Cannabidiol for the Management of Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature on the effect of cannabis-based products on the female reproductive system and establish whether there is any evidence that they benefit or harm patients with endometriosis and, therefore, whether there is sufficient evidence to recommend them. DATA SOURCES: An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database. Reference lists of articles retrieved were reviewed, and a gray literature search was also performed. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The original database search yielded 264 articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database, of which 41 were included. One hundred sixty-one studies relating to gynecologic malignancy, conditions unrelated to endometriosis, or therapies unrelated to cannabis-based products were excluded. Twelve articles were included from a gray literature search and review of references. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Most available evidence is from laboratory studies aiming to simulate the effects of cannabis-based products on preclinical endometriosis models. Some show evidence of benefit with cannabis-based products. However, results are conflicting, and the impact in humans cannot necessarily be extrapolated from these data. Few studies exist looking at the effect of cannabis or its derived products in women with endometriosis; the majority are in the form of surveys and are affected by bias. National guidance was also reviewed: at present, this dictates that cannabis-based products can only be prescribed for conditions in which there is clear published evidence of benefit and only when all other treatment options have been exhausted. CONCLUSION: Current treatment options for endometriosis often affect fertility and/or have undesirable side effects that impede long-term management. Cannabis-based products have been suggested as a novel therapeutic option that may circumvent these issues. However, there is a paucity of well-designed, robust studies and randomized controlled trials looking at their use in the treatment of endometriosis. In addition, cannabis use has a potential for harm in the long term, with a possible association with "cannabis use disorder," psychosis, and mood disturbances. At present, national guidance cannot recommend cannabis-based products to patients in the UK owing to lack of clear evidence of benefit. More comprehensive research into the impact of endocannabinoids in the context of endometriosis is required before their use can be recommended or prescribed.

Women's perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences: a qualitative thematic analysis of a national survey of pregnant women in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this national survey was to explore pregnant women's perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences. METHODS: Through patient and public involvement, a questionnaire was developed and advertised via the BBC website, Twitter and other online media during May 2020. The findings were analysed by qualitative thematic analysis. Women who are currently pregnant, or who have delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to partake in a national online survey. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred fifty-one participants replied to the online questionnaire. Participants provided significant insight into the perceived barriers to seeking healthcare during this pandemic. These include 'not wanting to bother anyone', 'lack of wider support from allied healthcare workers' and the influence of the media. Other concerns included the use of virtual clinics antenatally and their acceptability to patients, the presence of birthing partners, and the way in which information is communicated about rapidly changing and evolving services. The influence of the media has also had a significant impact on the way women perceive hospital care in light of COVID-19 and for some, this has shaped whether they would seek help. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first ever reported study in the United Kingdom to explore pregnant women's perceptions of COVID-19 and their subsequent healthcare experiences. It has also provided insight into perceived barriers into seeking care as well as maternal concerns antenatally, intrapartum and postpartum.

Self-help materials for smoking relapse prevention: a process evaluation of the SHARPISH randomized controlled trial.

Background: UK Stop Smoking Services are effective at assisting smokers to quit. However, smoking relapse rates are high, representing a significant public health problem. No effective interventions are currently available. This embedded qualitative process evaluation, within a randomized controlled trial of a self-help smoking relapse prevention intervention, aimed to understand patient perspectives in explaining the null trial finding, and to make recommendations for intervention development. Methods: The intervention was a British version of the 'Forever Free' self-help booklets (SHARPISH-ISRCTN 36980856). The qualitative evaluation purposefully sampled 43 interview participants, triangulated with the views of 10 participants and 12 health professionals in focus groups. Data were thematically analysed. Results: Analysis revealed important variation in individual engagement with the self-help booklets. Variation was interpreted by the meta-themes of 'motivation for cessation', and 'positioning on information provision', interacting with the theme of 'mechanisms for information provision'. Conclusions: Targeting self-help information towards those most motivated to engage may be beneficial, considering the social and cultural realities of individual's lives. Individual preferences for the mechanisms of information delivery should be appraised when designing future interventions. Long-term personalized follow-up may be a simple step in improving smoking relapse rates.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Evaluation of symptoms, using a questionnaire, in a research setting, before and after treatment.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no defined, objective, and reproducible intervention with which to make a diagnosis. There are many different treatment options available, but without the correct diagnosis, affected women are unable to access the right therapy. This paper reports on the questionnaire arm of the VAN study (VAginal Health - What's Normal?) which aimed to evaluate the performance and acceptability of the methods of assessment of GSM, described below. OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) questionnaire: a multidimensional measure of the impact of vaginal symptoms on functioning and well-being in postmenopausal women, in a prospective, observational, feasibility study. METHODS: 60 women were recruited to the study (20 premenopausal, asymptomatic women (control group) and 40 peri- and postmenopausal, symptomatic women). All women had a baseline assessment, using three different interventions, in addition to the DIVA questionnaire and symptomatic women were offered treatment, followed by a second assessment undertaken at 16 weeks, using the same interventions. This paper focusses on the outcomes for the questionnaire and specifically on the paired data sets, before and after treatment. RESULTS: An improvement in the score for all four sections of DIVA (Activities of daily living, Emotions, Sexual Activity, and Feelings about yourself and your body (female embodiment)) was observed, following any treatment. Additional questions were added to DIVA, to assess patient preference in relation to the different diagnostic interventions. These included a speculum examination as part of the clinical assessment, a smear taken from the lateral vaginal wall to assess the vaginal maturation index, both undertaken by a clinician and a self-administered tampon to collect vaginal secretions, to determine the small molecule metabolite profile, using NMR spectroscopy, and to enable analysis of the vaginal microbiome. The medical standard tampon was the preferred intervention, before and after treatment, for women eligible for treatment. CONCLUSION: The VAN study demonstrates that DIVA, a previously tested questionnaire, is an easily accessible intervention, to assess the impact of urogenital symptoms on quality-of-life indicators in women in the United Kingdom with GSM and that women prefer to use a tampon themselves, rather than have a clinician performed vaginal speculum examination or a vaginal smear.

Implementation challenges in preeclampsia care: perspectives from health care professionals in urban Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan Africa bears the burden of 70% of maternal deaths worldwide, of which ∼10% are attributable to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, primarily complications of preeclampsia. In other global settings, outcomes of pregnancies affected by preeclampsia are improved with timely and effective medical care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of local health care professionals on how preeclampsia care is currently delivered in the study setting and what challenges they experience in providing prompt and safe care. We identified specific objectives of exploring stakeholder perceptions of (1) recognizing preeclampsia and (2) timely intervention when preeclampsia is diagnosed. We also explored the wider system factors (eg, cultural, financial, and logistic challenges) that health care professionals perceived as affecting their ability to deliver optimal preeclampsia care. STUDY DESIGN: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with health care professionals and stakeholders. The findings were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants contributed to the study, including doctors and midwives with varying degrees of clinical experience and external stakeholders. The following 5 key themes emerged: delayed patient presentation, recognizing the unwell patient with preeclampsia, the challenges of the existing triage system, stakeholder disconnect, and ways of learning from each other. Health care professionals referenced an important psychosocial perspective associated with preeclampsia in the study setting, which may influence the likelihood of seeking care through traditional healers rather than hospital-based routes. CONCLUSION: We identify the key barriers to improving maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia, described at both the institutional level and within the wider setting. The study provides invaluable contextual information that suggests that a systems-based approach to health care quality improvement may be effective in reducing rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Systematic review of patient-specific pre-operative predictors of pain improvement to endometriosis surgery.

BACKGROUND: Up to 28% of endometriosis patients do not get pain relief from therapeutic laparoscopy but this subgroup is not defined. OBJECTIVES: To identify any prognostic patient-specific factors (such as but not limited to patients' type or location of endometriosis, sociodemographics and lifestyle) associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in post-surgical pain response to operative laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched from inception to 19 May 2020 without language restrictions. Backward and forward citation tracking was used. SELECTION CRITERIA DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Cohort studies reporting prognostic factors, along with scores for domains of pain associated with endometriosis before and after surgery, were included. Studies that compared surgeries, or laboratory tests, or outcomes without stratification were excluded. Results were synthesised but variation in study designs and inconsistency of outcome reporting precluded us from doing a meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies were included. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale graded three studies as high, one as moderate and one as having a low risk of bias. Four of five included studies separately reported that a relationship exists between more severe endometriosis and stronger pain relief from laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Currently, there are few studies of appropriate quality to answer the research question. We recommend future studies report core outcome sets to enable meta-analysis. LAY SUMMARY: Endometriosis is a painful condition caused by displaced cells from the lining of the womb, causing inflammation and scarring inside the body. It affects 6-10% of women and there is no permanent cure. Medical and laparoscopic surgical treatments are available, but about 28% of patients do not get the hoped-for pain relief after surgery. Currently, there is no way of predicting who gets better and who does not. We systematically searched the world literature to establish who may get better, in order to improve counselling when women choose treatment options. We identified five studies of variable quality showing: More complex disease (in specialist hands) responds better to surgery than less, but more studies needed.