commonly found in white females in childhood with reduced vision. One in two cases have been reported to develop maculopathy or posterior pole retinal detachment as they grow older. The pathophysiology of MGDA-associated maculopathy is not well understood.We describe a 31-year-old black woman, who presented with gradual reduction of vision in the right eye due to MGDA-associated maculopathy. We identified morphological characteristics of the optic disc and macula with multicolour and optical coherence tomography imaging.We speculate that the centripetal inner retina traction and cerebrospinal fluid pressure fluctuation play an important role in inner retinal fluid accumulation in the pathology of retinoschisis in MGDA. Further studies will shed some light of a potential cause-and-effect relationship between MGDA and retinoschisis.