Overview of global real-world data sources for pediatric pharmacoepidemiologic research.

PURPOSE: Given limited information available on real-world data (RWD) sources with pediatric populations, this study describes features of globally available RWD sources for pediatric pharmacoepidemiologic research. METHODS: An online questionnaire about pediatric RWD sources and their attributes and capabilities was completed by members and affiliates of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology and representatives of nominated databases. All responses were verified by database representatives and summarized. RESULTS: Of 93 RWD sources identified, 55 unique pediatric RWD sources were verified, including data from Europe (47%), United States (38%), multiregion (7%), Asia-Pacific (5%), and South America (2%). Most databases had nationwide coverage (82%), contained electronic health/medical records (47%) and/or administrative claims data (42%) and were linkable to other databases (65%). Most (71%) had limited outside access (e.g., by approval or through local collaborators); only 10 (18%) databases were publicly available. Six databases (11%) reported having >20 million pediatric observations. Most (91%) included children of all ages (birth until 18th birthday) and contained outpatient medication data (93%), while half (49%) contained inpatient medication data. Many databases captured vaccine information for children (71%), and one-third had regularly updated data on pediatric height (31%) and weight (33%). Other pediatric data attributes captured include diagnoses and comorbidities (89%), lab results (58%), vital signs (55%), devices (55%), imaging results (42%), narrative patient histories (35%), and genetic/biomarker data (22%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview with key details about diverse databases that allow researchers to identify fit-for-purpose RWD sources suitable for pediatric pharmacoepidemiologic research.

Describing diversity of real world data sources in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: The DIVERSE scoping review.

PURPOSE: Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used for medical regulatory decisions, yet concerns persist regarding its reproducibility and hence validity. This study addresses reproducibility challenges associated with diversity across real-world data sources (RWDS) repurposed for secondary use in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Our aims were to identify, describe and characterize practices, recommendations and tools for collecting and reporting diversity across RWDSs, and explore how leveraging diversity could improve the quality of evidence. METHODS: In a preliminary phase, keywords for a literature search and selection tool were designed using a set of documents considered to be key by the coauthors. Next, a systematic search was conducted up to December 2021. The resulting documents were screened based on titles and abstracts, then based on full texts using the selection tool. Selected documents were reviewed to extract information on topics related to collecting and reporting RWDS diversity. A content analysis of the topics identified explicit and latent themes. RESULTS: Across the 91 selected documents, 12 topics were identified: 9 dimensions used to describe RWDS (organization accessing the data source, data originator, prompt, inclusion of population, content, data dictionary, time span, healthcare system and culture, and data quality), tools to summarize such dimensions, challenges, and opportunities arising from diversity. Thirty-six themes were identified within the dimensions. Opportunities arising from data diversity included multiple imputation and standardization. CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions identified across a large number of publications lay the foundation for formal guidance on reporting diversity of data sources to facilitate interpretation and enhance replicability and validity of RWE.

Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Real-World Data.

Increasing availability of real-world data (RWD) generated from patient care enables the generation of evidence to inform clinical decisions for subpopulations of patients and perhaps even individuals. There is growing opportunity to identify important heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) in these subgroups. Thus, HTE is relevant to all with interest in patients' responses to interventions, including regulators who must make decisions about products when signals of harms arise postapproval and payers who make coverage decisions based on expected net benefit to their beneficiaries. Prior work discussed HTE in randomized studies. Here, we address methodological considerations when investigating HTE in observational studies. We propose 4 primary goals of HTE analyses and the corresponding approaches in the context of RWD: to confirm subgroup effects, to describe the magnitude of HTE, to discover clinically important subgroups, and to predict individual effects. We discuss other possible goals including exploring prognostic score- and propensity score-based treatment effects, and testing the transportability of trial results to populations different from trial participants. Finally, we outline methodological needs for enhancing real-world HTE analysis.

Pregnancy and fetal outcomes following maternal exposure to glatiramer acetate in all three trimesters of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) exposure throughout pregnancy in patients with multiple sclerosis are scarce. In this analysis, we assessed pregnancy and fetal outcomes following maternal glatiramer acetate (GA) exposure in all three trimesters among cases reported between 1997 and 2020. METHODS: Pregnancy reports of maternal in utero exposure to 20 and 40 mg/mL GA in all three trimesters from 1997 to 2020 were eligible. Both prospective pregnancy data, reported prior to knowledge of pregnancy outcome, and retrospective data were included. The primary endpoint was major congenital malformations (MCMs) based on the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies and Twins (EUROCAT) classification. Additional endpoints included fetal death, preterm birth, and low birth weight. The MCM rate was compared to the EUROCAT background rate. RESULTS: A total of 618 GA-exposed pregnancies in all three trimesters resulted in 634 fetuses, including 14 twin pregnancies. One fetal death was reported. All 414 fetuses with data reported prior to knowledge of pregnancy outcome (prospective data) were live births and no fetal death was reported. Preterm birth was reported in 23/213 (10.8%) pregnancies with known gestational age. Low birth weight was reported in 13/203 (6.4%) infants with known birth weight. The prevalence of MCM in prospective live births ranged from 2.2% to 2.4%, which was similar to background rates (2.1%-3.0%). The frequency of these pregnancy and infant outcomes was comparable across GA doses. CONCLUSIONS: In utero exposure to 20 and 40 mg/mL GA in three trimesters of pregnancy does not appear to be related to adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes.

Delayed pregnancy detection and return to fertility with extended levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives: A real world setting cohort study.

PURPOSE: As part of the European risk management plan of a 91-day extended levonorgestrel-containing combined oral contraceptive (COCLNG ), a study was performed to assess its safety. This analysis was conducted to examine delayed pregnancy detection and return to fertility with extended combined oral contraceptives (COC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in new users of 91-day COCLNG or 28-day COCLNG within a US-based healthcare claims database from 2006 to 2017. Delayed pregnancy detection during current COCLNG exposure was defined as the time between estimated pregnancy start and first prenatal care encounter. Additionally, the time between estimated pregnancy start and COCLNG discontinuation was measured. To measure return to fertility, pregnancy rates were estimated among females who discontinued treatment. 91-day COCLNG users were propensity score-matched to 28-day COCLNG users. Hazard ratio for pregnancy was calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The 91-day and 28-day COCLNG users had 25 593 and 76 586 treatment episodes, respectively. The median time to pregnancy detection was 64.5 and 61.0 days (p = 0.24) in users of 91-day COCLNG and 28-day COCLNG . The median exposure time to treatment after estimated pregnancy start was 54.0 and 38.0 days (p < 0.01). In the fertility analysis, pregnancy rates were 54.82 (95% CI, 50.05-59.93) and 69.30 (95% CI, 64.98-73.82) per 1000 person-years in extended COCLNG discontinuers and 28-day COCLNG discontinuers. The adjusted hazard ratio of pregnancy was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Small differences were observed for pregnancy rates and delayed pregnancy detection between 91-day extended COCLNG and 28-day COCLNG , which may be related to the longer days' supply of extended COCLNG . Differences in the fertility analysis may be related to unmeasured residual confounding.

The risk of melanoma with rasagiline compared with other antiparkinsonian medications: A retrospective cohort study in the United States medicare database.

PURPOSE: Compare the risk of melanoma between initiators of rasagiline or other antiparkinsonian drugs (APDs) in a Parkinson's disease (PD) population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the US Medicare claims research database (2006-2015) in adults aged ≥65 years with PD claims. Other APD initiators were randomly matched (4:1) to rasagiline initiators on age, sex, and cohort entry year. Cutaneous melanoma events were identified by a validated claims algorithm. Incidence rates (IRs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and Cox-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for melanoma comparing rasagiline with other APD initiators were calculated and analyzed by duration of study medication use and cumulative dose of rasagiline. Potential indicators of surveillance bias were explored. RESULTS: Among 23 708 rasagiline initiators and 96 552 matched APD initiators, the crude IR of melanoma/100 000 person-years was 334.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 291.5-381.6) and 208.2 (95% CI, 190.1-227.5), respectively (crude IRR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.36-1.89). The adjusted HR was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.14-1.65) and increased with longer rasagiline exposure and higher cumulative rasagiline doses. Rasagiline initiators more frequently had dermatologist visits or skin biopsies before cohort entry than APD initiators and had a higher incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer during follow-up (crude IRR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.35-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: A small increased incidence of melanoma with exposure to rasagiline compared with other APDs was observed. Although the pattern with dose and duration is consistent with a hypothesized biologic effect, the increased skin cancer surveillance among rasagiline users suggests surveillance bias as a contributing explanation for the observed results.

A multinational, drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim use in real-world setting in Europe.

PURPOSE: Lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex, Teva Pharma B.V.) is approved for reduction in neutropenia duration and febrile neutropenia incidence. In the framework of lipegfilgrastim regulatory approval in the EU, the Health Authorities requested a drug utilization study. This study was conducted to characterize prescribing patterns of lipegfilgrastim and quantify the extent of on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world setting in Europe. METHODS: Information on lipegfilgrastim use between January 2014 and March 2020 was abstracted from medical records in hospital and outpatient clinical settings. Indication for lipegfilgrastim was classified either as on-label or off-label use according to pre-determined criteria. The primary endpoint was the extent of lipegfilgrastim off-label use based on the most recent lipegfilgrastim cycle. RESULTS: Records of 481 patients were obtained from five European countries. Lipegfilgrastim was most commonly prescribed for prevention of neutropenia by oncologists and hematologists. Patients who were administered lipegfilgrastim were primarily ≥ 55 years old (65.1%) and female (65.7%). The most frequent underlying diagnosis was breast cancer (38.3%). For the most recent lipegfilgrastim cycle, on-label use was recorded in 452/459 patients with no missing data (98.5%), while off-label use was recorded in 7/459 patients (1.5%). The majority of off-label use was attributed to use with non-cytotoxic chemotherapy (57.1%). Off-label use of lipegfilgrastim across all treatment cycles with no missing data was 11/1547 cycles (0.7%). CONCLUSION: Using real-world data, these findings confirm the low rate of lipegfilgrastim off-label use as reported in a preceding feasibility study, indicating very high adherence to the approved indication.

Transit use reduction following COVID-19: The effect of threat appraisal, proactive coping and institutional trust.

Transit systems suffered from a significant demand decrease during COVID-19. Understanding the psychological motivators underlying reduced transit use can help transit authorities and operators to take proactive action towards returning to the "new normal" and increasing their preparedness towards future pandemics. This study is based on the protection motivation theory to understand the effect of threat appraisal, and coping appraisal and denial mechanisms on transit use reduction for commuting. The behavioral framework is validated by a survey of 856 transit users in Israel during August 2020, three months after the end of the lockdown and before the vaccine administration. The results show that: i) Skepticism, risk ubiquity, and personal immunity beliefs lead to maladaptive threat appraisal; ii) wearing masks and social distancing are antecedents of fear of infection while using transit and reduced transit use; iii) higher perceived threat deters transit use, while trust in transit operators motivates transit use; and iv) in a franchised transit system, trust in transit operators depends on the perceived level-of-service and trust in the ability of government authorities to regulate, monitor and enforce transit operators' preventive and protective actions.

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Europe.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented following the 2014 referral for valproate in Europe. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey was conducted over 2-month period in 2016 among physicians who prescribed valproate in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain and Sweden. The web-based questionnaire included five endpoints to evaluate physicians' knowledge on (a) prescribing valproate only for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women if other treatments were ineffective or not tolerated; (b) ensuring supervision by experienced physicians while treating these conditions; (c) considering alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy, regular review of treatment needs and re-assessing the benefit-risk balance in women and girls reaching puberty; (d) informing patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and (e) advising women on effective contraception during their treatment. RESULTS: Among 1153 physicians, 95.5% responded prescribing valproate for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women only if other treatments are ineffective/not tolerated; 66.5% supervised while treatment; 76.6% considered alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy; 92.1% informed patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and 94.4% advised patients on the use of effective contraception during its treatment. Overall, 25.8% physicians recalled receiving both educational material (EM) and Dear Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC). All endpoint rates were higher for physicians who acknowledged receipt of both DHPC and EM compared to physicians who did not receive them. CONCLUSIONS: Although results varied across geography and physician speciality, majority of physicians had good knowledge about the indication and safety aspects of prescribing and using valproate.

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A drug utilisation study in Europe.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented in Europe in 2014 for valproate-containing products to mitigate their risk during pregnancy and to characterise valproate prescribing patterns in women of childbearing potential (WCBP) before and after implementation of RMMs. METHODS: A multinational cohort study based on existing data sources using a pre-/post- design was performed in five European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK) in an outpatient setting. Effectiveness of RMMs was assessed by comparing the proportion of valproate initiations as second (or subsequent) line therapy before and after implementation of RMMs (primary outcome) with an increase in this proportion indicating success of RMMs. Overall use of valproate and incidence of pregnancies in WCBP were also examined. RESULTS: The proportion of valproate initiations as second line therapy increased after implementation of RMMs in incident female users in Sweden (from 81.1%, 95% CI 79.9%-82.3% to 84.5%, 95% CI 83.5%-85.5%) and the UK (from 66.4%, 95% CI 64.5%-68.3% to 72.4%, 95% CI 70.0%-74.9%), it remained the same in Germany and Spain and decreased in France from 48.7% (95% CI 45.6%-51.9%) to 40.6% (95% CI 37.6%-43.7%). In Sweden and the UK, the incidence of pregnancies exposed to valproate decreased in the post-implementation period: 8.0 vs 9.5 and 10.9 vs 16.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results on primary outcome of this study suggest limited effectiveness of the RMMs. Additional RMMs were implemented in 2018.

Recycling and consumption reduction following the COVID-19 lockdown: The effect of threat and coping appraisal, past behavior and information.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created sudden, rapid, and unprecedented change in almost every possible aspect of the general population's behavior. Despite its devastating consequences, the COVID-19 pandemic can alter individual behavior towards responsible environmental actions. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed pro-environmental beliefs and behavior. We compare pre-COVID-19 recycling and consumption reduction with post-COVID-19 intentions, focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic's role in catalyzing the change. The protection motivation theory is applied to investigate threat appraisal and coping appraisal as potential motivators for taking climate change more seriously and engaging in pro-environmental behavior. A tailor-made survey carried out during the national lockdown imposed in March-April 2020 in Israel served for the analysis. A generalized ordered probit estimated on a sample of 296 respondents served to validate the behavioral model. The results confirm that threat and coping appraisal are drivers of behavioral change towards pro-environmental behavior. The results show that: i) 40% of low-intensity recyclers are likely to increase recycling compared to 20% of high-intensity recyclers; ii) following the COVID-19 outbreak, 40% intend to consume less; iii) the changes are catalyzed by threat and coping appraisal; iv) taking climate change more seriously following the pandemic is a function of the individual's perceived association between COVID-19 and climate change, external knowledge, income loss due to the pandemic, self-resilience, and ecocentric beliefs; v) self-resilient attitudes lead to positive behavioral change, while anthropocentric beliefs impede changes towards sustainable behavior.

Assessment of colistimethate sodium (COLOBREATHE) risk minimization measures implemented in the European Union: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of additional risk minimization measures (aRMMs) implemented in Europe for colistimethate sodium (CMS) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients/caregivers following safety concerns regarding incorrect use of CMS delivered via Turbospin inhaler. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among HCPs and patients/caregivers in Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom between September 2016 and March 2018. Knowledge of the educational materials was assessed regarding common side effects, correct use of CMS and Turbospin inhaler, and capsule breakage. Awareness, receipt, and utilization of the aRMMs were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 124 HCPs surveyed, the majority acknowledged awareness (86.2%), receipt (91.0%), and utilization (81.6%) of the CMS educational materials and were knowledgeable about the common CMS side effects (93.2%). Most HCPs correctly answered most questions regarding the proper use of CMS (>90%), yet only half knew how to correctly use the Turbospin inhaler (53.2%). Knowledge about capsule breakage was moderate (67.5%). Of the 29 patients/caregivers surveyed, almost half were aware of the educational materials (48.1%); of these, 69.2% received and used the materials. Most patients/caregivers were knowledgeable about the common CMS side effects (81.5%) and proper CMS use (>85%); however, knowledge about correct Turbospin inhaler use and potential for capsule breakage was moderate to low (48.1% and 37.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs and patients/caregivers have good knowledge about the common side effects associated with CMS. However, knowledge of correct use of the Turbospin inhaler and capsule breakage was moderate to low.

Effect of age and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of trimetazidine: An open-label multiple-dose study.

This study evaluated the effect of age and renal impairment on pharmacokinetics of trimetazidine (TMZ) in healthy elderly and renally impaired subjects and assess safety and tolerability. In this open-label, multi-dose study, 73 subjects were divided into six treatment groups: (1) 55-65 years; (2) 66-75 years; (3) >75 years (dosing for groups 1-3 [healthy]: B.D. for 4 days), (4) mild renally impaired (dosed B.D. for 8 days); (5) moderate renally impaired (dosed O.D. for 8 days); and (6) severe renally impaired-no dialysis (dosed once every 48 h for 8 days). Blood and urine samples were collected and analyzed. The geometric least squares mean ratios for; Group 2 and 1 of AUC(0-τ)ss was 112.2 (90% CI; 92.0-136.8) and Cmax,ss was 109.9 (89.6-134.8), Group 3 and 1 of AUC(0-τ),ss was 140.5 (115.9-170.3) and Cmax,ss was 137.8 (112.9-168.2), Group 4 and 1 of AUC(0-τ),ss was 114.2 (90.3-144.4) and Cmax,ss was 120.8 (92.5-157.8), Group 5 and 1 of; AUC(0-τ),ss was 213.0 (153.1-296.3) and Cmax,ss was 123.3 (92.2-164.7) and Group 6 and 1 of AUC(0-τ),ss was 247.4 (197.8-309.6) and Cmax,ss was 95.6 (73.0-125.1). Significant increase in systemic exposure of TMZ was observed in subjects; over 75 year's age and renally impaired compared to healthy subjects. TMZ was safe and well-tolerated.

A drug utilization study to evaluate effectiveness of risk minimization measures for trimetazidine in France, Hungary, Romania and Spain.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The approved indication for trimetazidine (TMZ) was restricted to "add-on therapy for the symptomatic treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris who are inadequately controlled by or intolerant to first-line antianginal therapies" in 2012 by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). TMZ was no longer indicated for ophthalmology and otolaryngology (ENT) indications. This drug utilization study analysed actual utilization of TMZ before and after the restriction on its indications to evaluate the effectiveness of risk minimization measures (RMM). METHODS: This was a multi-national, cross-sectional, non-interventional drug utilization study using European databases: IMS Prescribing Insights (PI) for France and Spain, National Diagnostic Index (NDI) for Romania and National Prescription Audit (NPA) for Hungary. TMZ prescriptions issued by Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) specialists, ophthalmologists, cardiologists and General Physicians (GPs)/others were analysed during the 24-month period before (reference period) and after RMM implementation (assessment period). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: During the assessment period, most of the TMZ prescriptions for ENT and ophthalmology indications (un-authorized indications) were made by GPs/others followed by ENT specialists, ophthalmologists and cardiologists in most of the countries. The proportion of TMZ prescriptions for ENT or ophthalmological indications after the restrictions on indication was reduced in Hungary (by 0.4%) and Spain (by 11.8%), remained the same in Romania and increased in France (by 3.7%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This study showed that a significant proportion of TMZ prescriptions was off-label for ENT or ophthalmological indications following the RMM implementation. More effective RMM strategies are required to reduce off-label prescriptions of TMZ.

Challenges of post-authorization safety studies: Lessons learned and results of a French study of fentanyl buccal tablet.

PURPOSE: Recruiting and retaining participants in real-world studies that collect primary data are challenging. This article illustrates these challenges using a post-authorization safety study (PASS) to assess adverse events (AEs) experienced with fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) over 3 months of treatment. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, multicenter study in France conducted over 1 year. The study employed primary data collection in FBT-treated patients and their treating physicians via a site qualification questionnaire and patient log completed by physicians and a questionnaire and pain diary completed by patients. Strategies to increase participation included reminders, newsletters, frequent follow-up telephone calls, and reducing the extent of data collected. RESULTS: Of the 1118 physicians contacted who returned the participation form or responded to a telephone call, only 128 expressed willingness to participate. Key reasons for non-participation were lack of interest (69.7%) and FBT not being used in practice by the contacted physician (25.1%). Overall, 224 patients were screened by 31 physicians, and 97 were enrolled. Key reasons for patient non-inclusion were unwillingness or inability to complete the patient AE diary or questionnaire (40.9% [52/127]) and patients' decision (33.9% [43/127]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts to increase participation, enrollment in this study was low. Recruitment and retention methods are limited in their capacity to optimally execute a primary data collection in a PASS. For a PASS to provide reliable and valid information on medication use, involvement from health care agencies, regulators, and pharmaceutical companies is needed to establish their importance, drive study participation, and reduce patient withdrawal.

Modafinil and the risk of cardiovascular events: Findings from three US claims databases.

PURPOSE: This study examined the potential risk of cardiovascular (CV) events associated with modafinil and the consistency of the risk estimates across databases. METHODS: A retrospective, inception cohort design of patients who initiated treatment with modafinil between 2006 and 2008 was used in three US health care claims databases. Modafinil users were matched with nonusers. Patients were further divided into two cohorts of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and non-OSA (NOSA) cohorts. Endpoints of interest, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, CV hospitalizations, and all-cause death, were assessed using incidence rates and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The cohorts included a total of 175 524 patients in MarketScan CM; 77 266-in IMS LifeLink; and 8174-in MarketScan Medicaid. No increased risk for MI in the OSA and NOSA cohorts was observed across all three databases. The risks of CV hospitalization in the OSA and NOSA cohorts were not different between the modafinil users and nonusers, except for IMS LifeLink database where the HR was lower than one in the modafinil users compared with the nonusers (HR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.87). For OSA patients with prior stroke, an adjusted HR of 1.96 (95% CI, 1.02 to 3.76) was observed for stroke among modafinil users compared with nonusers. Among the NOSA, the HRs for all-cause death in the OSA were inconsistent across databases. CONCLUSIONS: Except for few CV outcomes, applying one common protocol generated consistent risk estimates of CV events following modafinil use across cohorts and databases.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of risk minimization measures for trimetazidine: A cross sectional joint PASS survey among physicians in selected European countries.

PURPOSE: In 2012, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) restricted prescription of trimetazidine (TMZ) to "add-on therapy for patients with stable angina pectoris who are inadequately controlled by or intolerant to first-line therapies." TMZ was no longer indicated for ophthalmology and otolaryngology. Risk minimization measure (RMM) was communicated to physicians. The survey presented here evaluated effectiveness of the RMM and assessed physicians knowledge and compliance with RMM. It also analyzed actual prescribing pattern of TMZ. METHODS: A cross sectional, web-based survey was developed and conducted among prescribing physicians of TMZ across 12 European countries. Physicians' samples were weighted to account for the actual proportion of specialties within and across countries. RESULTS: Using weighted samples, data from 1123 physicians and 8332 prescriptions were analyzed. Most (74.0%) of the physicians assumed stable angina pectoris to be an indication for TMZ. Three quarter of (75.7%) of these physicians were aware of the approved indication. Vertigo (62.1%), tinnitus (42.5%), declined visual acuity, and visual field disturbances (45.1%) were also presumed to be approved indications for TMZ, and physicians actually prescribed for these indications. Only 29.8% of the physicians remembered receiving RMM communications regarding TMZ. Most (90.5%) of the physicians expressed their interest to know and comply with the safety communications. Of all prescriptions, 33.9% were issued for add-on therapy for patients with stable angina pectoris. CONCLUSIONS: RMM for TMZ prescription have been moderately effective. Improvement in physician's compliance with safety information of TMZ is necessary for patient's safety.

The prevalence and trends of antiviral medication use during pregnancy in the US: a population-based study of 664,297 deliveries in 2001-2007.

To evaluate the prevalence, trends, timing and duration of exposure to antiviral medications during pregnancy within a US cohort of pregnant women and to evaluate the proportion of deliveries with a viral infection diagnosis among women given antiviral medication during pregnancy. Live-born deliveries between 2001 and 2007, to women aged 15-45 years, were included from the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program, a collaborative research program between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and eleven health plans. They were evaluated for prevalence, timing, duration, and temporal trends of exposure to antiviral medications during pregnancy. We also calculated the proportion of deliveries with a viral infection diagnosis among those exposed to antiviral medications. Among 664,297 live births, the overall prevalence of antiviral exposure during pregnancy was 4 % (n = 25,155). Between 2001 and 2007, antiviral medication exposure during pregnancy doubled from 2.5 to 5 %. The most commonly used antiviral medication was acyclovir, with 3 % of the deliveries being exposed and most of the exposure occurring after the 1st trimester. Most deliveries exposed to antiviral medications were exposed for less than 30 days (2 % of all live births). Forty percent of the women delivering an infant exposed to antiviral medications had a herpes diagnosis. Our findings highlight the increased prevalence of women delivering an infant exposed to antiviral medications over time. These findings support the need for large, well-designed studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of these medications during pregnancy.

The causation-prevention chain in infrastructure safety measures: A consideration of four types of policy lock-ins.

Safety policies typically follow Lasswell's linear decision cycle paradigm: diagnostics, prescription, application, monitoring, and appraisal. Contemporary policy research highlights the existence of complexities in policy-making, which trigger policy lock-ins. We consider four cases in which the complex nature of the causation-prevention discourse leads to decision-making lock-ins, which deter safety progress. The four cases are conflicting narratives, missing causation inferences, prevention and mobility mismatch, and a tension between policy transfer and existing policy environments. The cases are demonstrated on recent examples of infrastructure measures that were observed in Israeli practice, which are, respectively: adding a motorway illumination, setting bus priority routes, safety improvements of multi-lane urban roads, and establishing traffic calming areas. While the four case-studies are region-specific, the discussion is relevant to other road safety measures and countries with similar policy-making problems. The consideration highlights the importance of policy-making dynamics to increase the resilience of the Safe System approach.

Pregnancy and fetal outcomes following paternal exposure to glatiramer acetate.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine pregnancy and fetal outcomes following paternal exposure to glatiramer acetate (GA). METHODS: Pregnancy reports of paternal GA-exposure at time of conception from 2001 to 2022 were extracted from Teva Global Pharmacovigilance database. Pregnancy reports obtained prior to (prospective) or after (retrospective) knowledge of the pregnancy outcome were included. The primary endpoint was major congenital malformation (MCM) in the offspring according to the US Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) and European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies and Twins (EUROCAT) classification. Other pregnancy and fetal outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, pregnancy termination, fetal death, preterm birth, and low birth weight, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 466 paternal GA-exposed pregnancies were retrieved, 232 prospective cases and 234 retrospective cases. Of 349 (74.9%) pregnancies with known outcomes, 316 (90.5%) were live births, 28 (8.0%) were spontaneous abortions, 3 (0.9%) were elective pregnancy terminations, and 2 (0.6%) were stillbirths. In prospective live birth cases, there were 7/111 (6.3%) preterm births and 5/115 (4.3%) neonates with a low birth weight. The prevalence of total MCM among prospective cases was 1.7% (2 cases of 116 live births and fetal death/stillbirth), which is slightly lower than the background rates from MACDP (3%) and EUROCAT (2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not indicate an increase in the rate of adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes after paternal exposure to GA. These results provide additional information regarding pregnancy outcomes following paternal exposure to GA for healthcare professionals, male patients and their female partners who are considering pregnancy while their male partner is using GA.

This research aimed to look at how pregnancies and babies were affected when fathers with multiple sclerosis have been prescribed and taken the medication, glatiramer acetate (GA). Researchers looked at reports of pregnancies where the father had taken GA around the time of conception, from 2001 to 2022. They got this information from the Teva Global Pharmacovigilance database. They included reports where the pregnancy was known about either before (prospective) or after (retrospective) the outcome was known. They looked at outcomes like major birth defects, miscarriages, pregnancy terminations, fetal deaths, premature births, and low birth weight. The study found a total of 466 pregnancies where the father had taken GA. Of these pregnancies, the final outcome of pregnancy was found for 349 pregnancies. Most of these pregnancies (90.5%) resulted in live births, 8.0% ended in miscarriage, 0.9% in termination, and 0.6% in stillbirth. Among prospective live births, 6.3% were premature, and 4.3% had low birth weight. The amount of major birth defects was 1.7%, which was slightly lower than usual. The study did not suggest that exposure of the father to GA negatively affects the pregnancy or the baby. These findings can help healthcare providers, male patients taking GA, and their partners who are thinking about pregnancy while the male partner is taking GA.