Red blood cell transfusion and outcome in cancer.

Oncology services utilize about 15% of the blood transfusion resources in the USA. Red blood cell transfusion is performed immediately before, during or after major surgery to compensate for blood loss and hemodilution. However, a lack of evidence-based guidelines leads to variable transfusion practices among clinicians. The benefits of transfusing blood products are obvious in life-threatening low blood cell counts or bleeding, but it is becoming apparent that deliberate blood transfusion in some cancer patients can trigger negative clinical impacts. This review attempts to provide an overview of the impact of red blood cell transfusion in patients suffering from various types of oncologic pathologies.

Reflections on multiple strategies to reduce transfusion in cancer patients: A joint narrative.

Transfusion of red blood cells, platelets and plasma is widely used in the management of anemia and coagulopathy in cancer patients undergoing surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The decision to transfuse should not be made lightly as exposure to transfused blood, whether from an allogeneic or even autologous source, is not without risk and the long-term effect of blood transfusion on cancer outcomes remains questionable. Recognition of anemia associated with nutritional deficiency should be promptly corrected while avoiding the use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Minimizing blood loss and the prompt control of bleeding, coupled with a restrictive transfusion strategy, seem to be a reasonable approach that does not appear to be associated with long-term sequelae. Limiting platelet transfusion to patients with severe hypo-proliferative thrombocytopenia, and implementation of local hemostatic measures, together with the use of fractionated coagulation factor concentrates, as an alternative to frozen plasma transfusion, may reduce the exposure of cancer patients to potentially harmful thrombogenic and pro-inflammatory cellular microparticles. This joint narrative highlights current opinions for minimizing blood usage in patients with cancer.

Predictive Factors of the Use of Systemic Therapy in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Who Gets Chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy improves survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). Although in a clinical trial setting, strict eligibility criteria are used for chemotherapy, little is known about the use of chemotherapy in the general population. The study aims to assess clinicopathological variables that correlate with the use of chemotherapy in patients with stage IV CRC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving patients with stage IV CRC, diagnosed between 1992 and 2005, in the province of Saskatchewan was carried out. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation of various clinicopathological factors with the use of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 1,237 eligible patients were identified. Their median age was 70 years (range: 22-98) and the male:female ratio was 1.3:1. 23.8% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of ≥2 and 61.8% of the patients had a comorbid illness. 46.8% of the patients received chemotherapy. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an age of <65 years [odds ratio (OR) 3.82, 95% CI: 2.59-5.63], metastasectomy (OR 3.60, 95% CI: 1.82-7.10), normal albumin (OR 3.26, 95% CI: 2.44-4.36), no comorbid illness (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.34-6.16), ECOG PS of <2 (OR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.94-3.82), normal blood urea nitrogen (OR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.40-3.59), palliative radiation (OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.38-2.99), primary tumor resection (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.47-2.73), and the time period (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.41-2.42) were significantly correlated with the use of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of chemotherapy appears to be increasing in stage IV CRC. Patients treated with curative intention or who underwent primary tumor resection were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Despite a known benefit of chemotherapy in elderly patients, a differential use of chemotherapy was noted in this population.

Advances in the management of colorectal cancer: from biology to treatment.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant neoplasm worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. This article reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and prognosis of CRC with special emphasis on advances in the management of CRC over the past decade. METHODS: A review of the published English literature was conducted using the search engines PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. A total of 127 relevant publications were identified for further review. RESULTS: Most CRC are sporadic and are due to genetic instability and multiple somatic mutations. Approximately 80% of cancers are diagnosed at the early stage and are curable. The pathologic stage at presentation is the most important predictor of outcome after resection of early stage cancer. Surgery is the primary treatment modality for localized CRC. Advances in (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation have reduced the disease recurrence and increased survival in high risk diseases. Although recent advancements in combination chemotherapy and target agents have increased the survival of incurable CRC, it is remarkable that only selected patients with advanced CRC can be cured with multimodality therapy. CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, there has seen substantial progress in our understanding of and in the management of CRC.

Outcomes of Rural Men with Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Population Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is rare in men. This population-based study aimed to determine outcomes of male breast cancer in relation to residence and other variables. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, men diagnosed with breast cancer in Saskatchewan during 2000-2019 were evaluated. Cox proportional multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between survival and clinicopathological and contextual factors. RESULTS: One hundred-eight eligible patients with a median age of 69 years were identified. Of them, 16% had WHO performance status ≥ 2 and 61% were rural residents. The stage at diagnosis was as follows: stage 0, 7%; I, 31%; II, 42%; III, 11%; IV, 8%. Ninety-eight percent had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The median disease-free survival of urban patients was 97 (95% CI: 50-143) vs. 64 (46-82) months of rural patients (p = 0.29). The median OS of urban patients was 127 (94-159) vs. 93 (32-153) months for rural patients (p = 0.27). On multivariable analysis, performance status ≥ 2, hazard ratio (HR) 2.82 (1.14-6.94), lack of adjuvant systemic therapy, HR 2.47 (1.03-5.92), and node-positive disease, HR 2.32 (1.22-4.40) were significantly correlated with inferior disease-free survival in early-stage invasive breast cancer. Whereas stage IV disease, HR 7.8 (3.1-19.5), performance status ≥ 2, HR 3.25 (1.57-6.71), and age ≥ 65 years, HR 2.37 (1.13-5.0) were correlated with inferior overall survival in all stages. CONCLUSIONS: Although residence was not significantly correlated with outcomes, rural men had numerically inferior survival. Poor performance status, node-positive disease, and lack of adjuvant systemic therapy were correlated with inferior disease-free survival.

Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Telemedicine in Cancer Care in Saskatchewan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Telemedicine is a useful tool that connects patients to their care team remotely and improves access to medical care for rural residents. This study aimed to determine the telemedicine experience of both rural patients with cancer and their physicians, and to explore factors associated with a positive patient experience. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, cancer patients and physicians in Saskatchewan completed a paper-based survey composed of 32 items or an electronic survey of 18 items, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess patient satisfaction in relation to various sociodemographic and cancer-related factors. Results: Overall, 25 physicians and 165 patients participated in the study. Among the physicians, 94% were confident in their telemedicine assessment, 58% agreed that telemedicine improved clinical efficiency, and 73% agreed that doctor−patient rapport was unimpaired with telemedicine. Of 165 patients, 61% had used telemedicine for the first time, 81% felt that their needs were met, 83% were satisfied with the quality of their care, and 88% had a positive experience. Overall, 83% patients vs. 45% physicians preferred telemedicine to a face-to-face clinic visit (p = 0.005). On univariate analysis, patients ≥ 65 years old had a greater positive telemedicine experience compared to patients < 65 years old (odds ratio 4.1 [1.2−13.8], p = 0.02). Conclusion: Both patients and physicians have a high rate of positive experiences with telemedicine. However, patients have a higher preference for telemedicine over face-to-face visits compared to physicians. In addition, elderly patients have more positive telemedicine experiences compared to younger patients.

Evolving landscape of first-line combination therapy in advanced renal cancer: a systematic review.

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy with approximately 30% of cases diagnosed at the advanced or metastatic stage. While single-agent vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy has been a mainstay of treatment, data from multiple phase III trials assessing first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations have demonstrated a significant survival benefit. Methods: A systematic search of the published and presented literature was performed to identify phase III trials assessing ICI combination regimens in RCC using search terms 'immune checkpoint inhibitors' AND 'renal cell carcinoma,' AND 'advanced'. Results: Six phase III trials showed significant benefits for ICI combinations compared with sunitinib. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab significantly improved overall survival [OS; median, 47.0 versus 26.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-0.81, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS; median 11.6 versus 8.3 months, HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61-0.87, p = 0.0004) in International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate and poor-risk patients. OS was also significantly improved for ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations regardless of risk, including pembrolizumab plus either axitinib (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.60-0.88, p < 0.001) or lenvatinib (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49-0.88, p = 0.005) and nivolumab plus cabozantinib (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.50-0.87, p = 0.003). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: Phase III first-line trials of ICI combinations showed survival benefits compared with a control arm of sunitinib. Global access to these combinations should be made available to patients with advanced RCC.

Preservation of quality of life in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with tucatinib or placebo when added to trastuzumab and capecitabine (HER2CLIMB trial).

AIMS: In HER2CLIMB, tucatinib significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the impact of tucatinib on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in HER2CLIMB. METHODS: Patients were randomised 2:1 to tucatinib or placebo combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Starting with protocol version 7, the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) were administered at day 1 of cycle 1, every two cycles during cycles 3-9, every three cycles during cycle 12 and thereafter and at each patient's 30-day follow-up visit. RESULTS: Among 364 patients eligible for HR-QoL assessment, 331 (91%) completed ≥1 assessment. EQ-VAS scores were similar for both arms at baseline and maintained throughout treatment. EQ-5D-5L scores were similar between the treatment arms, stable throughout therapy and worsened after discontinuing treatment. Risk of meaningful deterioration (≥7 points) on EQ-VAS was reduced 19% in the tucatinib vs. placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.18); the median (95% CI) time to deterioration was not reached in the tucatinib arm and was 5.8 months (4.3, -) in the placebo arm. Among patients with brain metastases (n = 164), risk of meaningful deterioration on EQ-VAS was reduced 49% in the tucatinib arm (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.93); the median (95% CI) time to deterioration was not reached in the tucatinib arm and was 5.5 months (4.2, -) in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: HR-QoL was preserved for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who were treated with tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine and maintained longer with tucatinib therapy than without it among those with brain metastases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02614794.

Activating AKT1 and PIK3CA Mutations in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in AKT1 and PIK3CA are undercharacterised in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but are linked to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling and sensitivity to pathway inhibitors in other cancers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, genomic context, and clinical associations of AKT1/PIK3CA activating mutations in mCRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed targeted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing data from 599 metastatic prostate cancer patients with circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) content above 2%. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In patients with AKT1/PIK3CA mutations, cfDNA was subjected to PTEN intron sequencing and matched diagnostic tumour tissue was analysed when possible. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the patients, 6.0% (36/599) harboured somatic clonal activating mutation(s) in AKT1 or PIK3CA. Mutant allele-specific imbalance was common. Clonal mutations in mCRPC ctDNA were typically detected in pretreatment primary tissue and were consistent across serial ctDNA collections. AKT1/PIK3CA-mutant mCRPC had fewer androgen receptor (AR) gene copies than AKT1/PIK3CA wild-type mCRPC (median 4.7 vs 10.3, p = 0.003). AKT1 mutations were mutually exclusive with PTEN alterations. Patients with and without AKT1/PIK3CA mutations showed similar clinical outcomes with standard of care treatments. A heavily pretreated mCRPC patient with an AKT1 mutation experienced a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen with Akt inhibitor (ipatasertib) monotherapy. Ipatasertib also had a marked antitumour effect in a patient-derived xenograft harbouring an AKT1 mutation. Limitations include the inability to assess AKT1/PIK3CA correlatives in ctDNA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: AKT1/PIK3CA activating mutations are relatively common and delineate a distinct mCRPC molecular subtype with low-level AR copy gain. Clonal prevalence and evidence of mutant allele selection propose PI3K pathway dependency in selected patients. The use of cfDNA screening enables prospective clinical trials to test PI3K pathway inhibitors in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY: Of advanced prostate cancer cases, 6% have activating mutations in the genes AKT1 or PIK3CA. These mutations can be identified using a blood test and may help select patients suitable for clinical trials of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors.

Effects of Social and Contextual Factors Including Marital Status and Children on the Use of Palliative Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that social and contextual factors such as living alone are associated with outcomes in cancer patients. However, little is known about their influence on the use of palliative chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we examined social and contextual factors, including marital status, having children, and distance to a cancer center, for their association with the use of chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. METHODS: A cohort of patients with mCRC diagnosed from 2006 to 2010 in Saskatchewan was evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the variables and use of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 569 patients, 326 (57%) received chemotherapy significant differences were noted between the chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy groups with respect to age (62 vs. 76 y), poor performance status (18% vs. 58%), comorbid illness (24% vs. 63%), low albumin (61% vs. 89%), anemia (61% vs. 87%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (53% vs. 84%), elevated creatinine (6% vs. 11%), hyponatremia (20% vs. 14%), primary tumor resection (61% vs. 47%), metastasectomy (21% vs. 9%), mean distance to cancer center (98.7±113.6 vs. 127.8±124.6 km), married/partnered (67% vs. 33%), and having children (64% vs. 36%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, low performance status (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-8.1), not having children (OR, 3.3; 95% CI: 1.78-6.2), hyponatremia (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.6-5.1), elevated alkaline phosphatase (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.8-4.8), and low albumin (OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2-3.8) were correlated with low rates of chemotherapy use. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the use of chemotherapy in patients with mCRC significantly varies between those with and without children.

Travel distance and use of salvage palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Salvage palliative chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer has been associated with significant improvement in survival. However, not all patients receive all available therapies. Travel burden can affect patient access and use of future therapy. The present study aims to determine relationship between travel distance (TD) and salvage palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHOD: A patient cohort diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer during 2006-2010 in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada was studied. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess relationship between travel distance and subsequent line therapies. RESULTS: The median age of 264 eligible patients was 62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 53-72]. The patients who received salvage systemic therapy had a median distance to travel of 60.0 km (IQR: 4.7-144) compared with 88.1 km (IQR: 4.8-189) if they did not receive second- or third-line therapy (P=0.06). In multivariate analysis distance to the cancer center <100 km, odds ratio (OR) 1.69 (95% CI: 1.003-2.84), no metastasectomy, OR 1.89 (95% CI: 1.03-3.46), and absence of comorbid illness as per Charlson comorbid index, OR 1.45 (95% CI: 1.19-1.77) were correlated with the use of second- and subsequent line therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Our result revealed that travel distance to the cancer center greater than 100 km was associated less frequent use of second or subsequent line therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Primary Tumor Location and Survival in the General Population With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence from clinical trials suggests that primary tumor location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer correlates with differential outcomes, and patients with tumors originating in the right side of the colon have inferior survival. We conducted a large population-based cohort study using individual patient data to confirm the prognostic importance of primary tumor location in the general population with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: A cohort of 1947 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer from 1992 to 2010 was studied. Ascending and transverse colon cancers were defined as right-sided tumors. Cox proportional multivariate analyses were done to determine prognostic significance of primary tumor location. RESULTS: The median age was 70 years (interquartile range, 60-78 years), and the male to female ratio was 1.3:1. Twenty-nine percent had World Health Organization performance status of > 1. Seven-hundred and seventy (39%) patients had right-sided tumors, and 908 (47%) received chemotherapy. The median overall survival of patients with right-sided tumors was 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.7-15.3 months) compared with 20.5 months (95% CI, 18.5-22.5 months) of patients with left-sided tumors (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, right-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20-1.60), no metastasectomy (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.90-2.90), intact primary tumor (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.32-1.90), an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30-1.90), lack of combination chemotherapy (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80), stage IVb disease (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17-1.86), leukocytosis (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.73), and World Health Organization performance status > 1 (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.55) were correlated with inferior survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer and right-sided tumors who received chemotherapy have inferior survival independent of other known prognostic variables. Future studies are required to understand the underlying pathophysiology.

Outcomes and Drug Costs of Sunitinib Regimens for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Provincial Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Conventional sunitinib dosing in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) administers 50 mg daily on a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off (4/2) schedule. Not all patients tolerate this regimen and many undergo modifications to schedule, dose, or both. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib by the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency between January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2013, were included. Regimens were categorized as standard intermittent dosing (SID), modified intermittent schedule (MIS), modified intermittent dosing (MID), combination of modified schedule and dosing (MSD), or continuous dosing (CD). The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), discontinuation due to adverse effects (AE), and medication cost. RESULTS: Among 161 patients, 18.0%, 51.6%, and 30.4% had favorable, intermediate, and poor Heng risk prognoses, respectively. A total of 140 (87.0%) received sunitinib as first-line therapy. MID was associated with longer OS compared with SID (estimated median 28.4 vs. 11.2 months). PFS was longer for MID, MSD, and CD compared with SID (estimated median 12.0, 9.0, and 8.0 months vs. 3.0 months, respectively). Adjustment for potential confounders did not negate these associations. SID also had higher average monthly drug costs than MIS, MID, and MSD. Overall discontinuation rate due to AE was high (24%). CONCLUSION: An adjusted-dose sunitinib regimen is associated with improved OS and PFS over SID, with lower costs. The development of toxicities requiring dose reductions serves as a predictive biomarker for better outcomes.

Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Confirmatory Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have suggested that patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumor (SRPT) have better survival. Yet the results are not confirmed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Lack of randomization and failure to control prognostic variables such as performance status are major critiques to the findings of the observational studies. We previously have shown that SRPT, independent of chemotherapy and performance status, improves survival of stage IV CRC patients. The current study aims to validate our findings in patients with stage IV CRC who were diagnosed during the period of modern chemotherapy. METHODS: A cohort of 569 patients with stage IV CRC diagnosed during 2006-2010 in the province of Saskatchewan was evaluated. Cox regression model was used for the adjustment of prognostic variables. RESULTS: Median age was 69 years (59-95) and M: F was 1.4:1. Fifty-seven percent received chemotherapy, 91.4% received FOLFIRI or FOLFOX & 67% received a biologic agent. Median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SRPT and received chemotherapy was 27 months compared with 14 months of the non-resection group (p<0.0001). Median OS of patients who received all active agents and had SRPT was 39 months (95%CI: 25.1-52.9). On multivariate analysis, SRPT, hazard ratio (HR):0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56), use of chemotherapy, HR: 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.43), metastasectomy, HR: 0.43 (95%CI: 0.31-0.58), second line therapy, HR: 0.50 (95%CI: 0.35-0.70), and third line therapy, HR: 0.58 (95%CI: 0.41-0.83) were correlated with superior survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms our findings and supports a favorable association between SRPT and survival in patients with stage IV CRC who are treated with modern therapy.

Genetic Confirmation of Mungbean (Vigna radiata) and Mashbean (Vigna mungo) Interspecific Recombinants using Molecular Markers.

Molecular confirmation of interspecific recombinants is essential to overcome the issues like self-pollination, environmental influence, and inadequacy of morphological characteristics during interspecific hybridization. The present study was conducted for genetic confirmation of mungbean (female) and mashbean (male) interspecific crosses using molecular markers. Initially, polymorphic random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), universal rice primers (URP), and simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers differentiating parent genotypes were identified. Recombination in hybrids was confirmed using these polymorphic DNA markers. The NM 2006 × Mash 88 was most successful interspecific cross. Most of true recombinants confirmed by molecular markers were from this cross combination. SSR markers were efficient in detecting genetic variability and recombination with reference to specific chromosomes and particular loci. SSR (RIS) and RAPD identified variability dispersed throughout the genome. In conclusion, DNA based marker assisted selection (MAS) efficiently confirmed the interspecific recombinants. The results provided evidence that MAS can enhance the authenticity of selection in mungbean improvement program.

Duplication Cyst Presenting as Hydrocoele in a Child.

Enteric duplication cyst can occur anywhere in Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT), from oropharynx to rectum. Their presentation depends upon the portion of GIT involved. The most common site of GIT involved is small intestine, in 50% of cases. Small intestinal duplication cyst usually present with abdominal pain or mass and rarely as intussusception, volvulus or small bowel obstruction. It may also present very rarely as inguinal hernia of which only 2 cases have been reported yet. We report a 3 years child presenting as hydrocoele of the cord which turned to be duplication cyst which is very rare presentation.

CT-planned accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy in the radical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgery is the standard treatment for stage I, II and certain stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). A proportion of patients with technically operable NSCLC do not undergo surgery because of significant co-morbidity or refusal, and radical radiotherapy may cure some of these patients. Between April 1997 and March 2000, 135 consecutive patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC were treated with CT-planned accelerated hypofractionated radical radiotherapy to a dose of 50-55Gy in 15-20 fractions over 3-4 weeks at a single centre. The 2-year overall and cause-specific survival for all patients was 44.4% (95% CI = 36.8, 53.7) and 47.8% (95% CI = 39.9, 57.3) respectively. Overall median survival was 21 months (95% 18, 28). There were no reports of severe acute or late treatment-related toxicities. These results compare favourably with previously published studies on radical radiotherapy in NSCLC, suggesting this may be an effective and safe technique.

Recoverable hearing loss with amphetamines and other drugs.

Prolonged and sustained consumption of alcohol, heroin and volatiles had been reported to impair hearing. Amphetamine related hearing loss is clinically different from the hearing loss seen with other agents. It seems that illicit drug use could result in two clinically different types of hearing losses. In May and June of 2001, 183 men aged 18 and above who met DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence were studied in a hospital in Saudia Arabia. The purpose of the study was to ascertain the prevalence of amphetamine-related recoverable hearing loss, establish whether similar hearing loss also occurred with other drugs of abuse and determine if drug-related psychosis was more prevalent in those amphetamine users who developed this type of hearing loss. Recoverable type of hearing loss was not just seen in amphetamine users but also occurred with cannabis, heroin, alcohol, dextromethorphan and glue use. Drug-induced psychosis was three and a half times more common in those amphetamine users who developed a hearing loss. Major depression and suicidality was also more common in these individuals. This association of major depression and subsequent development of hearing loss was also found in those using other type of drugs. It was concluded that a history of major depression was a good predictor of later development of both drug-induced psychosis and hearing loss in amphetamine users, and hypoperfusion was proposed as the possible explanation.

Hearing loss in amphetamine users.

Sensory perceptions are modified by amphetamines. Prolonged and heavy use can lead to neuronal damage, neurotransmitter depletion and receptor supersensitivity. Sensorineural deafness had been reported in chronic users of volatile inhalants, alcohol and heroin. There are no reports of hearing problems with amphetamines. Hearing loss was identified in seven amphetamine-dependent inpatients in the detox unit at Al Amal Hospital, Jeddah. Subjects were men aged 18 and over who met DSM IV criteria for substance dependence. The hearing loss was suspected on clinical grounds during the admission interview, and was quite noticeable. Both ears were similarly affected. The symptom mostly appeared three to eight hours after ingestion of the tablets, and did not develop every time the drug was used. Hearing was apparently recovered in every case within four to ten days of cessation of amphetamine use. During the hearing loss, sounds were perceived as less loud and less sharp compared to normal. These cases suggest that chronic amphetamine use may result in reversible hearing loss. The various mechanisms by which this might occur are discussed. The author concludes that these observations should be replicated with a large group of subjects and recommends further investigations to elucidate the nature and site of the damage.