RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Oxaliplatin is an anticancer drug used primarily for cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, and oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reaction is a rare but serious side effect. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 280 patients who developed oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions and 476 patients who did not. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis indicated that a history of allergy (odds ratio (OR) = 2.232, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.209, 4.119), P = .010), previous oxaliplatin exposure (OR = 8.081, 95% CI (3.024, 21.593), P < .001), and chemotherapy regimen (OR = 2.148, 95% CI (1.411, 3.271), P < .001) were risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. These reactions averaged 7.29 ± 2.78 (median 7, 1-16) cycles, with a mean cumulative dose of 589.53 ± 274.43â mg. Grade 2 oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions were the most common, occurring in 197 patients (70.4%), followed by grade 3 reactions in 68 patients (24.3%), and grade 4 reactions in 9 patients (3.2%). The most common symptom of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions was itching (211 patients, 75.4%), followed by facial flushing (133 patients, 47.5%), and chest discomfort (77 patients, 27.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a history of allergy to previous oxaliplatin exposure and chemotherapy regimens as risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. Healthcare providers should be aware of the risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions and carefully monitor patients receiving oxaliplatin.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the most highly prescribed drugs in the world for the treatment of pain, inflammation, and fever, are associated with gastric mucosal damages including ulcer directly or indirectly. This study was aimed to document the preventive effects of an organosulfur constituent of garlic, S-allyl cysteine (SAC), against NSAIDs-induced gastric damages, as well the elucidation of its pharmacological actions, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and cytoprotective actions. METHODS: Different doses of SAC were administrated intragastrically before the indomethacin administration. After killing, in addition to gross and pathological evaluations of ulcer, the expressions of inflammatory mediators, including cyclooxygenase-2, prostaglandin E2 , IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and anti-oxidant capacity, were analyzed by Western blot analysis or ELISA, respectively. Transferase deoxytidyl uridine end labeling assay, periodic acid and Schiff staining, F4/80 staining, and CD31 staining were compared among doses of SAC. Detailed documentation of in vitro biological actions of SAC, including NF-κB, histone deacetylator inhibition, phase 2 enzyme, and MAPKs, was performed. RESULTS: SAC was very effective in preventing indomethacin-induced gastric damages in a low dose through significant decreases in macrophage infiltration as well as restorative action. Indomethacin-induced expressions of inflammatory mediators were all significantly attenuated with SAC in accordance with histone deacetylator inhibition. In addition, SAC significantly increased the total anti-oxidant concentration and mucus secretion, and allows for a significant induction of HO-1. However, these preventive effects of SAC were dependent on dosage of SAC; higher dose above 10 µM paradoxically aggravated NSAID-induced inflammation. CONCLUSION: Synthetic SAC can be promising therapeutics agent to provide potent anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and mucosa protective effects against NSAID-induced damages.