Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 16(1): 18-23; discussion 23-4, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16552373

RESUMEN

Our objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of different insufflation methods in women undergoing laparoscopy and to develop a model for selection of the appropriate insufflation technique based on the patient's characteristics and surgeon's experience. We performed a retrospective analysis of laparoscopic procedures on 3086 women over a 13-year period at the University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY. All laparoscopic procedures were performed on an outpatient basis by residents under faculty supervision. Five different insufflation techniques were evaluated: standard transumbilical insufflation, open laparoscopy, transuterine insufflation, subcostal insufflation, and direct trocar insertion technique. Body mass index and previous abdominal surgeries were identified as the most important factors in the selection of the most successful insufflation method based on the surgeon's experience, using data mining techniques. During the first insufflation attempt, we were successful at achieving a pneumoperitoneum 94.7% of the time. This number increased to 98.1% when we switched to a second alternative insufflation method. In all, there were 5 complications out of 3086 patients (0.16%) after all insufflation techniques.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Insuflación/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neumoperitoneo Artificial/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA