Tracheal Resection after Previous Treatment Provides Comparable Outcome to Primary Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal and laryngotracheal surgery provides both excellent functional results and long-term outcomes in the treatment of tracheal stenosis. Consequently, challenging re-resections are rarely necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of (laryngo-)tracheal re-resection and surgery after bronchoscopic interventions with that of primary surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing resection for benign tracheal stenosis at our center between 1/2016 and 4/2020 were included. Perioperative characteristics and functional outcomes of patients were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients who underwent (laryngo-)tracheal resection were included (previous resection [A = 6], previous stent [B = 6], previous bronchoscopic intervention w/o stenting [C = 19], untreated [D = 35]). Baseline parameters were largely comparable between groups with exception from group B that had significantly worse lung function. Group A necessitated more complex reconstructions (end-to-end: n = 1: 17%| cricotracheal n = 2: 33%| cricotracheal with mucosectomy n = 2: 33%| laryngoplasty: n = 1: 17%) than patients in group D (end-to-end n = 21: 60%| cricotracheal n = 14: 40%). Postoperative outcomes were comparable throughout groups (intensive care unit: 1[1-18] days; hospital stay: 8[5-71] days). Anastomotic complications were higher after previous stenting (A: 0%; B: 33.3%; C: 10.5%; D: 2.9%; B/D p = 0.008| surgical revisions: A: 16.7%; B: 33.3%; C: 0%; D: 5.7%; B/D, p = 0.035). Overall, postoperative lung function was significantly better (forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 63% ± 24 vs. 75% ± 20; p = 0.001 | PeakEF 3.3 ± 1.9 vs. 5.0 ± 2.2L; p = 0.001). No 90-day mortality was observed in any group. Median follow-up was 12(1-47) months. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients treated in a specialized center, tracheal or laryngotracheal resection after previous tracheal interventions provides comparable outcome to primary surgery.

Effectiveness of Robotic Lobectomy-Outcome and Learning Curve in a High Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has been developed as a sophisticated tool to expand possibilities in minimal invasive surgery. The learning curve for this method is short in various surgical fields; however, limited data exist on the learning curve in robotic thoracic surgery. METHODS: This study analyzes a single center experience of robotic lobectomies using a prospectively kept database. Perioperative data and outcome of patients during the learning curve were compared with patients operated with increased institutional experience. The learning curve was defined as the initial 20 lobectomies. RESULTS: Sixty-four robotic lobectomies were performed between January 2014 and February 2017. Indications, preoperative lung functions, comorbidities, patient age, and tumor stage were comparable between patients operated during the learning curve and thereafter. The mean operative time could be significantly reduced after the learning curve (286 ± 86 vs. 211 ± 62 minutes; p = 0.0003). The conversion rate dropped from 4 of 20 (20%) during the learning curve to 2 of 44 (4.5%, p = 0.07) thereafter. Chest tube duration (4.3 ± 2.9 vs. 3.8 ± 2.1 days) and hospital stay (8.3 ± 3.4 vs. 7.9 ± 4.5 days) were not different in the two phases. The number of resected lymph nodes increased from 11.2 ± 6.8 to 13.9 ± 6.5 (p = 0.0797). Lymph node upstaging was achieved in 8 (12.9%) cases. Ninety-day mortality was 0%, and 2-year overall survival was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic thoracic surgery can be safely performed and trained with low complication rates and contributes to the extension of minimal invasive thoracic surgery. The initial learning curve in our experience is overcome after 20 cases. However, to become proficient in more advanced procedures and to further reduce operative time, additional training is required. Prospective studies are required to clearly determine the role of robotic surgery in comparison to the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures.

Independent Predictors for Higher Postoperative Pain Intensity During Recovery After Open Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis in 621 Patients.

Objective: To evaluate two standard procedure-specific pain regimens and to assess independent predictors for higher pain intensity after thoracic surgery. Methods: Patients received either oral opioid analgesia (Opioid Group) or epidural analgesia and were then bridged to systemic opioid analgesia (EDA + O Group) in this retrospective observational study. Medical history, discharge letters, anesthetic protocols, and pain protocols were evaluated in 621 patients after open thoracotomy and assessed with a stepward back elimination in a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Data of 621 thoracotomies in 2014 were analyzed, 309 patients in the Opioid Group and 312 patients in the EDA + O Group. Pain scores at rest and on coughing were significantly lower in the EDA + O Group on postoperative days (PODs) 1-4 (P < 0.001). Stepwise backward elimination in multivariate logistic regression identified preexisting pain disease (P = 0.034), no epidural analgesia (P < 0.001), opioids in preoperative pain therapy (P < 0.001), and antidepressant medication (P = 0.003) as independent risk factors for higher pain intensity at rest on PODs 1-4. Same on PODs 5-8 with regard to opioids in preoperative pain therapy (P < 0.001) and antidepressant medication (P = 0.018). Moreover, on PODs 5-8, male gender had a lower risk (P < 0.003) for pain, and preexisting musculosceletal disease had a lower risk for more postoperative pain (P = 0.009). On coughing, male gender and younger age proved to have a lower risk for postoperative pain on PODs 1-8 and on PODs 1-4, respectively. Opioids in preexisting pain therapy and antidepressant medication were identified as risk factors for pain on PODs 1-8 on coughing, and pain disease was identified as a risk factor for more pain on PODs 1-4 (P = 0.041). Moreover, preexisting cardiac disease indicated more pain on PODs 1-4 (P = 0.05), and musculoskeletal disease and neurological disease indicated more pain on PODs 5-8 (P = 0.041, and P = 0.023). Conclusions: We present data on independent risk factors for higher pain intensity during recovery after thoracotomy. The lack of postoperative epidural analgesia, female gender, preexisting opioid pain therapy, and chronic pain are the strongest risk factors for higher pain intensity. Antidepressant medication was identified as an independent risk factor at rest and on coughing on all PODs. Study limitations: The study design is retrospective.

Same-day Routine Chest-X Ray After Thoracic Surgery is Not Necessary!

INTRODUCTION: Performing a routine postoperative chest X-ray (CXR) after general thoracic surgery is daily practice in many thoracic surgery departments. The quality, frequency of pathological findings and the clinical consequences have not been well evaluated. Furthermore, exposure to ionising radiation should be restricted to a minimum and therefore routine practice can be questioned. METHODS: As a hospital standard, each patient was given a routine CXR after opening of the pleura and inserting a chest tube. From October 2015 to March 2016, each postoperative patient with a routine CXR was included in a prospective database, including film quality, pathological findings, clinical and laboratory results and cardiorespiratory monitoring, as well as clinical consequences. RESULTS: 546 patients were included. Risk factors for postoperative complications were obesity in 50 patients (9.2%), emphysema in 127 patients (23.3%), coagulopathy in 34 patients (6.2%), longer operation time (more than two hours) in 242 patients (44.3%) and previous lung irradiation in 29 (5.3%) of patients. Major lung resections were performed in 191 patients (35.9%). 263 (48.2%) patients had procedures with minimally invasive access. The quality of the X-ray film was insufficient in 8.2% of patients. 90 (16.5%) of CXRs were found to show pathological findings, with a trend for more pathological findings after open surgery (55/283; 19.4%) compared to minimally invasive surgery (35/263; 13.3%) (p = 0.064). 11 (2.0%) patients needed a surgical or clinical intervention during postoperative observation; this corresponds to 12.2% of patients with a pathological finding on CXR. Nine of these 11 patients were clinically symptomatic and only two (0.37%) patients were asymptomatic with a relevant pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Our study cannot support routine postoperative CXR after general thoracic procedures and we believe that restriction to clinically symptomatic cases should be a safe option.

Robotic thoracic surgery results in shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative pain compared to open thoracotomy: a matched pairs analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate postoperative pain intensity and length of hospital stay after open or robotic thoracic surgery in a standardized postoperative pain therapy setting. METHODS: In the present retrospective (oberservation period: January 2015 until January 2016) study we matched data of 38 patients with robotic thoracic surgery ("robotic patients"; age: 62.2 years, male gender: 42.1%) with 38 patients with open thoracic surgery ("open patients"; age: 62.5 years, male gender: 42.1%). Power analysis indicated that 36 patients per group would be required. RESULTS: 68% of all patients received an epidural catheter, and 32% a systemic opioid based analgesia. Postoperative pain intensity in "robotic patients" was lower at rest on postoperative day 3-5 compared to "open patients" (NRS POD 3 robotic surgery 0.5±1.0 vs. open surgery 1.0±1.6, p = 0.04; NRS POD 4 robotic surgery 0,5 ± 1.0 vs. open surgery 1.1±1.3, p=0.04; NRS POD 5 robotic surgery 0.7 ± 1.0 vs. open surgery 1.5±1.5, p=0.003). Chest tube duration was shorter in "robotic patients" (2.9 ± 2.0 days vs. 4.9 ± 2.2 days; p < 0.001). Moreover, length of hospital stay was shorter in "robotic patients" than in "open patients" (6.9 days vs. 8.0 days; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in postoperative opioid consumption between the groups. Nearly 95% of patients were discharged home with an oral opioid in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients after robotic pulmonary resection experience lower postoperative pain and are discharged earlier from hospital than patients after open thoracic surgery. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The study design is retrospectively.

The Influence of Type of Anesthesia, Perioperative Pain, and Preoperative Health Status on Chronic Pain Six Months After Thoracotomy-A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPP) has a high incidence. However, less is known about risk factors and the influence of different analgesia therapies. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients either received standardized epidural analgesia or began an oral analgesic protocol with controlled-release oxycodone immediately postoperatively. Patients answered a baseline questionnaire on the day before surgery and a follow-up questionnaire six months postoperatively. The questionnaire included Short-Form 12, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, and descriptive questions for CPP. Pain protocols of all patients were examined. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors related to CPP. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled; data of 131 patients were available after the six-month follow-up period. Fifty-one patients (39%) had CPP six months postoperatively. Of these, more than 80% had impaired daily activity or ability to work, or reported sleeping disturbance due to CPP. The strongest predictive factors for the development of CPP were: thoracic pain for three months preoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69-7.40, P = 0.001), thoracic pain for 12 months preoperatively (OR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.28-5.83, P = 0.009), and higher pain scores at rest in the first five postoperative days compared with patients without CPP (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.24-2.57, P = 0.002). Neuropathic pain was present in 4.8% of patients. Patients with CPP had a reduced physical (P = 0.005) and mental health status (P = 0.03) six months after surgery compared with patients without CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative thoracic pain and higher pain scores in the first five postoperative days seem to be the strongest risk factors for the development of CPP. CPP patients reported poorer mental and physical health before and six months after surgery.

Short- and Mid-Term Changes in Lung Function after Bilateral Pulmonary Metastasectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The resection of pulmonary metastases is associated with a loss of lung function. The amount of functional impairment after bilateral metastasectomy remains unclear. Because only around 35% of those patients may expect long-term survival, it is important to preserve enough pulmonary function for an adequate quality of life. This analysis of 31 bilaterally operated patients was performed to describe the amount of pulmonary function loss. METHODS: This is a post-hoc subanalysis and comparison of a population that was published before. All pulmonary metastasectomies were performed through an anteroaxillary thoracotomy in all patients. Resections were performed with staplers, electrocautery, or laser. All patients had pulmonary function tests (PFTs) preoperative and after 3 months at the follow-up visit, including spirometry, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) and blood gases. Of the 31 bilaterally operated cases, 15 had additional PFTs after each staged operation before discharge from hospital. RESULTS: Altogether, 271 nodules (median 7, mean 8.2) were removed from the 31 patients with a lobectomy in 2, a segmentectomy in 8, and multiple wedge resections in 21 patients, with this being the largest resection. The mean loss of pulmonary function at follow-up visit was forced vital capacity (FVC) - 15.2%, total lung capacity (TLC) - 13.8%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) - 16.3%, and Dlco - 10.3%, all of which were significant (p = < 0.001). The 15 patients with PFTs after each operation showed a stepwise decrease of volume parameters and Dlco with deepest values after the second surgery of around - -40% from preoperative values. At this time, Po 2 was also significantly reduced by 10 mm Hg (p = 0.01). Comparing the bilateral group with 86 patients after unilateral metastasectomy, we found significantly more nodules removed in the bilateral group (8.2 vs. 3.1; p < 0.001) and that the loss of volume parameters was twice that of the unilateral group after metastasectomy. Dlco impairment did not differ between the groups (- 10.3 vs. - 9.5%; p = 0.868) after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Midterm pulmonary function impairment after bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy is 15% of spirometry values and 10% of Dlco. Reduction of spirometry values is almost twice compared with the group after unilateral surgery. Early functional loss after the second intervention causes FVC, TLC, and FEV1 reduction of around 40% and is associated with lower Po 2 (- 10 mm Hg). Therefore, bilateral metastasectomy can be offered to patients who do not have greater pulmonary limitations.

[Sufficient high frequency jet ventilation during a period of 2.5 h - Airway management during resection of a tracheaesophageal fistula and tracheal resection]. / Kasuistik: Suffiziente High-Frequency-Jet-Ventilation über 2,5 h.

We present a 54 year old female patient who had undergone a Ross procedure in 2009, and in 2013 again a replacement of the aortic root and arch with bioprothetic material and homograft replacement of the pulmonalis walve. Postoperatively the patient had experienced a functional compromising tracheal stenosis and a persistent esophago-tracheal fistula. Endoscopic attempts to close the fistula were not successful, and the fistula was "bridged" with an endoscopically positioned tracheal stent.We report the anaesthesiological management during the open surgical repair of the esophago-tracheal fistula and resection of 2 tracheal rings with high frequency jet ventilation over a period of 2.5 h. The Patient was discharged from hospital on the 17. postoperative day.

Controlled-Release Oxycodone as "Gold Standard" for Postoperative Pain Therapy in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery or Thoracoscopy: A Retrospective Evaluation of 788 Cases.

BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical efficacy of controlled-release oxycodone for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracoscopy. METHODS: Pain therapy is standardized in our thoracic center throughout the complete postoperative stay. Patients receive immediately postoperative standardized oral analgesic protocol with controlled-released oxycodone (Oxy Group) or oxycodone with naloxone (Targin Group) and nonopioid every 6 h. We switched the opioid protocol from controlled-release oxycodone to Targin in January 2012. All patients are visited daily by a pain specialist throughout the whole stay. RESULTS: Data of 788 patients undergoing VATS (n = 367) or thoracoscopy (n = 421) during January 2011 until March 2013 were analyzed. In VATS, patients with Targin had higher pain scores at rest (p < 0.02) and on coughing (p < 0.001) than patients with oxycodone alone and more patients with Targin were dismissed with oral opioid dose than patients with oxycodone alone (p < 0.001). No differences in pain scores on POD 5 and 6, or in length of hospital stay, incidence of nausea, time to first dejection or opioid dose after dismission were found between controlled-release oxycodone and Targin. After conventional thoracoscopy, 209 patients received controlled-release oxycodone and 212 Targin. Patients with Targin had higher pain scores at rest (p < 0.004) and on coughing (p < 0.01) than patients with oxycodone alone and more patients with Targin were dismissed with oral opioid dose than patients with oxycodone alone (p < 0.004). There were no differences in pain scores on POD 5 and 6, or in length of hospital stay, incidence of nausea, time to first dejection or opioid dose after dismission. CONCLUSION: Oral opioid analgesia with controlled-release oxycodone is an effective postoperative regimen after VATS and thoracoscopies. Our retrospective data indicate that Targin might be less effective analgesic than oxycodone after VATS and thoracoscopies with no improvement in bowel function in the immediate postoperative period. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The study design is retrospective in nature.

Thoracic pain in patients with chronic interstitial lung disease-an underestimated symptom.

Introduction: Prevalence and predisposing factors for the development of thoracic pain (TP) in patients with chronic interstitial lung disease (cILD) are largely unknown. Underestimation and insufficient therapy of pain can lead to worsened ventilatory function. Quantitative sensory testing is an established tool for characterization of chronic pain and its neuropathic components. We investigated frequency and intensity of TP in cILD patients and the potential association with lung function and quality of life. Materials and methods: We prospectively investigated patients with chronic interstitial lung disease to analyze risk factors for the development of thoracic pain and quantify thoracic pain through quantitative sensory testing. In addition, we studied the relationship between pain sensitivity and lung function impairment. Results: Seventy-eight patients with chronic interstitial lung disease and 36 healthy controls (HCs) were included. Thoracic pain occurred in 38 of 78 patients (49%), most frequently in 13 of 18 (72%, p = 0.02) patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. The occurrence was mostly spontaneous and not related to thoracic surgical interventions (76%, p = 0.48). Patients with thoracic pain showed a significant impairment of mental well-being (p = 0.004). A higher sensitivity to pinprick stimulation during QST can be observed in patients with thoracic pain (p < 0.001). Steroid treatment was associated with lower sensitivity within thermal (p = 0.034 and p = 0.032) and pressure pain testing (p = 0.046). We observed a significant correlation between total lung capacity and thermal (p = 0.019 and p = 0.03) or pressure pain sensitivity (p = 0.006 and p = 0.024). Conclusion: This study was performed to investigate prevalence, risk factors and thoracic pain in patients with chronic interstitial lung disease. Thoracic pain mostly occurs spontaneous as a frequent symptom, and seems to be an underestimated symptom in patients with chronic interstitial lung disease, especially those with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Timely identification of thoracic pain may allow starting symptomatic treatment at early stage, before impairment in quality of life occurs. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/, Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS) DRKS00022978.

The pathological oral cavity as a preventable source of postoperative pneumonia in thoracic surgery: a prospective observational study.

Background: Pneumonia after thoracic surgery considerably contributes to perioperative morbidity and mortality. So far, the forced expiratory volume in one second and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon dioxide are the most common validated prognosticators to estimate individual risk. Beyond functional parameters, modifiable risk factors for respiratory complications like pneumonia are poorly investigated in a prospective way. Thus, we aimed to assess the impact of oral health status in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and its correlation to perioperative outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery from October 2, 2018 to April 29, 2020. The day before surgery, patients were examined by a dentist. Oral health status (caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss, and regular dental visits) was correlated with perioperative outcomes. Results: During the study period, 230 consecutive patients were included. Oral health status was poor in the study population. Postoperative complications were associated with active caries [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, P<0.03]. Patients with frequent dental visits and treated teeth had a lower risk for postoperative complications compared with patients without regular visits (OR 0.3, P<0.02). Patients with a high burden of caries had a significantly increased risk for pneumonia (OR 7.9, P<0.002). The forced expiratory volume in one second was a significant prognosticator for postoperative complications; however, no association between the forced expiratory volume in one second and oral health parameters was observed. Conclusions: A pathological oral health status is a modifiable factor predicting postoperative complications and pneumonia. A prospective randomized interventional study is warranted to clarify whether an improvement in oral health status can lead to a reduction of perioperative risk.

Dataset of a study investigating autologous blood patch pleurodesis in postoperative prolonged air leaks after lung resection.

Prolonged air leak (PAL) after pulmonary resection is one if the most common complications in thoracic surgery. The dataset was obtained from a prospective randomized study investigating autologous blood patch pleurodesis in PAL. Patients were randomized to either receiving 100 ml autologous blood injected at postoperative days five and six (group A) or to watchful waiting (group B). The primary and secondary endpoints focused on differences in the duration of PAL in each group and possible complications. The results were reported in The Journal of Surgical Research. In this Data in Brief article, we provide additional data concerning pain medication and pain score during the first ten postoperative days. This should provide additional insights into the trial.

Clinical equivalence of controlled-release oxycodone 20 mg and controlled-release tramadol 200 mg after surgery for breast cancer.

AIMS: To assess clinical equivalence of 20 mg controlled-release oxycodone (Oxygesic; Mundipharma, Limburg, Germany) and 200 mg controlled-release tramadol (Tramal long; Grunenthal, Aachen, Germany) on a 12-hour dosing schedule in a randomized, double-blinded study of 54 ASA I-III physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status) patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: General anesthesia using remifentanil and propofol was performed for surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups, receiving either 20 mg controlled-release oxycodone (Oxy group) or 200 mg controlled-release tramadol (Trama group) with the premedication (7.5 mg midazolam) and again 12 hours later. All patients had access to rescue medication (i.v. paracetamol). The primary variables for clinical equivalence were the differences between the mean values for pain scores at rest and pain scores on coughing over 24 hours after operation. The equivalence margin was determined as +/-10 on the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Regarding pain scores at rest, the 90% CI of the mean differences between the treatment groups over 24 hours after operation was found to be within the predefined equivalence margin [-4.5 to +1.7], and the CI values for pain scores on coughing [-6.2 to +1.7] were similar. Cumulative paracetamol given over the 24-hour observation period did not differ significantly between the Oxy group (1.32 +/-1.9 g) and the Trama group (1.61 +/- 1.1 g; p = 0.32). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups regarding adverse events such as nausea (p = 0.13), vomiting (p = 0.24) and itching (p = 0.77). Also, no differences were found concerning patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.8) or patients' general perception of postoperative pain management (p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: 20 mg controlled-release oxycodone is clinically equivalent to 200 mg controlled-release tramadol for postoperative analgesia after surgery for breast cancer.

Haloperidol versus haloperidol plus ondansetron for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting after ophthalmologic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study we investigated the efficacy of haloperidol (10 microg/kg) and the combination of haloperidol (10 microg/kg) with ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg) for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ophthalmologic surgery. METHODS: 60 patients (ASA status 1-3) with risk factors for PONV (female, non-smoker, motion sickness or PONV in history, opioids for postoperative analgesia) undergoing retinal or strabismus surgery were included into the study and randomised to the haloperidol group (H-Group) or the haloperidol-ondansetron group (H/O-Group). 20 min before the end of anaesthesia the study medication was given. Nausea, vomiting, pain scores, and adverse events were assessed postoperatively over 24 h. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV was lower for the H/O-Group (23 vs. 57% for the H-Group). Especially the incidence of vomiting was reduced for the H/O-Group (7 vs. 27% in the H-Group). No significant differences could be detected regarding adverse events. CONCLUSION: The single use of haloperidol for the prophylaxis of PONV is doubtful. Better results were obtained with the combination therapy of haloperidol with ondansetron, especially for vomiting.

Manually controlled total intravenous anesthesia augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring for complex stereotactic neurosurgical procedures.

Stereotactically guided procedures are performed for an ever extending range of conditions. They present a unique anesthetic challenge. In our institution, a standardized anesthetic protocol for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring with BIS or AEP monitors was introduced. We conducted a retrospective study of 21 patients (ASA status 2-3) presenting for stereotactically guided procedures who were anesthetized according to the protocol. Median duration of anesthesia was 260 minutes (222 to 325 min); on average 3.0 (1.0 to 4.2) adjustments to the TIVA-protocol were made per patient. Highest and lowest mean arterial blood pressures in relation to baselines were 100% (87.5% to 109.8%) and 68.7% (64.0% to 72.6%), respectively. Likewise highest and lowest heart rates recorded were 106.7% (98.5% to 119.0%) and 75.0% (68.2% to 83.3%). After discontinuation of TIVA, spontaneous breathing returned after 5.0 minutes (4.0 to 8.0 min), extubation was possible after 6.0 minutes (5.0 to 10.0 min) and patients were ready for discharge to the ward after 15.0 minutes (12.0 to 18.0 min). There were no cases of postoperative nausea or vomiting. We found that manually controlled TIVA, augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring, facilitated maintenance of an appropriate depth of anesthesia with stable hemodynamics and excellent recovery times.

Erroneous diagnosis of small cell lung cancer based on small biopsies with far-reaching consequences: case report of a typical carcinoid tumor.

Although neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung are frequently discussed together, carcinoids are very different from high-grade small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). SCLC is found in heavy-smoking, older patients, whereas smoking is not strongly associated with carcinoid tumors. We present the case of a 46-year-old never smoking woman who was misdiagnosed with SCLC. The patient was not responsive to radio-chemotherapy plus prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI); she had a typical carcinoid (TC) tumor according to the final pathology report. We aim to demonstrate that diagnosis of SCLC based on cytology or small biopsy specimens must be scrutinized when the clinical constellation is unusual, or when the follow-up assessment shows no response to systemic treatment.

A comparison between IV paracetamol and IV metamizol for postoperative analgesia after retinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical efficacy of IV paracetamol 1 g and IV metamizol 1 IV metamizol 1 g on a 24-h dosing schedule in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 38 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing retinal surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: General anaesthesia using remifentanil, propofol, and desflurane was performed for surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups, receiving infusions of paracetamol 1 g/100 mL (Para Group), of metamizol 1 g/100 mL (Meta Group), or of 100 mL of saline solution as placebo control (Plac Group) 30 min before arrival in the recovery area and every 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. All patients had unrestricted access to intravenous opioid rescue medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy variables were pain scores at rest over 30 h postoperatively analysed by using repeated ANOVA measurement. Secondary efficacy variables were pain scores on coughing, also analysed by repeated ANOVA measurement. RESULTS: Five patients in the Plac Group and one patient in the Meta Group interrupted the study protocol. Regarding pain scores at rest, Mauchly-test of sphericity was significant (p = 0.03). For the p time effects a significant result was detected (p < 0.001). The main effect between the three treatment groups was significantly different (p = 0.01). The Bonferroni adjusted pair wise comparisons between p the Plac Group and the Para Group showed a significant difference in favour of IV paracetamol (p = 0.024; mean difference 14.8; p 95% CI 1.6-28.0), between the Plac Group and the Meta Group in favour of IV metamizol (p = 0.025; mean difference 14.4; 95% CI p 1.5-27.4), and no significant difference between the Para Group and the Meta Group (p = 1.0; mean difference 0.4; 95% CI-12.8 to 13.6). Pain scores on coughing showed a significant different main effect between the three treatment groups (p = 0.022). The Bonferroni adjusted pair wise comparisons between the Plac Group and the Para Group showed a significant difference in favour of IV paracetamol (p = 0.032; mean difference 17.9; 95% CI 1.3-34.6), a p difference, though not reaching statistical significance, in favour of IV metamizol between the Plac Group and the Meta Group (p = 0.081; p mean difference 15.0; 95% CI -1.4 to 31.4), and no significant difference between the Para Group and the Meta Group (p = 1.0; p mean difference 2.9; 95% CI -13.8 6 to 19.6). None of the patients experienced itching; one patient in the Meta Group developed a mild erythema. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of nausea (Plac vs. Para Group: p = 0.94, Plac vs. Meta Group: p = 0.98, Para vs Meta Group: p = 0.95) or vomiting (Plac vs. Para Group: p = 0.73, Plac vs. Meta Group: p = 0.85, Para vs Meta Group: p = 0.86) between the groups. Patients in the Plac Group experienced significantly more often sedation than patients in the Meta Group (p = 0.049). There was a trend of higher sedation in the Plac Group than in the Para Group, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was no difference in sedation between the Meta and the Para Groups (p = 0.84). CONCLUSION: IV paracetamol 1 g has a similar analgesic potency as IV metamizol 1 g for postoperative analgesia after retinal surgery.

The human error: delayed diagnosis of intravascular loss of guidewires for central venous catheterization.

We report three recent cases in which there was intravascular loss of the entire guide wire. In one case, this loss was discovered more than three months after the patient's procedure. In another case, the loss was detected one month later, and in the third case, four days was the interval of the loss. We discuss the problems of human error and failure of diagnosis, both of which were responsible for serious sequelae.

Clinical efficacy of controlled-release oxycodone 20 mg administered on a 12-h dosing schedule on the management of postoperative pain after breast surgery for cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical efficacy of controlled-release oxycodone (CRO) 20 mg on a 12-h dosing schedule in this prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of 40 ASA physical status I-III women undergoing breast surgery for cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: General anaesthesia using remifentanil and propofol was performed for surgery. Both groups received premedication with oral midazolam 7.5 mg 1 h before surgery. In the controlled-release oxycodone group, one tablet of 20 mg CRO was administered with the premedication, and 12 h after the premedication another 20 mg CRO. In the placebo (PL) group, a placebo tablet was administered with the premedication, and 12 h later another placebo tablet. All patients had access to opioid rescue medication via an IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (AUC), based on IV opioid rescue consumption over 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The AUC for IV PCA opioid consumption was significantly lower in the CRO group than in the PL group (p = 0.01). The CRO group required less IV opioid loading dose (p < 0.001), and consumed less opioid rescue medication 4 h (p = 0.036), 16 h (p = 0.01), and 24 h (p = 0.005) postoperatively. AUC for VAS scores at rest was significantly lower in the CRO group than in the PL group (p = 0.05). VAS scores at rest were lower in the CRO group 16 h (p = 0.04) and 24 h (p = 0.03) postoperatively. There was no difference in AUC for pain scores on movement (p = 0.103) and for quality of analgesia (p = 0.139). There was no difference in nausea between groups (p = 0.34). Pruritus, arterial hypotension or hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia were not observed in either treatment group. None of the patients showed signs of confusion, agitation, or respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of CRO 20 mg on a 12-h dosing schedule halves postoperative IV PCA opioid consumption. CRO 20mg is effective in preventing pain after breast surgery for cancer with only mild side-effects.